Provider review, September 2026

ElitePhysiqMD Review

This is the deepest prescription peptide catalogue on the roster: fifteen of the sixteen compounds this site tracks, each with a figure printed in plain text. Every one of those figures is a member rate, and the catalogue page does not say so — the membership charge only appears once you open a product page.

What ElitePhysiqMD charges

ElitePhysiqMD is not a paid partner; this link may earn a commission if that changes. Full disclosure.

Visit ElitePhysiqMD

By Nora Castellan, Standards Editor

A catalogue that prices almost everything

The shop page lists each compound under a category heading with a one-line description and a per-month figure beside it. Recovery, growth hormone, longevity, sexual health and focus each get their own group, and the weight-loss lane sits alongside them.

Fifteen of the sixteen compounds this site tracks appear here with a price. Two of those fifteen are sold only inside a two-peptide stack and have no figure of their own, which is recorded on the row rather than smoothed over.

One of the weight-loss compounds is described as investigational. That is the correct word for a molecule with no approved product behind it, and it is a rarer word on these sites than it should be.

The product pages carry their own disclaimers: that compounded preparations are not approved by the regulator and have not been evaluated for safety, effectiveness or quality, and that human evidence for peptides is limited. Those sentences sit on the page that takes the order, not in a footer.

The figure on the catalogue is not the charge

Every price on the catalogue listing is printed as a per-month rate with nothing beside it. Opening a product page shows a different picture: a struck-through list rate, a lower current rate, and a membership that renews automatically at its own monthly charge.

The lower rate is the membership rate. So a reader comparing this catalogue against another seller's is comparing a discounted figure that depends on a recurring charge the catalogue never mentions against, in most cases, a whole price.

The product pages are franker than the catalogue in a second way as well. They break the alternative out in full: buy once and you pay the list rate plus a visit fee plus overnight shipping, each named as its own line, and the total is printed.

This site records the catalogue figure, because that is what the seller publishes, and writes the membership charge and the one-time alternative into the qualifier beside it. Nothing here should be read as the cost of a month of therapy on its own.

The discount is uniform, and that is a hint rather than a reading

Nineteen figures on the catalogue divide cleanly by nine tenths to a whole dollar, which is consistent with the site-wide banner offering a tenth off every programme. On the two product pages opened in full, the current rate was exactly a tenth below the struck-through rate in both cases.

That is a strong pattern and it is still not a reading. A list price for an item whose own page was not opened is not recorded here, and each price row says which of the two situations it is in.

The distinction matters because arithmetic that fits is the easiest way to publish a number nobody ever saw on a page. A figure this site prints has to have been read.

Applying the pattern would have been convenient and would probably have been right. It is still not what happened, and the rows say so.

Where it puts itself, in its own words

The site describes what it sells as real medicine rather than grey-market research peptides, and says every treatment is prescribed by a licensed physician and compounded by a licensed pharmacy.

The research note this row was built from read the same page differently. Its extractor found the phrase research peptide in the copy and concluded the seller's language was neither clearly clinical nor clearly research-labelled. Reading the sentence around the hit shows the opposite: the phrase appears only inside the seller's own line distancing itself from that market.

That is the same failure this site guards against everywhere else. A matcher's hit describes the pattern, not the meaning, and the fix is to read the sentence rather than widen the pattern.

The pharmacy is described by licensing class on every page and never named. No state coverage list is published, and no certificate of analysis or purity report appears in the text of any page read.

Who it's for

  • Readers who want the widest prescription peptide menu they can compare in one place.
  • Buyers who want the visit fee and the shipping charge itemised rather than folded into one number.
  • Anyone who wants a seller to say on the product page that compounded preparations are not approved and that human evidence is limited.
  • Shoppers weighing a membership against buying once, who want both totals printed.

Who should look elsewhere

  • Anyone reading the catalogue as a price list, since every figure on it depends on a membership the catalogue does not mention.
  • Buyers who want the two stacked compounds sold individually, which they are not.
  • Readers who need the dispensing pharmacy named rather than described by licensing class.
  • Shoppers who need to know whether the service reaches their state.
  • Anyone who wants a certificate of analysis, which appears nowhere in the pages read.

Strengths

  • The widest prescription peptide catalogue on this roster, with a figure in visible text on every item
  • Its product pages state that compounded preparations are not FDA-approved and that human evidence for peptides is limited, on the page taking the order
  • Calls one of its weight-loss compounds investigational, which is accurate and rare
  • Publishes the one-time-purchase total, the visit fee and the shipping charge as separate named lines rather than one blended figure

Trade-offs

  • Every catalogue figure is a member rate, and the catalogue page itself never mentions the monthly membership those rates depend on
  • Two of the compounds it lists are sold only inside a two-peptide stack, so neither has a price of its own
  • The compounding pharmacy is described by licensing class on every page and is never named
  • No state coverage list and no certificate of analysis appear anywhere in the pages read

How we verified this

A provider to compare ElitePhysiqMD against

Trellis Vitality

Trellis Vitality frames its program around body-composition tracking rather than scale weight, pairing NAD+, glutathione and tesamorelin with at-home biomarker panels and a 90-day re-test, and names its dispensing pharmacy, VialsRX in Houston, by address.

Read the full Trellis Vitality review

Trellis Vitality is not a paid partner; this link may earn a commission if that changes. Full disclosure.

Visit Trellis Vitality

Frequently asked questions

How many compounds does it sell?

Fifteen of the sixteen this site tracks carry a figure on its catalogue. Two of those are available only inside a two-peptide stack rather than on their own.

Is the catalogue price what I would pay?

No. Every figure on the catalogue is a member rate, and the membership carries its own monthly charge that the catalogue page never mentions. The product pages disclose it.

What if I do not want a membership?

The product pages print the alternative in full: the list rate plus a visit fee plus overnight shipping, each named, with the total shown.

Does it say these are prescription products?

Yes. It describes what it sells as real medicine rather than grey-market research peptides, and says every treatment is prescribed by a licensed physician and compounded by a licensed pharmacy.

Is the pharmacy named?

No. It is described by its licensing class on every page read and never identified.

ElitePhysiqMD is not a paid partner; this link may earn a commission if that changes. Full disclosure.

Visit ElitePhysiqMD