Enough! publishes a commitment ladder that prints the total charge and the derived monthly rate on the same line — so the cheapest number on the page is visibly attached to a payment of more than two thousand dollars taken up front.
What Enough! Wellness charges
NAD+: $249 — PER FOUR WEEKS, and it buys the whole stack — NAD+, sermorelin and glutathione together, not the coenzyme alone. The seller publishes a full commitment ladder beside it and prints the total and the derived rate on each rung: "4-week subscription $249/4-week · 12-week commitment charged as $627 → $209/month · 24-week commitment charged as $1,134 → $189/month · 52-week commitment charged as $2,327 → $179/month". ⛔ The lowest figure on the page, $179/month, is a division of a $2,327 charge taken up front
Enough! Wellness also sells 2 compounds this site boards without publishing a price for them: Sermorelin and Glutathione.
Enough! Wellness is not a paid partner; this link may earn a commission if that changes. Full disclosure.
By Nora Castellan, Standards EditorUpdated September 2026
The ladder shows its own arithmetic
Four rungs are published. The shortest is a four-week subscription. The other three are commitments of twelve, twenty-four and fifty-two weeks, and each prints two numbers: what the seller charges, and what that works out to per month.
That is exactly the disclosure this market usually omits. The shape a buyer gets caught by is a headline monthly figure that turns out to be an annual prepayment divided by twelve, with the prepayment nowhere on the page.
Here the prepayment is on the page, on the same line, in the same sentence as the monthly figure it produces. A reader who takes the lowest number can see immediately what buying it costs on the day.
This site records the four-week rate, because it is the only rung with no commitment attached, and its qualifier carries the whole ladder.
One stack, three compounds, one price
The three compounds are sold together as a single stack rather than individually. No compound in it has a price of its own.
This row therefore carries one price attached to the lead compound, with a qualifier saying what the figure actually buys. Repeating the same number on each of the three would imply three prices where the seller publishes one.
The billing period is four weeks, and the seller says so rather than calling it a month — a distinction worth about four per cent a year and almost never drawn.
A fifty-state claim and no company
Coverage is stated unqualified in the trust bar: licensed clinicians, all fifty states. That is recorded as an all-fifty claim.
No corporate entity is published anywhere on the page, and there is no copyright line at all — so nothing on the page dates it or names who is behind it.
One figure on the page is not a price: a line of marketing copy referring to what a clinic elsewhere would charge. It describes a competitor, not this seller, and is not recorded.
Who it's for
Readers who want the total charge printed beside the monthly rate it produces.
Buyers comparing commitment lengths against a no-commitment rate.
Anyone who values a seller calling four weeks four weeks.
Shoppers who need national availability.
Who should look elsewhere
Anyone who wants a price for one compound rather than a bundle of three.
Readers who need a corporate entity or any dating on the page.
Buyers who cannot pay a commitment up front and want the best rate.
Shoppers who need the dispensing pharmacy named.
Strengths
Prints the total charge and the derived monthly rate on every rung of its commitment ladder
States the billing period as four weeks rather than calling it a month
Says plainly what is in the stack and that a clinician adjusts it
Publishes an unqualified fifty-state claim in its own trust bar
Trade-offs
The best-value figure requires a $2,327 payment up front, which only the same line discloses
No compound in the stack has a price of its own
Publishes no corporate entity and no copyright line on the page read
Prints "No $5,000 clinic" as marketing copy, which is a competitor figure and not its own
How we verified this
Fetched the offer page with a full browser user-agent and compared the effective URL to the requested one.
Fired a nonsense-path control at the host in the same run; it returned an honest not-found status.
Joined the text nodes before matching and read all eight dollar figures with the words attached to them.
Kept each commitment total paired with the monthly rate the seller derives from it, rather than recording the rates alone.
Identified the one competitor figure in the marketing copy and excluded it.
Ran an entity sweep for corporate forms and found none, and confirmed there is no copyright line on the page.
Screened the trading name against the regulator's live warning-letter index, with a known-positive and a nonsense control in the same run.
A provider to compare Enough! Wellness against
Trellis Vitality
Trellis Vitality frames its program around body-composition tracking rather than scale weight, pairing NAD+, glutathione and tesamorelin with at-home biomarker panels and a 90-day re-test, and names its dispensing pharmacy, VialsRX in Houston, by address.