Same review, same sources, same scoring — the summary and the reasoning open together on each row.
4. Embody
$99/mo — printed as "In Stock · Fixed price of $99/month" for "Compounded Glutathione Injections" and "Flat rate at $99/mo — less than $4/day", beside "Personalized dosing, 200mg–2000mg"
Summary, strengths and trade-offs9 points
Embody sells compounded semaglutide and tirzepatide from a store that prices every supply length, and runs separate offer pages for sermorelin, NAD+ and glutathione at one flat monthly figure each, though its offer page, its store and its terms print three different prices for the same GLP-1.
Strengths
- Names four dispensing pharmacies with their addresses and phone numbers on every page
- Prints a total and a per-month rate for every supply length of both GLP-1s, and the two agree
- Prices sermorelin, NAD+ and glutathione each on its own page, with the period printed beside the figure
- Names its operating company, its street address and its governing law
Trade-offs
- Its GLP-1 offer page, its store and its terms print three different prices for the same injection
- The offer-page figure matches the store's twelve-month rate, and the offer page never says so
- Every payment is final; a multi-month plan is not refunded even for months never shipped
- Its own pages disagree on which states it serves
- Names no clinician; care is attributed to a network
5. Shed
$119/mo — "Glutathione Injections / Starting at $119/month / Injectable method / Taken twice weekly / 1 month supply"
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
Shed prices four of the compounds compared here, states the supply period on every one, and is the clearest case on this roster of a seller whose own page prints three different figures for a single product.
Strengths
- Prices four of the compounds compared here, more than all but a handful of sellers on this roster
- States the supply period and the dosing frequency beside every figure
- Prices three separate NAD+ preparations rather than quoting one figure for all of them
- Names its operating company, its street address and its governing law in its own terms
Trade-offs
- Prints three different figures for its GHK-Cu product, two of which are divisions of a quarterly total
- Puts a GLP-1 comparison price on the sermorelin page, where a careless reader will take it for sermorelin’s
- Names no compounding pharmacy on any page read
- Makes no statement about which states it serves
6. HealthRX.com
$84 — from, per 10 mL vial; the guide page states no billing period, and the seller’s own shop page prices the same compound at $152 billed monthly
Summary, strengths and trade-offs10 points
HealthRX.com runs one of the widest priced peptide catalogs on this roster, publishing a figure for ten tracked compounds, per vial on its guide pages and as monthly subscriptions in its shop — including semax, epitalon and MOTS-c, which almost nobody prices — and answering its own service-area question with all 50 states.
Strengths
- Prices ten tracked compounds, four of which almost nothing else on this roster prices at all
- Answers its own service-area question with a plain "All 50 US states" rather than a pharmacy licensure claim
- States the vial size and strength beside every guide-page figure, so the unit is never left to inference
- Offers a monthly subscription and a one-time supply side by side on each shop product page
- Publishes a LegitScript certificate number on the page rather than only a seal image
Trade-offs
- Its guide page and its shop page publish different glutathione prices on the same day, and neither cites the other
- The shop page prints a "$122/month equivalent" that is a twelve-month total resolved to a month
- Describes the pharmacy only as "a US-licensed 503A compounding pharmacy" and never names one
- Several compound guide pages send their eligibility button to the weight-loss program rather than to the compound
- Publishes no operating company under a corporate suffix on any page read
7. Oak
$135/mo — per month, billed monthly on a non-recurring basis; the panel prints a struck-through $150 beside it
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
Oak prices four tracked peptides once a reader follows its own home-page links into its checkout, where each carries a struck-through former figure and a live one.
Strengths
- Prices four tracked compounds, tesamorelin and glutathione among them, rather than the growth-hormone line alone
- States the supply length on the two compounds where it differs from a month
- Says its longevity billing is monthly and non-recurring rather than a subscription
- Shows the former figure alongside the current one instead of quietly replacing it
Trade-offs
- Publishes no peptide figure on its marketing site; every price sits inside the checkout
- Its checkout answers 200 at a nonsense path, so a status check alone would not catch a bad address
- Names no dispensing pharmacy on either of its hosts
- Publishes no state list and no corporate entity
8. System Labs
$149/mo — per month, ongoing rate (after a $79 first-month intro) on the "Monthly Supply (2000mg)" listing; some visitors are shown a "Quarterly Supply (2000mg)" listing instead, at $133 after a $69 first month, with no billing period stated for that version
Summary, strengths and trade-offs6 points
System Labs is a peptide-only storefront with no GLP-1 line, selling NAD+, glutathione, sermorelin and a topical GHK-Cu cream, LegitScript-verified but without a named pharmacy partner or a published state list.
Strengths
- Carries a LegitScript verification seal
- Sells a genuinely peptide-focused menu rather than treating peptides as a GLP-1 add-on
- Its GHK-Cu cream is priced flat, with no strikethrough figure or first-month teaser
Trade-offs
- The compounding pharmacy is described only as "US-based," never named
- Which states it ships to is not published anywhere on the site
- Most of its other peptide prices are shown as a struck-through renewal rate beside a first-month promo, so the ongoing cost takes a second look to find
9. Lttl
$79/mo — plans start at, per month
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
Lttl prices four NAD+ formats at the same figure and undercuts most of this roster on glutathione, but every number it prints is a plan floor rather than a rate.
Strengths
- Prices the injectable, nasal and oral NAD+ formats identically
- Attaches a month to every figure on the homepage
- Says its medications are "compounded by certified U.S. pharmacies"
- Publishes its glutathione figure rather than folding it into a bundle
Trade-offs
- Every figure is a floor — "plans start at" — with no ceiling published
- Publishes no operating company on any page read
- Describes an "FDA-Registered Pharmacy" without naming one
- Its first-month discount is advertised as a code with no stated expiry
10. MyDrHank
$103/mo — "Glutathione InjectionRx... From / $103 / /mo" \u2014 the same figure as this seller\u2019s nasal preparation of the compound, so the two forms are priced identically today
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
MyDrHank prices five preparations of three compounds compared here at flat monthly rates, and publishes every one of them only after its scripts run — the address alone serves the same short shell for a real product and for a path that does not exist.
Strengths
- Prices five preparations of three compounds at flat monthly rates on their own pages
- Prices both a needle and a needle-free form of two compounds separately
- Says on its own NAD+ pages that the clinical evidence for those routes is limited
- Falls back to the homepage for an unknown product rather than rendering an empty product page
Trade-offs
- Publishes nothing in the page itself — every figure exists only after its scripts run
- Serves the identical document for a real product and for a path that does not exist
- Prefixes every figure with "From", so none of the five is a settled charge
- Names no compounding pharmacy on a product page or in its terms
11. Bodybuilding Health+
$179/mo — starting at, per month, as the home-page card states it for the injection; this seller's sermorelin product page shows that a home-page card figure here can be a first-month rate contradicted by the product page, and the glutathione product page was not read
Summary, strengths and trade-offs9 points
Bodybuilding Health+ prices seven compounds compared here on plan ladders, and two of those ladders cost more per month the longer you commit — including the tirzepatide lane the seller itself badges "Best Value".
Strengths
- Prices seven compounds compared here, the widest priced menu among the sellers added in this pass
- Publishes a full plan ladder for both GLP-1 lines with the per-month figure and the total saving printed on each lane
- Names its operating company and a street address in its footer and terms, and names the governing law
- Its sermorelin product page states that the headline figure is a first-month rate, which the home-page card does not
Trade-offs
- Its own tirzepatide ladder charges more per month on the twelve-month lane than on the six-month lane, while badging the twelve-month lane "Best Value"
- The home page and the sermorelin product page disagree about whether the advertised figure is a first-month rate or a plan rate
- The FAQ says all fifty states and the terms say the service is available in certain states and to contact customer service for the list
- No compounding pharmacy is named and no lab work is described as included
- A Florida address in the footer and Georgia named as the governing law, which are two different states to keep track of
12. Trellis Vitality
$93/mo — treatment plans starting at, per month
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
Trellis Vitality frames its program around body-composition tracking rather than scale weight, pairing NAD+, glutathione and tesamorelin with at-home biomarker panels and a 90-day re-test, and names its dispensing pharmacy, VialsRX in Houston, by address.
Strengths
- Names its dispensing pharmacy, VialsRX in Houston, with a street address and phone number
- Includes at-home biomarker panels and a 90-day re-test rather than relying on scale weight alone
- No membership or consult fee is layered on top of the monthly peptide price
- Accepts HSA/FSA funds
Trade-offs
- Several headline statistics — a stated biomarker-improvement rate and an average annual-savings figure — are unsourced and cannot be independently checked
- Its cited patient-satisfaction rating names no review platform, so it cannot be verified against a public record
- The prescribing network it uses also serves several unrelated telehealth brands, so the clinical layer is not exclusive to Trellis
- Refunds are decided per order rather than under a stated policy
13. Auren Rx
$99/mo — per month, auto-refill membership (vs. $119/mo with no commitment)
Summary, strengths and trade-offs7 points
Auren Rx names both its prescribing group, Wasef Health, and its dispensing pharmacy, VialsRX in Houston, with street addresses and phone numbers, and lets a subscriber pause an auto-refill plan on NAD+, sermorelin, glutathione or GHK-Cu instead of forcing a full cancellation.
Strengths
- Names its prescribing group and pharmacy with full street addresses and phone numbers, rare in this category
- Carries a verifiable LegitScript seal
- The first visit is free and nothing is charged until a clinician reviews and approves the order
- An auto-refill plan can be paused rather than fully canceled
Trade-offs
- Its homepage headline price applies to a microdose track; the standard compounded dose costs more
- Its homepage teasers disagree with its own product pages on two of four peptides: NAD+ and glutathione are each advertised lower in the nav than the product page charges
- The listed New York address is a mail-forwarding suite, not a clinic
14. Idgie Health
$133/mo — per month on the 3-month plan, charged as $399 on the day you order and then every 3 months
Summary, strengths and trade-offs11 points
Idgie Health prices NAD+, glutathione, sermorelin, GHK-Cu and both GLP-1s by plan length, prints the full charge for every multi-month plan, and names its prescribing physician and its pharmacy.
Strengths
- Each priced product page shows the checkout total for its quarterly and six-month plans beside the per-month rate
- Sells NAD+ as an injection and a nasal spray, and prices sermorelin as an injection and as a troche with a per-strength table
- Discloses who prescribes (Dr. Sean Arora of Arora Health & Aesthetics, with an NPI number) and who dispenses (VialsRX, with a Houston address)
- States that no membership fee applies, and lists what the plan price covers
- Renewals can be stopped from the patient account or through the care team
Trade-offs
- The NAD+ injection page prints two different monthly rates for its six-month plan: the per-month figure and the amount charged do not agree
- Money paid for a quarterly or six-month term is not refundable under a policy that calls every sale final
- Its shipping policy contradicts the product pages on both cost and delivery time
- Template text has leaked between products: the NAD+ injection page's compounding note is about tirzepatide
- No strength is published for the NAD+, glutathione or sermorelin injections
- A state page claims every state, while the older terms of service restrict some services to unnamed states
15. Renlo Health
$99 — the per-month rate on the 3-month plan, from the seller's glutathione cost guide ("$129/mo, or $99/mo on the 3-month plan"); how that plan is charged, monthly or in one payment, is not stated
Summary, strengths and trade-offs10 points
Renlo Health prices compounded semaglutide, tirzepatide, NAD+ and glutathione at one figure per drug regardless of dose and names its pharmacy, but its own pages attach two different meanings to the GLP-1 headline price.
Strengths
- Names the pharmacy that fills its prescriptions, VialsRx of Houston, with a street address and phone number
- Names the physician who leads its care and the medical group its prescribers work through
- Keeps each treatment at one price whatever the dose, including NAD+ and glutathione
- Says every price includes the medication, supplies, provider care and shipping, with no membership or consultation fee
- Lists all fifty states plus Washington, D.C. by name
Trade-offs
- The GLP-1 headline price is described as a monthly rate on the product pages and as a first-month offer on a second page of the same site
- Its NAD+ product page and its NAD+ cost guide print different starting prices
- The lowest per-month figures belong to a 3-month plan whose billing schedule is never stated
- The NAD+ and glutathione pages advertise a four-month money-back guarantee, but the refund policy limits it to weight management programs
- No strength or dose is published for NAD+ or glutathione, and lab work is not included
16. Lavender Sky Health
$105 — for a 10 mL vial from the named pharmacy, with no billing period stated; the same page lists 10 mL at $135 from Strive and 30 mL at $175 from Empower or South Lake, the latter marked temporarily unavailable; medication pricing shown excludes the consultation fee, which is priced separately
Summary, strengths and trade-offs10 points
Lavender Sky Health publishes a price for every peptide it sells against the specific pharmacy that would fill it — nine pharmacies named, quantity by quantity — and states plainly that none of those figures includes the consultation fee it prices separately.
Strengths
- Names the pharmacy that would fill every single price it publishes, across nine pharmacies, which no other seller compared here does
- Prints the quantity beside every figure — milliliters, milligrams, grams or tablet count — so each number describes a stated amount
- States sitewide that the medication figures exclude the consultation fee, and then publishes what that consultation costs on a page of its own
- Publishes a per-pharmacy and per-formulation shipping-exclusion list rather than a single coverage sentence, which is the most detailed footprint disclosure compared here
- Names its operating company and a street address in its own privacy and HIPAA notices
Trade-offs
- Not one peptide figure on the pricing page states a billing period, so none of them is a monthly cost
- Almost every peptide price is hidden until a toggle is clicked: the pricing page renders about a fifth of its text closed, and a reader who does not operate the control sees no peptide price at all
- Its governing-law clause names no state — it reads "the laws of the state applicable to the patient's care" — so there is no forum a reader can identify in advance
- The all-fifty-states claim and the shipping-exclusion matrix have to be read together, and several products are unavailable in a dozen or more states depending on which pharmacy fills them
- Several published lines are marked temporarily unavailable or out of stock, including the cheapest nasal-spray option
17. Premier Hormone Health & Wellness
$99/mo — printed as "$99 / month" on the general wellness page's glutathione injections card; the card names no dose and does not say what the monthly figure includes
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
Premier draws the line between the platform company and the medical practice more explicitly than anything else on this roster. Its peptides are priced on catalog cards, and its sermorelin page prints no figure.
Strengths
- States that the company is a non-clinical platform and that the practices it supports are independently owned
- Prints a figure and its period on every card of its peptide and general wellness catalogs
- Prices sermorelin and tesamorelin separately for men and for women, each as a monthly starting figure
- Says its compounding pharmacies are US-based and describes the standards claimed
Trade-offs
- Its peptide figures are starting prices on catalog cards, and no card says what its figure includes
- The sermorelin page itself prints no figure and says only that the initial assessment will outline all costs
- Names no dispensing pharmacy
- Its state coverage is a one-line footer claim of serving all states, with no list behind it
18. He & She MD
$100/mo — per month on the three-month plan; one month is $125
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
He & She MD is one of the few sellers on this roster that names its dispensing pharmacies outright, and one whose plans page and product pages publish different prices for the same shorter plans.
Strengths
- Names both dispensing pharmacies, one with a street address and a telephone number
- Publishes a full plan ladder — one, three, six and twelve months — beside every peptide
- Says what the plan price includes: medication, supplies, shipping and provider support
- Prices glutathione and MOTS-C, which most sellers on this roster do not price at all
Trade-offs
- Its plans page and its product pages price the same shorter GLP-1 plans differently
- Its oral tirzepatide price table is labeled as sermorelin pricing
- Its cheapest rate on every ladder requires committing to twelve months
- The forty-four-state number belongs to its pharmacy, not to its own service, and no state list is published
19. Ozari Health
$100/mo — per month, "Billed monthly"; a quarterly lane works out at $92 a month, billed $275 every three
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
Ozari Health is the only seller in this batch that publishes a fifty-row table naming which of its two pharmacies fills in each state — and it dates its own prices.
Strengths
- Publishes a fifty-row table naming which pharmacy fills in each state
- Names both dispensing pharmacies, their cities and their accreditations
- Prints its own price-verification date on the treatment pages
- Gives the clearest statement of the compounded category on this roster
Trade-offs
- Its weight-loss figures are quarterly totals presented as monthly rates
- A second GLP-1 price ladder sits behind a JavaScript toggle and is not published as text
- Its "Save $268" and "Save $330" claims name no baseline, so the saving cannot be checked
- Requires a three-month minimum commitment on subscriptions
20. Trava Health
$124.71/mo — per month at 200 mg/mL; the page says the price changes with a different dose
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
Trava Health attaches a named dose to every peptide price it publishes — 3 mg of sermorelin, 100 mg of NAD+ — which almost nothing else on this roster does, and it names its four fulfilling pharmacies.
Strengths
- Prints the dose beside the price on every peptide product page, so the figure describes a specific quantity
- Names its four fulfilling pharmacies and its laboratory partners in its terms of service
- Tells shoppers on the product page itself that the price moves with the dose, instead of leaving that to checkout
- Publishes a quarterly saving as a dollar figure rather than a percentage
Trade-offs
- A site-wide banner describes its medications as tested in FDA approved labs, wording that is easy to read as FDA approval of the product; a compounded preparation is not an approved drug
- The quarterly package is advertised as a saving without the resulting per-month figure being stated
- No state coverage list is published
- The peptide menu is three compounds, so a shopper comparing a wider protocol will need a second seller
21. TeleZen MD
$158/mo — per month after the first month, which is $108 — the plan block reads "$108 / first month / $158 / month after"
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
TeleZen MD, a Florida limited liability company, publishes a first-month rate and the ongoing rate for four compounds, and puts a quarterly, semi-annual and annual lane beside the monthly one on its NAD+ and glutathione pages.
Strengths
- Prints the first-month rate and the ongoing rate together on every treatment page, rather than the introductory one alone
- Publishes four plan lengths on the NAD+ and glutathione pages with the total charge shown next to each per-month figure
- Answers the coverage question directly in its FAQ instead of leaving state availability to the intake
- Prices the nasal-spray route separately from the injection at two strengths
Trade-offs
- Says outright that patients do not choose the dispensing pharmacy and that its pharmacy partners may change at any time
- Names no pharmacy anywhere, describing them only as independent licensed 503A facilities
- Runs three stacked promotional codes on the same page, so the figure a reader sees first is rarely the plan rate
- Describes no lab work as included at any plan length
22. PepHaus
$159/mo — per month on the monthly plan, the only tier that is billed monthly; the same page prints $151/mo on a quarterly plan billed $453.15 and $143/mo on a 6-month plan billed $858.60, and advertises the $143 as its "from" price
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
PepHaus prints three plan lengths with a per-month figure and the prepaid total beside each, says on the product page itself that it is not a research-only website, and claims a certificate of analysis in every box — a certificate that is not reachable anywhere on the site.
