Transparent Meds answers the two questions most telehealth sellers dodge. Asked who its pharmacies are, it gives a name. Asked what states it serves, it lists forty-five and names the five it does not.
What Transparent Meds charges
Tesamorelin: $179/mo — per month as a program fee, struck through from $229; the page states the fee covers syringes and cold-pack shipping when prescribed
Sermorelin: $179/mo — per month as a program fee, struck through from $229 — the same pair of figures the tesamorelin card carries
Transparent Meds is not a paid partner; this link may earn a commission if that changes. Full disclosure.
By Nora Castellan, Standards EditorUpdated September 2026
It names the pharmacy and the clinician network separately
Its own FAQ answer is a name, not a category: prescriptions are fulfilled by a named United States compounding pharmacy, and the footer repeats the same name.
The clinician network is named separately, and the platform states that it is not itself a medical practice, a pharmacy or a healthcare provider.
Three different entities, three different roles, each said out loud — which is what makes a claim about any one of them checkable.
The state list is a list
It answers "What states do you serve?" by naming them, and the answer is forty-five rather than fifty.
It then names the gap by implication and invites contact: "Don't see your state? Contact us. We're expanding and may be able to help."
That last sentence is an intention rather than coverage, so it is not recorded here. The list is.
The unit is stated in a footnote, not left to inference
Directly beneath the price grid the page says the figures shown are monthly programme fees when prescribed, and that final cost is determined after clinician review.
Each card also prints a struck-through figure beside the live one, so the discount is visible rather than implied.
Both peptide cards carry the same pair of figures, which means neither is priced against the other on this site.
What renders and what is served
The price grid does not exist in the document this host serves. Every path returns the same shell, which is normal for an application of this kind and a trap for anything that reads served HTML only.
Read in a browser, the grid appears in full and every figure sits in laid-out visible text.
Its own AI-use policy is worth reading beside its imagery: it warns that pictures and video on the site may be entirely AI-generated.
Who it's for
Readers who want the dispensing pharmacy named before they buy.
Buyers who want a state list rather than a nationwide badge.
Shoppers who want the billing unit stated in the seller's own footnote.
Anyone comparing two growth-hormone-axis peptides from the same seller at the same fee.
Who should look elsewhere
Readers in Alaska, Louisiana, Mississippi, New Hampshire or New Mexico, the five states it names as unserved.
Buyers who want lab work covered by the programme fee rather than ordered at a clinician's discretion.
Shoppers who want the two peptides priced differently from one another.
Anyone who needs the product imagery to be photographic.
Strengths
Answers "Who are your pharmacies?" with a name — Rush Pharmacy — rather than with a regulatory category
Publishes the states it serves as a list and names the five it does not, instead of printing a nationwide badge
Names the clinician network separately from the platform, and says the platform is not a medical practice or a pharmacy
Says in a footnote beneath the grid that the figures are monthly program fees, so the unit is not left to inference
Trade-offs
The price grid does not exist until the page renders — the served document is the same shell for every path
Its two peptide cards carry the same live figure and the same struck-through figure, so neither is priced against the other
Labs are ordered only at a clinician's discretion and are not covered by the program fee
Its own AI-use policy warns that images and videos on the site "may contain or consist entirely of AI-generated or AI-enhanced depictions"
How we verified this
Read the price grid in a rendered browser, because the served document is the same shell for every path on this host and contains no grid at all.
Opened the FAQ answers individually rather than reading the question headings, and quoted the pharmacy answer and the state answer from the expanded text.
Counted the state list rather than trusting the shape of it, and named the five absences.
Recorded the live figure and the struck-through figure together, and took the monthly unit from the seller's own footnote beneath the grid.
Requested two deliberately meaningless paths on this host in the same session; both answered with a success code, so presence was judged on the rendered document, which was a bare not-found page with no grid.
Screened the brand against the live federal warning-letter table with a known-positive company and a nonsense string as controls in the same run; no letter.
A provider to compare Transparent Meds against
Trellis Vitality
Trellis Vitality frames its program around body-composition tracking rather than scale weight, pairing NAD+, glutathione and tesamorelin with at-home biomarker panels and a 90-day re-test, and names its dispensing pharmacy, VialsRX in Houston, by address.
It names one, in its own FAQ and again in its footer — a United States, state-licensed compounding pharmacy, identified by name rather than by category.
Does it serve my state?
It publishes a list of forty-five. The five it does not serve are Alaska, Louisiana, Mississippi, New Hampshire and New Mexico.
Are the prices monthly?
Yes. A footnote directly beneath the grid says the figures shown are monthly programme fees when prescribed.
Do I need labs?
Only if a clinician decides they are appropriate. Its own answer is that in-person steps or labs are ordered at the clinician's discretion, so no lab work is covered by the fee.
Transparent Meds is not a paid partner; this link may earn a commission if that changes. Full disclosure.