Provider review, September 2026

Team Wellcore Review

Team Wellcore names its dispensing pharmacy with an address and lists the ten states it cannot ship sterile compounds into, which is better disclosure than most of this roster. Then four of its six tracked products publish a price only to search engines, and never to a reader.

What Team Wellcore charges

NAD+: $250/mo — the only NAD+ figure the page actually renders — "Starting at $250" in its body copy, with no billing period; its structured data carries a lower figure that appears nowhere on screen, and a separate "$34 for consult" is charged before any medication is priced
Glutathione: $179/mo — the only glutathione figure the page actually renders — "Starting at $179" in its body copy, with no billing period; its structured data carries a lower figure that appears nowhere on screen, and a separate "$34 for consult" is charged before any medication is priced

Team Wellcore also sells 4 compounds this site boards without publishing a price for them: Sermorelin, Tesamorelin, GHK-Cu and PT-141.

Team Wellcore is not a paid partner; this link may earn a commission if that changes. Full disclosure.

Visit Team Wellcore

By Nora Castellan, Standards EditorUpdated September 2026

The price most of these products publish is not on the page

Six of the compounds this site ranks have a product page here. Only two of those pages show a reader a figure for the medication: one sentence of body copy on the NAD+ page and one on the glutathione page, each beginning with the words starting at.

The other four pages show no medication figure at all. Extract the visible text of the sermorelin, tesamorelin, copper-peptide or PT-141 pages and the only dollar amount on any of them is the consultation charge.

The figures exist. Every one of the six pages carries a price inside its structured data, the block of machine-readable markup a search engine reads to build a result listing. That is metadata written for a crawler, and it is not a price published to a customer.

So this site records two figures from this seller and leaves four products unpriced. A number a page never renders has not been published, and quoting one would put a price in front of readers that the seller has not put in front of its own.

Where both figures exist, they disagree

On the two pages that do render something, the visible sentence and the hidden metadata do not match. The NAD+ page tells a reader the therapy starts at one figure while its structured data carries a lower one. The glutathione page does the same thing, and the gap there is wider.

In both cases the number a reader sees is the higher one, and the number a search engine sees is the lower one. Whatever the reason, the effect is that the listing a shopper finds in search results is cheaper than the page it leads to.

This site records the visible figure in both cases. That is the more expensive reading, which is this site's standing rule whenever a seller contradicts itself, and it is also the only reading a customer could actually have arrived at by reading the page.

Neither visible figure carries a billing period. Nothing says whether the amount buys a month, a vial or a course, so neither is treated here as a monthly rate and both sit outside this site's monthly orderings.

You pay for the consultation before you learn the price

Every product page carries the same line: an initial charge for the consult, with the price of the medication charged upon consult approval. The consultation figure is small and it is stated plainly, which is more than several sellers here manage.

What it means in practice is that the cost of the therapy is settled after money has already changed hands and a provider has reviewed an intake. For the four products with no visible figure, a buyer has no published number to weigh at all before paying the consult.

The refill arrangement is stated: most products are described as being on a thirty- or ninety-day auto-renewal, with notice before each shipment. That is a recurring commitment, and it is disclosed rather than left to be discovered on a bank statement.

Labs are required for the testosterone program at a named national laboratory, and no peptide price here is described as including lab work.

The best disclosure on the site, and the arithmetic that undoes it

An expandable panel on the FAQ names the dispensing pharmacy in full, with a street address in Ohio and a telephone number. Eight of the thirty-one sellers compared on this site name the facility that fills an order, and this is one of them.

The same panel does something rarer still: it names the states that pharmacy cannot serve. Ten are listed by name, and the reason given is that it cannot dispense sterile compounds there. An exclusion list is more useful to a shopper than a coverage claim, because it can be checked against where they live.

The panel then says the pharmacy holds licenses in forty-four states. Fifty states minus ten exclusions is forty. The specific list and the round number cannot both be right, and this site records the narrower reading, because the list is checkable and the count is not.

The company behind the brand is named in the privacy policy as a limited liability company trading under the Wellcore name, with a Michigan address. Its own FAQ is direct that its compounded products are patient-specific and not FDA-approved.

