Same review, same sources, same scoring — the summary and the reasoning open together on each row.
4. HealthRX.com
$154 — from, per 50 mg vial; the page states no billing period
Summary, strengths and trade-offs10 points
HealthRX.com runs one of the widest priced peptide catalogs on this roster, publishing a figure for ten tracked compounds, per vial on its guide pages and as monthly subscriptions in its shop — including semax, epitalon and MOTS-c, which almost nobody prices — and answering its own service-area question with all 50 states.
Strengths
- Prices ten tracked compounds, four of which almost nothing else on this roster prices at all
- Answers its own service-area question with a plain "All 50 US states" rather than a pharmacy licensure claim
- States the vial size and strength beside every guide-page figure, so the unit is never left to inference
- Offers a monthly subscription and a one-time supply side by side on each shop product page
- Publishes a LegitScript certificate number on the page rather than only a seal image
Trade-offs
- Its guide page and its shop page publish different glutathione prices on the same day, and neither cites the other
- The shop page prints a "$122/month equivalent" that is a twelve-month total resolved to a month
- Describes the pharmacy only as "a US-licensed 503A compounding pharmacy" and never names one
- Several compound guide pages send their eligibility button to the weight-loss program rather than to the compound
- Publishes no operating company under a corporate suffix on any page read
5. Shed
$279 — the pricing block reads "Billed quarterly / GHK-Cu Scalp Peptide Solution / Starting at $93/month / 3-month supply / $279 for 90 day supply / Applied daily". $279 is the billed figure; the seller separately prints "$93/month" (exactly $279 divided by three) and, in the hero, "Starting at $76.33/month*" with "*3-month commitment required"
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
Shed prices four of the compounds compared here, states the supply period on every one, and is the clearest case on this roster of a seller whose own page prints three different figures for a single product.
Strengths
- Prices four of the compounds compared here, more than all but a handful of sellers on this roster
- States the supply period and the dosing frequency beside every figure
- Prices three separate NAD+ preparations rather than quoting one figure for all of them
- Names its operating company, its street address and its governing law in its own terms
Trade-offs
- Prints three different figures for its GHK-Cu product, two of which are divisions of a quarterly total
- Puts a GLP-1 comparison price on the sermorelin page, where a careless reader will take it for sermorelin’s
- Names no compounding pharmacy on any page read
- Makes no statement about which states it serves
6. System Labs
$109/mo — per month, flat (no promotional pricing)
Summary, strengths and trade-offs6 points
System Labs is a peptide-only storefront with no GLP-1 line, selling NAD+, glutathione, sermorelin and a topical GHK-Cu cream, LegitScript-verified but without a named pharmacy partner or a published state list.
Strengths
- Carries a LegitScript verification seal
- Sells a genuinely peptide-focused menu rather than treating peptides as a GLP-1 add-on
- Its GHK-Cu cream is priced flat, with no strikethrough figure or first-month teaser
Trade-offs
- The compounding pharmacy is described only as "US-based," never named
- Which states it ships to is not published anywhere on the site
- Most of its other peptide prices are shown as a struck-through renewal rate beside a first-month promo, so the ongoing cost takes a second look to find
7. Bodybuilding Health+
$129/mo — starting at, per month, as the home-page card states it for the topical; this seller's sermorelin product page shows that a home-page card figure here can be a first-month rate contradicted by the product page, and the GHK-Cu product page was not read
Summary, strengths and trade-offs9 points
Bodybuilding Health+ prices seven compounds compared here on plan ladders, and two of those ladders cost more per month the longer you commit — including the tirzepatide lane the seller itself badges "Best Value".
Strengths
- Prices seven compounds compared here, the widest priced menu among the sellers added in this pass
- Publishes a full plan ladder for both GLP-1 lines with the per-month figure and the total saving printed on each lane
- Names its operating company and a street address in its footer and terms, and names the governing law
- Its sermorelin product page states that the headline figure is a first-month rate, which the home-page card does not
Trade-offs
- Its own tirzepatide ladder charges more per month on the twelve-month lane than on the six-month lane, while badging the twelve-month lane "Best Value"
- The home page and the sermorelin product page disagree about whether the advertised figure is a first-month rate or a plan rate
- The FAQ says all fifty states and the terms say the service is available in certain states and to contact customer service for the list
- No compounding pharmacy is named and no lab work is described as included
- A Florida address in the footer and Georgia named as the governing law, which are two different states to keep track of
8. Auren Rx
$99/mo — per month, auto-refill membership (vs. $109/mo with no commitment)
Summary, strengths and trade-offs7 points
Auren Rx names both its prescribing group, Wasef Health, and its dispensing pharmacy, VialsRX in Houston, with street addresses and phone numbers, and lets a subscriber pause an auto-refill plan on NAD+, sermorelin, glutathione or GHK-Cu instead of forcing a full cancellation.
Strengths
- Names its prescribing group and pharmacy with full street addresses and phone numbers, rare in this category
- Carries a verifiable LegitScript seal
- The first visit is free and nothing is charged until a clinician reviews and approves the order
- An auto-refill plan can be paused rather than fully canceled
Trade-offs
- Its homepage headline price applies to a microdose track; the standard compounded dose costs more
- Its homepage teasers disagree with its own product pages on two of four peptides: NAD+ and glutathione are each advertised lower in the nav than the product page charges
- The listed New York address is a mail-forwarding suite, not a clinic
9. Idgie Health
$122/mo — per month for the 2% cream on the 3-month plan, charged as $367 every 3 months; the 4% cream is $497 every 3 months
Summary, strengths and trade-offs11 points
Idgie Health prices NAD+, glutathione, sermorelin, GHK-Cu and both GLP-1s by plan length, prints the full charge for every multi-month plan, and names its prescribing physician and its pharmacy.
Strengths
- Each priced product page shows the checkout total for its quarterly and six-month plans beside the per-month rate
- Sells NAD+ as an injection and a nasal spray, and prices sermorelin as an injection and as a troche with a per-strength table
- Discloses who prescribes (Dr. Sean Arora of Arora Health & Aesthetics, with an NPI number) and who dispenses (VialsRX, with a Houston address)
- States that no membership fee applies, and lists what the plan price covers
- Renewals can be stopped from the patient account or through the care team
Trade-offs
- The NAD+ injection page prints two different monthly rates for its six-month plan: the per-month figure and the amount charged do not agree
- Money paid for a quarterly or six-month term is not refundable under a policy that calls every sale final
- Its shipping policy contradicts the product pages on both cost and delivery time
- Template text has leaked between products: the NAD+ injection page's compounding note is about tirzepatide
- No strength is published for the NAD+, glutathione or sermorelin injections
- A state page claims every state, while the older terms of service restrict some services to unnamed states
10. Lavender Sky Health
$129 — for a 30 g facial serum from the named pharmacy, with no billing period stated; a 30 g topical face cream is $149 from Strive and $175 from Alchemist; medication pricing shown excludes the consultation fee, which is priced separately
Summary, strengths and trade-offs10 points
Lavender Sky Health publishes a price for every peptide it sells against the specific pharmacy that would fill it — nine pharmacies named, quantity by quantity — and states plainly that none of those figures includes the consultation fee it prices separately.
Strengths
- Names the pharmacy that would fill every single price it publishes, across nine pharmacies, which no other seller compared here does
- Prints the quantity beside every figure — milliliters, milligrams, grams or tablet count — so each number describes a stated amount
- States sitewide that the medication figures exclude the consultation fee, and then publishes what that consultation costs on a page of its own
- Publishes a per-pharmacy and per-formulation shipping-exclusion list rather than a single coverage sentence, which is the most detailed footprint disclosure compared here
- Names its operating company and a street address in its own privacy and HIPAA notices
Trade-offs
- Not one peptide figure on the pricing page states a billing period, so none of them is a monthly cost
- Almost every peptide price is hidden until a toggle is clicked: the pricing page renders about a fifth of its text closed, and a reader who does not operate the control sees no peptide price at all
- Its governing-law clause names no state — it reads "the laws of the state applicable to the patient's care" — so there is no forum a reader can identify in advance
- The all-fifty-states claim and the shipping-exclusion matrix have to be read together, and several products are unavailable in a dozen or more states depending on which pharmacy fills them
- Several published lines are marked temporarily unavailable or out of stock, including the cheapest nasal-spray option
11. The Edit
$129/mo — starting at, per month — the final rate depends on the strength prescribed
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
The Edit names its dispensing pharmacy, The Pharmacy Hub in Miami, up front, and prices NAD+, sermorelin, glutathione and GHK-Cu the same at every dose, with nothing charged until a clinician review is complete.
Strengths
- Names its dispensing pharmacy, The Pharmacy Hub in Miami, rather than describing it generically
- Charges one flat rate at every dose on its three injectable peptide lines
- Publishes prices on the treatment page itself, in both English and Spanish
- Runs no first-month teaser on its peptide lines, so the figure shown is the recurring one
- Carries a verifiable LegitScript seal
Trade-offs
- The GHK-Cu cream is quoted as a starting rate that moves with the strength prescribed, unlike the three flat injectable lines
- Longer plans are billed as one upfront charge rather than a lower recurring monthly rate
- Terms note that state availability is confirmed during consultation and may vary, despite advertising all 50 states
12. RxPepsDirect
$80 — pharmacy price for one vial at wholesale, billed by Optimal Balance Pharmacy, plus a separate $39 medical visit per order and $15 flat shipping; the catalog states no supply length
Summary, strengths and trade-offs9 points
RxPepsDirect charges one $39 fee per order for the medical visit and then steps out of the transaction: Optimal Balance Pharmacy bills the patient directly at its own wholesale price, and that price is printed for every peptide on the site.
Strengths
- Names both the dispensing pharmacy (Optimal Balance Pharmacy, a Texas 503A) and the outside laboratory that tests each batch (Eagle Analytical Services), and publishes the batch reports
- Lists all 29 licensed states by name in its FAQ rather than only printing the count
- Separates its own fee from the medication entirely: $39 per order for the visit, with the pharmacy billing the drug at wholesale and adding $15 flat shipping
- Every peptide price is readable without an account, combination vials included
Trade-offs
- The figure is a per-vial pharmacy price, not a monthly one — the BPC-157 page itself says one vial lasts about five weeks
- KPV is not sold on its own; it is only available inside BPC-157 combination vials
- Semax is sold only as a Semax/Selank nasal spray, so its figure is a combination price
- Caps an order at three different peptides, so a wider protocol needs a second $39 visit
- Its FAQ says the company was founded in 2026, so there is very little independent history behind the pharmacy-at-cost claim
13. Premier Hormone Health & Wellness
$139 — per bottle, printed as "$139 / bottle" on the general wellness page's GHK-Cu cream card; the card does not say how long a bottle lasts, and no monthly rate is printed
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
Premier draws the line between the platform company and the medical practice more explicitly than anything else on this roster. Its peptides are priced on catalog cards, and its sermorelin page prints no figure.
Strengths
- States that the company is a non-clinical platform and that the practices it supports are independently owned
- Prints a figure and its period on every card of its peptide and general wellness catalogs
- Prices sermorelin and tesamorelin separately for men and for women, each as a monthly starting figure
- Says its compounding pharmacies are US-based and describes the standards claimed
Trade-offs
- Its peptide figures are starting prices on catalog cards, and no card says what its figure includes
- The sermorelin page itself prints no figure and says only that the initial assessment will outline all costs
- Names no dispensing pharmacy
- Its state coverage is a one-line footer claim of serving all states, with no list behind it
14. The Aesthetic Concierge
$149 — an add-on list price; a scalp solution of the same peptide is $179
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
The Aesthetic Concierge prices its weight-loss medication in five-week blocks rather than months, includes basic blood work in its kick-off fee, and prints a states heading with nothing under it.
Strengths
- Includes basic weight-wellness blood work in the kick-off fee, which few sellers here do
- Prices a microdosing lane separately from a full-dose one on both molecules
- Prints the five-week block plainly instead of calling it a month
- Its discount arithmetic reconciles against every percentage it prints
Trade-offs
- Its list of states renders as nothing at all beneath its own heading
- Calls its supplier an "FDA 503A pharmacy", which is a category that does not exist
- Its brand-name management fee is billed every four weeks on one page and every five on another
- Its add-on peptide prices name no billing period
15. Pepti
$239 — vial price, an average four-week supply
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
Pepti prints one all-in monthly figure for every treatment it sells, in two formats side by side, and it is the only roster row that publishes both a fifty-state footprint and a price for epitalon.