Strengths
- Prints three plan lengths side by side with the per-month figure and the prepaid total for each, so the commitment behind the lowest rate is visible
- States its own position on research-labeled peptides on the product page, in its own words, rather than leaving the category to the reader
- Claims all fifty states in its own sentence on every peptide page, with the eligibility caveat stated rather than implied
- Lists what a box contains item by item, including the syringes, the swabs and the supply length
Trade-offs
- Claims a certificate of analysis three times per page and publishes no reachable certificate anywhere — no document, no image and no attribute wiring one into the page
- Its own comparison table characterizes the research-chemical market's prices, which is a seller describing its rivals and is not evidence
- The advertised "from" figure is the six-month rate, so the headline price always carries a prepayment
- Only the semaglutide page names its compounding pharmacy; the sermorelin and tirzepatide pages describe it by licensing class alone
23. Raeliva
$189/mo — the monthly plan, and the only one offered for this product
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
Raeliva publishes nine per-compound monthly prices, says its providers are licensed in every state, and warns its own readers that the effective rate on a prepaid plan is not a monthly payment.
Strengths
- Publishes a standing monthly price for nine separate products
- Warns readers that a multi-month plan's monthly figure is an effective rate, not a payment
- Prices microdose products separately from full-dose ones
- Says its trial evidence describes a different product from the compounded one it sells
Trade-offs
- Names no dispensing pharmacy anywhere
- Says lab work may be billed separately on top of the plan price
- Its fifty-state claim is a count with no list behind it
- Its corporate name reads like a research supplier, which it is not
24. The Edit
$199/mo — per month, flat at every dose, provider visit and ongoing care included
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
The Edit names its dispensing pharmacy, The Pharmacy Hub in Miami, up front, and prices NAD+, sermorelin, glutathione and GHK-Cu the same at every dose, with nothing charged until a clinician review is complete.
Strengths
- Names its dispensing pharmacy, The Pharmacy Hub in Miami, rather than describing it generically
- Charges one flat rate at every dose on its three injectable peptide lines
- Publishes prices on the treatment page itself, in both English and Spanish
- Runs no first-month teaser on its peptide lines, so the figure shown is the recurring one
- Carries a verifiable LegitScript seal
Trade-offs
- The GHK-Cu cream is quoted as a starting rate that moves with the strength prescribed, unlike the three flat injectable lines
- Longer plans are billed as one upfront charge rather than a lower recurring monthly rate
- Terms note that state availability is confirmed during consultation and may vary, despite advertising all 50 states
25. RxPepsDirect
$20 — pharmacy price for one vial at wholesale, billed by Optimal Balance Pharmacy, plus a separate $39 medical visit per order and $15 flat shipping; the catalog states no supply length
Summary, strengths and trade-offs9 points
RxPepsDirect charges one $39 fee per order for the medical visit and then steps out of the transaction: Optimal Balance Pharmacy bills the patient directly at its own wholesale price, and that price is printed for every peptide on the site.
Strengths
- Names both the dispensing pharmacy (Optimal Balance Pharmacy, a Texas 503A) and the outside laboratory that tests each batch (Eagle Analytical Services), and publishes the batch reports
- Lists all 29 licensed states by name in its FAQ rather than only printing the count
- Separates its own fee from the medication entirely: $39 per order for the visit, with the pharmacy billing the drug at wholesale and adding $15 flat shipping
- Every peptide price is readable without an account, combination vials included
Trade-offs
- The figure is a per-vial pharmacy price, not a monthly one — the BPC-157 page itself says one vial lasts about five weeks
- KPV is not sold on its own; it is only available inside BPC-157 combination vials
- Semax is sold only as a Semax/Selank nasal spray, so its figure is a combination price
- Caps an order at three different peptides, so a wider protocol needs a second $39 visit
- Its FAQ says the company was founded in 2026, so there is very little independent history behind the pharmacy-at-cost claim
26. The Aesthetic Concierge
$149 — an add-on list price; the page names no billing period
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
The Aesthetic Concierge prices its weight-loss medication in five-week blocks rather than months, includes basic blood work in its kick-off fee, and prints a states heading with nothing under it.
Strengths
- Includes basic weight-wellness blood work in the kick-off fee, which few sellers here do
- Prices a microdosing lane separately from a full-dose one on both molecules
- Prints the five-week block plainly instead of calling it a month
- Its discount arithmetic reconciles against every percentage it prints
Trade-offs
- Its list of states renders as nothing at all beneath its own heading
- Calls its supplier an "FDA 503A pharmacy", which is a category that does not exist
- Its brand-name management fee is billed every four weeks on one page and every five on another
- Its add-on peptide prices name no billing period
27. Pepti
$209 — vial price, an average four-week supply
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
Pepti prints one all-in monthly figure for every treatment it sells, in two formats side by side, and it is the only roster row that publishes both a fifty-state footprint and a price for epitalon.
Strengths
- Prints an all-in monthly figure on every treatment card and states that no membership fee sits on top of it
- Names the unit each figure covers, so a four-week supply is never left to be guessed at
- Quotes a pen and a vial price side by side, which makes the format premium visible instead of buried in checkout
- States its own coverage as all 50 states and Washington, D.C. in its site footer
Trade-offs
- Bloodwork is a separate charge rather than part of the monthly figure, though recent labs can be uploaded instead
- The 503A/503B compounding pharmacy it uses is described but never named
- The PT-141 card gives no supply length, so its figure is the only one on the catalog that cannot be read as four weeks
- CJC-1295, ipamorelin and TB-500 are sold only inside combination vials
28. PeRx
Does not publish a Glutathione price.
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
PeRx, the trading name of Wellness MD Group PC, lists twenty-six compounds and blurs the price on every one of them, publishing a floor and a range on a separate pricing page instead.
Strengths
- Tied for the widest compound list on this roster, with each blend spelled out into its constituent peptides on its own page
- Publishes a floor and a range in ordinary body copy, so a reader can bound the cost without an account
- Names its operating company and its trading name in the first paragraph of its own terms
- Says in its terms that it ships to every state, and repeats the claim as a headline figure
Trade-offs
- Blurs the per-compound price on every product page and marks it hidden from screen readers, so no individual compound has a readable figure
- Its own pricing page contradicts itself on the consultation fee, listing "no separate consultation fee" among what every order includes and then answering twice that consultations are $50
- Says all sales are final once an approved prescription is charged
- Names no dispensing pharmacy, only the category
29. Gimme Care
$63/mo — per month when three months are bought at once
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
Gimme Care puts a labeled "Billing cycle" control beside every product and shows the one-month and three-month rate together, which is rarer here than it should be.
Strengths
- Labels the billing cycle explicitly instead of leaving a reader to infer it
- Shows the one-month and three-month rate for the same product side by side
- Names Start Gimme LLC as the operating company
- States in its own words that it is "available in all 50 states"
Trade-offs
- Its cheapest figures require buying three months at once
- Publishes no named dispensing pharmacy
- No certificate of analysis is reachable
- Its blog quotes market-wide NAD+ cost ranges that are not its own prices
30. Alternate Health Club
$79.99/mo — per month, printed as '$79.99 / month' on the product page; the seller states medication pricing is flat at every dose
Summary, strengths and trade-offs10 points
Alternate Health Club prices glutathione, NAD+ and sermorelin on three separate product pages of its own, each printing one figure with the month attached and no second, struck-through number beside it.
Strengths
- Gives each of its three tracked compounds its own product page with the figure and the period in the same line
- Prints one price per page with no struck-through second figure to read the wrong way round
- Says its medication pricing is flat at every dose rather than climbing as a dose is titrated up
- Answers its own question about state coverage instead of leaving the page silent
- Names its operating company and its state of registration in its terms
Trade-offs
- Names no dispensing pharmacy, describing it four different generic ways across four documents
- Publishes no state list and never prints the number of states it serves
- Its coverage answer sits inside a collapsed accordion rather than on the page
- Includes no lab work; its own terms treat laboratory tests as an extra cost
- States no dose or concentration on any of the three product pages
31. AgelessRx
$99/mo — starting rate on the three-month plan; the plain monthly rate is not published on that page
Summary, strengths and trade-offs9 points
AgelessRx publishes a short, deliberately curated peptide menu and names four compounds it has decided not to sell yet — but every headline figure on it is a first-month rate with a higher number behind it.
Strengths
- Names BPC-157, TB-500, MOTS-c and KPV on its own peptide page as compounds it has chosen not to sell yet, which is rare candor in this category
- Publishes the ongoing rate alongside the introductory one on three of its five peptide pages
- Sells PT-141 and sermorelin in both an injection and a nasal spray rather than a single format
- Says a plan can be paused or canceled at any time
Trade-offs
- Every headline figure on the site is a first-month rate, and the ongoing rate runs $50 to $70 higher
- The GHK-Cu cream page prints the same figure as both a first-month price and an ongoing one, so the two disagree on one page
- The glutathione page gives only the three-month-plan rate, leaving the plain monthly price unpublished
- The compounding pharmacy that fills prescriptions is not named, and no state list is published
- A competition ranking is quoted on the site as a credential; it is marketing, not an independent assessment of the products sold
32. Heally
$99/mo — starting at, per month — the page reads "the program starts at $99 per month. You pay only when you reorder, and there are no hidden fees or membership lock-in"
Summary, strengths and trade-offs9 points
Heally, Inc. runs a marketplace that puts a free consultation in front of three priced peptide programs, and bills only when a patient reorders rather than on a standing subscription.
Strengths
- Charges nothing for the consultation and says so on every program page, so the price of finding out is zero
- Bills on reorder rather than on a standing subscription, and says so beside each peptide figure
- Sells lab panels as a separate, separately priced catalog instead of folding an unnamed lab fee into a program
- Names its operating company in its own privacy policy
Trade-offs
- The sermorelin page publishes a first-month figure and no ongoing rate at all
- Names no dispensing pharmacy, referring to it only as a partner pharmacy
- Lab work is a separate purchase, so a program price is not an all-in figure
- Its per-month figures are floors, and the peptide pages do not say what raises them
- Prints two different starting figures for Zepbound on two of its own pages
33. Pomegranate Health
$99/mo — read as the product-page heading "Longevity | Glutathione Injection | $99/month | Antioxidant, protective, detox support"
Summary, strengths and trade-offs9 points
Pomegranate gives each compound its own page with a single monthly figure in the heading, and its terms name the territory it serves rather than leaving availability to be discovered at intake — but the figure for its one non-longevity peptide carries no period at all.
Strengths
- Gives each compound its own product page with one figure in the heading instead of a range or a ladder
- Names the territory it serves in its terms, including two territories beyond the fifty states
- Answers the lab question in its own words rather than leaving it unaddressed
- Publishes the same product list in its navigation and its footer, so the range is visible from any page
Trade-offs
- The one product outside its longevity line carries no billing period at all, while its three siblings all print a monthly one
- No dispensing pharmacy is named — the site badge reads only "FDA-Regulated Pharmacies", which describes a category
- The lab answer says lab testing is often an important part of care, which is the opposite of saying it is included
- The fifty-state claim is immediately qualified by a sentence saying certain services and medications may not be available in certain jurisdictions
- The lab and treatment answers sit inside a collapsed accordion and are absent from the page until it is clicked open
34. Amble
$100/mo — the month-to-month rate, read under the column header "Plan | Per Month" as "1 Month $100", beside "3 Month $92", "6 Month $83" and "12 Month $75"
Summary, strengths and trade-offs10 points
Amble puts a plan ladder under a column it labels "Per Month", so every rung on it is already a monthly rate and nothing has to be divided — and then contradicts its own cheapest rung with a sitewide banner offer that no product page repeats.
Strengths
- Labels its price column "Per Month", so every rung of the plan ladder is already a monthly rate and a reader never has to divide anything
- Publishes the full ladder for all three priced compounds on the product pages themselves rather than behind an intake
- Names the five states where a live video or audio visit is required instead of leaving that to be discovered at checkout
- Answers the state-availability question about the company separately from the question about its prescribers, which most sellers on this roster conflate
Trade-offs
- A sitewide banner advertises a NAD+ figure that no product page repeats and that carries no billing period, so the seller shows two different NAD+ numbers at once
- No dispensing pharmacy is named — the FAQ answers only that 503A and 503B facilities are regulated, which describes a category and not a supplier
- The fifty-state claim carries the seller's own parenthetical "exclusions apply" and no exclusion is named anywhere on the site
- Twenty-two peptide URLs read as a catalog and are signed editorial articles with no price and no cart, which is easy to mistake for a product range
- Names a fourth compound as an available treatment in its FAQ and publishes no page or price for it
- No lab work is named as part of any plan, and the "what you get" list stops at supplies, shipping and monitoring
35. Belle Health
$119/mo — from, per month; the pricing page publishes this figure on a 2-month supply and lists no 1-month option
Summary, strengths and trade-offs9 points
Belle Health names the four compounding pharmacies it works with, prices sermorelin, NAD+ and glutathione as flat monthly rates on both a product page and a pricing page, and carries a February 2026 FDA warning letter about telehealth marketing claims.
Strengths
- Names four dispensing pharmacies outright instead of describing an unnamed licensed one
- Publishes every longevity figure twice — on the product page and again in a pricing table — and the two agree
- States that the price does not rise when the dose does, and that there is no consultation or setup fee
- Prices three tracked compounds, which most sellers publishing any peptide figure do not
Trade-offs
- Carries a February 2026 FDA warning letter over telehealth marketing claims
- Its FAQ pharmacy list and its pricing-page pharmacy tags do not name the same set
- Publishes no state list, so eligibility is settled inside the intake
- Its two GHK-Cu products carry prices but a "Coming Soon" control, so neither can be bought
- Lab work is described as ordered only when clinically necessary, never as included in the price
36. Zappy Health
$119/mo — read in the "Extend Your Vitality" block as "Glutathione | In Stock | As low as | From $119 / month" — the seller's own words are both "As low as" and "From", so this is the bottom of a range whose top is never printed
Summary, strengths and trade-offs10 points
Zappy is one of the few sellers on this roster that answers the pharmacy question with a name and a web address rather than a category, and it sells its longevity compounds both in multi-compound bundles and one at a time, each with a monthly figure of its own.
Strengths
- Answers the pharmacy question with a named company and its web address on a dedicated page, instead of describing a regulatory category
- Links that page from the footer of every page on the site rather than burying it in the terms
- States plainly that it is not a compounding pharmacy and does not manufacture anything it sells
- Marks stock status beside each product, so an unavailable item is not priced as though it were on the shelf
Trade-offs
- Carries an FDA warning letter that names this company and this exact domain, over claims made about its compounded weight-loss line
- Leads its longevity range with multi-compound bundles, whose figures are not the price of any one compound in them
- The longevity page labels every single-compound figure "AS LOW AS" and "from" without printing a ceiling, and two product pages call their figure a "Limited-time offer!" without saying when it ends
- The terms name no state and make no coverage claim at all
- Two safety pages render under a page title naming an entirely different compound, so the title cannot be used to identify what a page is about
- No lab work is included in or priced beside any plan
37. Zera Health
$124/mo — Monthly plan, "$124/mo — 100mg/mL nasal spray — billed monthly"; the same block prints a quarterly column at "$99/mo — billed every 3 months", which is the seller’s own division of a quarterly total, and the hero prints a struck first-month offer, "From $94 $179 /first mo."
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
Zera Health names Strive Pharmacy as its compounder in the footer of every treatment page, publishes a monthly and a quarterly plan side by side for three compounds compared here, and puts a fifty-state marquee above a FAQ that says something narrower.
Strengths
- Names Strive Pharmacy as the 503A compounder in the footer of every treatment page, with its web address
- Prints the monthly and the quarterly plan side by side with the billing cycle written into each, so the arithmetic is visible
- States the strength and the delivery form beside each figure rather than leaving the dose to an intake
- Says plainly on every plan block that there are no hidden fees and that shipping is included
Trade-offs
- A sitewide marquee reads fifty states while its own FAQ says the company operates in most of them
- Publishes no list of the states it actually serves
- One sitemap treatment path answers 200 and renders the homepage instead of the treatment
- Advertises third-party lab testing of the product in the same list as plan inclusions, where it reads like included lab work
38. PlexusDx
$125/mo — per month flat, in the seller's words "no commitment tiers, no per-formulation surcharge" — but the same page says both "Eligible adults in 46 states" and "Available in all 50 states"
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
PlexusDx sells five of the six compounds this site ranks — sermorelin, NAD+, glutathione, GHK-Cu and PT-141 — each as an all-inclusive monthly program, and it is one of only seven sellers here that reaches the PT-141 board at all.
Strengths
- Reaches five of the six compounds this site ranks, one of seven sellers here to reach five or more
- States on every program page that the monthly price does not change as the dose changes
- Names the three commitment tiers and their per-month rates side by side instead of advertising only the cheapest
- Offers GHK-Cu as a topical cream and glutathione as a nasal spray or troche, so two of the five need no injection
Trade-offs
- Publishes its own corporate name two different ways — "PlexusDx, Inc." in one terms document and "PlexusDX LLC" in the other
- The glutathione page states both a 46-state and an all-50-state footprint without resolving which applies
- No compounding pharmacy is named on any of the five product pages
- Five states are said to require a scheduled video visit rather than the async intake, but the page never lists which five
39. Wisp
$125/mo — starting at, per month, on the subscription — the block reads "Free Delivery / Starting at $125/ month / Choose a one-time treatment or subscription", and the one-time treatment's price is not published on that page, so this figure is the subscription rate only; a sitewide "15% off your first order" promotion was running when the figure was read, and $125 is the pre-discount rate
Summary, strengths and trade-offs9 points
Wisp sells one compound compared here, prices it as a subscription with the period named on the page, and does not publish the price of the one-time treatment it offers beside it.
Strengths
- Names the billing period in the price block itself rather than leaving it to a footnote
- Names its operating company, its mailing address and California as the governing law in its own terms
- Publishes a provider-credentials page, which few sellers compared here do at all
- Says on the product page that a one-time treatment exists as an alternative to the subscription
Trade-offs
- Prices only the subscription: the one-time treatment it offers on the same page carries no published figure
- One compound compared here, inside a catalog that is otherwise reproductive and sexual health, urinary infection, menopause and weight care
- A sitewide first-order discount was running when the figure was read, so the published number is the pre-discount rate
- Publishes no state list, only that the service is intended for visitors in the United States
- No compounding pharmacy is named and no lab work is described as included
40. NEUVÉ
$142/mo — "starting at" per month, and the seller's own pricing answer says "Medication, labs, and treatment supplies are billed separately" — so the drug is not in this figure
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
NEUVÉ publishes a starting monthly figure on six peptide protocols, then answers its own pricing question by saying medication, labs and supplies are billed separately — so the figure beside each protocol is not what the therapy costs.
