Best Tesamorelin Providers

Trellis Vitality frames its program around body-composition tracking rather than scale weight, pairing NAD+, glutathione and tesamorelin with at-home biomarker panels and a 90-day re-test, and names its dispensing pharmacy, VialsRX in Houston, by address.

Premier draws the line between the platform company and the medical practice more explicitly than anything else on this roster. Its peptides are priced on catalog cards, and its sermorelin page prints no figure.

RxPepsDirect charges one $39 fee per order for the medical visit and then steps out of the transaction: Optimal Balance Pharmacy bills the patient directly at its own wholesale price, and that price is printed for every peptide on the site.

Pepti prints one all-in monthly figure for every treatment it sells, in two formats side by side, and it is the only roster row that publishes both a fifty-state footprint and a price for epitalon.

MultiGen publishes a per-SKU formulary with the strength, the package size and the storage temperature on every line — and closes it by disclosing its own markup over compounding cost, which nothing else here does.

PeRx, the trading name of Wellness MD Group PC, lists twenty-six compounds and blurs the price on every one of them, publishing a floor and a range on a separate pricing page instead.

Prime Vitality Care puts baseline labs and quarterly lab monitoring inside its published monthly peptide figure, which two other rows on this roster do — and prints its membership tiers in a nav bar that renders on its privacy policy too.

Bayan Health is one of the few sellers anywhere on this roster that publishes a KPV price, and it bills that price monthly across a fixed three-month protocol.

FormBlends names its three dispensing pharmacies with their cities and designations, prices seven of the compounds compared here on one-month plans, and publishes a state-by-state map it dates and sources to its own last hundred and sixty-five shipped orders.

NEUVÉ publishes a starting monthly figure on six peptide protocols, then answers its own pricing question by saying medication, labs and supplies are billed separately — so the figure beside each protocol is not what the therapy costs.

Eviora MD prints a monthly starting figure on every card of an open twenty-card peptide menu, sells eight tracked peptides on their own, and publishes no price for its GLP-1 programs.

New Wave Health prints a monthly starting figure beside every product on a twenty-item peptide menu, and sells compounded semaglutide and tirzepatide with no price on either.

RX Bella prints a monthly starting figure on every card of a twenty-protocol peptide menu and on its two GLP-1 injections. Nine of those protocols are stacks priced as one, and no card names a dose.

DadVantage prices sermorelin at three vial strengths and NAD+ at two, and every figure it publishes is a quantity price rather than a monthly one.

MD Total Wellness prices its peptides and NAD+ by the vial with the vial size printed, on a price list of its own that its main service pages do not link to.

Robertson publishes a per-bottle catalog with the milligrams printed on every line, and opens it by telling readers it has discontinued peptides because of a federal change to what compounding pharmacies may make.

Invigorate publishes a per-compound price for eleven peptides and attaches no unit to any of them — not a vial, not a month, not a dose — on a page that prints the same list twice in two different orders.

PeptidesRx prices ten of the compounds compared here, names the pharmacy that fills the orders and gives its address, and runs two live catalogs on one domain whose figures do not agree with each other on a single compound.

Vitalex Health publishes the broadest open peptide price list read in this pass — twenty priced protocols across six goal areas, singles and stacks alike — on a page that ships the same template, the same headline and two identical figures as another seller entering this roster the same day.

Bridgeside Telehealth prices every peptide identically, at $99 for the consultation and $300 for the medication if it is prescribed, and charges nothing for the visit when therapy is judged inappropriate.

Rejuvia prices its peptides by the vial and prints beside each figure how many vials a course takes and how long it runs. The cost of a full course is mapped out at the consultation, not printed.

Rehydra+ Wellness grew out of a mobile IV-therapy business and now sells a broad peptide catalog — BPC-157, KPV, MOTS-C, tesamorelin, sermorelin and GHK-Cu — with prices posted openly on its storefront, though it names neither a legal entity nor the pharmacy that fills its orders.

Amble puts a plan ladder under a column it labels "Per Month", so every rung on it is already a monthly rate and nothing has to be divided — and then contradicts its own cheapest rung with a sitewide banner offer that no product page repeats.

Balanced Healthcare publishes two prices for everything — one for members, one for everyone else — and prices its peptide programs by tier rather than by compound.

Better Med Spa sells epithalon and GHK-Cu only as one combined protocol at one price, and attaches no billing period to any figure it publishes.