Strengths
- Prints an all-in monthly figure on every treatment card and states that no membership fee sits on top of it
- Names the unit each figure covers, so a four-week supply is never left to be guessed at
- Quotes a pen and a vial price side by side, which makes the format premium visible instead of buried in checkout
- States its own coverage as all 50 states and Washington, D.C. in its site footer
Trade-offs
- Bloodwork is a separate charge rather than part of the monthly figure, though recent labs can be uploaded instead
- The 503A/503B compounding pharmacy it uses is described but never named
- The PT-141 card gives no supply length, so its figure is the only one on the catalog that cannot be read as four weeks
- CJC-1295, ipamorelin and TB-500 are sold only inside combination vials
16. PeRx
Does not publish a GHK-Cu price.
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
PeRx, the trading name of Wellness MD Group PC, lists twenty-six compounds and blurs the price on every one of them, publishing a floor and a range on a separate pricing page instead.
Strengths
- Tied for the widest compound list on this roster, with each blend spelled out into its constituent peptides on its own page
- Publishes a floor and a range in ordinary body copy, so a reader can bound the cost without an account
- Names its operating company and its trading name in the first paragraph of its own terms
- Says in its terms that it ships to every state, and repeats the claim as a headline figure
Trade-offs
- Blurs the per-compound price on every product page and marks it hidden from screen readers, so no individual compound has a readable figure
- Its own pricing page contradicts itself on the consultation fee, listing "no separate consultation fee" among what every order includes and then answering twice that consultations are $50
- Says all sales are final once an approved prescription is charged
- Names no dispensing pharmacy, only the category
17. PlexusDx
$139/mo — per month flat, in the seller's words "no commitment tiers, no per-formulation surcharge" — a cream, not an injection
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
PlexusDx sells five of the six compounds this site ranks — sermorelin, NAD+, glutathione, GHK-Cu and PT-141 — each as an all-inclusive monthly program, and it is one of only seven sellers here that reaches the PT-141 board at all.
Strengths
- Reaches five of the six compounds this site ranks, one of seven sellers here to reach five or more
- States on every program page that the monthly price does not change as the dose changes
- Names the three commitment tiers and their per-month rates side by side instead of advertising only the cheapest
- Offers GHK-Cu as a topical cream and glutathione as a nasal spray or troche, so two of the five need no injection
Trade-offs
- Publishes its own corporate name two different ways — "PlexusDx, Inc." in one terms document and "PlexusDX LLC" in the other
- The glutathione page states both a 46-state and an all-50-state footprint without resolving which applies
- No compounding pharmacy is named on any of the five product pages
- Five states are said to require a scheduled video visit rather than the async intake, but the page never lists which five
18. FormBlends
$161/mo — "1-month plan / Pay monthly · Ships monthly / $161 /month / $161 due today"; longer plans quote "$143 /month" against "$429 due today", "$859" and "$1717"
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
FormBlends names its three dispensing pharmacies with their cities and designations, prices seven of the compounds compared here on one-month plans, and publishes a state-by-state map it dates and sources to its own last hundred and sixty-five shipped orders.
Strengths
- Names three dispensing pharmacies with their cities, legal names and designations
- Publishes a dated state map and says the count comes from its own shipped orders rather than a marketing claim
- Prints a one-month plan whose per-month figure is also what is charged that month
- Says plainly that shipping is included and lab work is not
Trade-offs
- Quotes per-month figures on its longer plans that are divisions of the amount actually billed
- Buries seven product pages inside a sitemap of more than a hundred thousand article URLs
- Sells one of the compounds compared here only inside a two-compound blend
- Redirects one product address to a different one, so a cited URL and a read URL can differ
19. Rylo
$199/mo — month-to-month plan: "$199 a month", "One price, every month. No contract, cancel any month." The same page's quarterly plan, selected by default, reads "$166 a month" and "Billed $499 every 3 months"; the home page rounds the quarterly rate to "From $167/month"
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
Rylo Health LLC names its dispensing pharmacy and its clinical group by name, prices six compounds at a flat rate that does not move with dose, and sells each on a quarterly plan or month to month, with the quarterly rate the lower of the two.
Strengths
- Names the dispensing pharmacy with its street address and phone number, and names the clinical group that writes the prescriptions
- Prints the three-month total beside every quarterly rate, and offers a month-to-month plan with no contract on the same page
- Says the price does not change with dose or refill, and charges no membership fee on top
- States that no lab work is required before starting, rather than leaving a lab fee to appear later
Trade-offs
- The lower rate needs a plan billed every three months; buying month to month costs more on every product
- The home page table shows only the quarterly rate, so the month-to-month price appears only on each product page
- Says formulations and fulfillment vary by state without saying which ones, so the fifty-state claim is qualified in a way a reader cannot check
- No lab work is included, which is the flip side of not requiring any
20. Eviora MD
$249/mo — the single "GHK-Cu" card prints "from $249/mo" — a floor; three stack cards that include GHK-Cu are priced higher and are not this row
Summary, strengths and trade-offs12 points
Eviora MD prints a monthly starting figure on every card of an open twenty-card peptide menu, sells eight tracked peptides on their own, and publishes no price for its GLP-1 programs.
Strengths
- Prints a monthly starting figure on every card of a twenty-card peptide page, with no quiz, account or email gate in front of it
- Sells eight tracked peptides as single products, so those figures can be set against other sellers
- Bills each subscription as one total, which its terms split between the pharmacy, the medical group and the platform
- States fifty-state service in its FAQ and on its About page
- Lists the five cases in which it refunds, one of them a provider declining to prescribe
Trade-offs
- Every figure is a floor written as "from", and only the NAD+ card names a form; no card states a dose
- CJC-1295, ipamorelin, TB-500, KPV and Semax appear only inside stacks, so none has a price of its own
- Several stack cards reuse a single peptide’s description — the four-peptide BPC-157 stack is described only as a copper peptide
- Its semaglutide, tirzepatide and microdose programs publish no price on their own pages
- Its homepage, program pages and terms give three different cancellation terms
- The pharmacy, the medical group and the prescriber all go unnamed
- Its peptide page follows the same template, card list and most of the same figures as other storefronts on this site, so it is not an independent reading of the market
21. New Wave Health
$249/mo — from, per month
Summary, strengths and trade-offs14 points
New Wave Health prints a monthly starting figure beside every product on a twenty-item peptide menu, and sells compounded semaglutide and tirzepatide with no price on either.
Strengths
- Puts a monthly starting figure beside every product on its peptide menu, with nothing advertised without one
- Names its operating company in its terms and prints a street address, a phone number and a support email for it
- Its terms promise an electronic notice 5 to 7 days before every recurring charge, and let a subscriber switch off auto-refill in the portal
- Lists the grounds on which it refunds, including a provider who declines to prescribe
- States under the menu that compounded medications are not FDA-approved
- Checked against FDA's warning-letter record in September 2026: no letter found under its name
Trade-offs
- Every figure is a floor written as "from", and nothing says what moves a program above it
- TB-500, KPV, CJC-1295, ipamorelin and semax are sold only inside combination products, so none has a price of its own
- Seven of its nine combination products carry the description of their first ingredient alone
- Its menu lists the same twenty products at the same figures as another storefront in this comparison that trades under a different company name
- Sells compounded semaglutide and tirzepatide with no price on either drug page
- Names no pharmacy and no prescriber, and its terms call the company a technology platform that does not practice medicine
- Its homepage says all 50 states while its program pages say Virginia and the states where its providers are licensed, without naming them
- Its FAQ says it never sells or shares data; its California privacy notice says it may have sold or shared identifiers and browsing data with advertising networks
22. RX Bella
$249/mo — printed as "GHK-Cu · from $249/mo", a floor; GHK-Cu also appears inside three stacks, whose combined figures are not this price
Summary, strengths and trade-offs9 points
RX Bella prints a monthly starting figure on every card of a twenty-protocol peptide menu and on its two GLP-1 injections. Nine of those protocols are stacks priced as one, and no card names a dose.
Strengths
- Prints a monthly floor on every one of twenty peptide protocols, grouped by goal, on an open page with no quiz or account in front of it
- Sells eight tracked peptides as single products, not only inside combinations, and prices semaglutide and tirzepatide on its home page
- Its terms say the subscription is one bundled charge covering the drug, the provider and the platform, with no separate membership fee
- Names its operating company, RX Web Meds LLC, with a mailing address, and lists the exact grounds on which it refunds
Trade-offs
- Every figure is a floor written as "from", and no card names a dose, a vial size or, apart from the NAD+ card, a delivery format
- Nine protocols are stacks priced as one, and some reuse a single peptide's description: the four-peptide BPC-157 blend is described as a copper peptide for skin and hair
- Its peptide menu repeats another telehealth brand's page, and every product the two share carries the identical figure, so the two are not independent prices
- Names no compounding pharmacy and no clinician, and its all-50-states claim is hedged by its program pages and terms, which publish no list
- Its program pages and its terms give different cancellation notice periods
23. AgelessRx
$99 — for the 0.5% cream; the same page prints this figure once as a first-month rate and once as an ongoing one
Summary, strengths and trade-offs9 points
AgelessRx publishes a short, deliberately curated peptide menu and names four compounds it has decided not to sell yet — but every headline figure on it is a first-month rate with a higher number behind it.
Strengths
- Names BPC-157, TB-500, MOTS-c and KPV on its own peptide page as compounds it has chosen not to sell yet, which is rare candor in this category
- Publishes the ongoing rate alongside the introductory one on three of its five peptide pages
- Sells PT-141 and sermorelin in both an injection and a nasal spray rather than a single format
- Says a plan can be paused or canceled at any time
Trade-offs
- Every headline figure on the site is a first-month rate, and the ongoing rate runs $50 to $70 higher
- The GHK-Cu cream page prints the same figure as both a first-month price and an ongoing one, so the two disagree on one page
- The glutathione page gives only the three-month-plan rate, leaving the plain monthly price unpublished
- The compounding pharmacy that fills prescriptions is not named, and no state list is published
- A competition ranking is quoted on the site as a credential; it is marketing, not an independent assessment of the products sold
24. Robertson Wellness Center
$125 — Per bottle, and the largest strength on the page — "GHK-CU … 50 mg bottle $125", which is a fifth of the milligram cost of the 10 mg lines beside it
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
Robertson publishes a per-bottle catalog with the milligrams printed on every line, and opens it by telling readers it has discontinued peptides because of a federal change to what compounding pharmacies may make.
Strengths
- Prints the strength on every single price line, so per-milligram comparison is actually possible
- Tells readers a regulatory change has removed peptides from its list instead of quietly deleting them
- Prices its consultation separately and visibly
- Names the oral forms as capsules and prices them per pack rather than pretending they are vials
Trade-offs
- Publishes no corporate entity — a trading name, a Beverly Hills phone number and nothing more
- Does not say which peptides the regulatory change removed
- Sells CJC-1295 and ipamorelin only as one blended bottle, so neither has a price of its own
- Publishes no state coverage and names no dispensing pharmacy
25. CLYR Health
$149 — from, billed once, for one bottle; a $249.99 figure on the same page belongs to a competitor column
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
CLYR Health prices seven tracked compounds by weekly dose with the whole ladder visible before any intake, names its pharmacy, and puts a competitor's cream price in the same table as its own.
Strengths
- Prices seven tracked compounds with the full ladder visible before any intake
- Prints the vial size, concentration and weekly dose beside each figure
- Names its dispensing pharmacy and its medical group
- Its savings arithmetic reconciles against every multi-vial total it prints
Trade-offs
- Puts a competitor's cream price in the same table as its own
- Its tirzepatide hero quotes a cycle rate the ladder below contradicts
- Its LegitScript badge links to its own article rather than to a listing
- Says only that the service is available in certain states, without naming any
26. Always Wellness and Recovery
$159 — one-time price for a single unit; the product page offers no bundle and names no billing period
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
Always Wellness and Recovery prints a single-vial price and a three-month bundle total on the same card for each of its injectable peptides, and then divides the bundle itself — its own product copy restates a $529 three-month supply as "about $176 per month".
Strengths
- Prints the single-vial price and the multi-month bundle total on the same card, so a reader can see what the longer commitment actually costs
- Says in its own words that there is no membership fee, no subscription and no automatic billing
- Lists what ships in the box — vial, bacteriostatic water, syringes, dosing guide and sharps container — rather than leaving supplies unstated
- Names both compounding categories it sources from, 503A and 503B, and claims fifty-state service in three separate places
Trade-offs
- Its own product copy divides a three-month total into a per-month figure that is never billed
- The compounding pharmacies are described only by their regulatory category and are never named
- The nasal-spray bundles are priced only on the catalog card, with no product page of their own read
- No lab work is included, and labs are not mentioned in any program description
27. Invigorate Advanced Aesthetics
$175 — No unit is published — "GHK-Cu | Known for skin rejuvenation, hair support, and tissue repair | $175"
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
Invigorate publishes a per-compound price for eleven peptides and attaches no unit to any of them — not a vial, not a month, not a dose — on a page that prints the same list twice in two different orders.
