Every dollar figure on this seller's peptide site prices a downloadable PDF guide, not a peptide. A price extractor pointed at this host publishes a therapy price that does not exist.
What Perfect B Aesthetic Medicine charges
Perfect B Aesthetic Medicine does not publish a price today.
Perfect B Aesthetic Medicine also sells 8 compounds this site boards without publishing a price for them: Ipamorelin (board ranks no provider), Tesamorelin, BPC-157 (board ranks no provider), TB-500 (board ranks no provider), GHK-Cu, MOTS-C (board ranks no provider), Semax (board ranks no provider) and Epitalon (board ranks no provider).
Perfect B Aesthetic Medicine is not a paid partner; this link may earn a commission if that changes. Full disclosure.
By Nora Castellan, Standards EditorUpdated September 2026
Read the noun before the number
The peptide host carries five dollar amounts. They sit in an access block offering one guide, three guides at a discount against a struck-through anchor, or all ten guides at a larger discount, described as instant downloads with a one-time payment.
Every one of those figures buys a document. Not a consultation, not a vial, not a month — a PDF protocol guide.
A naive extractor takes the lowest figure, finds a peptide name in the same block, and publishes a per-peptide therapy price. It would be wrong by category, not by degree, and the source URL behind it would look entirely legitimate.
This site records no price for this seller, and this review exists mainly to name the shape.
The cost article is about other companies
The seller's parent domain publishes a cost article for one of the peptides, and that article carries dozens of figures in per-vial, per-month, per-cycle and per-year units.
Those are market-survey numbers describing what other providers charge. None is this seller's price, and attributing any of them would be a fabrication with a real-looking citation.
This is one of several sellers in this batch that publish editorial about the market's prices on their own domain. Where the domain is the seller's, the temptation to read the numbers as the seller's is strong and always wrong.
A named catalogue and nothing else
The seller states how many peptide options it offers and then names them, which makes the catalogue easy to census. Eight compounds this site tracks are among them.
No corporate entity is published; the footer carries a trading name only. No dispensing pharmacy is named and no state coverage exists.
No certificate or testing document is claimed anywhere on the pages read.
Who it's for
Nobody comparing prices — this row exists to show what a plausible-looking price can turn out to be.
Readers who want a seller to state and name its whole catalogue.
Buyers interested in per-compound protocol documents.
Shoppers near the practice.
Who should look elsewhere
Anyone looking for a therapy price on this host, which does not publish one.
Readers who would read the cost article's figures as this seller's.
Buyers who need a corporate entity or a named pharmacy.
Shoppers who need state coverage.
Strengths
States how many peptide options it offers and names every one of them
Publishes protocol guides per compound rather than one generic explainer
Prices its guides transparently, with the discount arithmetic shown
Runs the peptide catalogue on its own subdomain, so the menu is easy to census
Trade-offs
Publishes no therapy price at all — every figure on the peptide host buys a PDF
Its cost articles quote a whole market's figures on the seller's own domain, which is easy to misattribute
Publishes no corporate entity
Names no dispensing pharmacy and publishes no state coverage
How we verified this
Fetched the peptide host's front page with a full browser user-agent and compared the effective URL to the requested one.
Fired a nonsense-path control at that host in the same run; it returned an honest not-found status.
Joined the text nodes before matching and read all five dollar amounts with the nouns they attach to.
Established that every figure prices a downloadable document and recorded no therapy price rather than attributing one.
Excluded the parent domain's cost-article figures as market-survey numbers about other companies.
Counted the compounds this site tracks among the options the seller names.
Screened the trading name against the regulator's live warning-letter index, with a known-positive and a nonsense control in the same run.
A provider to compare Perfect B Aesthetic Medicine against
Trellis Vitality
Trellis Vitality frames its program around body-composition tracking rather than scale weight, pairing NAD+, glutathione and tesamorelin with at-home biomarker panels and a 90-day re-test, and names its dispensing pharmacy, VialsRX in Houston, by address.