PeptideMD prices peptides by tier rather than by molecule, and its homepage and its pricing page quote two different figures for the same single-peptide tier.

Solas publishes no corporate entity and instead puts one named, licensed clinician on every page — and prices peptides per cycle rather than per month, which is a unit almost nothing else here uses.

Team Wellcore names its dispensing pharmacy with an address, a phone number and the ten states that pharmacy cannot ship sterile compounds into — and then charges for a consult before it will quote the price of any medication.

Thrivelab names 503A compounding as its source and condemns the research-peptide gray market by name — then publishes no price for any peptide it lists, only for its two weight-loss molecules.

Vita Bella prices NAD+ against IV clinics in a two-column table, and both of its own figures are conditioned by a footnote most readers will skip.

ZYP Medical prices peptides as four-week stacks rather than by the month, lists the seven states it serves by name, and states in its own words that its compounded GLP-1 medicines are not FDA-approved.

Magnolia Regenerative Medicine publishes a flat per-compound rate for twelve of the peptides this site tracks, on one catalog page, with the billing cadence printed beside each figure.

Transparent Meds names its compounding pharmacy, its clinician network and the forty-five states it serves in its own FAQ, and prices tesamorelin and sermorelin at the same figure on its home page.

LVNG RX puts a monthly starting figure on each single-peptide program and on both weight-loss injections. The weight-loss figures sit on its home page; the program pages that advertise flat, transparent pricing print none.

ElitePhysiqMD publishes the widest prescription peptide catalog on this roster — fifteen of the sixteen compounds this site tracks, each with a figure in visible text — and every one of those figures is a member rate that sits on top of a separate monthly membership charge.

Hartwater charges the same figure for every peptide it prescribes and says so in one sentence — so its price column has one number in it, and any table that gives this seller eleven different figures has invented the variance.

Meto puts a $149 blood panel in front of the prescription and bills in two published lines: a $29 monthly membership charged $320 a year, and the medication itself at a monthly rate that starts at $85 for BPC-157.

Alinwell prices eight peptides per month on one page and prices sermorelin twice — its homepage and its peptide menu carry different sermorelin figures on the same day.

Ambiante Health and Wellness is the fourth seller found serving a byte-identical peptide menu under a different company and a different price list, and it prices seven tracked compounds on its own.

Believe Health runs the same peptide menu as two other sellers on this roster under a different company, and it is the dearer of the three on every compound they share.

Longevixx runs one of the wider peptide menus on this roster — twenty programs, each quoted as a monthly figure — including PT-141, epitalon and semax, which few sellers price.

LunaRx is the only seller on the shared peptide template that prices semax, and it is the cheapest of the three on sermorelin, MOTS-C and epitalon.

Loop Health sells peptides inside a membership, prices four tracked compounds at a flat monthly rate that does not climb with dose, and states a state count rather than publishing a list.

Mirabel Meds publishes a wide peptide menu with a monthly figure on every product, and prices five of them as multi-peptide stacks rather than as single compounds.

Sky Health publishes a single alphabetical price chart covering seventy-one services, prices the peptide visit separately from the medication, and puts a "From" in front of the figures that are floors.

Regenics prints two figures for every peptide it sells — a list price and a lower member price — and the member price is the only one a buyer can reach, because the catalog itself says ten further peptides are visible only after a $39-a-month membership.

Nuform Health, Inc. sells prescription peptide kits that are prepaid in multi-month blocks, and it says in its own copy that it does not offer monthly prescriptions or subscription plans — so the per-month figure printed beside each kit is arithmetic, not a bill.

Bowery Clinic puts one flat sticker price on each peptide with the strength and the supply length printed beside it, and tells shoppers on the product page that nothing further is added at checkout.

Nip & Tuck publishes a figure against each of eight compounds and its own overall range in words — and prints two different sermorelin prices on the same page.

Miami Bariatric prices six peptides on one table and gives almost every one a different term — four to eight weeks, six weeks, nine to twelve weeks — while calling four weeks a month.

LeadWest Medical is a Newport Beach telemedicine practice serving California and Nevada that prints a price and a milligram strength for every peptide it carries, then states underneath the list that those figures exist for presentation purposes.

AgeRejuvenation names fourteen tracked compounds on one peptide page, the deepest single menu in this batch, and does not price a single one of them.

the biostation links per-compound fact sheets from its peptide page, and one of the two, fetched directly, answers successfully with an empty file.