Strengths
- Publishes a per-compound figure for eleven peptides rather than one starting rate
- Prints the catalog as a proper table as well as a card grid
- Prices blends as their own lines instead of implying them from the singles
- The price list sits on the service page itself, not behind an intake
Trade-offs
- Not one figure carries a unit — no vial size, no dose, no billing period
- The card grid prints prices before the names they belong to on about half the rows
- Publishes no corporate entity; the only company named on the legal page is its web agency
- Names no dispensing pharmacy and publishes no state coverage
28. Form by GBY
$199 — per unit — the page prints "$199 per unit" for the cream, not a monthly rate, though it also promises monthly delivery
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
Form by GBY prices GHK-Cu by the unit and NAD+ and glutathione by the month on single-compound pages, and sells its weight-loss medicines only inside a three-component formula.
Strengths
- Gives GHK-Cu, glutathione, NAD+ and sermorelin their own pages instead of one combined menu
- Answers "Is compounded GHK-Cu FDA-approved?" with "No" in its own FAQ, on each product page
- Prints the unit its GHK-Cu price is charged against rather than implying a month
- Says plainly that the FDA does not review compounded products for safety, effectiveness or quality
Trade-offs
- Sells its weight-loss medicines only inside a three-component formula, so neither drug has a scoped price
- Its bundle page prints a figure for glutathione that its own product page contradicts
- Publishes no state list and names no dispensing pharmacy
- No certificate of analysis is reachable
29. Rehydra+ Wellness
$220 — starting at
Summary, strengths and trade-offs7 points
Rehydra+ Wellness grew out of a mobile IV-therapy business and now sells a broad peptide catalog — BPC-157, KPV, MOTS-C, tesamorelin, sermorelin and GHK-Cu — with prices posted openly on its storefront, though it names neither a legal entity nor the pharmacy that fills its orders.
Strengths
- Publishes a phone and text line plus a named staff email, unusual for this category
- Its catalog spans six named peptides beyond a GLP-1 and testosterone line
- Consultations are free and financed payment plans are offered
Trade-offs
- No legal entity is named anywhere on the site; the terms identify only the brand
- Says it serves 20 states but never lists which ones, so coverage cannot be confirmed before intake
- Its LegitScript badge is a self-hosted image linking to a generic checker page rather than a confirmable certification record
- The compounding pharmacy is not named, and no page says which of its named clinicians prescribes
30. Rejuvia Wellness
$240 — per vial, printed as $240 in the table's "VIAL" column beside a course of "3 vials / 3 months"; the page says vials start at $240 and most protocols need one to six vials, so the figure is the price of one vial, not of the course
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
Rejuvia prices its peptides by the vial and prints beside each figure how many vials a course takes and how long it runs. The cost of a full course is mapped out at the consultation, not printed.
Strengths
- States the vial count, the milligram strength and the course length beside every vial price
- Publishes a figure for eight separate tracked compounds
- Charges nothing for the initial consultation and says so
- Marks each course as a standard or premium tier rather than blending them
Trade-offs
- Each figure is the price of one vial, and most courses take more than one, so no figure on the table is the cost of a multi-vial course
- Publishes no corporate entity on any page read
- Charges separately for the initiation visit on top of every course
- Publishes no state list and names no dispensing pharmacy
31. Vitalex Health
$249 — from, per month — a floor rather than a quoted bill
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
Vitalex Health publishes the broadest open peptide price list read in this pass — twenty priced protocols across six goal areas, singles and stacks alike — on a page that ships the same template, the same headline and two identical figures as another seller entering this roster the same day.
Strengths
- Prices seventeen distinct protocols in visible text on one open page, with no quiz, account or gate in front of any of them
- Groups the catalog by goal rather than by compound, and names the exact combination in every stack
- Prices the stacks as well as the singles, so a reader can see what adding a peptide actually costs
- Claims fifty-state service for itself with a number on its own About page
Trade-offs
- Its peptide page is the same template, headline and disclaimer as another seller on this roster, with two figures identical to the dollar — the two are not independent readings of the market
- Every figure is a "from" floor, so none is a quoted monthly charge
- CJC-1295, ipamorelin, TB-500, KPV and Semax are sold only inside stacks and are never priced alone
- No compounding pharmacy is named anywhere, and the disclaimer places prescribing entirely with independent third parties
32. MD Total Wellness
$275 — per 50mg vial; the page names no billing period
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
MD Total Wellness prices its peptides and NAD+ by the vial with the vial size printed, on a price list of its own that its main service pages do not link to.
Strengths
- Prices its peptides and NAD+ by the vial with the vial size printed
- Includes in-office lab testing inside its published weight-loss price
- States plainly that its compounded weight-loss medicines are not FDA-approved
- Says where it dispenses from and where it can ship, in one sentence
Trade-offs
- Its per-vial price list is on a page its main service pages do not link to
- Serves one state, so most readers cannot buy from it
- Names no dispensing pharmacy and publishes no certificate of analysis
- Its terms name Florida law for a California clinic
33. Bridgeside Telehealth
$300 — the same flat "Peptide medication: $300 (if prescribed)" that applies to every peptide here, with a separate $99 consultation; GHK-Cu is named outright on the recovery page and no strength, format or supply length is stated
Summary, strengths and trade-offs9 points
Bridgeside Telehealth prices every peptide identically, at $99 for the consultation and $300 for the medication if it is prescribed, and charges nothing for the visit when therapy is judged inappropriate.
Strengths
- One published figure covers any peptide it prescribes, so the price does not move with the compound chosen
- States that there is no charge for the visit at all if peptide therapy is not clinically appropriate
- Names its operating entity, Bridgeside Telehealth LLC, in its own Terms of Use rather than trading under a bare brand
- Says plainly that additional peptides are only considered after the first month, instead of selling a stack up front
Trade-offs
- Publishes two incompatible price structures on one site: the home page says "The total cost is $300" including the consultation, while every peptide page says the consultation is $99 and the medication $300 on top of it
- Its own FAQ asks "Is the $300 a subscription?" and the answer field still reads "Tab Item Content"
- Says it is licensed in 44 states and publishes no list of which ones
- Names no compounding pharmacy, only "a licensed U.S. compounding pharmacy"
- The category pages name only GHK-Cu and NAD+ outright; the rest of the menu appears as categories and disclaimer text rather than a catalog with strengths
34. PeptidesRx
$307 — "GHK-Cu / Firmer skin, thicker hair, faster healing / $307 per vial / $782 for 3 months / 50 mg". The WooCommerce catalog prices it at "$ 279.00".com/product/ghk-cu-injectable/
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
PeptidesRx prices ten of the compounds compared here, names the pharmacy that fills the orders and gives its address, and runs two live catalogs on one domain whose figures do not agree with each other on a single compound.
Strengths
- Prices ten of the compounds compared here, more than any other seller on this roster
- Names its dispensing pharmacy, its street address and its telephone number
- States the vial strength and the expected duration of a vial beside most figures
- Publishes the states its pharmacy is not licensed in rather than only the count
Trade-offs
- Runs two live catalogs whose figures disagree on every compound they share
- Prints a third, templated figure on every product page that belongs to no product
- Gives two coverage numbers in one paragraph that cannot both be right
- Prices a third figure for one compound on a marketing page separate from both catalogs
35. Balanced Healthcare
Does not publish a GHK-Cu price.
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
Balanced Healthcare publishes two prices for everything — one for members, one for everyone else — and prices its peptide programs by tier rather than by compound.
Strengths
- Publishes both the member and the non-member figure instead of only the discounted one
- States the dose count and the number of days its NAD+ loading course covers
- Says the loading course is recommended rather than required
- Runs a full published pricing page rather than quoting only at consult
Trade-offs
- Its peptide tiers do not name the compounds they cover, so no figure is compound-scoped
- Every figure has two values, and which one applies depends on a membership sold separately
- Its NAD+ course covers eight days, which no monthly comparison can absorb
- Publishes no corporate entity, no state list and names no dispensing pharmacy
36. Better Med Spa
Does not publish a GHK-Cu price.
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
Better Med Spa sells epithalon and GHK-Cu only as one combined protocol at one price, and attaches no billing period to any figure it publishes.
Strengths
- Names thirteen tracked compounds, one of the deepest menus on this roster
- Publishes a figure on each individual treatment page rather than gating them
- Gives epithalon and GHK-Cu a dedicated page rather than burying them in a list
- Separates its NAD+ IV from its at-home and in-office shot plans
Trade-offs
- Attaches no billing period to any peptide figure, so none can be compared
- Sells epithalon only bundled with GHK-Cu, so neither has a price of its own
- Its legal company name shares no words with its brand
- Publishes no state list and names no dispensing pharmacy
37. Body Good Studio
Does not publish a GHK-Cu price.
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
Body Good Studio carries a 2025 federal warning letter, prices five tracked compounds openly, and publishes a line on its own home page conceding that its brand names and final copy are still pending clinical and legal review.
Strengths
- Prices five tracked compounds on one open page with no intake in the way
- Prints the vial sizes behind each range rather than only the floor
- Charges one semaglutide price at every dose
- States in its own words that its compounded products are not FDA-approved
Trade-offs
- Carries a 2025 federal warning letter naming its own website
- Its own page says the brand names and final copy are pending clinical and legal review
- Its fifty-state claim is hedged in the following sentence and no list is published
- Three of its five figures name no billing period at all
38. PeptideMD
Does not publish a GHK-Cu price.
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
PeptideMD prices peptides by tier rather than by molecule, and its homepage and its pricing page quote two different figures for the same single-peptide tier.
Strengths
- Says which pharmacy class compounds its medication and that shipping is cold-chain
- Includes a baseline lab panel in its higher peptide tiers and says so on the page
- Publishes a full pricing page rather than gating rates behind intake
- Quotes two- and three-month terms alongside the one-month rate
Trade-offs
- Its homepage and its pricing page disagree on the price of its own entry peptide tier
- Peptide pricing is per tier, so no figure attaches to any named molecule
- Publishes no corporate entity on any of the four pages read
- Publishes no state list and names no dispensing pharmacy
39. Rixa Health
Does not publish a GHK-Cu price.
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
Rixa Health prices its weight-loss ladders in four- and five-week blocks rather than months, prints the weekly milligram at every rung, and says the figure is a pass-through of what the compounding pharmacy charges.
Strengths
- Prints the weekly milligram beside every rung of both ladders
- States the block each figure buys — four weeks, five weeks or thirty days — instead of implying a month
- Says its price is a pass-through of what the preparing compounding pharmacy charges, shipped separately
- Says it offers no contracts or long-term commitments
Trade-offs
- Nothing it prices is priced by the month, so nothing compares cleanly to a monthly rate
- Its oral semaglutide is a two-ingredient tablet, so that route carries no scoped price
- Names no dispensing pharmacy and publishes no state list
- Several rungs of its own ladder still carry the placeholder text "Your description goes here"
40. Solas Health & Wellness
Does not publish a GHK-Cu price.
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
Solas publishes no corporate entity and instead puts one named, licensed clinician on every page — and prices peptides per cycle rather than per month, which is a unit almost nothing else here uses.
Strengths
- Publishes a per-cycle range as well as a starting figure, so the spread a buyer faces is visible
- Puts one named, licensed clinician on the pages and states the two states she is licensed in
- Says the consultation fee is credited toward the first cycle rather than charged on top
- States plainly that no membership, enrollment or hidden fees apply
Trade-offs
- Publishes no corporate entity anywhere on the pages read
- The peptide price is per cycle, and the only cycle length it publishes is a four-to-twelve-week range on its blog, so it cannot be compared with a monthly rate
- Names no dispensing pharmacy, describing them only as licensed compounding pharmacies
- Its NAD+ figures use two different units — four injections for one price, and a single infusion for another
41. Team Wellcore
Does not publish a GHK-Cu price.
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
Team Wellcore names its dispensing pharmacy with an address, a phone number and the ten states that pharmacy cannot ship sterile compounds into — and then charges for a consult before it will quote the price of any medication.
Strengths
- Names the dispensing pharmacy with a street address and a phone number rather than describing a class of facility
- Names the ten states that pharmacy cannot ship sterile compounds into, which is a checkable exclusion list rather than a coverage claim
- States the consult charge up front and says the medication is billed only after a provider approves
- Describes its compounded products as patient-specific and not FDA-approved in its own FAQ rather than burying the point
Trade-offs
- Four of its six tracked products publish a price only inside structured data, where no reader ever sees it
- Where a visible figure and a structured-data figure both exist they disagree, and the visible one is the higher
- Its own state arithmetic is wrong — it claims licensure in forty-four states while naming ten it is excluded from
- No visible figure carries a billing period, so nothing it publishes can be read as a monthly rate
42. Valhalla Vitality
Does not publish a GHK-Cu price.
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
Valhalla Vitality lets the patient choose which pharmacy fills the prescription and says the price does not change either way.