Strengths
- Names the laboratories it draws through, Quest and LabCorp, which most sellers here leave unstated
- Answers its own question about what the monthly price covers instead of leaving the exclusions unwritten
- Publishes a starting figure for six separate peptide protocols rather than one blended program rate
- States the governing law and the county where a dispute would be heard
Trade-offs
- The figure beside each protocol excludes the medication, which is the largest part of what the therapy costs
- Every one of its six figures is a "starting at" floor with no plan term and no ceiling published
- Two of the six protocols price a two-peptide stack, so neither peptide in either pair has a price of its own
- No compounding pharmacy is named, only the category of facility that compounds the medication
41. JRNYS
$149/mo — from, per month; read off the /longevity index because the product's own page prints only its neighbor's price
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
JRNYS prints each longevity product's price only on the other product's page — read either one alone and the NAD+ and glutathione figures come out reversed.
Strengths
- Prices NAD+, glutathione and a tirzepatide microdose separately rather than behind the membership floor
- Names its microdose product as a microdose rather than as a full dose
- Says plainly in its terms that prescriptions may move between pharmacies
- Publishes a longevity index that lists every product and figure in one place
Trade-offs
- Each longevity product page prints its neighbor's price and none of its own
- Its FAQ says pricing is confirmed after consultation while its pages publish fixed figures
- Names no dispensing pharmacy, and says the dispenser can change without notice
- Makes no state-coverage claim on the pages read
42. PharmaZee
$149/mo — recurring monthly on the 1-Month Supply tab; the same panel prints a first month of $99.00
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
PharmaZee prices five tracked peptides with a first-month figure and a recurring figure printed side by side, names its two filling pharmacies, and carries a 2026 federal warning letter.
Strengths
- Prints the first-month figure and the recurring figure together, so the introductory rate is not disguised
- Prices five products covering four tracked compounds, including two routes of the same one
- Names both filling pharmacies with street addresses in its FAQ
- States the concentration and bottle size on the products where those differ
Trade-offs
- Carries a federal warning letter that names this exact domain
- Hides the pharmacy names and the coverage answer inside collapsed accordions
- Publishes no state list and answers the coverage question with named prescribers instead
- Serves no sitemap, so the product list can only be found through the navigation
43. Rylo
$149/mo — month-to-month plan: "$149 a month", "One price, every month. No contract, cancel any month." The same page's quarterly plan, selected by default, reads "$133 a month" and "Billed $399 every 3 months"
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
Rylo Health LLC names its dispensing pharmacy and its clinical group by name, prices six compounds at a flat rate that does not move with dose, and sells each on a quarterly plan or month to month, with the quarterly rate the lower of the two.
Strengths
- Names the dispensing pharmacy with its street address and phone number, and names the clinical group that writes the prescriptions
- Prints the three-month total beside every quarterly rate, and offers a month-to-month plan with no contract on the same page
- Says the price does not change with dose or refill, and charges no membership fee on top
- States that no lab work is required before starting, rather than leaving a lab fee to appear later
Trade-offs
- The lower rate needs a plan billed every three months; buying month to month costs more on every product
- The home page table shows only the quarterly rate, so the month-to-month price appears only on each product page
- Says formulations and fulfillment vary by state without saying which ones, so the fifty-state claim is qualified in a way a reader cannot check
- No lab work is included, which is the flip side of not requiring any
44. Effecty
$175/mo — the billed-monthly rate, read in the cost table as "Monthly | Billed monthly | $175", beside "3-Month | Billed every 3 months | $145", "6-Month | Billed every 6 months | $135" and "12-Month | Best value | Billed yearly | $125"
Summary, strengths and trade-offs10 points
Effecty prints a three- or four-rung cost table under the heading "How much does treatment cost?" on its injectable pages, with the billing cycle spelled out beside every rung — and then prices the same compound differently on its own index page than on the product page it links to.
Strengths
- Names the billing cycle beside every rung of its injectable cost tables, so no rung has to be interpreted
- Footnotes its own headline figures with the prepayment they require, on the same page, rather than leaving the asterisk unexplained
- Prices five distinct longevity products including two delivery forms of one compound
- Splits the shipping answer between its weight-loss line and its longevity line instead of giving one blanket claim
Trade-offs
- Prices one product differently on its index page than on the product page that index links to, and only the index says which figure requires prepayment
- The oral-dissolving page has no cost table at all, so its single hero figure carries no billing period
- No dispensing pharmacy is named — the answer is "state-licensed compounding pharmacies" and, elsewhere, "our trusted pharmacy partner"
- The availability claim is "all states nationwide" and never counts them, so it cannot be checked against a list
- A nonsense path on this host lands on the homepage rather than returning a document, so a URL cannot be verified by status alone
- No lab work appears in any plan description
45. Mondae
$179/mo — the same figure and the same two companion figures as its sermorelin and NAD+ pages — recorded as read, not reconciled
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
Mondae names the pharmacy that fills each order and states that shipping states differ by pharmacy — then prints the same three figures on all three of its peptide pages.
Strengths
- Names the dispensing pharmacy on the product page and warns that coverage varies by pharmacy
- States a per-month unit rather than leaving the period to be inferred
- Says in its own words that it charges no membership fee and the same price at every dose
- Names both its own company and the telehealth platform behind it
Trade-offs
- Three different molecules carry an identical set of figures, which no page explains
- Two of the three figures on each page carry no unit at all
- The plan-length selector's default is not visible in the page as served
- Publishes no state list of its own and describes no lab work as included
46. Options Medical Weight Loss
$179/mo — per month, on its own product page
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
Options Medical Weight Loss prices NAD+ and glutathione on their own product pages by the month, says its weight-loss injections are made in 503B outsourcing facilities, and prints an FDA compounding disclaimer under each figure.
Strengths
- Gives NAD+ and glutathione their own product pages with a monthly figure on each
- Says the FDA does not review or approve compounded medications for safety or effectiveness, on every product page
- Names the facility category its weight-loss injections come from rather than saying only "licensed"
- Names the two manufacturers of the approved versions of the drugs it prescribes
Trade-offs
- Its semaglutide figure requires paying for twelve months upfront, and its tirzepatide figure is a program starting rate that the homepage prints higher
- Publishes no state list and names no dispensing pharmacy
- Sells no other tracked peptide
- No certificate of analysis is reachable
47. Form by GBY
$199/mo — per month, on the standalone glutathione page
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
Form by GBY prices GHK-Cu by the unit and NAD+ and glutathione by the month on single-compound pages, and sells its weight-loss medicines only inside a three-component formula.
Strengths
- Gives GHK-Cu, glutathione, NAD+ and sermorelin their own pages instead of one combined menu
- Answers "Is compounded GHK-Cu FDA-approved?" with "No" in its own FAQ, on each product page
- Prints the unit its GHK-Cu price is charged against rather than implying a month
- Says plainly that the FDA does not review compounded products for safety, effectiveness or quality
Trade-offs
- Sells its weight-loss medicines only inside a three-component formula, so neither drug has a scoped price
- Its bundle page prints a figure for glutathione that its own product page contradicts
- Publishes no state list and names no dispensing pharmacy
- No certificate of analysis is reachable
48. Body Good Studio
$99 — from, the bottom of a range across two vial sizes; the card names no billing period
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
Body Good Studio carries a 2025 federal warning letter, prices five tracked compounds openly, and publishes a line on its own home page conceding that its brand names and final copy are still pending clinical and legal review.
Strengths
- Prices five tracked compounds on one open page with no intake in the way
- Prints the vial sizes behind each range rather than only the floor
- Charges one semaglutide price at every dose
- States in its own words that its compounded products are not FDA-approved
Trade-offs
- Carries a 2025 federal warning letter naming its own website
- Its own page says the brand names and final copy are pending clinical and legal review
- Its fifty-state claim is hedged in the following sentence and no list is published
- Three of its five figures name no billing period at all
49. Good Life Meds
$99 — the page names no supply period; the product carries a coming-soon badge and an $80 first-order promotion
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
Good Life Meds names its pharmacies and prints four green "Passed" test badges on every product page, with no document behind any of them.
Strengths
- Names both dispensing pharmacies and its medical group
- Charges one semaglutide price at every dose level
- Prints the milligram content and the vial volume on its peptide pages
- Says plainly that its published prices exclude promotional offers
Trade-offs
- Prints four green test-passed badges with no certificate behind any of them
- Publishes no statement that its compounded products are not FDA-approved
- Its three peptide products carry coming-soon badges and no supply period
- Its fifty-state operation is a count with no list
50. Always Wellness and Recovery
$129 — the "From" figure on the catalog card; the same card offers a bundle at $279, and no billing period is named for either
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
Always Wellness and Recovery prints a single-vial price and a three-month bundle total on the same card for each of its injectable peptides, and then divides the bundle itself — its own product copy restates a $529 three-month supply as "about $176 per month".
Strengths
- Prints the single-vial price and the multi-month bundle total on the same card, so a reader can see what the longer commitment actually costs
- Says in its own words that there is no membership fee, no subscription and no automatic billing
- Lists what ships in the box — vial, bacteriostatic water, syringes, dosing guide and sharps container — rather than leaving supplies unstated
- Names both compounding categories it sources from, 503A and 503B, and claims fifty-state service in three separate places
Trade-offs
- Its own product copy divides a three-month total into a per-month figure that is never billed
- The compounding pharmacies are described only by their regulatory category and are never named
- The nasal-spray bundles are priced only on the catalog card, with no product page of their own read
- No lab work is included, and labs are not mentioned in any program description
51. Next Vial
$149.99 — starting at, the bottom of a range; the page names no billing period
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
Next Vial names its pharmacy with a street address and lists the forty-nine states it serves, and then hides every price but one behind a plan selector.
Strengths
- Names its dispensing pharmacy with a street address and a telephone number
- Lists the forty-nine states it serves rather than printing a count
- Names the clinician network that reviews the intake
- States plainly that compounded medicines are not FDA-reviewed
Trade-offs
- Four of its five peptide products show a plan selector where a price should be
- Its weight-loss floor covers two different drugs behind one figure
- The one published figure names no billing period
- Alaska is absent from its own state list, so the coverage is not nationwide
52. Team Wellcore
$179 — the only glutathione figure the page actually prints — "Starting at $179" in its body copy, with no billing period; its structured data carries a lower figure that appears nowhere on screen, and a separate "$34 for consult" is charged before any medication is priced
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
Team Wellcore names its dispensing pharmacy with an address, a phone number and the ten states that pharmacy cannot ship sterile compounds into — and then charges for a consult before it will quote the price of any medication.
Strengths
- Names the dispensing pharmacy with a street address and a phone number rather than describing a class of facility
- Names the ten states that pharmacy cannot ship sterile compounds into, which is a checkable exclusion list rather than a coverage claim
- States the consult charge up front and says the medication is billed only after a provider approves
- Describes its compounded products as patient-specific and not FDA-approved in its own FAQ rather than burying the point
Trade-offs
- Four of its six tracked products publish a price only inside structured data, where no reader ever sees it
- Where a visible figure and a structured-data figure both exist they disagree, and the visible one is the higher
- Its own state arithmetic is wrong — it claims licensure in forty-four states while naming ten it is excluded from
- No visible figure carries a billing period, so nothing it publishes can be read as a monthly rate
53. HealthSource
$180 — printed as "Glutathione Injection — Wellness — $180.00 every 4 weeks". Same thirteen-charge year as the seller's other peptides
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
HealthSource prices every peptide "every 4 weeks" — thirteen charges a year, not twelve — on a page that also carries "every 30 days" and "/ month" against other products.
Strengths
- States the billing period on every single line rather than leaving it to be assumed
- Prices four peptide SKUs across three routes on one browsable catalog
- Distinguishes fixed-price SKUs from variant SKUs and says which is which on the card
- Tags every prescription item on the catalog rather than only at checkout
Trade-offs
- Its peptides bill every four weeks, which is thirteen charges a year and will read as twelve in any monthly column
- Three different billing periods appear on the same catalog page against different products
- No operating company was found on the pages read
- No pharmacy named, no certificate of analysis, no state coverage list
54. CoraDoc
$199 — for ten weeks, struck through from $349
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
CoraDoc prices its peptides in four and ten-week blocks rather than months, and runs a countdown sale whose banner figures contradict the program cards on the same page.
Strengths
- Prices three peptides individually rather than behind its own category floor
- Prints the block length — four weeks, ten weeks — beside each peptide figure
- States in its own words that its compounded weight-loss drugs are not FDA-approved
- Disclaims the similarly named company its brand could be confused with
Trade-offs
- Its sale banner and its program cards give different prices for both weight-loss molecules
- The sale carries a hard end date, so every figure here is perishable
- Names no dispensing pharmacy and publishes no certificate of analysis
- Its nationwide claim is prose with no state list behind it
55. PeptidesRx
$208 — "Glutathione / Injection or nasal spray. Detox, glow and immune support. / from $208 per vial / 3 and 6 month pricing available". Three FIGURES EXIST for this one COMPOUND: the WooCommerce page prints "$ 156.00" (/product/glutathione/) and the marketing landing page prints "Glutathione Injection $175" (/glutathione-injection/)
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
PeptidesRx prices ten of the compounds compared here, names the pharmacy that fills the orders and gives its address, and runs two live catalogs on one domain whose figures do not agree with each other on a single compound.
Strengths
- Prices ten of the compounds compared here, more than any other seller on this roster
- Names its dispensing pharmacy, its street address and its telephone number
- States the vial strength and the expected duration of a vial beside most figures
- Publishes the states its pharmacy is not licensed in rather than only the count
Trade-offs
- Runs two live catalogs whose figures disagree on every compound they share
- Prints a third, templated figure on every product page that belongs to no product
- Gives two coverage numbers in one paragraph that cannot both be right
- Prices a third figure for one compound on a marketing page separate from both catalogs
56. CLYR Health
$249 — one-time, for a ninety-day supply
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
CLYR Health prices seven tracked compounds by weekly dose with the whole ladder visible before any intake, names its pharmacy, and puts a competitor's cream price in the same table as its own.
Strengths
- Prices seven tracked compounds with the full ladder visible before any intake
- Prints the vial size, concentration and weekly dose beside each figure
- Names its dispensing pharmacy and its medical group
- Its savings arithmetic reconciles against every multi-vial total it prints
Trade-offs
- Puts a competitor's cream price in the same table as its own
- Its tirzepatide hero quotes a cycle rate the ladder below contradicts
- Its LegitScript badge links to its own article rather than to a listing
- Says only that the service is available in certain states, without naming any
57. SynergyRx
$275 — starting at, the bottom of a range; the catalog names no billing period
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
SynergyRx prices four tracked peptides at exactly the same figure and its two GLP-1s separately, prints that figure before the product name rather than after it, and runs terms of service naming a different company as the operator.
Strengths
- Puts a figure beside four separate tracked peptides rather than behind one category floor
- Says plainly that it neither manufactures nor dispenses what it sells
- Prices PT-141, which few sellers on this roster price at all
- Publishes its catalog without an intake in the way
Trade-offs
- Prices four different peptides at exactly the same number, with no dose or vial size to separate them
- Its terms of service name a different company as the operator throughout
- Publishes no price for either weight-loss molecule
- Will not publish its state list, directing readers to customer service instead
58. DadVantage Men’s Health
$300 — for a 30 mL vial; the page states no billing period
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
DadVantage prices sermorelin at three vial strengths and NAD+ at two, and every figure it publishes is a quantity price rather than a monthly one.
Strengths
- Names the vial strength beside every figure, so a reader can compare cost per milligram
- Prices three sermorelin strengths instead of one headline number
- States plainly that telehealth visits work anywhere in Florida and in-home visits are local
- Puts its peptide and injection prices on one open page with no intake
Trade-offs
- No figure on the page carries a billing period of any kind
- Publishes no operating company on any page read
- Serves one state, so most readers here cannot use it
- Names no dispensing pharmacy and publishes no certificate of analysis
59. AHBARx
$499 — charged every 6 months for a 6-month supply, medication delivered every 3 months
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
AHBARx sells sermorelin by the vial with a monthly delivery, and sells its NAD+ and glutathione only as six-month prepaid supplies.
Strengths
- States the delivery cadence beside every figure, not just the amount
- Says in its own words that services are available "within all 50 states of the United States"
- Publishes the vial strength — 9mg — beside the sermorelin price
- Says its medications are sourced through "U.S.-based, FDA-registered compounding pharmacies"
Trade-offs
- Publishes no operating company on any page read
- Two of its three tracked compounds are sold only as six-month prepaid supplies
- Charges every six months while shipping every three, so the money runs ahead of the medicine
- Names no dispensing pharmacy and publishes no certificate of analysis
60. Balanced Healthcare
Does not publish a Glutathione price.
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
Balanced Healthcare publishes two prices for everything — one for members, one for everyone else — and prices its peptide programs by tier rather than by compound.
Strengths
- Publishes both the member and the non-member figure instead of only the discounted one
- States the dose count and the number of days its NAD+ loading course covers
- Says the loading course is recommended rather than required
- Runs a full published pricing page rather than quoting only at consult
Trade-offs
- Its peptide tiers do not name the compounds they cover, so no figure is compound-scoped
- Every figure has two values, and which one applies depends on a membership sold separately
- Its NAD+ course covers eight days, which no monthly comparison can absorb
- Publishes no corporate entity, no state list and names no dispensing pharmacy
61. Bayan Health
Does not publish a Glutathione price.
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
Bayan Health is one of the few sellers anywhere on this roster that publishes a KPV price, and it bills that price monthly across a fixed three-month protocol.
Strengths
- Publishes a KPV price, which almost nothing else on this roster does
- States both the monthly charge and the three-month commitment on the same line
- Says the physician consultation fee is included in the monthly price
- Describes its supply in its own words as "U.S. 503A pharmacy partners"
Trade-offs
- Publishes no operating company on any page read
- Sells five more tracked compounds without publishing a figure for any of them
- Ships the whole three-month protocol at once while billing across three months
- Publishes no state list, names no pharmacy and posts no certificate of analysis
62. Enough! Wellness
Does not publish a Glutathione price.
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
Enough! publishes a commitment ladder that prints the total charge and the derived monthly rate on the same line — so the cheapest number on the page is attached to a two-thousand-dollar up-front payment, in writing.
