Relive Health is a franchisor rather than a clinic, and it says so in the name it publishes: the company on the other side of its terms is the franchising entity. It names nine of the compounds this site tracks and prices none of them, and its terms carry a modification date nearly three years old.
What Relive Health charges
Relive Health does not publish a price today.
Relive Health also sells 9 compounds this site boards without publishing a price for them: CJC-1295 (board ranks no provider), GHK-Cu, Ipamorelin (board ranks no provider), MOTS-C (board ranks no provider), NAD+, PT-141, Sermorelin, TB-500 (board ranks no provider) and Tesamorelin.
Relive Health is not a paid partner; this link may earn a commission if that changes. Full disclosure.
By Nora Castellan, Standards EditorUpdated September 2026
The company you contract with is a franchisor
The terms name a franchising company as the party, not a clinical practice, and give a postal address for it.
That distinction matters for a reader trying to work out who is responsible for the care as opposed to the brand.
It is a structure this comparison contains more than one example of, and it is not visible from a service page.
The name is published clearly enough that a reader can look the company up, which is the point of recording it.
A nine-compound list and a stale legal page
The peptide page names nine tracked compounds and three more this site does not follow, all in one document.
The terms carry a last-modified date from nearly three years before this reading, which is worth knowing before relying on any clause in them.
Nothing on either page attaches a figure to any compound.
A wide menu and an old legal page is a common combination here, and both halves are recorded rather than the flattering one.
No figure, and where one was looked for
Neither the peptide page nor the terms carries a dollar sign anywhere in its joined text.
The documentation question closes quickly: no certificate is claimed, and the attribute sweep found none linked either.
Publishing a figure somewhere on its own site is true of one hundred and thirty-seven of the two hundred and ten sellers here, so it separates far fewer of them than a reader expects.
The host itself was checked in the same pass as everything above: ⛔ 200 for a path that does not exist, with the nonsense path served straight back and no redirect to expose it, which is what any absence recorded here rests on.
What the roster says about these gaps
One hundred and seventy-six of the two hundred and ten sellers here publish no state list at all, and this is one of them, so eligibility is settled inside an intake rather than before one.
Sixteen of the two hundred and ten sellers here name the facility that fills an order; this is one of the one hundred and ninety-four that do not, so there is no facility a reader can look up.
Four of the two hundred and ten sellers here describe lab work as included in what they charge, and this is not one of them.
It declares nine of the sixteen compounds this site tracks, and thirty-five sellers here declare more, so it is an above-average menu rather than a wide one.
Who it's for
Readers who want to know whether the company behind a brand is a franchisor.
Buyers who want a wide compound list from a branded network.
Shoppers near one of the network's locations.
Anyone comparing declared menus across multi-location operators.
Who should look elsewhere
Anyone who needs a price.
Readers who want a clinical entity named rather than a franchising one.
Buyers relying on current legal terms.
Shoppers looking for glutathione, epitalon, semax or KPV, none of which is named.
Strengths
Names the contracting company and publishes a postal address for it
Names the company on the other side of the transaction rather than only a trading name
Declares nine of the sixteen compounds this site tracks on pages a reader can reach
Answers the category question in plain language rather than in a disclaimer
Trade-offs
Its terms carry a last-modified date from nearly three years before this reading
Publishes no figure for any compound on the pages read
Publishes no state list and names no dispensing pharmacy
Describes no lab work as included in what it charges
How we verified this
Read every page cited on this row as rendered text in a browser-equivalent fetch, with the response decompressed before any character was counted.
Fired a nonsense-path control at this host in the same run and compared the address requested with the address actually served, so no claim here rests on a status code alone.
Joined every text node before scanning for a dollar sign, so a figure split across nested elements could not read as an absence.
Fired a nonsense-path control and found this host answers 200 with the nonsense path served back unchanged, so every address here came from the seller's own links.
Read the last-modified date printed on the terms rather than assuming a current legal page.
Screened this seller in the live federal warning-letter record by entity and by brand, with a known-good positive control and a nonsense negative control fired in the same run.
Read the company column of every returned record rather than accepting a full-text match, and attached no letter on a name match.
Swept every attribute on the pages read for a certificate, not only the link targets, because certificates in this market hide in data attributes and lightbox images.
Re-counted the state-list, pharmacy-naming and lab-inclusion claims against the current roster rather than reusing figures from an earlier pass.
A provider to compare Relive Health against
Trellis Vitality
Trellis Vitality frames its program around body-composition tracking rather than scale weight, pairing NAD+, glutathione and tesamorelin with at-home biomarker panels and a 90-day re-test, and names its dispensing pharmacy, VialsRX in Houston, by address.