Strengths
- Lets the patient pick which verified pharmacy fills the prescription
- Says the price is the same whichever pharmacy is chosen
- States that compounded drug products are not approved or evaluated by the FDA
- Says it serves 50 states nationwide
Trade-offs
- Publishes a figure for only one of the four compounds it sells
- Publishes no operating company on any page read
- Names none of the pharmacies it invites patients to choose between
- No certificate of analysis is reachable
43. PreventiveMD
$89/mo — "As low as $89/mo per month, all-in" — the seller's own wording, a floor rather than a quoted rate, on a page that separates its all-in lane from its branded lane where the membership fee and the medication are billed as two named lines. this figure is for the TOPICAL cream. The seller states the injectable form "is the version currently under FDA review and is not something we offer at this time"
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
PreventiveMD prints an all-in monthly figure for each compounded protocol and, on the same page, breaks its branded lane into a membership fee plus a medication rate as two named lines — and it publishes a list of the peptides it will not sell yet, with the review dates it is waiting on.
Strengths
- Prints an all-in monthly figure per compounded protocol and, on the same page, breaks the branded lane into a membership fee and a medication rate as two separate named lines
- Publishes a list of eleven peptides it does NOT offer because they are under regulatory review, with the anticipated review dates, instead of quietly not selling them
- Says in its own FAQ that its compounded medications are not FDA-approved and describes the pharmacy category and the standard they work under
- Distinguishes the topical form of its copper peptide from the injectable form and states plainly that it does not sell the injectable
Trade-offs
- Every peptide figure is an "as low as" floor rather than a quoted rate, so no page states what a given patient would pay
- No state coverage list appears anywhere, on any page read
- The compounding pharmacies are described as a class it works with and are never named
- Its participating medical group is named as the current one, which is a disclosure that the arrangement can change
44. PepScribe
$99/mo — from; a topical cream, not an injection
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
PepScribe prices six tracked compounds individually from one catalog and says in its own FAQ which pharmacy class fills them — 503A — while declining to name the pharmacy itself, because the one that fills your order depends on your state.
Strengths
- Prices six tracked compounds individually rather than behind one category floor
- Says which pharmacy class fills its orders and which sterile-compounding standards apply
- Publishes the same sermorelin figure on the catalog and on the product page
- Says the online visit costs nothing and that there is no membership fee
Trade-offs
- Names the clinician network but not the dispensing pharmacy, because it varies by state
- Makes no state-coverage claim of any kind on the pages read
- Publishes no certificate of analysis
- Its catalog prints each price between one product and the next, which is easy to misread
45. Stealth Health
$105.31/mo — from, per month, for a combination topical that pairs GHK-Cu with zinc-thymulin
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
Stealth Health prices to the cent and attaches a month to every figure, and it is the only seller in this batch whose glutathione comes in two separately priced formulations.
Strengths
- Attaches "/mo" to every figure across every product page
- Prices two glutathione formulations separately instead of quoting one number
- Names Stealth Health Inc as the operating company
- Says no payment is taken upfront — only when a prescription is approved
Trade-offs
- Publishes no state list, and its shipping claim spans two countries
- Names no dispensing pharmacy
- Its GHK-Cu price buys a combination topical, not the copper peptide alone
- No certificate of analysis is reachable
46. Green Cap Health
$119.99/mo — from, per month on the category and product pages; the same seller's pricing page prints $89.99 a month for the same foam
Summary, strengths and trade-offs9 points
Green Cap Health sells compounded semaglutide and tirzepatide at one monthly price at any dose, and prices NAD+ and sermorelin injections as add-ons to those plans. It publishes two different monthly figures for the same GHK-Cu foam on two of its own pages.
Strengths
- Puts the per-month figure and the prepay total side by side for each injection
- Prices each weight-loss drug the same at any dose, with no separate membership charge
- States in its own words that its compounded products are not FDA-approved
- Says it requires third-party batch testing from its pharmacy partners and reviews the reports
- Prices NAD+ and sermorelin separately rather than behind one longevity floor
Trade-offs
- Publishes two different monthly prices for the same copper-peptide foam on two of its own pages
- Names no dispensing pharmacy and publishes no certificate of analysis
- Names Texas as where its people hold licenses without saying where it can ship
- Sells NAD+ mainly as a cream and a foam, so the injection is the only tracked form with a clean figure
47. Magnolia Regenerative Medicine
$135/mo — starting at, per month; monthly and quarterly options offered
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
Magnolia Regenerative Medicine publishes a flat per-compound rate for twelve of the peptides this site tracks, on one catalog page, with the billing cadence printed beside each figure.
Strengths
- Prices twelve tracked compounds individually on one catalog page instead of behind an intake
- Prints the billing cadence beside each figure, so a quarterly item is visible as one
- Names Magnolia Regenerative Medicine Health LLC as the operating company in its own footer
- Separates single-compound products from its blends by name, which makes a scoped price readable
Trade-offs
- Publishes no list of states it serves
- Names no dispensing pharmacy; its comparison table says only "US FDA-Inspected Pharmacy"
- Sells five of the compounds it stocks only inside blends, so those carry no scoped price
- No certificate of analysis is reachable
48. Meto
$135/mo — per month a la carte, on top of a $29/month membership billed at $320 annually and a one-time $149 Peptide Readiness Panel; the member rate the site refers to is not published
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
Meto puts a $149 blood panel in front of the prescription and bills in two published lines: a $29 monthly membership charged $320 a year, and the medication itself at a monthly rate that starts at $85 for BPC-157.
Strengths
- Splits the bill into two published lines, membership and medication, and says so plainly instead of quoting one blended figure
- Publishes a monthly figure for each single peptide as well as for the stacks, so a one-peptide protocol can be costed before signing up
- Marks its MOTS-c and tesamorelin stack "Not currently available while awaiting FDA regulatory action" rather than quietly delisting it
- Requires a blood panel before prescribing and prices it openly at $149 instead of burying it in an intake
Trade-offs
- The $149 panel and the $29 monthly membership both sit on top of every medication price, so no single figure on the site is the cost of therapy
- Says medication is billed "at your member rate - typically 15-25% below a la carte" without publishing what that member rate actually is
- Publishes a headline of 50 states covered by its clinician network but no state-by-state list
- Describes its pharmacies only as FDA-registered and 503A; none is named anywhere on the site
49. EdgeRx
$175/mo — per month, for the single published GHK-Cu protocol
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
EdgeRx sells the same compound in two needle-free formats at the same monthly price, and says in its own words that it is "not the peptide gray-market".
Strengths
- Charges the same monthly figure for the nasal and sublingual route of a compound
- Groups its catalog by goal and prints a protocol count beside each group
- Says its GHK-Cu topical is "pharmacy-compounded, not the OTC version"
- Attaches the month to every protocol figure it publishes
Trade-offs
- Publishes no operating company on any page read
- Its PT-141 and glutathione lines are sold inside multi-protocol categories with no single figure
- Publishes no state list and names no dispensing pharmacy
- Says its compounds are "tested for purity" but publishes no certificate of analysis
50. Rebody Health
$214.99/mo — per month after the first month, which is $99 — the page reads "$99 today, then $214.99 a month. Pause or cancel before any refill."
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
Rebody Health, operated by Compound Technologies, Inc., prices five compounds across injection, nasal spray, troche and cream, and prints the ongoing rate beside the first-month rate on every product page instead of only the discounted one.
Strengths
- Prints the recurring rate beside the discounted first month on every product page, so the ongoing cost is readable before checkout
- Enumerates its jurisdictions state by state in its terms, District of Columbia included, rather than asserting a count
- Sells one compound in more than one route — sermorelin, NAD+ and PT-141 each have an alternative to the needle, priced separately
- States in its terms that the consultation fee sits inside the plan price and names the amount
Trade-offs
- Names no compounding pharmacy — its terms say only that orders are dispensed by independent licensed pharmacies
- The injectable NAD+ line bills in two-month blocks, so its advertised per-month figure is a division rather than a charge
- Every headline figure on the site is an introductory one, and the ongoing rate is roughly double it on most products
- No lab work is described as included at any tier
51. Mirabel Meds
$247/mo — printed as "GHK-Cu · from $247/mo" — a floor; GHK-Cu also appears inside two multi-peptide stacks, whose combined figures are not this price
Summary, strengths and trade-offs7 points
Mirabel Meds publishes a wide peptide menu with a monthly figure on every product, and prices five of them as multi-peptide stacks rather than as single compounds.
Strengths
- Puts a monthly figure on every product in a wide menu, with the period printed beside each one
- Sells eight tracked compounds as single products rather than only inside combinations
- Names its corporate entity plainly in its own terms
Trade-offs
- Every figure is a floor written as "from", so no product has a quoted rate a buyer can hold it to
- Five products price a multi-peptide stack at one figure, which cannot be compared against a single-compound price
- No pharmacy is named — the site refers to partner pharmacies as a category
- No service area is published anywhere on the site, including in its terms
52. Alinwell
$249/mo — from, per month
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
Alinwell prices eight peptides per month on one page and prices sermorelin twice — its homepage and its peptide menu carry different sermorelin figures on the same day.
Strengths
- Prices eight separate peptides on a single readable menu page
- States a monthly period on every peptide figure it publishes
- Names its operating company in its own terms rather than only a brand
- Says in its own words that its peptides are compounded in a U.S. pharmacy
Trade-offs
- Publishes two different sermorelin figures on two of its own pages
- Its peptide descriptions are misfiled — a copper-peptide sentence sits under a four-compound blend
- Publishes no list of states it serves
- Names no dispensing pharmacy and publishes no certificate of analysis
53. Ambiante Health and Wellness
$249/mo — from, per month, for the single-compound listing
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
Ambiante Health and Wellness is the fourth seller found serving a byte-identical peptide menu under a different company and a different price list, and it prices seven tracked compounds on its own.
Strengths
- Prices seven tracked compounds individually rather than only as blends
- States that its medications are compounded in a United States pharmacy on every product card
- Says a licensed provider reviews each case before a prescription is written
- Publishes its menu without an intake wall, so the figures can be compared before signing up
Trade-offs
- Serves the same peptide menu as three other sellers on this roster under a different company
- Its own template misfiles some descriptions, so a blend can carry a single compound’s sentence
- Publishes no state list and names no dispensing pharmacy
- No certificate of analysis is reachable
54. Believe Health
$249/mo — from, per month
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
Believe Health runs the same peptide menu as two other sellers on this roster under a different company, and it is the dearer of the three on every compound they share.
Strengths
- Publishes a monthly figure for seven separate compounds
- Names Believe Health LLC as the operating company in its own terms
- Prices its NAD+ line on the homepage rather than behind an intake
- Says its peptides are "reviewed individually by a licensed provider and compounded in a U.S. pharmacy"
Trade-offs
- Runs a peptide menu identical to two other sellers here under a different company
- Carries the misfiled compound descriptions that template ships with
- Publishes no state list, no named pharmacy and no certificate of analysis
- Its homepage and menu price different subsets, so no single page shows the whole catalog
55. Longevixx
$249/mo — starting rate, per month
Summary, strengths and trade-offs7 points
Longevixx runs one of the wider peptide menus on this roster — twenty programs, each quoted as a monthly figure — including PT-141, epitalon and semax, which few sellers price.
Strengths
- Publishes a monthly figure beside every one of its twenty peptide programs, not a starting price for the catalog as a whole
- Prices PT-141, epitalon and semax, three compounds most sellers on this roster do not list at all
- Charges nothing when a request is turned down
Trade-offs
- Semax, KPV, TB-500 and CJC-1295 are sold only inside combination vials, so the figure beside each is the price of a pairing rather than of that peptide alone
- Its terms limit service to the states where the company operates without naming them, so coverage cannot be checked before signup
- The compounding pharmacy that fills prescriptions is not named on the site
- Every figure is a starting rate, and the catalog does not say what moves a program above it
56. LunaRx
$249/mo — from, per month
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
LunaRx is the only seller on the shared peptide template that prices semax, and it is the cheapest of the three on sermorelin, MOTS-C and epitalon.
Strengths
- Prices eight compounds per month, including semax, which few sellers here price at all
- Says on its own homepage that its protocols are "503A compounded — no reconstitution required"
- Names LunaRx LLC on the site itself, not only in a buried terms page
- Undercuts both of its template siblings on sermorelin, MOTS-C and epitalon
Trade-offs
- Its peptide menu is identical to two other sellers here, under a different company
- Prices semax only as a two-compound "Semax / Selank" line
- Publishes no state list and names no dispensing pharmacy
- No certificate of analysis is reachable anywhere on the site
57. Hartwater Wellness
$285/mo — the same flat monthly figure the seller applies to every peptide it prescribes — "$285 per month for a single peptide … regardless of which peptide you are prescribed"; bundles are $239 and $215 per peptide per month
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
Hartwater charges the same figure for every peptide it prescribes and says so in one sentence — so its price column has one number in it, and any table that gives this seller eleven different figures has invented the variance.