Strengths
- Prints the total charge and the derived monthly rate on every rung of its commitment ladder
- States the billing period as four weeks rather than calling it a month
- Says plainly what is in the stack and that a clinician adjusts it
- Publishes an unqualified fifty-state claim in its own trust bar
Trade-offs
- The best-value figure requires a $2,327 payment up front, which only the same line discloses
- No compound in the stack has a price of its own
- Publishes no corporate entity and no copyright line on the page read
- Prints "No $5,000 clinic" as marketing copy, which is a competitor figure and not its own
63. Valhalla Vitality
Does not publish a Glutathione price.
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
Valhalla Vitality lets the patient choose which pharmacy fills the prescription and says the price does not change either way.
Strengths
- Lets the patient pick which verified pharmacy fills the prescription
- Says the price is the same whichever pharmacy is chosen
- States that compounded drug products are not approved or evaluated by the FDA
- Says it serves 50 states nationwide
Trade-offs
- Publishes a figure for only one of the four compounds it sells
- Publishes no operating company on any page read
- Names none of the pharmacies it invites patients to choose between
- No certificate of analysis is reachable
64. ZYP Medical
Does not publish a Glutathione price.
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
ZYP Medical prices peptides as four-week stacks rather than by the month, lists the seven states it serves by name, and states in its own words that its compounded GLP-1 medicines are not FDA-approved.
Strengths
- Names the seven states it serves rather than printing a count
- States plainly that its compounded semaglutide, tirzepatide and NAD+ are not FDA-approved
- Prints the unit beside almost every figure — four weeks, six weeks, one-time, per month
- Says its consult fee buys clinical time and does not guarantee a prescription
Trade-offs
- Prices most of its peptide catalog as multi-compound stacks, so no single peptide has its own figure
- Names no dispensing pharmacy and publishes no certificate of analysis
- Serves seven states, so most of the country cannot buy from it
- Its testosterone line reaches only three of those seven states, which the page states separately
65. Dr. Gillis' Wellness Center
$40/mo — printed as "Start today for only $40 per month!" at the close of the section headed "Glutathione/ Meno Shot". The lowest monthly peptide figure on this roster, and the section describes the product as aimed at menopausal symptoms rather than sold as a general antioxidant
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
Dr. Gillis' Wellness Center prices its growth-hormone peptide by the fifth and the third of a milliliter — the only per-volume peptide price on this roster — and never prints the concentration those volumes contain.
Strengths
- One of the widest clinical peptide lists on this roster, named openly in its own navigation
- Publishes a single pricing page covering every service rather than scattering figures across product pages
- Defines its own marketing name for a peptide in the seller's own words instead of leaving it opaque
- States its service area by naming the towns it serves
Trade-offs
- Prices the growth-hormone peptide by syringe volume without printing the concentration, so the figure converts to nothing
- Prices two peptides as one combination, so neither has an individual figure
- No operating company established on the page read
- No dispensing pharmacy named, no certificate of analysis, and a regional clinic model rather than a shipped program
66. PepScribe
$79/mo — from
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
PepScribe prices six tracked compounds individually from one catalog and says in its own FAQ which pharmacy class fills them — 503A — while declining to name the pharmacy itself, because the one that fills your order depends on your state.
Strengths
- Prices six tracked compounds individually rather than behind one category floor
- Says which pharmacy class fills its orders and which sterile-compounding standards apply
- Publishes the same sermorelin figure on the catalog and on the product page
- Says the online visit costs nothing and that there is no membership fee
Trade-offs
- Names the clinician network but not the dispensing pharmacy, because it varies by state
- Makes no state-coverage claim of any kind on the pages read
- Publishes no certificate of analysis
- Its catalog prints each price between one product and the next, which is easy to misread
67. Stealth Health
$85/mo — from, per month — the second, cheaper glutathione formulation on the same menu
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
Stealth Health prices to the cent and attaches a month to every figure, and it is the only seller in this batch whose glutathione comes in two separately priced formulations.
Strengths
- Attaches "/mo" to every figure across every product page
- Prices two glutathione formulations separately instead of quoting one number
- Names Stealth Health Inc as the operating company
- Says no payment is taken upfront — only when a prescription is approved
Trade-offs
- Publishes no state list, and its shipping claim spans two countries
- Names no dispensing pharmacy
- Its GHK-Cu price buys a combination topical, not the copper peptide alone
- No certificate of analysis is reachable
68. Harbor
$89/mo — a flat monthly program rate, read as "Glutathione program | Most chosen | $89 /mo | Flat monthly price — no increases as your dose changes"; the cross-sell blocks on the sibling compound pages repeat the same figure, so all three longevity pages agree with one another
Summary, strengths and trade-offs10 points
Harbor publishes one flat figure per compound with "no increases as your dose changes" written beside it, names its partner medical group in a footer disclosure, and then tells you in its own terms that it makes no promise the service reaches your state.
Strengths
- Prints one flat figure per compound with an explicit promise that it does not rise as the dose is titrated
- States what the figure covers — medication, clinician care and check-ins — on the same line as the figure
- Names its operating company, its state of incorporation and its registered address in the first paragraph of its terms
- Names the partner medical group that provides consultations, separately from the platform company
- Says plainly that it is not a pharmacy and does not dispense, rather than implying it fills its own prescriptions
Trade-offs
- The terms decline to say where the service is available, so no state coverage can be recorded at all
- Advertises a large saving on multi-month prepaid plans without publishing a single prepaid rung to check it against
- No dispensing pharmacy is named — prescriptions go to an unnamed pharmacy "within a pharmacy network"
- The claim that a prescriber is licensed in your state is a fact about the prescriber and reads, in context, like a coverage promise the terms explicitly refuse to make
- No lab work is included in or priced beside the program rate
69. PreventiveMD
$94/mo — "As low as $94/mo per month, all-in" — the seller's own wording, a floor rather than a quoted rate, on a page that separates its all-in lane from its branded lane where the membership fee and the medication are billed as two named lines
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
PreventiveMD prints an all-in monthly figure for each compounded protocol and, on the same page, breaks its branded lane into a membership fee plus a medication rate as two named lines — and it publishes a list of the peptides it will not sell yet, with the review dates it is waiting on.
Strengths
- Prints an all-in monthly figure per compounded protocol and, on the same page, breaks the branded lane into a membership fee and a medication rate as two separate named lines
- Publishes a list of eleven peptides it does NOT offer because they are under regulatory review, with the anticipated review dates, instead of quietly not selling them
- Says in its own FAQ that its compounded medications are not FDA-approved and describes the pharmacy category and the standard they work under
- Distinguishes the topical form of its copper peptide from the injectable form and states plainly that it does not sell the injectable
Trade-offs
- Every peptide figure is an "as low as" floor rather than a quoted rate, so no page states what a given patient would pay
- No state coverage list appears anywhere, on any page read
- The compounding pharmacies are described as a class it works with and are never named
- Its participating medical group is named as the current one, which is a disclosure that the arrangement can change
70. Meto
$95/mo — per month a la carte, on top of a $29/month membership billed at $320 annually and a one-time $149 Peptide Readiness Panel; the member rate the site refers to is not published
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
Meto puts a $149 blood panel in front of the prescription and bills in two published lines: a $29 monthly membership charged $320 a year, and the medication itself at a monthly rate that starts at $85 for BPC-157.
Strengths
- Splits the bill into two published lines, membership and medication, and says so plainly instead of quoting one blended figure
- Publishes a monthly figure for each single peptide as well as for the stacks, so a one-peptide protocol can be costed before signing up
- Marks its MOTS-c and tesamorelin stack "Not currently available while awaiting FDA regulatory action" rather than quietly delisting it
- Requires a blood panel before prescribing and prices it openly at $149 instead of burying it in an intake
Trade-offs
- The $149 panel and the $29 monthly membership both sit on top of every medication price, so no single figure on the site is the cost of therapy
- Says medication is billed "at your member rate - typically 15-25% below a la carte" without publishing what that member rate actually is
- Publishes a headline of 50 states covered by its clinician network but no state-by-state list
- Describes its pharmacies only as FDA-registered and 503A; none is named anywhere on the site
71. Magnolia Regenerative Medicine
$107/mo — starting at, per month; monthly and quarterly options offered
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
Magnolia Regenerative Medicine publishes a flat per-compound rate for twelve of the peptides this site tracks, on one catalog page, with the billing cadence printed beside each figure.
Strengths
- Prices twelve tracked compounds individually on one catalog page instead of behind an intake
- Prints the billing cadence beside each figure, so a quarterly item is visible as one
- Names Magnolia Regenerative Medicine Health LLC as the operating company in its own footer
- Separates single-compound products from its blends by name, which makes a scoped price readable
Trade-offs
- Publishes no list of states it serves
- Names no dispensing pharmacy; its comparison table says only "US FDA-Inspected Pharmacy"
- Sells five of the compounds it stocks only inside blends, so those carry no scoped price
- No certificate of analysis is reachable
72. Jently
$119/mo — as low as, per month
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
Jently names the compounding pharmacy that fills its prescriptions, with its street address and its 503A status, and prices five tracked compounds at the same monthly floor.
Strengths
- Names Precision Compounding Pharmacy, with its street address and its 503A status
- Says compounded drugs are not FDA-approved for safety, efficacy or quality, in its own words
- States that it is a telehealth platform and not a pharmacy or a manufacturer
- Prices five tracked compounds openly rather than behind an intake
Trade-offs
- Its host answers a success code for a page that does not exist, so no absence can be proven by status
- Publishes no state list, saying only that notices are on a partner’s page
- Every headline figure is an "as low as" floor rather than the rate at a stated dose
- No certificate of analysis is reachable
73. Vigormeds
$119/mo — from, per month, for the oral tablet
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
Vigormeds publishes two different monthly figures for its NAD+ injection and two more for its NAD+ nasal spray, with identical descriptions and nothing distinguishing them, and one product card whose price is printed with no number in it.
Strengths
- Prices NAD+ and glutathione across injection, nasal spray, oral and topical routes
- States in its own terms that it is not licensed to practice medicine and provides no healthcare service
- Says a prescription may be filled by and transferred between several pharmacies, which most sellers leave unsaid
- Marks products that are not yet available as coming soon rather than selling them
Trade-offs
- Publishes two different monthly figures for its NAD+ injection and two more for its nasal spray, unreconciled
- One product card prints a price with no number in it at all
- Its weight-loss figures carry no billing period beside them
- Publishes no state list; its terms point at a link instead of naming states
74. Measured
$129/mo — catalog card prints "FROM" above "$129/mo", with "No insurance required" and "Medication included"
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
Measured prices three of the compounds compared here in one catalog table, marks each as medication-included, and is the rare seller that publishes its service area as a named list of states rather than a claim.
Strengths
- Publishes its service area as a named list of twenty-six states rather than a nationwide claim
- Prices three of the compounds compared here in one catalog table, so they can be compared without three intakes
- Marks every peptide card medication-included and no-insurance-required beside the figure
- Answers its own lab-work question plainly instead of leaving it to an intake
Trade-offs
- Carries a federal warning letter over false and misleading telehealth claims
- Names no dispensing pharmacy — only "independent, state-licensed pharmacies"
- The sitemap advertises per-compound URLs that all serve the same catalog page
- The catalog states no form for any peptide, so injection, oral and nasal are not distinguished
75. PrescribedRX
$133/mo — the seller’s own per-month equivalent of a $399 three-month plan; the monthly plan is $169
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
PrescribedRX publishes a monthly rate and a three-month equivalent for every peptide it sells, and shows the arithmetic on the same tile.
Strengths
- Publishes the prepaid total and the per-month equivalent for every plan
- Gives each compound and each route its own priced page
- Names PrescribedRX LLC as the operating company
- Prices the nasal glutathione separately from the injection instead of quoting one figure
Trade-offs
- Publishes no state list
- Names no dispensing pharmacy
- No certificate of analysis is reachable
- Its struck-through comparison prices are never explained
76. Luma Meds
$139/mo — per month, with a first month offered free
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
Luma Meds says it is available in all fifty states on its product page and only in certain states in its terms, and its compounded tirzepatide plan card renders no price at all.
Strengths
- States in its own words that compounded medicines are not FDA-reviewed
- Prices the oral and injectable forms of the weight-loss molecules separately
- Publishes a standing monthly figure for NAD+, sermorelin and glutathione
- Names its medical group in its terms
Trade-offs
- Its terms contradict its own fifty-state claim
- Its injectable tirzepatide card renders no price, leaving one navigation entry as the only figure
- Semaglutide carries three different prices across one page
- Its three-month anchor price does not match three times its own monthly rate
77. Factor Health MD
$140/mo — starting at, per month
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
Factor Health MD publishes the deepest plan ladder in this batch — four terms plus a pay-as-you-go rung priced by milligrams — and names two different states as its governing law in one contract.
Strengths
- Publishes four subscription terms and a pay-as-you-go rung for both weight-loss molecules
- Prices the pay-as-you-go rung by vial strength, so a reader can see what milligrams cost
- Every stated monthly-times-term total reconciles exactly
- Prices NAD+, sermorelin and glutathione individually as well as inside bundles
Trade-offs
- Its own terms name Florida law in one section and Delaware in another
- Calls its suppliers FDA-approved compounding pharmacies, a category that does not exist
- Points readers to a state list that is not on the site
- Both weight-loss products are vitamin blends by default rather than the bare active
78. Bioverse
$149/mo — read from "Starting at $165 $149/mo" with the higher figure struck through, and confirmed by "Best value for Glutathione — Starts at $149/month. Lower than 12 leading brands.*" on the same page. No plan term is stated
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
Bioverse publishes downloadable certificates of analysis — and the page holds exactly two of them, both for its weight-loss drugs, neither for the injectable coenzyme or antioxidant this site compares.
Strengths
- Publishes downloadable certificates of analysis at a named URL, and both files resolve to real PDFs rather than dead links
- States both the anchor figure and the charged figure in the same line on each product page
- Prints "Only pay if prescribed" beside the price rather than after checkout
- Names the operating company in its own footer and the clinical practice in its terms
Trade-offs
- The certificate page lists exactly two documents and neither covers a compound this site compares — the testing disclosure and the peptide catalog do not overlap
- Carries an FDA warning letter over online sale of unapproved and misbranded drugs
- Publishes no dispensing pharmacy and no state coverage list
- The "lower than 12 leading brands" comparison names none of the twelve
79. Layla
$149/mo — per month after a $119 first month; a quarterly plan is $119 a month
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
Layla publishes three different tirzepatide prices on one page, two mutually exclusive discount labels on another, and a savings total that does not match its own arithmetic.
Strengths
- Publishes a monthly and a quarterly lane for each of its three peptides
- Names its provider entity in its terms
- Prices NAD+ and glutathione separately rather than as one longevity product
- Prints the standing rate beside the first-month rate rather than only the discount
Trade-offs
- Carries three different tirzepatide prices on a single page
- Its sermorelin card prints two first-month discounts that cannot both be true
- Two of its savings totals do not match its own arithmetic
- Publishes no statement that its compounded products are not FDA-approved
80. Loop Health
$149/mo — starting at, per month, on both the men’s and the women’s shop pages
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
Loop Health sells peptides inside a membership, prices four tracked compounds at a flat monthly rate that does not climb with dose, and states a state count rather than publishing a list.
Strengths
- Charges the same monthly figure at every GLP-1 dose, so titrating up does not raise the bill
- Prices four tracked peptides on the same page as its weight-loss medicines
- Cites named trials by name and journal beside its GLP-1 claims
- Describes itself as an independent health research collective rather than a pharmacy
Trade-offs
- States a count of forty-four states but publishes no list of them
- Its host answers a success code for a page that does not exist, so nothing can be shown absent by status alone
- Names no dispensing pharmacy
- Sells peptides only inside a membership, so the peptide figure is not the whole cost
81. Rebody Health
$149/mo — per month after the first month, which is $74.50 — the page reads "$74.50 today. Then $149 monthly. Pause or cancel before the next processing date."
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
Rebody Health, operated by Compound Technologies, Inc., prices five compounds across injection, nasal spray, troche and cream, and prints the ongoing rate beside the first-month rate on every product page instead of only the discounted one.
Strengths
- Prints the recurring rate beside the discounted first month on every product page, so the ongoing cost is readable before checkout
- Enumerates its jurisdictions state by state in its terms, District of Columbia included, rather than asserting a count
- Sells one compound in more than one route — sermorelin, NAD+ and PT-141 each have an alternative to the needle, priced separately
- States in its terms that the consultation fee sits inside the plan price and names the amount
Trade-offs
- Names no compounding pharmacy — its terms say only that orders are dispensed by independent licensed pharmacies
- The injectable NAD+ line bills in two-month blocks, so its advertised per-month figure is a division rather than a charge
- Every headline figure on the site is an introductory one, and the ongoing rate is roughly double it on most products
- No lab work is described as included at any tier
82. Whoosh Wellness
$159/mo — starting at, per month
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
Whoosh Wellness says every batch it ships is third-party tested and publishes two sermorelin ladders on one page whose lower rungs differ by three hundred dollars.
Strengths
- Says in visible text that every batch is third-party tested for potency and purity
- Prices GHK-Cu at two named strengths rather than one blended figure
- States it compounds only at licensed 503A/503B pharmacies
- Attaches a month to almost every figure on its pricing page
Trade-offs
- Prints two sermorelin ladders on one page, $300 apart, with no stated difference
- Publishes no certificate of analysis despite claiming batch testing
- Publishes no operating company on any page read
- Its product page for GHK-Cu drops the period its pricing page states
83. ElitePhysiqMD
$225/mo — the catalog rate of $225.00/mo.; every figure on this catalog is the member price under a $99.00/month membership, and on the two product pages opened in full the member figure was exactly 10% below the struck-through list price ($225.00 against $250.00, $267.30 against $297.00). The list price for this item was not read on its own page and is not stated here.
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
ElitePhysiqMD publishes the widest prescription peptide catalog on this roster — fifteen of the sixteen compounds this site tracks, each with a figure in visible text — and every one of those figures is a member rate that sits on top of a separate monthly membership charge.
Strengths
- The widest prescription peptide catalog on this roster, with a figure in visible text on every item
- Its product pages state that compounded preparations are not FDA-approved and that human evidence for peptides is limited, on the page taking the order
- Calls one of its weight-loss compounds investigational, which is accurate and rare
- Publishes the one-time-purchase total, the visit fee and the shipping charge as separate named lines rather than one blended figure
Trade-offs
- Every catalog figure is a member rate, and the catalog page itself never mentions the monthly membership those rates depend on
- Two of the compounds it lists are sold only inside a two-peptide stack, so neither has a price of its own
- The compounding pharmacy is described by licensing class on every page and is never named
- No state coverage list and no certificate of analysis appear anywhere in the pages read
84. Pause Rx
$249/mo — starting at, per month
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
Pause Rx prices eight peptide products at a monthly rate, names Rush Pharmacy as its filler, and says on every page that it is not a pharmacy itself.