Who it's for

Readers who want the dispensing pharmacy identifiable by address and phone rather than described as a licensed facility.
Shoppers who would rather be told which states are excluded than be given a coverage claim they cannot check.
Buyers who want the auto-renewal cadence disclosed before they start rather than discovered on a statement.
Anyone who wants a seller to say plainly that its compounded products are patient-specific and not FDA-approved.

Who should look elsewhere

Anyone comparing prices, since four of six tracked products show a reader no figure at all.
Shoppers who will not pay a consultation charge before learning what the medication costs.
Readers who need a monthly rate, because neither visible figure carries a billing period.
Buyers in the ten excluded states, who cannot be sent a sterile compounded injection at all.
Anyone who wants a seller's own state count to agree with its own state list.

Strengths

Names the dispensing pharmacy with a street address and a phone number rather than describing a class of facility
Names the ten states that pharmacy cannot ship sterile compounds into, which is a checkable exclusion list rather than a coverage claim
States the consult charge up front and says the medication is billed only after a provider approves
Describes its compounded products as patient-specific and not FDA-approved in its own FAQ rather than burying the point

Trade-offs

Four of its six tracked products publish a price only inside structured data, where no reader ever sees it
Where a visible figure and a structured-data figure both exist they disagree, and the visible one is the higher
Its own state arithmetic is wrong — it claims licensure in forty-four states while naming ten it is excluded from
No visible figure carries a billing period, so nothing it publishes can be read as a monthly rate

How we verified this

Loaded the two priced product pages and the FAQ twice, more than a minute apart, and compared the price, state and consult tokens; all three were identical across the pair.
Probed the host with a nonsense path in the same run and confirmed a not-found response at a size clearly distinct from a real product page.
Checked the final resolved address of every fetch, which is how several product paths were found to redirect to gendered variants of themselves.
Extracted the visible text of all six product pages and confirmed that four of them render no medication figure anywhere.
Read the structured-data price on all six pages separately, compared it against the visible text, and recorded the visible figure wherever the two disagreed.
Declined to record any figure that appears only in structured data, on the ground that metadata for a crawler is not a price published to a reader.
Opened the FAQ's partner-pharmacy panel and recorded the pharmacy name, address, phone number and the ten excluded states as published.
Built the state list from the ten named exclusions rather than from the seller's own count, after confirming the two do not agree.
Confirmed the operating company from the privacy policy rather than from the brand name on the site.
Counted the pharmacy-naming claim against the current roster rather than reusing an earlier figure.

A provider to compare Team Wellcore against

Trellis Vitality

Trellis Vitality frames its program around body-composition tracking rather than scale weight, pairing NAD+, glutathione and tesamorelin with at-home biomarker panels and a 90-day re-test, and names its dispensing pharmacy, VialsRX in Houston, by address.

Read the full Trellis Vitality review

Trellis Vitality is not a paid partner; this link may earn a commission if that changes. Full disclosure.

Visit Trellis Vitality

Frequently asked questions

Why do only two products have a price here?

Because only two of the six pages show a reader a figure. The other four carry a price inside machine-readable markup that no visitor sees, and metadata written for a search engine is not a published price.

Which figure is right when the page and the metadata disagree?

This site records the one a reader can see, which on both pages is the higher of the two. That is the only figure a customer could have reached by reading the page.

Do I pay before I know what the medication costs?

Yes. Every product page states an initial consultation charge, with the medication priced only after a provider approves. For the four unpriced products there is no published figure to weigh beforehand.

Which states cannot be served?

The FAQ names ten by name — California, Nevada, New Jersey, North Carolina, Texas, Massachusetts, Mississippi, New Hampshire, West Virginia and Delaware — because the partner pharmacy cannot dispense sterile compounds there.

The site says forty-four states. Why does this page say forty?

Because fifty states minus the ten it excludes is forty. The specific exclusion list is checkable and the round number is not, so the narrower reading is recorded and the disagreement is noted.

Which pharmacy fills the order?

It is named in full on the FAQ, with a street address in Ohio and a telephone number. That is enough to look the facility up, which most sellers compared here do not allow.