Strengths
- States one price for every peptide and says so explicitly, which removes the whole per-compound guessing game
- Publishes the bundle rates as well as the single rate
- Describes its pharmacies by license class and locates them in its own metro
- Draws the line against research-chemical vendors in its own words rather than by implication
Trade-offs
- Publishes no corporate entity
- Lists NAD+ and glutathione inside a peptide menu, which blurs a category the flat pricing then covers
- Names no dispensing pharmacy
- Publishes no state coverage; it is a single Texas clinic
58. ElitePhysiqMD
$299.70/mo — the catalog rate of $299.70/mo.; every figure on this catalog is the member price under a $99.00/month membership, and on the two product pages opened in full the member figure was exactly 10% below the struck-through list price ($225.00 against $250.00, $267.30 against $297.00). The list price for this item was not read on its own page and is not stated here.
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
ElitePhysiqMD publishes the widest prescription peptide catalog on this roster — fifteen of the sixteen compounds this site tracks, each with a figure in visible text — and every one of those figures is a member rate that sits on top of a separate monthly membership charge.
Strengths
- The widest prescription peptide catalog on this roster, with a figure in visible text on every item
- Its product pages state that compounded preparations are not FDA-approved and that human evidence for peptides is limited, on the page taking the order
- Calls one of its weight-loss compounds investigational, which is accurate and rare
- Publishes the one-time-purchase total, the visit fee and the shipping charge as separate named lines rather than one blended figure
Trade-offs
- Every catalog figure is a member rate, and the catalog page itself never mentions the monthly membership those rates depend on
- Two of the compounds it lists are sold only inside a two-peptide stack, so neither has a price of its own
- The compounding pharmacy is described by licensing class on every page and is never named
- No state coverage list and no certificate of analysis appear anywhere in the pages read
59. iThriveMD
$59 — the member price for the topical cream; the page states no billing period and shows $149 without membership
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
iThriveMD prints a non-member and a member price for every peptide it sells, and the member price is between a half and a fifth of the other.
Strengths
- Prints the member and non-member figure together instead of only the discounted one
- Says its compounding happens "under Section 503A in a USP <797>-compliant sterile cleanroom"
- Operates in-person clinics as well as telehealth and says so
- States that compounded drugs "have not been reviewed or approved by the FDA"
Trade-offs
- None of its figures carries a billing period
- Its cheapest prices require buying a separate hormone or weight-loss plan first
- Answers 200 at every path, so nothing about the site can be proven absent
- Publishes no operating company, no state list and no named pharmacy
60. Regenics
$109 — member price ($199 non-member) for one bottle; no billing period is stated on the page
Summary, strengths and trade-offs9 points
Regenics prints two figures for every peptide it sells — a list price and a lower member price — and the member price is the only one a buyer can reach, because the catalog itself says ten further peptides are visible only after a $39-a-month membership.
Strengths
- Prints the non-member figure beside the member figure on every peptide page, so the discount is visible rather than implied
- Says on the NAD+ page that the compound is "Not FDA-approved for weight loss or athletic performance", which is a scoping most sellers leave out
- Its sermorelin page states plainly that adult wellness use is off-label and that the evidence for it is limited
- Sells GHK-Cu as a prescribed compounded cream and says so, rather than as a cosmetic jar
Trade-offs
- The full peptide catalog is behind a paid membership — the site says ten further peptides are member-only and names none of them
- Every published figure is a member rate that sits on top of a $39-a-month membership charge
- Its NAD+ page shows no price at all until a potency is selected, so the page reads as priceless on arrival
- Two of its own pages describe the same sermorelin item at two different strengths
- The 503A compounding pharmacy is never named, and no service-state list is published anywhere
61. Whoosh Wellness
$125 — starting as low as, listed against $166; the product page states no billing period
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
Whoosh Wellness says every batch it ships is third-party tested and publishes two sermorelin ladders on one page whose lower rungs differ by three hundred dollars.
Strengths
- Says in visible text that every batch is third-party tested for potency and purity
- Prices GHK-Cu at two named strengths rather than one blended figure
- States it compounds only at licensed 503A/503B pharmacies
- Attaches a month to almost every figure on its pricing page
Trade-offs
- Prints two sermorelin ladders on one page, $300 apart, with no stated difference
- Publishes no certificate of analysis despite claiming batch testing
- Publishes no operating company on any page read
- Its product page for GHK-Cu drops the period its pricing page states
62. YourHealthRx
$175 — printed as 'GHK-Cu · As low as $175/mo' in the skin-and-aesthetic goal panel, under the same condition
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
YourHealthRx prints a rate against five separate peptides and conditions every one of them on a promotional code or a six-month commitment that expires on a stated date.
Strengths
- Publishes a rate for five distinct peptides rather than one blended protocol
- States the condition attached to its rates instead of hiding it after intake
- Prints an expiry date on the promotion rather than running it indefinitely
- Groups its catalog by goal so a reader can find the compound for their purpose
Trade-offs
- Not one advertised rate is a plain month-to-month price
- Every figure requires a promotional code or a six-month supply, or both
- Its own page says it does not prescribe and routes to partner workflows, leaving unclear whether it is the seller
- Publishes no state list and names no dispensing pharmacy
63. Pause Rx
$199 — starts at; the GHK-Cu page is the only one of the eight that states no period
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
Pause Rx prices eight peptide products at a monthly rate, names Rush Pharmacy as its filler, and says on every page that it is not a pharmacy itself.
Strengths
- Names Rush Pharmacy as the pharmacy that fills its prescriptions
- Repeats on every product page that it is "not a state-licensed pharmacy nor a drug manufacturer"
- Prices five tracked compounds across eight products, injection and needle-free alike
- Charges less for the sermorelin troche than for the injection
Trade-offs
- Its GHK-Cu cream is the one product with no stated billing period
- Publishes no operating company on any page read
- Publishes no state list
- No certificate of analysis is reachable
64. Bowery Clinic
$249 — flat product-page price; the page prints a strength and a supply length beside it that this figure does not reflect
Summary, strengths and trade-offs9 points
Bowery Clinic puts one flat sticker price on each peptide with the strength and the supply length printed beside it, and tells shoppers on the product page that nothing further is added at checkout.
Strengths
- Prints the strength, the format and the words "Lasts approximately 4 weeks" beside each sticker price, so the figure describes a stated quantity instead of a billing cycle
- Offers a dissolvable troche as well as a vial on several peptides, so most of the catalog is usable without injecting
- One of the widest published peptide menus on this roster: KPV, Semax, Epithalon and MOTS-c each carry their own visible price
- Answers the price question head-on in its FAQ, explaining why its peptides cost more than research-grade material
Trade-offs
- Its own Terms say charges "may include" consultation fees, laboratory or diagnostic services and membership or administrative fees, which contradicts the product pages saying there are no additional fees
- Section 32 of the same Terms states the products "are not intended for human or animal consumption of any kind" and are "Not medical treatments", wording that sits oddly on a site selling prescribed therapy
- Describes its pharmacies only as "503A FDA-Registered Pharmacies" and never names one
- Publishes no state list at all, so a shopper cannot tell before signing up whether care is available where they live
- Prices Semax, MOTS-c and Epithalon against a five-week supply, so those three figures are not monthly costs
65. Onus IV
$300 — a bare figure — the peptide menu reads "GLOW (GHK CU)... Price: $300" with no quantity, no strength and no period beside it, unlike this seller's NAD+ and glutathione lines, which both state a dose
Summary, strengths and trade-offs9 points
Onus IV is a Colorado clinic chain that publishes a dose-by-dose NAD+ ladder with a member price beside every rung — and the member discount widens from 18 percent at the smallest dose to 38 percent at the largest.
Strengths
- Publishes a dose-by-dose NAD+ ladder with a stated milligram amount and a figure on every rung, which almost nothing else compared here does
- Prints the member price beside the standard price on every rung rather than advertising a discount in the abstract
- Names its operating company and a privacy officer by name in its own policy
- Names the clinics and the mobile service it operates, so a reader can tell where the treatment happens
Trade-offs
- Colorado only, so most readers of a national comparison cannot buy here at all
- No governing-law clause exists: the site publishes a privacy policy and a disclaimer and has no terms-of-service page at all
- Its sermorelin listing is a range with no strength and no protocol, and its GHK-Cu listing is a bare figure with no quantity
- The published address omits the city, giving only a street, a state and a ZIP code
- No compounding pharmacy is named and no lab work is described as included
66. Nip & Tuck Wellness Institute
$335 — printed as 'GHK-Cu (The Glow Protocol) - Starting at $335+', a floor rather than a rate; a two-peptide stack pairing GHK-Cu with epithalon is priced higher on the same page
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
Nip & Tuck publishes a figure against each of eight compounds and its own overall range in words — and prints two different sermorelin prices on the same page.
Strengths
- Publishes a figure for eight separate tracked compounds on one page
- States its own overall price range in plain words rather than leaving it to be inferred
- Prices oral and injectable forms of the same compound separately
- Prices multi-peptide stacks separately from the single compounds inside them
Trade-offs
- Publishes two different sermorelin figures on one page with no explanation
- Almost every figure is a floor marked with a plus sign rather than a settled rate
- Publishes no corporate entity, only a named physician
- Publishes no state list and names no dispensing pharmacy
67. Miami Bariatric & Plastic Surgery
$399 — printed as 'From $399' against a term the page writes as '4-Week Program (1 Month)' — four weeks is thirteen payments a year, not twelve, so the seller's own equivalence is recorded and not adopted; a consult fee is charged on top
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
Miami Bariatric prices six peptides on one table and gives almost every one a different term — four to eight weeks, six weeks, nine to twelve weeks — while calling four weeks a month.
Strengths
- Publishes a figure for six separate compounds on a single readable table
- States the program length beside every figure rather than leaving the term unstated
- States the injection count for its NAD+ courses rather than only a duration
- Publishes its consultation fees separately and says when they are credited back
Trade-offs
- Six compounds carry six different terms, so no two figures on its own table are comparable
- Calls a four-week program one month, which is thirteen payments a year rather than twelve
- Every figure is a floor, and no page says what the ceiling is
- Publishes no corporate entity, no state list and names no dispensing pharmacy
68. modMD
$500 — Per 100 MG, not per month — read from the menu line "Peptides GHK-Cu (Copper Peptide) 100mg $500". A peptide telehealth consultation is priced separately on the same menu at $300
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
modMD publishes one long price menu on which some peptides are sold by the milligram and others by the month, with the unit printed on each line — the clearest single example of this market's unit problem.
Strengths
- Prints the unit on every peptide line, so a milligram price and a monthly price are never confused with each other
- Prices the telehealth consultation on the same menu as the medication instead of leaving it implied
- Publishes four NAD+ strengths and four glutathione strengths rather than one starting figure
- The whole catalog sits on one page a reader can scan end to end
Trade-offs
- Publishes no corporate entity across a 973 KB menu and an 832 KB terms page
- Sells TB-500 only inside blends, so no price for that peptide alone exists
- Its glutathione pricing does not scale with dose, which makes the cheapest line the most expensive per milligram
- Names no dispensing pharmacy and publishes no state coverage
69. AgeRejuvenation
Does not publish a GHK-Cu price.
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
AgeRejuvenation names fourteen tracked compounds on one peptide page, the deepest single menu in this batch, and does not price a single one of them.
Strengths
- Names fourteen tracked compounds on one page, the deepest single menu here
- Names its operating company on two separate legal pages
- Runs separate NAD+ and glutathione pages beneath the main peptide menu
- Covers KPV, semax, epitalon and MOTS-c, which most rosters miss entirely
Trade-offs
- Carries no figure on its peptide menu or on any compound page
- Its legal name is tied to one location while the brand is presented as regional
- Publishes no state list and names no dispensing pharmacy
- Describes no lab work as included in what it charges
70. Beverly Hills Rejuvenation Center
Does not publish a GHK-Cu price.
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
Beverly Hills Rejuvenation Center sells three tracked compounds as one blended product and organizes its peptide catalog by goal rather than by compound.
Strengths
- Publishes a peptide hub organized by goal, with the blend reachable as a linked product page
- Describes what it offers without claiming an approval it does not have
- Keeps its peptide offer separate from its other lines on the page
- Answers the category question in plain language rather than in a disclaimer
Trade-offs
- The three compounds cannot be bought separately, and no price is published for the blend
- Publishes no figure for any compound on the pages read
- Publishes no corporate entity, so there is no company a reader can look up
- Publishes no state list and names no dispensing pharmacy
71. the biostation
Does not publish a GHK-Cu price.