Strengths
- Names Rush Pharmacy as the pharmacy that fills its prescriptions
- Repeats on every product page that it is "not a state-licensed pharmacy nor a drug manufacturer"
- Prices five tracked compounds across eight products, injection and needle-free alike
- Charges less for the sermorelin troche than for the injection
Trade-offs
- Its GHK-Cu cream is the one product with no stated billing period
- Publishes no operating company on any page read
- Publishes no state list
- No certificate of analysis is reachable
85. WePeptideRx
$249/mo — per month supply, consultation included
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
WePeptideRx prices three peptides per month supply on one page and prices PT-141 only as a fixed-milligram bundle, so its cheapest and dearest figures are not comparable.
Strengths
- Prints "per month supply" beside its three main figures rather than a bare number
- States the milligram total behind every bundle price
- Says the provider consultation, medication and shipping are included with no separate fees
- Describes itself as LegitScript-certified telehealth in its own words
Trade-offs
- Publishes no operating company on any page read
- Its PT-141 and NAD+ bundles carry no period, so they cannot be compared to its monthly rows
- Answers 200 at a nonsense path, so absence cannot be proven from status alone
- Publishes no state list, no named pharmacy and no certificate of analysis
86. Nucore Health
$250/mo — per month, any dose
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
Nucore Health charges one monthly figure at any dose for each of its three NAD+ and glutathione products and says it serves all fifty states.
Strengths
- Prints "Any Dose" beside every figure, so titration does not change the price
- Says in its own words that services are "available nationwide in all 50 states"
- States that prescription treatment is not guaranteed and clinical review is required
- Marks its products FSA/HSA eligible on the product page
Trade-offs
- Charges more for the nasal spray than for the injection with no stated reason
- Publishes no operating company on any page read
- Names no dispensing pharmacy
- No certificate of analysis is reachable
87. Hartwater Wellness
$285/mo — the seller's flat per-peptide monthly figure, "$285 per month for a single peptide … regardless of which peptide you are prescribed" — injectable glutathione is listed inside this seller's peptide menu although it is a tripeptide antioxidant rather than a therapeutic peptide in the sense the rest of the menu uses
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
Hartwater charges the same figure for every peptide it prescribes and says so in one sentence — so its price column has one number in it, and any table that gives this seller eleven different figures has invented the variance.
Strengths
- States one price for every peptide and says so explicitly, which removes the whole per-compound guessing game
- Publishes the bundle rates as well as the single rate
- Describes its pharmacies by license class and locates them in its own metro
- Draws the line against research-chemical vendors in its own words rather than by implication
Trade-offs
- Publishes no corporate entity
- Lists NAD+ and glutathione inside a peptide menu, which blurs a category the flat pricing then covers
- Names no dispensing pharmacy
- Publishes no state coverage; it is a single Texas clinic
88. Arc-1
$329.99/mo — as low as, per month with subscription
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
Arc-1 publishes a list price and a lower subscription price for each injection, and the subscription figure is the only one on the page that carries a month.
Strengths
- Shows the list price and the subscription price side by side rather than only the lower one
- Prices three separate injections on an open storefront with no intake first
- Attaches the month explicitly to the subscription figure
- Publishes a glutathione injection price, which most sellers here do not
Trade-offs
- Publishes no operating company on any page read
- Its regular prices carry no billing period at all
- Publishes no state list and names no dispensing pharmacy
- A product page URL says "one-time-purchase" while the page sells a monthly subscription
89. modMD
$40 — Per 200 MG — the cheapest of four strengths on the menu: "Glutathione 200 mg $40 · 400 mg $45 · 600 mg $50 · 1000 mg $85". Unlike its NAD+ line the price does not scale with the dose, so a per-milligram comparison reverses the ranking
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
modMD publishes one long price menu on which some peptides are sold by the milligram and others by the month, with the unit printed on each line — the clearest single example of this market's unit problem.
Strengths
- Prints the unit on every peptide line, so a milligram price and a monthly price are never confused with each other
- Prices the telehealth consultation on the same menu as the medication instead of leaving it implied
- Publishes four NAD+ strengths and four glutathione strengths rather than one starting figure
- The whole catalog sits on one page a reader can scan end to end
Trade-offs
- Publishes no corporate entity across a 973 KB menu and an 832 KB terms page
- Sells TB-500 only inside blends, so no price for that peptide alone exists
- Its glutathione pricing does not scale with dose, which makes the cheapest line the most expensive per milligram
- Names no dispensing pharmacy and publishes no state coverage
90. Onus IV
$40 — per shot at what the page calls the 400 mg standard dosage, with no billing period stated; the members' price on the same line is $28
Summary, strengths and trade-offs9 points
Onus IV is a Colorado clinic chain that publishes a dose-by-dose NAD+ ladder with a member price beside every rung — and the member discount widens from 18 percent at the smallest dose to 38 percent at the largest.
Strengths
- Publishes a dose-by-dose NAD+ ladder with a stated milligram amount and a figure on every rung, which almost nothing else compared here does
- Prints the member price beside the standard price on every rung rather than advertising a discount in the abstract
- Names its operating company and a privacy officer by name in its own policy
- Names the clinics and the mobile service it operates, so a reader can tell where the treatment happens
Trade-offs
- Colorado only, so most readers of a national comparison cannot buy here at all
- No governing-law clause exists: the site publishes a privacy policy and a disclaimer and has no terms-of-service page at all
- Its sermorelin listing is a range with no strength and no protocol, and its GHK-Cu listing is a bare figure with no quantity
- The published address omits the city, giving only a street, a state and a ZIP code
- No compounding pharmacy is named and no lab work is described as included
91. iThriveMD
$49 — the member price; the page states no billing period and shows $129 without membership
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
iThriveMD prints a non-member and a member price for every peptide it sells, and the member price is between a half and a fifth of the other.
Strengths
- Prints the member and non-member figure together instead of only the discounted one
- Says its compounding happens "under Section 503A in a USP <797>-compliant sterile cleanroom"
- Operates in-person clinics as well as telehealth and says so
- States that compounded drugs "have not been reviewed or approved by the FDA"
Trade-offs
- None of its figures carries a billing period
- Its cheapest prices require buying a separate hormone or weight-loss plan first
- Answers 200 at every path, so nothing about the site can be proven absent
- Publishes no operating company, no state list and no named pharmacy
92. Modern Age
$50 — Per INJECTION, not per month: printed as "Glutathione Injection: Stress — $50/injection", with "Visit us in our NYC Clinic — Book an appointment or walk in any time" beneath it. The lowest figure on this roster and the smallest unit
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
Modern Age sells its peptides by the session and by the injection in a physical New York clinic, and the only corporate name in its terms belongs to its payment processor.
Strengths
- States its unit explicitly on every figure — per session, per injection — instead of leaving a period to be assumed
- Prints how long the infusion takes beside the price, which no shipped-subscription seller can offer
- Publishes an option table with multi-session pricing rather than one headline figure
- Says where the service happens and that walk-ins are accepted
Trade-offs
- The only corporate name in its terms is its payment processor's
- A single physical clinic, so its figures are not comparable to a nationwide shipped program
- No dispensing pharmacy named and no certificate of analysis
- Its per-session figure is many times any subscription figure on this roster, and the units are not interchangeable
93. Nex Gen Health Rx
$57.32 — from; the product page states no billing period. The odd cents are the seller’s own figure, not a conversion
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
Nex Gen Health Rx names its dispensing pharmacy, prices four tracked compounds, and states a period for none of them.
Strengths
- Names Manifest Pharmacy rather than describing an unnamed accredited one
- Publishes a PT-141 figure, which most of this roster does not
- Prices glutathione to the cent instead of rounding to a marketing number
- Cross-links each product to the others from within the product page
Trade-offs
- None of its four figures carries a billing period
- Publishes no operating company on any page read
- Its sermorelin price is published on a testosterone product page rather than a sermorelin one
- Publishes no state list and no certificate of analysis
94. Nuform Health
$78 — the per-month figure printed beside a prepaid five-month kit — "$78/mo injectable kit · $390 (5 month plan) · Billed in 5 month increments · INCLUDES SUPPLIES"; the whole $390 is charged at once
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
Nuform Health, Inc. sells prescription peptide kits that are prepaid in multi-month blocks, and it says in its own copy that it does not offer monthly prescriptions or subscription plans — so the per-month figure printed beside each kit is arithmetic, not a bill.
Strengths
- States its own position on research-labeled peptides in plain words on its product pages, rather than leaving the category question to the reader
- Prints the prepaid total and the plan length beside every per-month figure, so the arithmetic is visible
- Says outright that it does not sell monthly prescriptions or subscriptions, which is the fact most sellers with prepaid kits leave out
- Names its operating company in its own footer and again in its terms
Trade-offs
- Every peptide price is a division of a prepaid block, so the advertised per-month figure is never what is charged
- Two entities appear across the site and the terms, and neither document explains which one a buyer contracts with
- The compounding pharmacy is described only as a 503A/503B facility and is never named
- No state coverage list, and no certificate of analysis or third-party testing anywhere in the pages read
95. Take10Rx
$82.45 — printed "per month" under a "QUARTERLY PLAN" heading billing $247.36 today; the same page asks "Can I Pay Monthly Instead of Quarterly?"
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
Take10Rx prices sermorelin, glutathione and two forms of NAD+ per month on a quarterly plan, and its own product page asks whether a buyer can pay monthly instead — which is the clearest sign that the per-month figure is not a monthly charge.
Strengths
- Prints the amount actually charged today beside the per-month figure
- Puts the plan heading directly above the price rather than in a footnote
- Answers on its own page whether monthly billing is possible instead of quarterly
- Gives sermorelin, glutathione and both NAD+ routes their own product pages
Trade-offs
- Prints "per month" for a charge its own heading says is quarterly
- Carries a second billed figure on two pages with nothing saying what it buys
- Publishes no state list and names no dispensing pharmacy
- No certificate of analysis is reachable
96. Invyncible
$88 — the current price against a struck-through $110.00 anchor; the page offers a 10 mL and a 30 mL option under one displayed figure and does not say which the figure belongs to, and adds "Refrigeration required. Must ship overnight."
Summary, strengths and trade-offs9 points
Invyncible names six compounding pharmacies with street addresses and phone numbers, says the patient chooses which one fills the prescription, and prints a two-state exclusion at the top of every product page — three disclosures almost nobody else on this roster makes.
Strengths
- Names six compounding pharmacies in a table with street addresses, phone numbers and websites, rather than describing a category
- States that the patient chooses which of those pharmacies fills the prescription, and may nominate one outside the network
- Prints its two-state exclusion in visible text at the top of every product page rather than revealing it at checkout
- Names the operating company, its brand relationship and a street address in the footer of every page
- Warns on the glutathione page that the product needs refrigeration and overnight shipping, before the order is placed
Trade-offs
- No product page states a billing period or a supply length, so none of its figures can be read as a monthly cost
- Every figure is a discount against a struck-through anchor, which is a promotional shape rather than a settled price
- The glutathione page offers two vial sizes under a single displayed figure without saying which it applies to
- No certificate of analysis or third-party testing claim appears on any page read
97. Heva Health
$99 — for a 10 mL vial; the shop page states no billing period
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
Heva Health sells peptides by the vial from an open shop page, and its PT-141 figure is one of the lowest anywhere on this roster.
Strengths
- Publishes the volume of every vial beside its price
- Runs an open shop page rather than quoting only after an intake
- Names Heva Health LLC as the operating company
- Says its medications are "FDA-approved or compounded at FDA-registered, state-licensed pharmacies"
Trade-offs
- No figure on the shop page carries a billing period
- Its "licensed in all 50 states" line describes the clinician, not the service area
- Publishes no state list of its own and names no dispensing pharmacy
- No certificate of analysis is reachable
98. Regenics
$99 — member price ($249 non-member) for a ten-injection vial; the seller's own NAD+ page restates the list figure as $24.90/week, which is that figure divided by ten
Summary, strengths and trade-offs9 points
Regenics prints two figures for every peptide it sells — a list price and a lower member price — and the member price is the only one a buyer can reach, because the catalog itself says ten further peptides are visible only after a $39-a-month membership.
Strengths
- Prints the non-member figure beside the member figure on every peptide page, so the discount is visible rather than implied
- Says on the NAD+ page that the compound is "Not FDA-approved for weight loss or athletic performance", which is a scoping most sellers leave out
- Its sermorelin page states plainly that adult wellness use is off-label and that the evidence for it is limited
- Sells GHK-Cu as a prescribed compounded cream and says so, rather than as a cosmetic jar
Trade-offs
- The full peptide catalog is behind a paid membership — the site says ten further peptides are member-only and names none of them
- Every published figure is a member rate that sits on top of a $39-a-month membership charge
- Its NAD+ page shows no price at all until a potency is selected, so the page reads as priceless on arrival
- Two of its own pages describe the same sermorelin item at two different strengths
- The 503A compounding pharmacy is never named, and no service-state list is published anywhere
99. VIV RX
$99 — from — the shop grid and the product page both print this as a floor per month
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
VIV RX prices three tracked peptides as floors on one shop page, itemises what each plan includes, and carries a 2026 federal warning letter naming its own domain.
Strengths
- Lists what each plan includes as an itemised set rather than as a promise of value
- States the administration route and frequency for each compound on its own page
- Says plainly that FDA registration is not FDA approval, on the same line as the claim
- Prices three tracked compounds on one page a reader can compare at a glance
Trade-offs
- Carries a federal warning letter that names this exact domain
- Every figure is a floor, so the price a buyer actually pays is not published
- Names no dispensing pharmacy, only a license held by an unnamed one
- Publishes no state list and settles eligibility inside the intake
100. BioGlow Health
$129 — the price beside "~1 month supply"; the listing's own description calls this nasal product injectable
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
BioGlow Health puts every peptide figure in visible text on an open shop page with no account gate, and then describes two of its three nasal sprays with the word "Injectable" — the injection copy pasted onto the nasal listing.
Strengths
- Every product figure sits in visible text on an open shop page — no account, no quiz and no blur between a reader and the price
- Publishes a dose ladder for its GLP-1 line rather than one headline figure, which is the same transparency applied to a different lane
- Runs the whole site in English and Spanish from a header toggle
- Claims fifty-state service for itself in its own footer
Trade-offs
- Two of its three nasal-spray listings — NAD+ and glutathione — describe themselves as injectable, so the delivery copy contradicts the product name
- Every price is labeled "~1 month supply" with a tilde and no billing cycle, so no figure is a quoted monthly charge
- The compounding pharmacies are described only as licensed and are never named
- Lab panels are required by its own process description but are not stated to be included in any price
101. YourHealthRx
$129 — printed as 'Glutathione · As low as $129/mo' in the same goal panel, under the same code-or-six-month-supply condition
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
YourHealthRx prints a rate against five separate peptides and conditions every one of them on a promotional code or a six-month commitment that expires on a stated date.
Strengths
- Publishes a rate for five distinct peptides rather than one blended protocol
- States the condition attached to its rates instead of hiding it after intake
- Prints an expiry date on the promotion rather than running it indefinitely
- Groups its catalog by goal so a reader can find the compound for their purpose
Trade-offs
- Not one advertised rate is a plain month-to-month price
- Every figure requires a promotional code or a six-month supply, or both
- Its own page says it does not prescribe and routes to partner workflows, leaving unclear whether it is the seller
- Publishes no state list and names no dispensing pharmacy
102. TeleWellnessMD
$149.95 — per vial as listed — "Glutathione / 2000mg / 200mg/mL 10mL Vial"; the seller publishes no billing period for it
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
TeleWellnessMD prices by the vial rather than by the month, printing the strength and the vial volume beside every figure, and it folds the consultation fee into the price of the therapy instead of billing it separately.
Strengths
- Prints the strength and the vial volume beside every figure, so a reader can see what the money buys
- Folds the consultation fee into the therapy price rather than charging for the visit separately
- Offers glutathione in two vial sizes at two published figures instead of one blended rate
- States that further consultations are scheduled at no additional cost
Trade-offs
- Publishes no billing period at all, so none of its figures can be compared against a monthly rate
- Ships its whole formulary inside a hidden block of the catalog page, where the prices render for nobody
- Names its own corporate entity two ways — "TeleWellnessMD®, LLC" in the Terms of Use, "TeleWellnessMD™ Inc." in the footer
- Describes its pharmacies as LegitScript certified without naming any of them
103. Nava Health
$160 — per infusion at one gram for a non-member; the same row shows $60 for a member. Two grams is $190 non-member and three grams $220
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
Nava Health publishes a full price list with a member and a non-member column for every line, prices NAD+ and glutathione by the infusion at three strengths each, and adds a third column for two membership tiers on its packages.
Strengths
- Publishes a full itemised service price list rather than a headline figure
- Prints the member and non-member price on the same row, so the discount is visible
- Prices NAD+ and glutathione at three strengths each rather than one
- Warns readers in its own words against buying research chemicals online
Trade-offs
- Its host answers a success code for a page that does not exist, so no absence here can be proven by status
- Prices infusions per session, so nothing here is a monthly cost
- Publishes no state list and names no dispensing pharmacy
- Sells seven other tracked peptides that carry no published figure at all
104. FancyMeds
$179 — billed every four weeks; the same eight-week treatment is $339 as a one-time payment
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
FancyMeds carries a 2025 federal warning letter, names two pharmacies — one of which carries a letter of its own — and puts the other drug's price card directly under each product's own.
Strengths
- Names two dispensing pharmacies, one by its legal entity and its trading name
- Publishes an installment price and a one-time total for the same treatment
- States the titration schedule and the treatment length beside each figure
- Prices PT-141 and glutathione, which most sellers here do not price at all
Trade-offs
- Each product page carries a cross-sell card holding the other drug's price
- Its own FAQ heading about state availability has no answer in the page
- Its four-week installment is not a month, though it reads like one
- Carries a 2025 federal warning letter naming its own website, and one of its two named pharmacies carries a separate federal letter for adulterated drug products
105. Levers Health
$187 — a SUPPLY QUANTITY purchased outright, not a billing cycle: the product page's variant list reads "Glutathione - 1 Month Supply - $187.00", with "2 Month Supply - $327.00" and "4 Month Supply - $597.00" beside it. A banner on the same site advertises "Summer Glow Up: Glutathione Injections for $109", alongside a dated discount code — two figures for one product, live together, and the banner one carries an expiry
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
Levers Health sells its antioxidant in one-, two- and four-month supplies at three stated figures, while a banner on the same site advertises the same injection at barely half the one-month price.
