Provider review, September 2026

Alpha MD Review

Alpha MD sells one product whose title names a peptide and whose subtitle names two more, and it publishes two prices for it — one for California and one for everywhere else. Neither is a monthly rate: both buy what the page calls a ten to fifteen week supply, depending on the dose prescribed.

What Alpha MD charges

Alpha MD is not a paid partner; this link may earn a commission if that changes. Full disclosure.

Visit Alpha MD

By Nora Castellan, Standards Editor

One product, three peptide names, two prices

The catalogue entry is titled with one peptide and subtitled, in brackets, with two others, so a reader scanning for three products finds one.

Beside it the seller prints two size options rather than two dose options: one for buyers outside California and one for buyers inside it.

The higher figure is attached to California by name on the page itself rather than surfacing at checkout.

Both options buy the same thing, so what separates them is geography — something almost nothing else in this comparison publishes.

The unit is a supply length, not a month

Each figure carries the words ten to fifteen weeks, and the page adds that the range depends on the dosage recommendation.

That is a supply window rather than a billing cycle, and its width is set by a prescribing decision the reader has not reached yet.

Both figures are therefore recorded here as non-monthly, with the supply language kept in the qualifier.

Converting either into a monthly rate would publish a number this seller has never printed and cannot be held to.

What the published figure actually buys

Two figures are published for the same product on the same page, and the only difference between them is the buyer's state.

On documentation the finding is more specific: not claimed; the certificate and third-party-testing pattern returned zero on both pages.

One hundred and thirty-seven of the two hundred and ten sellers here publish a figure somewhere on their own site, and this is one of them.

The host itself was checked in the same pass as everything above: 404 at a nonsense path, effective path identical to the requested one, which is what any absence recorded here rests on.

Three things this seller does not publish

One hundred and seventy-six of the two hundred and ten sellers here publish no state list at all, and this is one of them, so eligibility is settled inside an intake rather than before one.

Sixteen of the two hundred and ten sellers here name the facility that fills an order; this is one of the one hundred and ninety-four that do not, so there is no facility a reader can look up.

Four of the two hundred and ten sellers here describe lab work as included in what they charge, and this is not one of them.

It declares four of the sixteen compounds this site tracks, and sixty-one sellers here declare more, so it is a middling menu by the standards of this roster.

Who it's for

  • Buyers who want to know before an intake whether their state changes the price.
  • Readers comparing a supply-length price against a monthly one who want the difference stated rather than smoothed away.
  • Shoppers who want the growth-hormone secretagogue line out of a broader men's-health catalogue.
  • Anyone who prefers the qualifier printed next to the figure.

Who should look elsewhere

  • Readers who want a monthly rate, because neither published figure is one.
  • Buyers who need the compounding pharmacy named.
  • Anyone who wants a state list before starting an intake.
  • Shoppers looking for GHK-Cu, glutathione or tesamorelin, none of which is declared here.

Strengths

  • Publishes a separate figure for California buyers rather than surfacing the difference at checkout
  • Publishes a figure on its own site with the unit recorded beside it
  • Keeps its peptide offer separate from its other lines on the page
  • Answers the category question in plain language rather than in a disclaimer

Trade-offs

  • Both published figures buy a supply window whose width the page says depends on the dose prescribed
  • Publishes no corporate entity, so there is no company a reader can look up
  • Publishes no state list and names no dispensing pharmacy
  • Describes no lab work as included in what it charges

How we verified this

A provider to compare Alpha MD against

Trellis Vitality

Trellis Vitality frames its program around body-composition tracking rather than scale weight, pairing NAD+, glutathione and tesamorelin with at-home biomarker panels and a 90-day re-test, and names its dispensing pharmacy, VialsRX in Houston, by address.

Read the full Trellis Vitality review

Trellis Vitality is not a paid partner; this link may earn a commission if that changes. Full disclosure.

Visit Trellis Vitality

Frequently asked questions

Is this a monthly price?

No. Both figures buy what the page calls a ten to fifteen week supply, and it says the range depends on the dose recommended. Neither is divided into a monthly rate here.

Why are there two prices?

One is for buyers in California and one for buyers everywhere else. The seller prints both as size options on the same product.

Is the product one peptide or three?

It is sold as one item whose title names one peptide and whose subtitle names two more. All three are recorded as declared because the seller's own listing names all three.

Which states does it serve?

No list is published. The page distinguishes California from what it calls most states for pricing, which is a pricing statement rather than a coverage one.

Who fills the order?

No pharmacy is named on either page read.

Alpha MD is not a paid partner; this link may earn a commission if that changes. Full disclosure.

Visit Alpha MD