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
the biostation links per-compound fact sheets from its peptide page, and one of the two, fetched directly, answers successfully with an empty file.
Strengths
- Publishes per-compound reading material of its own, which most sellers here do not
- Describes what it offers without claiming an approval it does not have
- Keeps its peptide offer separate from its other lines on the page
- Answers the category question in plain language rather than in a disclaimer
Trade-offs
- One of the two linked documents answers with an empty file, and neither is a certificate
- Publishes no figure for any compound on the pages read
- Publishes no corporate entity, so there is no company a reader can look up
- Publishes no state list and names no dispensing pharmacy
72. Della Bellezza Med Spa
Does not publish a GHK-Cu price.
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
Della Bellezza names sixteen compounds on one service page, eleven of them ones this site tracks, and its own storefront — open to the public — sells skincare rather than any of them.
Strengths
- One of the widest single-page compound lists on this roster
- Declares eleven of the sixteen compounds this site tracks on pages a reader can reach
- Keeps its peptide offer separate from its other lines on the page
- Answers the category question in plain language rather than in a disclaimer
Trade-offs
- Its own storefront is open and sells skincare, so the breadth is a menu with nothing priced behind it
- Publishes no figure for any compound on the pages read
- Publishes no corporate entity, so there is no company a reader can look up
- Publishes no state list and names no dispensing pharmacy
73. Dr. Gillis' Wellness Center
Does not publish a GHK-Cu price.
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
Dr. Gillis' Wellness Center prices its growth-hormone peptide by the fifth and the third of a milliliter — the only per-volume peptide price on this roster — and never prints the concentration those volumes contain.
Strengths
- One of the widest clinical peptide lists on this roster, named openly in its own navigation
- Publishes a single pricing page covering every service rather than scattering figures across product pages
- Defines its own marketing name for a peptide in the seller's own words instead of leaving it opaque
- States its service area by naming the towns it serves
Trade-offs
- Prices the growth-hormone peptide by syringe volume without printing the concentration, so the figure converts to nothing
- Prices two peptides as one combination, so neither has an individual figure
- No operating company established on the page read
- No dispensing pharmacy named, no certificate of analysis, and a regional clinic model rather than a shipped program
74. Eden Health Club
Does not publish a GHK-Cu price.
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
Eden Health Club runs a separate page for each of thirteen compounds tied to one Colorado location, and the only number on any of them is the same one repeated sitewide.
Strengths
- Publishes a page per compound rather than one combined peptide menu
- Names thirteen tracked compounds, among the deepest menus here
- Names its operating company on the pages it serves
- Ties each compound page to a named location rather than a vague service area
Trade-offs
- Carries no compound-specific figure on any of its per-compound pages
- The only figure sitewide repeats identically on every page, so it prices nothing
- Publishes no state list and names no dispensing pharmacy
- Describes no lab work as included in what it charges
75. GoalBMI Wellness
Does not publish a GHK-Cu price.
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
GoalBMI Wellness sells peptides as fixed four-to-six-week programs from a Brooklyn telehealth practice, quoting each one as a starting figure with a $99 consultation stated separately alongside it.
Strengths
- Quotes each peptide as a program with a stated length of about four to six weeks rather than as an open-ended monthly charge
- Lists on every product page exactly what the program price covers: medication, syringes, alcohol pads, supplies and shipping
- Prices the required consultation separately at $99, so the entry cost is not hidden inside the program figure
- Publishes a figure for the four-peptide KLOW combination and a separate one for oral KPV, which most sellers leave to a phone call
Trade-offs
- Its Terms name only "New York, Florida, Pennsylvania, Michigan, New Jersey, and additional participating states", so the real footprint is not published
- The MOTS-c program at $599 for four to six weeks is the most expensive figure for that compound anywhere on this roster
- Every figure is a starting price its own disclaimer says may change with dose, formulation or program length
- Does not name the compounding pharmacy that fills its prescriptions
76. InjectCo
Does not publish a GHK-Cu price.
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
InjectCo publishes two different monthly prices for the same compounded semaglutide program on two of its own pages, and prints "We Only Use FDA-Approved, Trusted Products" above copy describing compounded drugs.
Strengths
- Itemises what the monthly subscription buys, down to the injection supplies and the training
- Prices a sublingual form separately from the injection
- Names the pharmacy class — 503B — rather than leaving it unstated
- Publishes street addresses for two physical clinics
Trade-offs
- Publishes two different monthly figures for the same compounded semaglutide program
- Prints an FDA-approval headline above compounded product copy
- Its five dedicated peptide pages carry no price for any peptide
- Serves one state, so most readers cannot buy from it
77. Just Wellness
Does not publish a GHK-Cu price.
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
Just Wellness prices nine things on its home page and not one of them is a peptide; its peptide page, the one document that should carry a figure, carries none.
Strengths
- Publishes detailed prices for its other services in clearly stated units
- Describes what it offers without claiming an approval it does not have
- Keeps its peptide offer separate from its other lines on the page
- Answers the category question in plain language rather than in a disclaimer
Trade-offs
- Its peptide page is the only page on the site with no figure on it at all
- Publishes no figure for any compound on the pages read
- Publishes no corporate entity, so there is no company a reader can look up
- Publishes no state list and names no dispensing pharmacy
78. Kina Health
Does not publish a GHK-Cu price.
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
Kina Health publishes three different corporate names across three of its own pages and no figure for any of the three peptides it sells.
Strengths
- One of the three company names in its terms reads as a pharmacy business, though no page says which facility fills a given order
- Lists NAD+, glutathione and GHK-Cu as distinct treatments rather than one bundle
- States a flat consult fee up front rather than revealing it at checkout
- Publishes both a terms page and a separate privacy policy
Trade-offs
- Three different company names appear across its own pages with no explanation of the relationship
- Publishes no figure for any peptide it sells
- Publishes no state list
- Describes no lab work as included in what it charges
79. Loop Health
Does not publish a GHK-Cu price.
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
Loop Health sells peptides inside a membership, prices four tracked compounds at a flat monthly rate that does not climb with dose, and states a state count rather than publishing a list.
Strengths
- Charges the same monthly figure at every GLP-1 dose, so titrating up does not raise the bill
- Prices four tracked peptides on the same page as its weight-loss medicines
- Cites named trials by name and journal beside its GLP-1 claims
- Describes itself as an independent health research collective rather than a pharmacy
Trade-offs
- States a count of forty-four states but publishes no list of them
- Its host answers a success code for a page that does not exist, so nothing can be shown absent by status alone
- Names no dispensing pharmacy
- Sells peptides only inside a membership, so the peptide figure is not the whole cost
80. Lovely Meds
Does not publish a GHK-Cu price.
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
Lovely Meds carries a 2025 federal warning letter, names seven dispensing pharmacies outright, and prints weight-loss body copy on a sermorelin product page.
Strengths
- Names seven dispensing pharmacies with their cities, which almost no seller here does
- Charges one price at every dose on both weight-loss molecules
- Publishes the full plan ladder from one month to twelve
- Says in its own words that its compounded medicines are not FDA-evaluated
Trade-offs
- Carries a 2025 federal warning letter naming its own website
- Its sermorelin page carries a weight-loss product's body copy word for word
- Its home page prints an FDA-approval claim beside compounded product cards
- Admits it is available in many but not all states without saying which
81. Nava Health
Does not publish a GHK-Cu price.
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
Nava Health publishes a full price list with a member and a non-member column for every line, prices NAD+ and glutathione by the infusion at three strengths each, and adds a third column for two membership tiers on its packages.
Strengths
- Publishes a full itemised service price list rather than a headline figure
- Prints the member and non-member price on the same row, so the discount is visible
- Prices NAD+ and glutathione at three strengths each rather than one
- Warns readers in its own words against buying research chemicals online
Trade-offs
- Its host answers a success code for a page that does not exist, so no absence here can be proven by status
- Prices infusions per session, so nothing here is a monthly cost
- Publishes no state list and names no dispensing pharmacy
- Sells seven other tracked peptides that carry no published figure at all
82. Pure Hydration
Does not publish a GHK-Cu price.
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
The only two dollar figures on Pure Hydration's copper-peptide page are the seller describing what the market charges, in an answer that never says what it charges.
Strengths
- Names its operating company in the footer of every page read
- Publishes per-compound pages rather than one undifferentiated peptide menu
- Publishes patient injection guides as documents a reader can actually open
- Answers a cost question at all, which several sellers in this batch do not
Trade-offs
- Prices only its in-person NAD+ infusions; the figures on its GHK-Cu page describe the market, not its own peptide programs
- Serves its own patient PDFs over plain HTTP from an HTTPS page
- Names no dispensing pharmacy and publishes no state coverage
- Its cost answer reads like a quote and is not one, which is the easiest error on this host to make
83. RegenCen
Does not publish a GHK-Cu price.
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
RegenCen argues against the research-use market by invoking FDA prohibition, and publishes its operator under a management-company name a reader would never guess.
Strengths
- States its position on research-use compounds explicitly rather than staying silent
- Publishes its operating company, even though the name shares nothing with the brand
- Runs a dedicated peptide-therapy treatment page separate from its IV line
- Names five distinct compounds across its treatment pages
Trade-offs
- Its legal name shares no words with its brand, so the operator is effectively hidden in plain sight
- Carries no figure on any of the six pages read
- Its regulatory claim about prohibited compounds is its own assertion with no source attached
- Publishes no state list and names no dispensing pharmacy
84. Relive Health
Does not publish a GHK-Cu price.
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
Relive Health's terms name a franchising company rather than a clinical one, so the party on the other side of the contract is the brand owner.
Strengths
- Names the contracting company and publishes a postal address for it
- Names the company on the other side of the transaction rather than only a trading name
- Declares nine of the sixteen compounds this site tracks on pages a reader can reach
- Answers the category question in plain language rather than in a disclaimer
Trade-offs
- Its terms carry a last-modified date from nearly three years before this reading
- Publishes no figure for any compound on the pages read
- Publishes no state list and names no dispensing pharmacy
- Describes no lab work as included in what it charges
85. South Florida Face & Body
Does not publish a GHK-Cu price.
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
South Florida Face & Body publishes a whole-menu price range instead of a price per compound, and says plainly that a quote far below the market usually means gray-market product.
Strengths
- Publishes a price range rather than refusing to discuss cost before intake
- States that consultation and baseline labs are quoted separately
- States that an outside licensed pharmacy fills prescriptions, rather than implying it dispenses in house
- Warns in its own words what an unusually low quote usually means
Trade-offs
- Its range covers the whole menu, so no compound has a price of its own
- Publishes no corporate entity, only a named clinician and a license number
- Charges for consultation and labs on top of the quoted range
- Publishes no state list beyond the one state it operates in
86. Spa Sydell
Does not publish a GHK-Cu price.
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
Spa Sydell organizes its peptide menu three ways — by compound, by blend and by concern — and prices none of them; the numbers on its site belong to its skincare shop.
Strengths
- Lets a reader browse peptides by individual compound, by blend or by concern
- Names eleven tracked compounds across its browse pages
- Keeps its retail shop on separate pages from its therapy menu
- Returns a clean hard error for a path that does not exist
Trade-offs
- Carries no figure on any of its four peptide browse pages
- Publishes no corporate entity on any page read
- Publishes no state list and names no dispensing pharmacy
- Describes no lab work as included in what it charges
87. Vyora Wellness
Does not publish a GHK-Cu price.
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
Vyora Wellness describes independent third-party potency and purity testing in its own FAQ, and publishes one peptide price behind a shop that hides most of the rest.
Strengths
- Describes what its third-party testing checks — strength, match to prescription, contaminants
- Names Vyora Wellness LLC and publishes an informed-consent addendum
- Says it partners with "U.S.-based 503A certified pharmacies"
- Attaches a month to the one peptide figure it shows publicly
Trade-offs
- Publishes no certificate of analysis despite describing third-party testing
- Gates most product pages behind a password, so most prices cannot be read
- Publishes no state list and names no dispensing pharmacy
- Its one readable NAD+ figure appears only in a related-products strip
88. Andrew Meds
$79/mo — month to month; three months is $69 a month, six is $59 and twelve is $49, each total printed
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
Andrew Meds lists forty-four states by name and publishes a four-rung ladder for three compounds, then says on the same page that it serves all fifty and the District of Columbia.
Strengths
- Lists forty-four states by name rather than printing only a count
- Publishes a four-rung ladder with the total on every rung for three separate products
- Prices a GHK-Cu cream individually, which few sellers here do
- Says its prices cover the medication and the supplies
Trade-offs
- Its own FAQ claims fifty states and the District of Columbia one sentence before listing forty-four
- Names no dispensing pharmacy
- Its growth-hormone product is a two-compound blend, so neither compound has a price of its own
- Says in its terms that it is not a HIPAA covered entity
89. VAULT Men's Health
$229/mo — starting at, per month; the page attaches no dose, vial size or quantity to the figure
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
VAULT Men's Health is one of the few sellers on this roster to publish a price for BPC-157, TB-500, CJC-1295, ipamorelin and GHK-Cu individually — and it attaches no dose or vial size to any of them.