Strengths
- Publishes three supply lengths at three stated figures, so the multi-month discount is calculable rather than implied
- One of the best-documented operating companies in this batch — named across several pages with a street address and a copyright line
- Carries a copper-peptide topical alongside the injectables, which few sellers here do
- Shows a customer review count on the product card rather than an unsourced rating alone
Trade-offs
- A banner figure and a product-page figure for the same injection differ by seventy-eight dollars
- The banner discount is date-stamped, so any comparison built on it decays on a known day
- Claims third-party testing in its terms and a purity test on the product page, with no certificate reachable
- No pharmacy named and no state coverage list
106. Avara Rx
$199 — starting at; the page states no billing period
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
Avara Rx prints "Starting at" and a number on each of its three peptide pages and states no period on any of them, while its GLP-1 copy on the same site says "per month".
Strengths
- Publishes a figure for all three of its tracked compounds without an intake
- Describes itself in its own words as "a LegitScript-certified telehealth pharmacy"
- Gives each compound its own page rather than burying them in one menu
- States a review cadence — "1:1 doctor-led care, every quarter" — beside each price
Trade-offs
- None of its three peptide figures carries a stated billing period
- Publishes no operating company on any page read
- Publishes no state list and names no dispensing pharmacy
- Its GLP-1 copy states a period its peptide pages do not
107. Harmony Wellness Clinic
$200 — for a 5 week supply — five weeks is not a month
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
Harmony Wellness Clinic prices its peptides by supply length rather than by month, and three of its four supply lengths are not a month.
Strengths
- Attaches a supply length to almost every figure instead of printing a bare number
- Prices eleven tracked compounds on one open services page
- Says its prescriptions "may include FDA-approved medications or compounded formulas, which are not reviewed by the FDA"
- Names the regulatory class of its suppliers — 503A pharmacies licensed by state boards
Trade-offs
- Charges the same $200 for a five-week supply and a one-month supply of different compounds
- Its PT-141 price names no supply length at all
- Publishes no operating company, no state list and no named pharmacy
- No certificate of analysis is reachable
108. Lyfe Rx
$250 — a bare storefront figure; a separate "Glutathione Protocol" is listed at $215.00 on the same page
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
Lyfe Rx carries a 2025 federal warning letter naming its own website, and today publishes a flat storefront price for bremelanotide and for two glutathione products with no billing period stated anywhere on the listing.
Strengths
- Puts a figure beside every product in an open storefront rather than behind an intake
- States in its own words that compounded drugs are not reviewed by the FDA and are not generic equivalents
- Says plainly that it is a telehealth platform and not a pharmacy
- Sells bremelanotide under its molecule name rather than a brand alias
Trade-offs
- Carries a 2025 federal warning letter that names its own website address
- Prints no billing period beside any storefront figure, so no price here is a monthly one
- Lists a nasal spray and a "protocol" at different prices for the same compound without saying what separates them
- Names no dispensing pharmacy and publishes no certificate of analysis
109. LifespanningRx
$270 — one-time purchase of a 1 month supply; the same page prices the identical supply at $229.50 on a lane it labels "1-month subscription SAVE 15%"
Summary, strengths and trade-offs6 points
LifespanningRx names its operating company and its state of incorporation in its own terms, and puts a supply-duration control on each product page so a reader can see what one month and what three months cost before starting an intake.
Strengths
- Names its operating company, its state of incorporation and a street address in its own terms, and names Florida as the governing law
- A supply-duration control sits on each product page, so the one-month and three-month figures can both be read before an intake starts
- States beside the price that a prescription follows a telehealth consultation and that the preparation is dispensed by a licensed compounding pharmacy
Trade-offs
- No state coverage list appears anywhere on the site, so eligibility can only be settled by starting an intake
- The compounding pharmacy that fills an order is described by category and never named
- The home page carries a patient-count claim and a clinician-credential claim that a reader has no way to check from outside
110. AquaVita NextGen
$295 — the whole price of a ten-injection kit — "Peptides · Glutathione · $295 · Glutathione 10 ML (10 injections) · 10 week program". A per-kit charge covering ten weeks, not a monthly rate
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
AquaVita NextGen prices its two peptide products as ten-injection kits covering a ten-week program, not as monthly subscriptions — and files them, along with a lipotropic vitamin injection, under a heading it wrote itself: Peptides.
Strengths
- States the program length and the number of injections beside each peptide price, so the unit behind the figure is visible
- Prices its weight-loss lane in both a one-month and a three-month supply with both totals shown
- Names the operating company in the opening sentence of its terms and says it owns and operates the site
- Carries a disclaimer stating the products are compounded and advising a licensed clinician be consulted first
Trade-offs
- Its peptide prices cover ten weeks while its weight-loss prices cover a month, on the same page and with no note that the units differ
- It files a lipotropic vitamin injection under the heading "Peptides" alongside the two peptide products
- The disclaimer under its product grid is the dietary-supplement formula — that statements have not been evaluated and the product is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any disease — printed beneath compounded prescription products
- No state coverage list, no named pharmacy and no certificate of analysis anywhere in the pages read
111. AgeRejuvenation
Does not publish a Glutathione price.
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
AgeRejuvenation names fourteen tracked compounds on one peptide page, the deepest single menu in this batch, and does not price a single one of them.
Strengths
- Names fourteen tracked compounds on one page, the deepest single menu here
- Names its operating company on two separate legal pages
- Runs separate NAD+ and glutathione pages beneath the main peptide menu
- Covers KPV, semax, epitalon and MOTS-c, which most rosters miss entirely
Trade-offs
- Carries no figure on its peptide menu or on any compound page
- Its legal name is tied to one location while the brand is presented as regional
- Publishes no state list and names no dispensing pharmacy
- Describes no lab work as included in what it charges
112. the biostation
Does not publish a Glutathione price.
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
the biostation links per-compound fact sheets from its peptide page, and one of the two, fetched directly, answers successfully with an empty file.
Strengths
- Publishes per-compound reading material of its own, which most sellers here do not
- Describes what it offers without claiming an approval it does not have
- Keeps its peptide offer separate from its other lines on the page
- Answers the category question in plain language rather than in a disclaimer
Trade-offs
- One of the two linked documents answers with an empty file, and neither is a certificate
- Publishes no figure for any compound on the pages read
- Publishes no corporate entity, so there is no company a reader can look up
- Publishes no state list and names no dispensing pharmacy
113. Della Bellezza Med Spa
Does not publish a Glutathione price.
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
Della Bellezza names sixteen compounds on one service page, eleven of them ones this site tracks, and its own storefront — open to the public — sells skincare rather than any of them.
Strengths
- One of the widest single-page compound lists on this roster
- Declares eleven of the sixteen compounds this site tracks on pages a reader can reach
- Keeps its peptide offer separate from its other lines on the page
- Answers the category question in plain language rather than in a disclaimer
Trade-offs
- Its own storefront is open and sells skincare, so the breadth is a menu with nothing priced behind it
- Publishes no figure for any compound on the pages read
- Publishes no corporate entity, so there is no company a reader can look up
- Publishes no state list and names no dispensing pharmacy
114. Eden Health Club
Does not publish a Glutathione price.
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
Eden Health Club runs a separate page for each of thirteen compounds tied to one Colorado location, and the only number on any of them is the same one repeated sitewide.
Strengths
- Publishes a page per compound rather than one combined peptide menu
- Names thirteen tracked compounds, among the deepest menus here
- Names its operating company on the pages it serves
- Ties each compound page to a named location rather than a vague service area
Trade-offs
- Carries no compound-specific figure on any of its per-compound pages
- The only figure sitewide repeats identically on every page, so it prices nothing
- Publishes no state list and names no dispensing pharmacy
- Describes no lab work as included in what it charges
115. EdgeRx
Does not publish a Glutathione price.
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
EdgeRx sells the same compound in two needle-free formats at the same monthly price, and says in its own words that it is "not the peptide gray-market".
Strengths
- Charges the same monthly figure for the nasal and sublingual route of a compound
- Groups its catalog by goal and prints a protocol count beside each group
- Says its GHK-Cu topical is "pharmacy-compounded, not the OTC version"
- Attaches the month to every protocol figure it publishes
Trade-offs
- Publishes no operating company on any page read
- Its PT-141 and glutathione lines are sold inside multi-protocol categories with no single figure
- Publishes no state list and names no dispensing pharmacy
- Says its compounds are "tested for purity" but publishes no certificate of analysis
116. Immortals
Does not publish a Glutathione price.
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
Immortals quotes its headline offer per day over a catalog priced per item, and only one of the four tracked compounds it names carries a figure at all.
Strengths
- Names four tracked compounds as products in its own navigation
- Publishes a figure on its own site with the unit recorded beside it
- Keeps its peptide offer separate from its other lines on the page
- Answers the category question in plain language rather than in a disclaimer
Trade-offs
- Its headline figure is quoted per day, a unit nothing else here can be compared against
- Publishes no corporate entity, so there is no company a reader can look up
- Publishes no state list and names no dispensing pharmacy
- Describes no lab work as included in what it charges
117. InjectCo
Does not publish a Glutathione price.
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
InjectCo publishes two different monthly prices for the same compounded semaglutide program on two of its own pages, and prints "We Only Use FDA-Approved, Trusted Products" above copy describing compounded drugs.
Strengths
- Itemises what the monthly subscription buys, down to the injection supplies and the training
- Prices a sublingual form separately from the injection
- Names the pharmacy class — 503B — rather than leaving it unstated
- Publishes street addresses for two physical clinics
Trade-offs
- Publishes two different monthly figures for the same compounded semaglutide program
- Prints an FDA-approval headline above compounded product copy
- Its five dedicated peptide pages carry no price for any peptide
- Serves one state, so most readers cannot buy from it
118. Invigorate Health
Does not publish a Glutathione price.
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
Three unrelated businesses connected to this comparison trade under names built from the same word, and this is one of them; its peptide page names no peptide.
Strengths
- Publishes a detailed infusion menu that names both compounds recorded here
- Describes what it offers without claiming an approval it does not have
- Keeps its peptide offer separate from its other lines on the page
- Answers the category question in plain language rather than in a disclaimer
Trade-offs
- Its peptide page names no compound, and its brand collides with two unrelated sellers
- Publishes no figure for any compound on the pages read
- Publishes no corporate entity, so there is no company a reader can look up
- Publishes no state list and names no dispensing pharmacy
119. Just Wellness
Does not publish a Glutathione price.
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
Just Wellness prices nine things on its home page and not one of them is a peptide; its peptide page, the one document that should carry a figure, carries none.
Strengths
- Publishes detailed prices for its other services in clearly stated units
- Describes what it offers without claiming an approval it does not have
- Keeps its peptide offer separate from its other lines on the page
- Answers the category question in plain language rather than in a disclaimer
Trade-offs
- Its peptide page is the only page on the site with no figure on it at all
- Publishes no figure for any compound on the pages read
- Publishes no corporate entity, so there is no company a reader can look up
- Publishes no state list and names no dispensing pharmacy
120. Kina Health
Does not publish a Glutathione price.
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
Kina Health publishes three different corporate names across three of its own pages and no figure for any of the three peptides it sells.
Strengths
- One of the three company names in its terms reads as a pharmacy business, though no page says which facility fills a given order
- Lists NAD+, glutathione and GHK-Cu as distinct treatments rather than one bundle
- States a flat consult fee up front rather than revealing it at checkout
- Publishes both a terms page and a separate privacy policy
Trade-offs
- Three different company names appear across its own pages with no explanation of the relationship
- Publishes no figure for any peptide it sells
- Publishes no state list
- Describes no lab work as included in what it charges
121. Lovely Meds
Does not publish a Glutathione price.
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
Lovely Meds carries a 2025 federal warning letter, names seven dispensing pharmacies outright, and prints weight-loss body copy on a sermorelin product page.
Strengths
- Names seven dispensing pharmacies with their cities, which almost no seller here does
- Charges one price at every dose on both weight-loss molecules
- Publishes the full plan ladder from one month to twelve
- Says in its own words that its compounded medicines are not FDA-evaluated
Trade-offs
- Carries a 2025 federal warning letter naming its own website
- Its sermorelin page carries a weight-loss product's body copy word for word
- Its home page prints an FDA-approval claim beside compounded product cards
- Admits it is available in many but not all states without saying which
122. Premium Health
Does not publish a Glutathione price.
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
Premium Health carries a February 2026 federal warning letter, names three pharmacies, prices both weight-loss molecules by the month — and ships them every ninety days.
Strengths
- Names three dispensing pharmacies for its weight-loss products
- States its dose ceilings and exactly what exceeding them adds to the price
- Says the membership fee includes the medication, the supplies and the shipping
- Publishes a street address and a disclaimer separating itself from a similarly named firm
Trade-offs
- Carries a February 2026 federal warning letter naming its own website
- Prices by the month while shipping every ninety days
- Calls its own products extremely safe and claims an extreme safety profile for the drug class
- Its NAD+ product is a two-compound blend, so it has no price for NAD+ alone
123. Simply Direct Medicine
Does not publish a Glutathione price.
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
Simply Direct Medicine publishes a real price list of membership tiers and a scheduling charge, and links a specials sheet whose file name carries the month it expires in.
Strengths
- Publishes membership pricing in clearly named tiers rather than on request
- Describes what it offers without claiming an approval it does not have
- Keeps its peptide offer separate from its other lines on the page
- Answers the category question in plain language rather than in a disclaimer
Trade-offs
- None of its published figures prices a compound, and its specials sheet is dated by month
- Publishes no figure for any compound on the pages read
- Publishes no corporate entity, so there is no company a reader can look up
- Publishes no state list and names no dispensing pharmacy
124. South Florida Face & Body
Does not publish a Glutathione price.
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
South Florida Face & Body publishes a whole-menu price range instead of a price per compound, and says plainly that a quote far below the market usually means gray-market product.
Strengths
- Publishes a price range rather than refusing to discuss cost before intake
- States that consultation and baseline labs are quoted separately
- States that an outside licensed pharmacy fills prescriptions, rather than implying it dispenses in house
- Warns in its own words what an unusually low quote usually means
Trade-offs
- Its range covers the whole menu, so no compound has a price of its own
- Publishes no corporate entity, only a named clinician and a license number
- Charges for consultation and labs on top of the quoted range
- Publishes no state list beyond the one state it operates in
125. Spa Sydell
Does not publish a Glutathione price.
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
Spa Sydell organizes its peptide menu three ways — by compound, by blend and by concern — and prices none of them; the numbers on its site belong to its skincare shop.
Strengths
- Lets a reader browse peptides by individual compound, by blend or by concern
- Names eleven tracked compounds across its browse pages
- Keeps its retail shop on separate pages from its therapy menu
- Returns a clean hard error for a path that does not exist
Trade-offs
- Carries no figure on any of its four peptide browse pages
- Publishes no corporate entity on any page read
- Publishes no state list and names no dispensing pharmacy
- Describes no lab work as included in what it charges
126. StackMD
Does not publish a Glutathione price.
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
StackMD prices NAD+, sermorelin and glutathione from one homepage list and settles every product page at a single "plans starting at" figure.
Strengths
- Says explicitly there are "no membership fees or hidden charges"
- Explains in its own words what compounding is and why a pharmacy may do it
- Prices three tracked compounds on one homepage list
- Gives each compound and each route its own product page
Trade-offs
- Its per-compound figures carry no billing period
- Publishes no complete operating company name
- Its product pages quote a plan floor that is lower than any compound figure it names
- Publishes no state list, no named pharmacy and no certificate of analysis
127. Talon Wellness
Does not publish a Glutathione price.
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
Talon claims all fifty states in its own header and publishes nothing at all about what peptide therapy costs — its peptide page carries no figure of any kind.
Strengths
- States a fifty-state footprint in its own header rather than burying it in terms
- Separates peptide therapy from its weight-loss and hormone lines as its own service
- Publishes a described process rather than only a booking form
- Names the two compounds this site tracks plainly on the service page
Trade-offs
- Publishes no figure of any kind on its peptide page or its terms
- Publishes no corporate entity
- Names no dispensing pharmacy
- The pricing language the seller carried in an earlier capture is no longer on the page, so nothing about cost is currently disclosed
128. TrueMe
Does not publish a Glutathione price.
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
TrueMe publishes an actual list of the states it serves, prices NAD+ and sermorelin on a one-month and a three-month cadence, and prints two different versions of that state list on its own site.
Strengths
- Publishes an itemised list of the states it serves rather than a count
- Prints the month-to-month and the three-month rate side by side on every product
- Says compounded medications are not FDA-approved and have not been evaluated for safety, effectiveness or quality
- States that it is not a state-licensed pharmacy nor a drug manufacturer
Trade-offs
- Publishes two different versions of its own state list, one with five states and one with six
- Sells its weight-loss products under drug-class names without naming the drug
- Lists glutathione with no price attached
- Names no dispensing pharmacy and no certificate of analysis is reachable
129. Voxy Health
Does not publish a Glutathione price.
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
Voxy Health prints four plan lengths for each weight-loss drug with the billing cadence written beside every rate, so a prepaid figure can never be mistaken for a monthly one. It sells three tracked peptides with no price attached to any of them.
Strengths
- Prints the billing cadence beside every rate, so a prepaid figure is never shown as a monthly one
- Publishes a street address and a telephone number in its footer
- Says compounded medications are not reviewed by the FDA for safety or efficacy, twice on the same page
- Says what each plan includes — medication, supplies, shipping and check-ins — rather than leaving it to checkout
Trade-offs
- Lists NAD+, glutathione and sermorelin as treatments and prices none of them
- Says availability may vary by state without publishing a list of states
- Names no dispensing pharmacy, saying only that it is 503A licensed
- Its batch-testing sentence is a claim; no certificate of analysis is reachable
130. Vyora Wellness
Does not publish a Glutathione price.
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
Vyora Wellness describes independent third-party potency and purity testing in its own FAQ, and publishes one peptide price behind a shop that hides most of the rest.
