AgeRejuvenation names fourteen tracked compounds on a single peptide page, one of the deepest menus on this roster, and attaches a figure to none of them.
What AgeRejuvenation charges
AgeRejuvenation does not publish a price today.
AgeRejuvenation also sells 14 compounds this site boards without publishing a price for them: BPC-157 (board ranks no provider), CJC-1295 (board ranks no provider), Epitalon (board ranks no provider), GHK-Cu, Glutathione, Ipamorelin (board ranks no provider), KPV (board ranks no provider), MOTS-C (board ranks no provider), NAD+, PT-141, Semax (board ranks no provider), Sermorelin, TB-500 (board ranks no provider) and Tesamorelin.
AgeRejuvenation is not a paid partner; this link may earn a commission if that changes. Full disclosure.
By Nora Castellan, Standards EditorUpdated September 2026
One page, fourteen compounds
The peptide therapy page names fourteen compounds this site tracks, which is more than most sellers list across an entire catalog, let alone on one page.
BPC-157, CJC-1295, epitalon, GHK-Cu, glutathione, ipamorelin, KPV, MOTS-c, NAD+, PT-141, semax, sermorelin, TB-500 and tesamorelin all appear together.
NAD+ and glutathione also get pages of their own beneath the main menu, so the two most commonly asked-about lines are given room to be explained separately.
The recurring number is not a price
One figure appears on every page of the site, unchanged from page to page. A number that never varies with the content around it is site furniture rather than the cost of anything.
The peptide menu carries no figure of its own, and neither does any compound page. So a menu of fourteen compounds resolves to zero published costs.
Anyone comparing on price will have to ask by compound, and should confirm whether the recurring number has any bearing on treatment at all.
A location-specific company behind a location-neutral brand
The operating company is named on both the privacy policy and the terms page, which is a more consistent disclosure than most sellers here manage.
That company name is tied to one specific location, while the brand is presented as regional. The two do not describe the same footprint.
It is a disclosure rather than a defect, but a reader should search the company name printed on the legal pages when checking licenses or filings.
What the consult will decide
No list of states appears anywhere, so eligibility is settled by contacting the clinic rather than by reading a coverage list first.
The facility that compounds or dispenses is not named on any page. A buyer has no specific pharmacy to look up before starting a course.
No lab work is described as included in what the clinic charges. Treat any panel as a separate charge and get that confirmed before booking.
Who it's for
Readers whose compound is unusual enough that menu depth matters more than price.
Buyers shopping KPV, semax, epitalon or MOTS-c, which most rosters miss entirely.
Anyone who wants NAD+ and glutathione explained on their own pages.
Shoppers who want the operating company named on more than one legal page.
Who should look elsewhere
Anyone who needs a figure before contacting a clinic.
Readers who want the brand footprint to match the legal entity behind it.
Buyers who need a state list to confirm eligibility in advance.
Shoppers who want the dispensing facility named or lab work included.
Strengths
Names fourteen tracked compounds on one page, the deepest single menu here
Names its operating company on two separate legal pages
Runs separate NAD+ and glutathione pages beneath the main peptide menu
Covers KPV, semax, epitalon and MOTS-c, which most rosters miss entirely
Trade-offs
Carries no figure on its peptide menu or on any compound page
Its legal name is tied to one location while the brand is presented as regional
Publishes no state list and names no dispensing pharmacy
Describes no lab work as included in what it charges
How we verified this
Read the peptide therapy page and counted the tracked compounds named on it, recording the list rather than a summary of it.
Compared the one recurring figure across pages and recorded it as site furniture, because it repeats identically wherever it appears.
Confirmed the peptide menu and the compound pages carry no figure of their own before recording no price row for this seller.
Read the privacy policy and the terms page for the operating company and recorded the name exactly as printed on both.
Screened this clinic against the federal warning-letter record by company name and by brand, with a known-positive and a nonsense control run alongside it.
A provider to compare AgeRejuvenation against
Trellis Vitality
Trellis Vitality frames its program around body-composition tracking rather than scale weight, pairing NAD+, glutathione and tesamorelin with at-home biomarker panels and a 90-day re-test, and names its dispensing pharmacy, VialsRX in Houston, by address.