Strengths
- Prices BPC-157, TB-500, CJC-1295, ipamorelin and GHK-Cu individually, which most sellers here do not
- Every figure sits on its own compound's page rather than inside a category floor
- States plainly that compounded medicines are not FDA-approved
- Publishes its governing law and venue
Trade-offs
- No price carries a dose, a vial size or a quantity, so none can be compared per milligram
- Its own pricing page is linked and returns not-found
- Its FAQ renders question headings with no answers under them
- Names no dispensing pharmacy and makes no state-coverage claim
90. Vital Edge
$249/mo — per month, flat regardless of dose, with consultation and shipping included — the card prints "then $249/month"; the card names no delivery format
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
Vital Edge hides a five-compound peptide price list behind a tab on its homepage — nothing about peptides renders until that tab is clicked — and serves a different toll-free number on every page load.
Strengths
- States that the monthly fee is flat regardless of dose, so titrating up does not raise the bill
- Says the figure covers consultation, medication and shipping rather than medication alone
- Publishes what happens if treatment is declined: "If medication isn't prescribed, the tele-health consult fee is $80"
- Prices its GLP-1 line in the open too, brand and compounded side by side
Trade-offs
- Nothing about peptides renders until a tab is clicked, so the peptide prices are invisible on arrival
- A different toll-free number is served on each page load, so the contact number a reader notes down is not stable
- Names no compounding pharmacy and publishes no service-state list
- Its GHK-Cu card names no delivery format, so a reader cannot tell whether the figure buys an injection or a cream
91. FitFlow Rx
$68 — a topical foam sold for hair growth; the treatment page states no billing period
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
FitFlow Rx charges one flat figure per compound at every dose, and prices a GHK-Cu foam lower than anything else it sells.
Strengths
- Repeats "same price at every dose" on every treatment page, so titration does not raise the bill
- Prices six separate formats rather than one figure per compound
- Says on every product page that compounded drugs are not FDA-approved
- Includes the provider consultation and shipping in the published figure
Trade-offs
- Its treatment pages omit the billing period its homepage states
- Publishes no operating company on any page read
- Publishes no state list and names no dispensing pharmacy
- No certificate of analysis is reachable for any product
92. Fitish
$150 — "GHK-Cu Face Cream / $150 / Topical compounded formulation. Medical evaluation required. Creams are custom compounded and take 48 hours once approved" \u2014 the only Fitish product read whose block does not say "Pricing is for a monthly supply", so no billing period is stated for it
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
Fitish prices three of the compounds compared here across five preparations, says in one sentence what each figure covers, and is one of very few sellers on this roster that publishes the states it will not ship a product to.
Strengths
- Publishes the states one of its products will not ship to, which most sellers here do not do at all
- Says in one sentence that the figure covers the consult, the medication and shipping
- Prices two preparations of the same compound separately at two different figures
- States the dose options beside the compound rather than leaving them to the intake
Trade-offs
- Carries a federal warning letter that names its own domain
- Publishes a no-ship list on one product page and none on the other four
- Prints a zero inside its own price block, where a compare-at figure would sit
- Names no compounding pharmacy on any page read
93. RyzeRx
$199 — the product-page price for "GHK-Cu Cream", printed as "$199 USD" beside "Add to cart" with no billing period, supply length or tube size
Summary, strengths and trade-offs9 points
RyzeRx prices every product on its own page, from single peptides to vial-by-vial weight-loss strengths, and says on none of them what period or supply the figure buys.
Strengths
- Puts a figure on every product page, from single peptides to each weight-loss vial strength
- Publishes its site in English and Spanish from the same navigation
- Says its medicines come from United States licensed pharmacies
- Offers a free consultation before any commitment
Trade-offs
- No product page says what period or supply its figure buys, though its terms say subscription plans renew automatically
- Its homepage cards still lead with category starting figures that none of the named peptides carries
- Its fifty-state lines are a marketing statistic and a statement about provider licensure, not a coverage statement
- Names no dispensing pharmacy and no certificate of analysis is reachable
- The support phone line in its terms, "(800) 555-0123", has the shape of a placeholder number; the cancellation route the terms actually name is email
94. BloomMD
$245 — printed as "AquaBiome 0.5% (GHK-Cu) Refill — $245.00". The compound is identified only inside the product's brand name and its concentration; a reader scanning for the compound by name alone would miss it. A refill SKU with no billing period stated
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
Every BloomMD peptide figure is a refill SKU rather than a first fill, and the only corporate name in its terms of service belongs to the software vendor that builds the site.
Strengths
- Prices copper-peptide, antioxidant and coenzyme refills separately and openly, which most sellers on this roster do not publish at all
- Puts every refill figure on one browsable collection instead of behind an intake
- Separates its brand-drug membership SKUs from the drug SKUs rather than blending them into one number
- Names the concentration inside the copper-peptide product label
Trade-offs
- Every peptide figure is a refill, so none of them is what a new patient pays first
- The only corporate name in the terms of service is a software vendor's
- The only third-party-testing language on the site sits on a supplement page, not on any peptide
- No dispensing pharmacy named and no state coverage list
95. Ascend Vitality
Does not publish a GHK-Cu price.
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
Ascend Vitality sells named multi-peptide stacks as single SKUs, and every figure it publishes carries the same unfinished sentence: "As low as with 6-month plan".
Strengths
- Names the peptides inside each stack rather than selling a blend under a marketing name alone
- Prints the milligram strength beside the antioxidant and both available strengths beside the nasal spray
- Publishes the whole peptide catalog on one browsable page with a figure on every card
- Names the operating company and a street address in its own footer
Trade-offs
- Every figure carries the same incomplete sentence as its only qualifier
- Its stack SKUs cannot be compared against any single-compound price on this roster, because they are not the same product
- A promotional banner was live on the date read, so these figures are discounted ones
- Claims a third-party lab in its terms with no certificate reachable anywhere
96. David Borenstein
Does not publish a GHK-Cu price.
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
This practice names twelve compounds across offices in two states and publishes no company name at all: its copyright line is a bare year.
Strengths
- Names twelve compounds, seven of them tracked here, on one service page
- Describes what it offers without claiming an approval it does not have
- Keeps its peptide offer separate from its other lines on the page
- Answers the category question in plain language rather than in a disclaimer
Trade-offs
- Publishes no company name anywhere — the copyright line carries a year and nothing else
- Publishes no figure for any compound on the pages read
- Publishes no corporate entity, so there is no company a reader can look up
- Publishes no state list and names no dispensing pharmacy
97. California Trim Clinic
Does not publish a GHK-Cu price.
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
California Trim Clinic advertises a monthly starting figure for each weight-loss drug and footnotes it with a three-month requirement, and lists thirteen tracked peptides on a therapy page that carries no price at all.
Strengths
- Says compounded medications are prepared for patient-specific use pursuant to an individual prescription and are not FDA-approved
- Names the city its practice is based in rather than only claiming to be nationwide
- Publishes a starting figure for both weight-loss drugs rather than hiding both behind an intake
- Publishes a free educational guide about what to ask before starting peptide or weight-loss care
Trade-offs
- Advertises a monthly figure whose own footnote attaches a three-month term
- Lists thirteen tracked peptides and prices none of them
- Publishes no state list and names no dispensing pharmacy
- No certificate of analysis is reachable
98. Denver Peptide Clinic
Does not publish a GHK-Cu price.
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
Denver Peptide Clinic publishes a certification seal and, beside it, the certifier's own lookup pre-filled with its address — a claim a reader can check rather than an image they must trust.
Strengths
- Publishes the certifier's own lookup link, not just a badge image
- Describes what it offers without claiming an approval it does not have
- Keeps its peptide offer separate from its other lines on the page
- Answers the category question in plain language rather than in a disclaimer
Trade-offs
- Its front page names no compound at all; the three declared here are on its questions page
- Publishes no figure for any compound on the pages read
- Publishes no corporate entity, so there is no company a reader can look up
- Publishes no state list and names no dispensing pharmacy
99. Denver Wellness & Aesthetics Center
Does not publish a GHK-Cu price.
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
This clinic names eighteen compounds on one page, eleven of them tracked here, and the only company name on its legal page belongs to the agency that built the site.
Strengths
- One of the widest declared lists on this roster, in about five thousand characters
- Declares eleven of the sixteen compounds this site tracks on pages a reader can reach
- Keeps its peptide offer separate from its other lines on the page
- Answers the category question in plain language rather than in a disclaimer
Trade-offs
- Its legal page carries its web agency's company name and none of its own
- Publishes no figure for any compound on the pages read
- Publishes no corporate entity, so there is no company a reader can look up
- Publishes no state list and names no dispensing pharmacy
100. Dvida Spa
Does not publish a GHK-Cu price.
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
Dvida tells readers, on its own peptide page, that two of the compounds it lists there appear on the FDA's bulk drug substances warning list and are not approved for human use.
Strengths
- Names the FDA bulk substances warning list against two compounds on its own menu, on the page selling them
- Answers "are peptides FDA-approved" with the word "No" and then explains
- Names its operating company in the first line of its terms
- Distinguishes compounded GLP-1s from branded products in the same note
Trade-offs
- Publishes no price for anything
- Publishes no state coverage and names no dispensing pharmacy
- Its own product URL carries a spelling error that a reader retyping the address will not reproduce
- The disclosure is strong but the catalog detail behind each compound is thin
101. Executive Medicine of Texas
Does not publish a GHK-Cu price.
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
Executive Medicine of Texas names eleven tracked compounds in a service page of about six and a half thousand characters, one of the densest declared lists on this roster.
Strengths
- Names eleven tracked compounds in a page short enough to read in full
- Declares eleven of the sixteen compounds this site tracks on pages a reader can reach
- Keeps its peptide offer separate from its other lines on the page
- Answers the category question in plain language rather than in a disclaimer
Trade-offs
- Its own terms page names no company, so the absence rests on the page that should have carried it
- Publishes no figure for any compound on the pages read
- Publishes no corporate entity, so there is no company a reader can look up
- Publishes no state list and names no dispensing pharmacy
102. Evolve Telemed
Does not publish a GHK-Cu price.
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
Evolve Telemed publishes a thirty-three item treatment catalog carrying GHK-Cu and glutathione, no price on any of it, and an article that names the gray-market peptide labels and tells readers to avoid them.
Strengths
- Publishes a browsable catalog of thirty-three treatments with a short description of each
- Names the gray-market labels readers should treat as warnings, and explains what they mean
- Says it does not provide medical or pharmacy services, employ providers, or influence clinical decisions
- Describes its own site as an advertisement for telehealth services rather than as a clinic
Trade-offs
- Publishes no price for any of the thirty-three treatments it lists
- The only figure on its treatments page is a promotion for a third-party service
- Publishes no state list and names no dispensing pharmacy
- No certificate of analysis is reachable
103. Focal Point Vitality
Does not publish a GHK-Cu price.
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
Focal Point Vitality carries eleven tracked compounds in its own navigation, including KPV and semax, and no price behind any of them.
Strengths
- Carries eleven tracked compounds in its navigation, including KPV and semax
- Exposes a deep, followable site rather than a single landing page
- Names compounds most local clinics do not stock, such as epitalon and MOTS-c
- Returns a clean hard error for a path that does not exist
Trade-offs
- Carries no figure on any page read
- Publishes no corporate entity anywhere
- Publishes no state list and names no dispensing pharmacy
- Describes no lab work as included in what it charges
104. Glowlight Med Spa
Does not publish a GHK-Cu price.
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
Glowlight's peptide page carries eight dollar figures and every one of them also renders on its privacy policy, which is what proves none of them prices a peptide.
Strengths
- Names five tracked compounds and keeps its weight-loss program visibly separate from them
- Describes what it offers without claiming an approval it does not have
- Keeps its peptide offer separate from its other lines on the page
- Answers the category question in plain language rather than in a disclaimer
Trade-offs
- Every figure on the peptide page is a site-wide promotion that also renders on the privacy policy
- Publishes no figure for any compound on the pages read
- Publishes no corporate entity, so there is no company a reader can look up
- Publishes no state list and names no dispensing pharmacy
105. Hybrid Medical Solution
Does not publish a GHK-Cu price.
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
Hybrid Medical Solution names ten tracked compounds across goal-based sub-pages, links a storefront that sells supplements, and carries only its web agency's company name on the page.