Strengths
- Describes what its third-party testing checks — strength, match to prescription, contaminants
- Names Vyora Wellness LLC and publishes an informed-consent addendum
- Says it partners with "U.S.-based 503A certified pharmacies"
- Attaches a month to the one peptide figure it shows publicly
Trade-offs
- Publishes no certificate of analysis despite describing third-party testing
- Gates most product pages behind a password, so most prices cannot be read
- Publishes no state list and names no dispensing pharmacy
- Its one readable NAD+ figure appears only in a related-products strip
131. Taurus Meds
$79/mo — printed as "Glutathione — Master Antioxidant & Energy — $179 $79 /mo". All three peptides on this page carry the same anchor and the same promotional figure, so nothing here distinguishes one compound's cost from another's
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
Taurus Meds charges the same promotional figure for three different peptides against the same anchor, and the research-use language an automated scan finds on its site turns out to govern patient records, not products.
Strengths
- A dedicated peptide route with all three products, their anchors and their figures on one page
- Names the operating company, its state of registration and its street address in its own terms
- Names the clinical partner organization separately from the brand
- A flat price across three compounds, which removes the guesswork about which one is cheaper here
Trade-offs
- Every figure is promotional against the same anchor, with no expiry stated, so all three will decay together
- A flat cross-compound price tells a reader nothing about what any individual compound costs to supply
- No pharmacy named, no certificate of analysis, no state coverage list
- Its clinical partner stands behind other brands, so naming it distinguishes little
132. TRT Nation
$80/mo — per month, footnoted "*2.5 months minimum purchase"
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
TRT Nation prices sermorelin, NAD+, glutathione and tirzepatide by the month and footnotes a minimum purchase of two and a half or three months beneath most of them, so the monthly figure is not the smallest commitment.
Strengths
- Footnotes the minimum purchase directly beneath the monthly figure rather than at checkout
- Says there are no membership fees that are not applied to the prescription
- Lists the specific blood tests it requires and how old they may be
- Notes on its own cards that California pricing may differ
Trade-offs
- Most of its monthly figures cannot be bought for one month
- Publishes no state list; its own FAQ poses the question as a heading
- Names no dispensing pharmacy
- No certificate of analysis is reachable
133. YOURx Health
$95/mo — per month; the card immediately above it prices a B12 and MIC injection at $99, which is a different product
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
YOURx Health prices six tracked peptides by the month on one protocol page, and sells every one of its weight-loss medicines combined with vitamin B12, so none of those four carries a price scoped to the drug.
Strengths
- Prices six tracked peptides individually, each on its own card with its own figure
- Names YOURx Health LLC as the operating company in its footer
- Marks products that are not yet available as coming soon rather than selling them
- Says on the BPC-157 card that lab work is required before a prescription
Trade-offs
- Every weight-loss product is combined with vitamin B12, so none carries a price scoped to the drug
- Sells PT-141 only inside a three-ingredient troche
- Publishes no state list and names no dispensing pharmacy
- No certificate of analysis is reachable
134. JulyMD
$99/mo — from, per month
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
JulyMD carries a 2025 federal warning letter, serves every state but one, and runs terms of service that hand your data to a pharmacy network belonging to a different brand.
Strengths
- Prices the injectable and the nasal form of both its peptides separately
- Names the single state it cannot serve rather than hiding behind a vague availability line
- Names its medical group in its terms
- Prints the standing rate beside the promotional first month
Trade-offs
- Carries a 2025 federal warning letter naming its own website
- Its terms ask consent to disclose your data to a pharmacy network belonging to another brand
- Publishes no statement that its compounded medicines are not FDA-approved
- No price carries a dose, and its injection and nasal spray cost the same with no explanation
135. FitFlow Rx
$110/mo — from, per month, same price at every dose
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
FitFlow Rx charges one flat figure per compound at every dose, and prices a GHK-Cu foam lower than anything else it sells.
Strengths
- Repeats "same price at every dose" on every treatment page, so titration does not raise the bill
- Prices six separate formats rather than one figure per compound
- Says on every product page that compounded drugs are not FDA-approved
- Includes the provider consultation and shipping in the published figure
Trade-offs
- Its treatment pages omit the billing period its homepage states
- Publishes no operating company on any page read
- Publishes no state list and names no dispensing pharmacy
- No certificate of analysis is reachable for any product
136. VEVArx
$117/mo — the seller’s own stated equivalent of its $349 three-month plan
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
VEVArx sells peptides only as three-month plans and prints the total and the per-month equivalent together, except for PT-141, which it also sells monthly.
Strengths
- Prints the prepaid total and the per-month equivalent on the same card
- Offers PT-141 month to month as well as on a three-month plan
- States plainly that compounded medications are not approved by the FDA
- Lists what each plan includes rather than only what it costs
Trade-offs
- Sells sermorelin, glutathione and NAD+ only in three-month blocks
- Publishes no operating company on any page read
- Publishes no state list and names no dispensing pharmacy
- No certificate of analysis is reachable
137. Alyve
$129/mo — from, per month
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
Alyve prices seven tracked-compound products across injectable and sublingual forms, and runs a site-wide banner quoting a tirzepatide figure that matches neither of its own tirzepatide products.
Strengths
- Prices the injectable and the sublingual form of each molecule separately
- Says what the price includes — the vial size and a home kit
- States in bold on its own safety page that its compounded products are not FDA-approved
- Marks products that are not yet purchasable as coming soon rather than pricing them silently
Trade-offs
- Its site-wide banner quotes a tirzepatide price that matches neither of its tirzepatide products
- Names no dispensing pharmacy, only a "Pharmacy Network"
- Makes no state-coverage claim at all
- Its terms of service still carry an unreplaced template placeholder in the date line
138. GoodGirlRx
$135/mo — the one-month plan; this page mislabels its own $135 as a tirzepatide price
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
GoodGirlRx carries a February 2026 federal warning letter and prints a compounded-tirzepatide price on three product pages that do not sell tirzepatide — each one quoting that page's own figure.
Strengths
- Publishes a four-rung plan ladder for every product rather than a single floor
- Prices sermorelin in both an injectable and an oral form, separately
- Says plainly that it is not a pharmacy, a prescriber or a manufacturer
- Its discount arithmetic reconciles on all four ladders against the savings it prints
Trade-offs
- Carries a February 2026 federal warning letter naming its own website
- Three of its product pages label their own price as a compounded tirzepatide price
- Its headline figures are twelve-month prepay averages, not a month's price
- Names no dispensing pharmacy and makes no state-coverage claim
139. Alan Health
$155/mo — per month, and true only on a six-month plan paid upfront — the page's own footnote reads "*Paid upfront with a 6-month plan. Actual price to the consumer will depend on the product and plan purchased"
Summary, strengths and trade-offs9 points
Alan Health prints a per-month figure on each of three product pages and a footnote under each one that names a different prepayment term — six months, two months and three months — so the three numbers are not the same kind of number.
Strengths
- States the prepayment term under every published figure rather than printing a bare per-month number
- Names its operating company, its trading names and a notice address in its own terms, and names both the governing law and the venue
- Names the clinical groups it works with separately from the company that runs the website
- Sells each of its three compared compounds in more than one format — injection, nasal spray and patch on two of them
Trade-offs
- The prepayment term is different on each of its three product pages, so the three per-month figures are not comparable with each other
- Received an FDA warning letter in February 2026 over website labeling that presented the company as the compounder of drugs it does not compound
- Publishes no state list at all, and its terms say only that certain services are available in certain states
- One figure is shown as a reduction from a former price, and nothing on the page establishes that the former price was charged
- No compounding pharmacy is named and no lab work is described as included
140. Vital Edge
$180/mo — per month, flat regardless of dose, with consultation and shipping included — the card prints "then $180/month"
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
Vital Edge hides a five-compound peptide price list behind a tab on its homepage — nothing about peptides renders until that tab is clicked — and serves a different toll-free number on every page load.
Strengths
- States that the monthly fee is flat regardless of dose, so titrating up does not raise the bill
- Says the figure covers consultation, medication and shipping rather than medication alone
- Publishes what happens if treatment is declined: "If medication isn't prescribed, the tele-health consult fee is $80"
- Prices its GLP-1 line in the open too, brand and compounded side by side
Trade-offs
- Nothing about peptides renders until a tab is clicked, so the peptide prices are invisible on arrival
- A different toll-free number is served on each page load, so the contact number a reader notes down is not stable
- Names no compounding pharmacy and publishes no service-state list
- Its GHK-Cu card names no delivery format, so a reader cannot tell whether the figure buys an injection or a cream
141. BloomWell Rx
$249/mo — starts at, per month — the homepage and the product page agree on this one
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
BloomWell Rx prices NAD+ at $249 on its homepage and $349 on the NAD+ page itself, and says in its own words that it is not a pharmacy.
Strengths
- States on the product page itself that it "is not a state-licensed pharmacy nor a drug manufacturer"
- Tells patients in its terms they may direct a prescription to any pharmacy they choose
- Attaches the month to every peptide figure it publishes
- Prices glutathione consistently across its homepage and product page
Trade-offs
- Publishes two NAD+ figures $100 apart on two of its own pages
- Publishes no operating company on any page read
- Publishes no state list and names no dispensing pharmacy
- No certificate of analysis is reachable
142. Revitalize IV Solutions
$39 — The bottom of a range for an add-on, not a course — "Glutathione $39-$85", and the line beneath it names the options: "ala-carte | one gram | two grams". The $39 end is the smallest single add-on
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
Revitalize lists seventeen peptides on a page with no prices on it, prices two of them on a different page, and publishes the rest of the menu as a downloadable PDF — which does resolve.
Strengths
- Publishes a downloadable peptide menu from its own page, and the file actually resolves
- Prices its IV and injection lines in detail, with the gram options named
- Names seventeen peptides on one page, one of the widest declared catalogs in this batch
- Prices facial, IV, injection and laser lines on one public page
Trade-offs
- The peptide page itself contains no price at all — a reader has to find the pricing page or the PDF
- Only two of the fourteen compounds this site tracks carry a published figure
- Publishes no corporate entity; the footer has a year and no name
- Names no dispensing pharmacy and publishes no state coverage
143. LevelUp Rx
$57.32 — starting at, with no billing period stated anywhere on the page
Summary, strengths and trade-offs7 points
LevelUp Rx ships the same clinical product copy as another seller already on this roster — twenty-three byte-identical paragraphs on the sermorelin page alone, measured in one run — at roughly double the price, and publishes no operating company of its own on any of its three legal pages.
Strengths
- Every product page carries a figure in visible body text, with no account gate and no blur
- The catalog is grouped by condition, so the peptide lane is reachable in one click from any page
- The three peptide pages each print their figure in the same place and the same shape
Trade-offs
- No operating company appears anywhere on its about, terms or privacy pages — the only corporate names on them are the arbitration provider and an analytics vendor
- Its sermorelin page shows a one-month and a three-month option with a single price attached to neither
- Twenty-three of its thirty substantial sermorelin paragraphs are byte-identical to another seller on this roster, so the two rows are not independent readings of the market
- No compounding pharmacy is named, no state list is published, and no certificate of analysis appears on any page read
144. Reset IV
$59 — per session as an add-on on the pricing page; the seller's own add-on page prices the same thing at $75, twice
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
Reset IV carries a 2025 federal warning letter and is the rare seller here that prices NAD+ by the milligram — at a per-visit rate, in a handful of named cities, with no company name published anywhere.
Strengths
- Prices NAD+ at four separate doses with the milligrams printed on each
- States the infusion time beside every dose
- Charges per visit with no subscription and says there is no travel fee
- Names the cities it serves rather than implying national coverage
Trade-offs
- Carries a 2025 federal warning letter naming its own website
- Publishes no legal entity anywhere on the site; the federal letter is where the company name appears
- Prices its glutathione add-on at two different figures on two of its own pages
- Prints a blend's flat price directly under its NAD+ heading, where it reads like the NAD+ price
145. Citizen Meds
$79 — sold as a one-month supply; the hero anchors it against $249, a figure the product box does not carry
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
Citizen Meds sells every product as a one-month supply and renews every twenty-three days, and its NAD+ page prints two different struck-through prices for the same product on the same page.
Strengths
- Prints the dose, the concentration and the injection count beside every figure
- Publishes a full titration ladder so a reader can see what month four costs
- Names the branded product it is not, rather than implying equivalence
- Prices NAD+ and glutathione as well as the two weight-loss molecules
Trade-offs
- Sells a "one-month supply" on a subscription that renews every twenty-three days
- Its NAD+ page prints two different original prices for the same product
- Names no dispensing pharmacy and makes no state-coverage claim
- Both weight-loss products are co-formulated with additives the copy treats as standard
146. VITAstir
$79 — the advertised current price of a home kit the page calls a 30 Day supply; the same page prints $289.00 as the original price, and nothing on it establishes what that original price was charged at
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
VITAstir is a vitamin-injection shop that carries two compounds compared here, sells both as home kits at an advertised sale price, and says a clinical review happens after payment rather than before it.
Strengths
- Each kit page lists what arrives — the number of injections, the dose per injection, the syringes and the alcohol pads — beside the figure
- Names the supply length on both products, one as a month and one as thirty days
- Names its operating company and its trading name in its own terms and conditions
- States the route of administration and where the injection is given, rather than leaving it to a later email
Trade-offs
- Both figures are sale prices against a stated original price, and the page gives no period over which the original was offered
- The page says a clinical review may happen within twenty-four hours of purchase, so payment comes before the decision
- The governing-law clause in its terms is an unfilled template, with the state name still inside square brackets in the live document
- Two compounds compared here sit inside a catalog that is otherwise vitamin injections, so this is not a peptide clinic
147. MintRx
$110 — one-time purchase; the card offers $104.50 with Subscribe & Save and names no period, so this figure carries no term
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
MintRx publishes the most specific price disclosures in this batch — a strength, a container size and a supply length beside almost every figure — and names no operating company anywhere on its site.
Strengths
- Prints a strength, a container size or a spray count beside almost every figure, which is a more specific disclosure than most sellers here manage
- Names a 28-day supply and a 28-day refill cadence on its sermorelin cards rather than rounding either to a month
- Sells four tracked compounds in both an injectable and a non-injectable form, so the two routes can be compared on price directly
- Publishes a telephone number and a HIPAA notice alongside its terms and privacy policy
Trade-offs
- No operating company is named anywhere on the site — no corporate form, no street address, and no governing-law clause in the terms
- Six of its seven longevity and sexual-health products print their price only on another product's card, so a reader on one product page may see every figure except that product's own
- The same figure covers both PT-141 products on different terms, one described as a 30-day supply and the other as a single prescribed order
- No state coverage list, and the compounding pharmacy that fills an order is never named
148. Ascend Vitality
$149 — printed as "Glutathione — Starting at $149/month — As low as with 6-month plan — Glutathione 2000 mg". The milligram strength is stated, which is unusual on this roster
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
Ascend Vitality sells named multi-peptide stacks as single SKUs, and every figure it publishes carries the same unfinished sentence: "As low as with 6-month plan".
Strengths
- Names the peptides inside each stack rather than selling a blend under a marketing name alone
- Prints the milligram strength beside the antioxidant and both available strengths beside the nasal spray
- Publishes the whole peptide catalog on one browsable page with a figure on every card
- Names the operating company and a street address in its own footer
Trade-offs
- Every figure carries the same incomplete sentence as its only qualifier
- Its stack SKUs cannot be compared against any single-compound price on this roster, because they are not the same product
- A promotional banner was live on the date read, so these figures are discounted ones
- Claims a third-party lab in its terms with no certificate reachable anywhere
149. Momentum Health 360
$149 — starting from; the catalog names no billing period
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
Momentum Health 360 carries a June 2026 federal warning letter that names its own website and its FDA establishment identifier, and its NAD+ page renders a price for the two-month plan while the one-month lane prints no figure at all.
Strengths
- Prices five tracked compounds individually on an open catalog with no intake in the way
- States in its own words that its compounded medicines are not FDA-approved
- Prints "Billed monthly" beside the one figure that is a monthly figure
- Offers plan lengths from one to six months on the product page itself
Trade-offs
- Carries a June 2026 federal warning letter naming its own website and establishment identifier
- Its NAD+ one-month lane renders no price at all, so the cheapest term cannot be seen
- The NAD+ product page and the shop catalog print different figures for the same product
- Its catalog floors name no billing period, so four of its five prices are periodless
150. Ok Pharmacy
$149 — the reduced price for a related listing under the same resold brand, printed beside a higher struck-through figure with no period stated anywhere
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
Ok Pharmacy resells another company's branded peptide and publishes more about that company than the company publishes about itself, including a testing claim with no certificate behind it.
Strengths
- States the supply length and the injection frequency in the body text beside the figure
- Publishes a figure on its own site with the unit recorded beside it
- Keeps its peptide offer separate from its other lines on the page
- Answers the category question in plain language rather than in a disclaimer
Trade-offs
- Its testing claim reports what the brand says its partner pharmacies do, with no certificate anywhere
- Publishes no corporate entity, so there is no company a reader can look up
- Publishes no state list and names no dispensing pharmacy
- Describes no lab work as included in what it charges
151. RyzeRx
$149 — the product-page price for "Glutathione Nasal Spray", printed as "$149 USD" beside "Add to cart" with no billing period, supply length or bottle size
Summary, strengths and trade-offs9 points
RyzeRx prices every product on its own page, from single peptides to vial-by-vial weight-loss strengths, and says on none of them what period or supply the figure buys.
Strengths
- Puts a figure on every product page, from single peptides to each weight-loss vial strength
- Publishes its site in English and Spanish from the same navigation
- Says its medicines come from United States licensed pharmacies
- Offers a free consultation before any commitment
Trade-offs
- No product page says what period or supply its figure buys, though its terms say subscription plans renew automatically
- Its homepage cards still lead with category starting figures that none of the named peptides carries
- Its fifty-state lines are a marketing statistic and a statement about provider licensure, not a coverage statement
- Names no dispensing pharmacy and no certificate of analysis is reachable
- The support phone line in its terms, "(800) 555-0123", has the shape of a placeholder number; the cancellation route the terms actually name is email
152. Ways2Well
$149 — per infusion, booked singly; the menu lists this bag’s ingredients as glutathione alone, which is why it is filed here and the multi-ingredient bags are not
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
Ways2Well publishes an actual list of the states its peptide program reaches — one of the few sellers here that does — and prices its glutathione and NAD+ infusions by the bag rather than by the month.
Strengths
- Publishes an itemised list of the states its peptide program covers, not just a count
- Flags with a footnote which of those states restrict certain peptide therapies
- Lists the ingredients of every infusion, so a single-ingredient bag can be told from a blend
- Says plainly that some therapies it offers may not be approved by the FDA
Trade-offs
- Its homepage state count and its peptide state list do not agree
- Prices infusions per bag, so nothing here is a monthly cost
- Its testing language is a claim; no certificate of analysis is reachable
- Names no dispensing pharmacy
153. Try Invigor
$155 — starting at; the plan page names no period at all, unlike this seller's NAD+ and PT-141 pages, so this figure carries no term
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
Try Invigor names its operating company, its clinical groups and a street address, and prices four tracked compounds on plan pages — three of which name a billing period and two of which name none at all.