Della Bellezza names sixteen compounds on one service page, eleven of them ones this site tracks, and its own storefront — open to the public — sells skincare rather than any of them.

Eden Health Club runs a separate page for each of thirteen compounds tied to one Colorado location, and the only number on any of them is the same one repeated sitewide.

GoalBMI Wellness sells peptides as fixed four-to-six-week programs from a Brooklyn telehealth practice, quoting each one as a starting figure with a $99 consultation stated separately alongside it.

Harmony Wellness Clinic prices its peptides by supply length rather than by month, and three of its four supply lengths are not a month.

Nava Health publishes a full price list with a member and a non-member column for every line, prices NAD+ and glutathione by the infusion at three strengths each, and adds a third column for two membership tiers on its packages.

The only two dollar figures on Pure Hydration's copper-peptide page are the seller describing what the market charges, in an answer that never says what it charges.

Relive Health's terms name a franchising company rather than a clinical one, so the party on the other side of the contract is the brand owner.

South Florida Face & Body publishes a whole-menu price range instead of a price per compound, and says plainly that a quote far below the market usually means gray-market product.

Spa Sydell organizes its peptide menu three ways — by compound, by blend and by concern — and prices none of them; the numbers on its site belong to its skincare shop.

Vyora Wellness describes independent third-party potency and purity testing in its own FAQ, and publishes one peptide price behind a shop that hides most of the rest.

Royal Medical Centers publishes its whole peptide catalog as eleven product pages, prices each one for a month and for two months, and prints an FDA compounding disclaimer on every page.

California Trim Clinic advertises a monthly starting figure for each weight-loss drug and footnotes it with a three-month requirement, and lists thirteen tracked peptides on a therapy page that carries no price at all.

Carolina Health & Wellness carries eight tracked compounds across a deep site and puts a figure on none of them.

This clinic names eighteen compounds on one page, eleven of them tracked here, and the only company name on its legal page belongs to the agency that built the site.

Dvida tells readers, on its own peptide page, that two of the compounds it lists there appear on the FDA's bulk drug substances warning list and are not approved for human use.

Focal Point Vitality carries eleven tracked compounds in its own navigation, including KPV and semax, and no price behind any of them.

Hybrid Medical Solution names ten tracked compounds across goal-based sub-pages, links a storefront that sells supplements, and carries only its web agency's company name on the page.

InCare prints the sentence most sellers avoid — that its own menu mixes prescription medicines with research-only compounds — and tags the entries one by one.

MetroMed names eleven tracked compounds and sells some of them as kits, on a page that is nearly two megabytes of markup wrapped around about eight thousand characters of text.

Mojo Vitality names seven compounds including PT-141 and tesamorelin on a three-page site, and publishes no figure on any of them.

R2 publishes a regulatory-status and evidence-strength table against its own catalog, and tells readers in that table that the clinical evidence for some of what it sells is insufficient.

The Recovery Project carries twelve tracked compounds in its navigation, KPV and semax among them, and prices none of them anywhere on the site.

REGENX Health lists four peptides on a dedicated peptides page and puts a figure against none of them.

Revitalize lists seventeen peptides on a page with no prices on it, prices two of them on a different page, and publishes the rest of the menu as a downloadable PDF — which does resolve.

Rewind Anti-Aging of Miami gives seven compounds their own service pages and prices none of them — and shares nothing but a brand word with the Rewinding RX already on this roster.

Sage Wellness runs a numbered twenty-two entry per-compound library on its own domain, the largest structured compound reference any single seller on this roster publishes.

SCULPT promises a certificate of analysis, a third-party test and a purity threshold of ninety-nine percent, and publishes no certificate, no PDF and no link anywhere on the page that says it.

Strong Health writes the research-use distinction into its own sales copy and puts a page behind each of eleven compounds, then prints no figure on any of them.

VIP publishes the same product page five times, once per town, all linked from one document — so anything that crawls this seller sees five candidates unless it notices.

VitalRenew names nine tracked compounds in about five thousand characters, and only one of them has a page of its own.

Every dollar figure on Perfect B's peptide site prices a downloadable PDF guide, not a peptide — so a price scraper pointed at this host publishes a therapy price that does not exist.

telos rx names its operating company beside its brand in the footer and names sixteen peptides on one page — and publishes no figure on that page for any of them.

Viking runs a pricing page that refuses to price, and says why in words worth quoting — what it publishes instead is what it says its patients typically pay, which is not the same thing.