Strengths
- Splits a ten-compound menu across goal-based sub-pages rather than listing everything at once
- Declares ten of the sixteen compounds this site tracks on pages a reader can reach
- Keeps its peptide offer separate from its other lines on the page
- Answers the category question in plain language rather than in a disclaimer
Trade-offs
- Its linked storefront is open and sells supplements, so no compound on the menu is priced
- Publishes no figure for any compound on the pages read
- Publishes no corporate entity, so there is no company a reader can look up
- Publishes no state list and names no dispensing pharmacy
106. InCare Integrated Medical Care
Does not publish a GHK-Cu price.
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
InCare prints the sentence most sellers avoid — that its own menu mixes prescription medicines with research-only compounds — and tags the entries one by one.
Strengths
- States on the menu itself that it mixes prescription and research-only compounds
- Tags individual entries by category rather than leaving the reader to guess
- Names eleven tracked compounds, one of the deeper menus here
- Says the menu is for education and not medical advice, on the menu
Trade-offs
- Reports a third-party testing claim as its supplier's, and links no certificate anywhere
- Publishes no company in corporate form, only a trading name
- Carries no figure on its peptide menu
- Publishes no state list and names no dispensing pharmacy
107. MetroMed Health
Does not publish a GHK-Cu price.
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
MetroMed names eleven tracked compounds and sells some of them as kits, on a page that is nearly two megabytes of markup wrapped around about eight thousand characters of text.
Strengths
- Names eleven tracked compounds and runs a separate page for the kits it bundles them into
- Declares eleven of the sixteen compounds this site tracks on pages a reader can reach
- Keeps its peptide offer separate from its other lines on the page
- Answers the category question in plain language rather than in a disclaimer
Trade-offs
- A kit is not a per-compound unit, and no figure is published on either page
- Publishes no figure for any compound on the pages read
- Publishes no corporate entity, so there is no company a reader can look up
- Publishes no state list and names no dispensing pharmacy
108. R2 Medical Clinic
Does not publish a GHK-Cu price.
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
R2 publishes a regulatory-status and evidence-strength table against its own catalog, and tells readers in that table that the clinical evidence for some of what it sells is insufficient.
Strengths
- Publishes a regulatory status and an evidence strength for each peptide it sells, in a table
- States plainly that the human evidence for some of its own catalog is insufficient
- Distinguishes an approved indication from the use it is being sold for, compound by compound
- Says its medications come from compounding pharmacies and that they are not FDA-approved for all indicated uses
Trade-offs
- Publishes no price for anything
- Publishes no corporate entity
- Names no dispensing pharmacy and publishes no state coverage
- Its 404 page is nearly twice the size of its real terms page, so nothing on this host can be judged by weight
109. Ready Med
Does not publish a GHK-Cu price.
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
Ready Med carries a June 2026 federal warning letter, prints one price in its hero and a different one three times in the body of the same page, and answers its own question about which states it serves with text about something else.
Strengths
- States in its own words that compounded drugs do not undergo pre-market FDA approval
- Prices an oral and an injectable form of semaglutide separately
- Says what the membership covers, including the shipping cadence
- Publishes a street address that matches the one on its federal letter
Trade-offs
- Carries a June 2026 federal warning letter naming its own website
- Two of its product pages each print two different prices for the same product
- Its own FAQ question about state availability is answered with unrelated text
- Names no legal entity, no pharmacy, and gives a personal mail account as its contact
110. The Recovery Project
Does not publish a GHK-Cu price.
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
The Recovery Project carries twelve tracked compounds in its navigation, KPV and semax among them, and prices none of them anywhere on the site.
Strengths
- Carries twelve tracked compounds, one of the widest catalogs on this roster
- Stocks KPV and semax, which most sellers here do not name at all
- Exposes a deep followable site rather than a landing stub
- Returns a clean hard error with a tiny body for a path that does not exist
Trade-offs
- Carries no figure on any page read
- Publishes no corporate entity anywhere
- Publishes no state list and names no dispensing pharmacy
- Describes no lab work as included in what it charges
111. Revitalize IV Solutions
Does not publish a GHK-Cu price.
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
Revitalize lists seventeen peptides on a page with no prices on it, prices two of them on a different page, and publishes the rest of the menu as a downloadable PDF — which does resolve.
Strengths
- Publishes a downloadable peptide menu from its own page, and the file actually resolves
- Prices its IV and injection lines in detail, with the gram options named
- Names seventeen peptides on one page, one of the widest declared catalogs in this batch
- Prices facial, IV, injection and laser lines on one public page
Trade-offs
- The peptide page itself contains no price at all — a reader has to find the pricing page or the PDF
- Only two of the fourteen compounds this site tracks carry a published figure
- Publishes no corporate entity; the footer has a year and no name
- Names no dispensing pharmacy and publishes no state coverage
112. Royal Medical Centers
Does not publish a GHK-Cu price.
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
Royal Medical Centers publishes its whole peptide catalog as eleven product pages, prices each one for a month and for two months, and prints an FDA compounding disclaimer on every page.
Strengths
- Publishes a complete peptide catalog as individual product pages rather than a menu behind a form
- Prints a one-month and a two-month price on each product page
- Says in its own words that the FDA does not verify the safety, effectiveness or quality of compounded drugs
- Prints the vial strength and volume on its tesamorelin page, so the month it prices is checkable
Trade-offs
- Three of its eleven peptide products are blends, so those carry no scoped price
- Publishes no state list
- Names no dispensing pharmacy, saying only that medications are dispensed by licensed pharmacies
- No certificate of analysis is reachable
113. Sage Wellness & Health
Does not publish a GHK-Cu price.
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
Sage Wellness runs a numbered twenty-two entry per-compound library on its own domain, the largest structured compound reference any single seller on this roster publishes.
Strengths
- Publishes a numbered per-compound library on its own domain, each entry with its own address
- Declares eleven of the sixteen compounds this site tracks on pages a reader can reach
- Keeps its peptide offer separate from its other lines on the page
- Answers the category question in plain language rather than in a disclaimer
Trade-offs
- The most detailed reference surface here and no figure anywhere on it
- Publishes no figure for any compound on the pages read
- Publishes no corporate entity, so there is no company a reader can look up
- Publishes no state list and names no dispensing pharmacy
114. SCULPT Aesthetic Center
Does not publish a GHK-Cu price.
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
SCULPT promises a certificate of analysis, a third-party test and a purity threshold of ninety-nine percent, and publishes no certificate, no PDF and no link anywhere on the page that says it.
Strengths
- Names ten compounds this site tracks on one service page
- Publishes a per-peptide instruction card with a scannable video guide for reconstitution
- States the grade of peptide it claims to use rather than leaving it implied
- The service page is complete enough to compare against sellers who publish less
Trade-offs
- Promises a certificate of analysis and a ninety-nine percent purity threshold with no document behind either
- Publishes no price for anything
- Publishes no corporate entity
- Publishes no state coverage and names no dispensing pharmacy
115. Strong Health
Does not publish a GHK-Cu price.
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
Strong Health writes the research-use distinction into its own sales copy and puts a page behind each of eleven compounds, then prints no figure on any of them.
Strengths
- States in its own words that it will never supply a research-use vial
- Publishes a page per compound rather than a single undifferentiated peptide menu
- Publishes a comparison table naming the alternatives it is arguing against
- Says baseline and monitoring bloodwork are part of its model
Trade-offs
- Carries no figure on any of the seven compound pages read
- Publishes no corporate entity anywhere on those pages
- Publishes no state list and names no dispensing pharmacy
- Its comparison table describes rivals in categories it defines itself
116. VIP Weight Loss & Anti-Aging
Does not publish a GHK-Cu price.
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
VIP publishes the same product page five times, once per town, all linked from one document — so anything that crawls this seller sees five candidates unless it notices.
Strengths
- Serves five towns and names eight tracked compounds across its catalog
- Describes what it offers without claiming an approval it does not have
- Keeps its peptide offer separate from its other lines on the page
- Answers the category question in plain language rather than in a disclaimer
Trade-offs
- Duplicates every product page per town, which makes one seller look like five
- Publishes no figure for any compound on the pages read
- Publishes no corporate entity, so there is no company a reader can look up
- Publishes no state list and names no dispensing pharmacy
117. VitalRenew Clinic
Does not publish a GHK-Cu price.
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
VitalRenew names nine tracked compounds in about five thousand characters, and only one of them has a page of its own.
Strengths
- A dense declared list on a single page a reader can finish
- Declares nine of the sixteen compounds this site tracks on pages a reader can reach
- Keeps its peptide offer separate from its other lines on the page
- Answers the category question in plain language rather than in a disclaimer
Trade-offs
- Only one compound has any depth behind it; the rest are names on a list
- Publishes no figure for any compound on the pages read
- Publishes no corporate entity, so there is no company a reader can look up
- Publishes no state list and names no dispensing pharmacy
118. Copergrine
Does not publish a GHK-Cu price.
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
Copergrine sells peptide therapy and records software from the same navigation, and the only figures anywhere near its peptide page price the software.
Strengths
- Publishes its corporate name in the footer of the product page itself rather than only on a legal page
- Names the company on the other side of the transaction rather than only a trading name
- Keeps its peptide offer separate from its other lines on the page
- Answers the category question in plain language rather than in a disclaimer
Trade-offs
- The figures on its peptide page belong to a records-software product, so no peptide price is published
- Publishes no figure for any compound on the pages read
- Publishes no state list and names no dispensing pharmacy
- Describes no lab work as included in what it charges
119. Perfect B Aesthetic Medicine
Does not publish a GHK-Cu price.
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
Every dollar figure on Perfect B's peptide site prices a downloadable PDF guide, not a peptide — so a price scraper pointed at this host publishes a therapy price that does not exist.
Strengths
- States how many peptide options it offers and names every one of them
- Publishes protocol guides per compound rather than one generic explainer
- Prices its guides transparently, with the discount arithmetic shown
- Runs the peptide catalog on its own subdomain, so the menu is easy to take in at once
Trade-offs
- Publishes no therapy price at all — every figure on the peptide host buys a PDF
- Its cost articles quote a whole market's figures on the seller's own domain, which is easy to misattribute
- Publishes no corporate entity
- Names no dispensing pharmacy and publishes no state coverage
120. Renew Life Rx
Does not publish a GHK-Cu price.
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
Renew Life Rx gives semax and GHK-Cu their own pages, which few sellers here do, and serves two different GHK-Cu pages at two different URLs.
Strengths
- Publishes standalone pages for semax and GHK-Cu, compounds most sellers bundle away
- Names five distinct compounds rather than one blended protocol
- Keeps a dedicated peptides index separate from the homepage
- Returns a hard error with no body for a path that does not exist
Trade-offs
- Publishes two different GHK-Cu pages at two URLs with no stated relationship
- Publishes no corporate entity on any page read
- Carries no figure for anything it sells
- Publishes no state list and names no dispensing pharmacy
121. telos rx
Does not publish a GHK-Cu price.
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
telos rx names its operating company beside its brand in the footer and names sixteen peptides on one page — and publishes no figure on that page for any of them.
Strengths
- Names the operating company beside the brand in its own footer
- States the regulatory position in short, unhedged sentences
- Names twelve compounds this site tracks on a single page
- Publishes editorial about the peptides rather than only product cards
Trade-offs
- No figure appears on the page read, although the page links its own pricing anchor
- The catalog and the checkout live somewhere this pass did not reach
- Names no dispensing pharmacy
- Publishes no state coverage
122. Viking Alternative Medicine
Does not publish a GHK-Cu price.
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
Viking runs a pricing page that refuses to price, and says why in words worth quoting — what it publishes instead is what it says its patients typically pay, which is not the same thing.
Strengths
- Says in its own words why it will not publish a flat rate, instead of publishing a rate that is not one
- Publishes what it says most patients actually pay, with the period attached
- Prices its missed-appointment charge, which most of this roster leaves unstated
- Names ten peptides across its own FAQ and dedicated compound pages
Trade-offs
- Publishes no price for any compound — the range on the pricing page describes patients, not products
- Publishes no corporate entity
- Names no dispensing pharmacy and publishes no state coverage
- A reader who takes the bottom of its patient range as a price will be quoting the wrong kind of number
123. Zeuss
Does not publish a GHK-Cu price.
Summary, strengths and trade-offs8 points
Zeuss sells GHK-Cu only inside a three-ingredient hair formula, and it is the one seller added in this batch carrying a 2026 FDA warning letter.
Strengths
- Names Zeuss LLC as the operating company in its own terms
- Prints the milligram strength of each ingredient in its formulas, GHK-Cu included
- States plainly that compounded medications have not been approved by the FDA
- Offers a full refund if a physician cannot prescribe treatment
Trade-offs
- Carries a February 2026 FDA warning letter for false and misleading claims
- Sells GHK-Cu only inside a three-ingredient blend, so no copper-peptide price exists
- Publishes no state list and names no dispensing pharmacy
- No certificate of analysis is reachable