Strengths
- Names the operating company, its trading name and a service address in its own arbitration clauses, and names California as the governing law
- Names the two clinical groups it works with, separately from the company that runs the website
- Says in its own footer that it does not prescribe for bodybuilding, athletic performance or cosmetic purposes, which is a narrower scope than most sellers here claim
- Prices each compound in an injectable and an oral or nasal form on separate plan pages
Trade-offs
- Two of its five plan pages print a figure with no billing period at all, while the other three say per month
- The privacy policy still names a website address the company no longer serves
- No state coverage list, and the compounding pharmacy that fills an order is not named
- No lab work is described as included in any plan figure
154. The HCG Institute
$179 — "Glutathione Injections $179.00" in the storefront catalog, with no supply period stated. The same catalog prices two other preparations of the compound: "Glutathione Suppositories $199.00" and "Glutathione Troches $229.00"
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
The HCG Institute runs a forty-three item storefront where four of the compounds compared here carry list prices, states in a dropdown what each program length adds to the base figure, and names the one state it cannot ship to.
Strengths
- Publishes a list price against every one of forty-three catalog items
- Prints the longer-program cost as an uplift on the base figure rather than as a divided rate
- Names the one state it cannot ship to on each product page
- Lists exactly what a purchase includes, item by item, so what is missing is visible
Trade-offs
- Carries a federal warning letter that names its own domain
- Publishes no price on any of its compound-named editorial pages, only inside its store
- States no supply period or strength on four of its five priced items compared here
- Names no compounding pharmacy while stating it does not compound or dispense itself
155. BloomMD
$195 — a REFILL price, printed as "Glutathione Injections Refill — $195.00", with no billing period stated and no first-fill figure published anywhere on the collection
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
Every BloomMD peptide figure is a refill SKU rather than a first fill, and the only corporate name in its terms of service belongs to the software vendor that builds the site.
Strengths
- Prices copper-peptide, antioxidant and coenzyme refills separately and openly, which most sellers on this roster do not publish at all
- Puts every refill figure on one browsable collection instead of behind an intake
- Separates its brand-drug membership SKUs from the drug SKUs rather than blending them into one number
- Names the concentration inside the copper-peptide product label
Trade-offs
- Every peptide figure is a refill, so none of them is what a new patient pays first
- The only corporate name in the terms of service is a software vendor's
- The only third-party-testing language on the site sits on a supplement page, not on any peptide
- No dispensing pharmacy named and no state coverage list
156. ARSYNL Rx
$199 — read from the related-products strip on its own NAD+ listing, where the glutathione injection is priced; no period stated
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
ARSYNL Rx publishes a figure against every peptide it sells and a period against none of them — four product pages, four bare numbers, no billing cycle anywhere.
Strengths
- Names its operating company on its own pages rather than leaving a reader to guess
- Publishes a figure on the product page for each peptide it sells
- Keeps each compound on its own listing instead of burying prices in a plan grid
- Prices its nasal and injectable NAD+ separately rather than as one product
Trade-offs
- Attaches no billing period to any peptide figure, so none of them can be compared
- States no supply length or vial count beside a price
- One listed peptide product returns a gone status while the catalog still links it
- Publishes no state list and names no dispensing pharmacy
157. Fierce Health
$199 — the listing prints the same figure as both the regular price and the sale price, and states no period anywhere; a companion product on the same collection is priced as a program instead
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
Fierce Health prices most of its catalog as multi-month programs and one tracked compound as a plain product, and its second tracked compound has no reachable page.
Strengths
- Publishes a plain per-item figure for one tracked compound rather than a program rate
- Publishes a figure on its own site with the unit recorded beside it
- Keeps its peptide offer separate from its other lines on the page
- Answers the category question in plain language rather than in a disclaimer
Trade-offs
- Its second tracked compound is a named menu category whose own address returns not-found
- Publishes no corporate entity, so there is no company a reader can look up
- Publishes no state list and names no dispensing pharmacy
- Describes no lab work as included in what it charges
158. The I.V. Doc
$249 — per visit for a single in-home intramuscular injection, on the New York menu; the page states no billing period at all and this is not a monthly charge; the intravenous "Glutathione Boost" is $349 and a 2000 mg Boost is $649 on the same menu
Summary, strengths and trade-offs9 points
The I.V. Doc publishes a full per-treatment menu for in-home infusions, with a laid-out figure beside each item and no billing period anywhere — because these are visit prices, not plan prices.
Strengths
- Publishes a per-treatment menu with a laid-out figure beside every item, which most clinic-model sellers compared here do not
- Prints the dose beside the two NAD+ tiers, so the higher figure is attached to a stated milligram amount
- Names its operating company and each of the seven treating practice entities it contracts with
- Sells glutathione in both an injection and two intravenous strengths, each priced separately
Trade-offs
- Its governing-law clause names no state: it points at "the law of the state of residence of the registered Administrative Contact", so the forum depends on who books
- The prices are the New York menu and the location control could not be driven, so whether they hold in other cities is unknown
- These are per-visit figures with no billing period stated, so they do not sit beside a monthly plan price without conversion
- Publishes cities rather than states, so a reader outside a listed metro learns nothing about eligibility
- No compounding pharmacy is named and no lab work is described as included
159. Celia Rx
$349 — Per item with no period stated — "Glutathione Nasal Spray $349.00", the dearest single peptide item on the storefront and the only route this seller offers for it
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
Celia Rx runs an open storefront where every peptide carries a flat item price and the onboarding consultation is a line item of its own — and where one nasal spray is dearer than a bottle six times its concentration.
Strengths
- Publishes an open storefront with every item priced, rather than putting prices behind an intake
- Prices the onboarding consultation as its own line and states how long it is
- Prices every route of a compound rather than one headline form
- Names its operating company in the opening sentence of its terms
Trade-offs
- No item carries a billing period, so nothing on the storefront is comparable to a monthly rate
- Its oxytocin lines make the smaller bottle cheaper and far more concentrated, which reverses any per-milligram ranking
- Names no dispensing pharmacy, describing it only as "a qualified 503A pharmacy"
- Publishes no state coverage
160. Mojoon
$369 — an open-ended floor per course, struck through from $519; this page defines no period and publishes no ceiling
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
Mojoon publishes its catalog in Chinese for the US market, prices five tracked-compound products by a course of treatment it never defines in days, and leaves two of the five open-ended with a plus sign.
Strengths
- Publishes its whole catalog and its prices in the language its readers use
- Prints the vial size and the concentration on both peptide products
- States its eligibility threshold openly on the weight-loss pages
- Sells an at-home blood test as its own separate, separately priced product
Trade-offs
- Prices by a course of treatment it never defines in days on its peptide pages
- Two of its five figures are open-ended floors with no published ceiling
- Publishes no statement that compounded medicines are not FDA-approved
- Its licensed-physician count and its pharmacy-license count are different numbers, and neither is a list
161. AVArx
Does not publish a Glutathione price.
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
AVArx splits each peptide into an injectable and a sublingual or nasal listing, then prices none of the five — every page sells a provider evaluation instead of a product.
Strengths
- Separates injectable, troche and nasal forms of the same compound into distinct pages
- Names its operating company on two separate legal pages
- Frames each listing as a provider evaluation rather than as an over-the-counter purchase
- Publishes a clean hard error for a path that does not exist, so its pages can be trusted to exist
Trade-offs
- Carries no figure on any of its five treatment pages
- Gives a reader nothing to compare against another seller before intake
- Publishes no state list and names no dispensing pharmacy
- Describes no lab work as included in what it charges
162. Dvida Spa
Does not publish a Glutathione price.
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
Dvida tells readers, on its own peptide page, that two of the compounds it lists there appear on the FDA's bulk drug substances warning list and are not approved for human use.
Strengths
- Names the FDA bulk substances warning list against two compounds on its own menu, on the page selling them
- Answers "are peptides FDA-approved" with the word "No" and then explains
- Names its operating company in the first line of its terms
- Distinguishes compounded GLP-1s from branded products in the same note
Trade-offs
- Publishes no price for anything
- Publishes no state coverage and names no dispensing pharmacy
- Its own product URL carries a spelling error that a reader retyping the address will not reproduce
- The disclosure is strong but the catalog detail behind each compound is thin
163. Evolve Telemed
Does not publish a Glutathione price.
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
Evolve Telemed publishes a thirty-three item treatment catalog carrying GHK-Cu and glutathione, no price on any of it, and an article that names the gray-market peptide labels and tells readers to avoid them.
Strengths
- Publishes a browsable catalog of thirty-three treatments with a short description of each
- Names the gray-market labels readers should treat as warnings, and explains what they mean
- Says it does not provide medical or pharmacy services, employ providers, or influence clinical decisions
- Describes its own site as an advertisement for telehealth services rather than as a clinic
Trade-offs
- Publishes no price for any of the thirty-three treatments it lists
- The only figure on its treatments page is a promotion for a third-party service
- Publishes no state list and names no dispensing pharmacy
- No certificate of analysis is reachable
164. Gameday Men's Health
Does not publish a Glutathione price.
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
Gameday is a franchise operator, not a clinic — its terms name the franchising company as the party you contract with, and it refers to its own "Pharmacy Network" without naming a pharmacy in it.
Strengths
- Names the franchising company that actually owns and operates the site, in the terms' opening paragraph
- Publishes a per-compound service page for sermorelin and another for PT-141
- Publishes a notice address a reader can write to
- Distinguishes services it provides from services provided by affiliated practices
Trade-offs
- Publishes no price on any page read
- Refers to its own "Pharmacy Network" without naming a single pharmacy in it
- A franchise network means the clinic a reader visits is not the company they contracted with
- Publishes no state coverage
165. Glowlight Med Spa
Does not publish a Glutathione price.
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
Glowlight's peptide page carries eight dollar figures and every one of them also renders on its privacy policy, which is what proves none of them prices a peptide.
Strengths
- Names five tracked compounds and keeps its weight-loss program visibly separate from them
- Describes what it offers without claiming an approval it does not have
- Keeps its peptide offer separate from its other lines on the page
- Answers the category question in plain language rather than in a disclaimer
Trade-offs
- Every figure on the peptide page is a site-wide promotion that also renders on the privacy policy
- Publishes no figure for any compound on the pages read
- Publishes no corporate entity, so there is no company a reader can look up
- Publishes no state list and names no dispensing pharmacy
166. Hybrid Medical Solution
Does not publish a Glutathione price.
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
Hybrid Medical Solution names ten tracked compounds across goal-based sub-pages, links a storefront that sells supplements, and carries only its web agency's company name on the page.
Strengths
- Splits a ten-compound menu across goal-based sub-pages rather than listing everything at once
- Declares ten of the sixteen compounds this site tracks on pages a reader can reach
- Keeps its peptide offer separate from its other lines on the page
- Answers the category question in plain language rather than in a disclaimer
Trade-offs
- Its linked storefront is open and sells supplements, so no compound on the menu is priced
- Publishes no figure for any compound on the pages read
- Publishes no corporate entity, so there is no company a reader can look up
- Publishes no state list and names no dispensing pharmacy
167. InCare Integrated Medical Care
Does not publish a Glutathione price.
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
InCare prints the sentence most sellers avoid — that its own menu mixes prescription medicines with research-only compounds — and tags the entries one by one.
Strengths
- States on the menu itself that it mixes prescription and research-only compounds
- Tags individual entries by category rather than leaving the reader to guess
- Names eleven tracked compounds, one of the deeper menus here
- Says the menu is for education and not medical advice, on the menu
Trade-offs
- Reports a third-party testing claim as its supplier's, and links no certificate anywhere
- Publishes no company in corporate form, only a trading name
- Carries no figure on its peptide menu
- Publishes no state list and names no dispensing pharmacy
168. Lumora
Does not publish a Glutathione price.
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
Lumora runs a medication page per compound and a condition page per goal, and prices neither — its only published figure sits inside a liability clause.
Strengths
- Organizes its catalog by medication and by condition rather than by marketing bundle
- Names its operating company on three separate legal pages
- Routes a reader into a condition assessment rather than straight to a cart
- Publishes a separate data-privacy page beyond the standard privacy policy
Trade-offs
- Publishes no figure on the medication page for the peptide it sells
- Its brand name and legal name share no words, and the terms print two variants of the legal name
- Publishes no state list and names no dispensing pharmacy
- Describes no lab work as included in what it charges
169. Muse Maven Med Spa
Does not publish a Glutathione price.
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
Muse Maven appears under three different names across its own address, its terms and its footer, and sells three tracked compounds together as packages.
Strengths
- Names its three tracked compounds together in its own navigation rather than burying them
- Describes what it offers without claiming an approval it does not have
- Keeps its peptide offer separate from its other lines on the page
- Answers the category question in plain language rather than in a disclaimer
Trade-offs
- Publishes three different names for itself and no corporate form for any of them
- Publishes no figure for any compound on the pages read
- Publishes no corporate entity, so there is no company a reader can look up
- Publishes no state list and names no dispensing pharmacy
170. Neuron Medical Corporation
Does not publish a Glutathione price.
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
A named neurology practice that publishes its incorporation, its street address and the named clinician behind it — and routes supplement buyers to three separate off-domain storefronts it links from its own navigation.
Strengths
- Publishes the corporation, the named clinician behind it and a street address on every page read
- Commits in writing to telling a patient when a therapy is off-label or investigational
- Runs a dedicated page for the two nootropic peptides it offers rather than a generic menu
- Its terms are specific about which services fall outside ordinary care
Trade-offs
- Publishes no price on either page read
- Its copyright line is two years out of date
- Sends supplement buyers to three separate off-domain storefronts linked from its own nav
- Names no dispensing pharmacy and publishes no state coverage
171. Rewind Anti-Aging of Miami
Does not publish a Glutathione price.
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
Rewind Anti-Aging of Miami gives seven compounds their own service pages and prices none of them — and shares nothing but a brand word with the Rewinding RX already on this roster.
Strengths
- Publishes a service page per compound rather than one combined menu
- Names its operating company consistently on every page read
- Names ten tracked compounds including MOTS-c and tesamorelin
- Keeps its peptide pages separate from its weight-loss line
Trade-offs
- Carries no figure on any of the eight pages read
- Its brand words collide with an unrelated company already on this roster
- Publishes no state list and names no dispensing pharmacy
- Describes no lab work as included in what it charges
172. Vitality Medical Wellness Center
Does not publish a Glutathione price.
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
This center's brand and its address have nothing in common, and both compounds recorded for it come from its infusion menu rather than a peptide catalog.
Strengths
- Publishes a detailed infusion menu that names both compounds recorded here
- Describes what it offers without claiming an approval it does not have
- Keeps its peptide offer separate from its other lines on the page
- Answers the category question in plain language rather than in a disclaimer
Trade-offs
- Over twenty thousand characters on the peptide page and no compound catalog or figure in them
- Publishes no figure for any compound on the pages read
- Publishes no corporate entity, so there is no company a reader can look up
- Publishes no state list and names no dispensing pharmacy
173. Tru2u
Does not publish a Glutathione price.
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
Tru2u runs a shopping cart on prescription drug products while its own terms state, in capitals, that it does not sell or dispense any drug product — and none of its prices carries a dose, a strength or a period.
Strengths
- Prices the oral and injectable forms of both weight-loss molecules identically and separately
- Says plainly, in capitals, that it is not a provider, a practice or a pharmacy
- Puts every figure in the open with no intake in the way
- Names its state of incorporation in its terms
Trade-offs
- Runs a cart on prescription products while its own terms say it sells no drug product
- No price carries a dose, a strength, a vial size or a billing period
- Its testing badges — lab tested, GMP certified — are unsupported by any document
- Names no dispensing pharmacy and makes no state-coverage claim
174. Apollo Virtual Health
Does not publish a Glutathione price.
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
Apollo Virtual Health names four tracked compounds on a single short page and pads the list with nothing it does not carry.
Strengths
- A short catalog that can be read in full in a couple of minutes
- Describes what it offers without claiming an approval it does not have
- Keeps its peptide offer separate from its other lines on the page
- Answers the category question in plain language rather than in a disclaimer
Trade-offs
- No company name, no state list and no figure anywhere on the pages read
- Publishes no figure for any compound on the pages read
- Publishes no corporate entity, so there is no company a reader can look up
- Publishes no state list and names no dispensing pharmacy
175. Brightmeds
Does not publish a Glutathione price.
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
Brightmeds publishes a price for every product it sells — to search engines. The figures live in the page’s structured data and appear nowhere a reader can see them, so this record credits no published price.
Strengths
- Says compounded medications are not FDA-approved because they are made to an individual prescription
- Publishes dosing instructions for glutathione, NAD+ and sermorelin on their own pages
- Offers a full refund if a prescription is not approved
- Says plainly that it does not directly offer medical or pharmacy care
Trade-offs
- Publishes prices only in the page’s structured data, where no reader will see them
- Names the FDA as a recognizing authority in that markup for products it describes as compounded
- Publishes no state list and names no dispensing pharmacy
- No certificate of analysis is reachable
176. EllieMD
Does not publish a Glutathione price.
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
EllieMD publishes two company names in one sentence and says which of them does what, which is a fuller answer to who is charging you than almost anything else on this roster gives.
Strengths
- Names both the operating company and the company services are offered on behalf of, in one sentence
- Names the company on the other side of the transaction rather than only a trading name
- Keeps its peptide offer separate from its other lines on the page
- Answers the category question in plain language rather than in a disclaimer
Trade-offs
- No product price is reachable without completing an intake
- Publishes no figure for any compound on the pages read
- Publishes no state list and names no dispensing pharmacy
- Describes no lab work as included in what it charges
177. Viking Alternative Medicine
Does not publish a Glutathione price.
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
Viking runs a pricing page that refuses to price, and says why in words worth quoting — what it publishes instead is what it says its patients typically pay, which is not the same thing.
Strengths
- Says in its own words why it will not publish a flat rate, instead of publishing a rate that is not one
- Publishes what it says most patients actually pay, with the period attached
- Prices its missed-appointment charge, which most of this roster leaves unstated
- Names ten peptides across its own FAQ and dedicated compound pages
Trade-offs
- Publishes no price for any compound — the range on the pricing page describes patients, not products
- Publishes no corporate entity
- Names no dispensing pharmacy and publishes no state coverage
- A reader who takes the bottom of its patient range as a price will be quoting the wrong kind of number