Loop Health charges one flat monthly figure at every GLP-1 dose and prices four tracked peptides beside them. It states a state count without publishing a list, and its host returns a success code for pages that do not exist, so nothing here is recorded as absent on a status code alone.
What Loop Health charges
NAD+: $229/mo — starting at, per month, on both the men’s and the women’s shop pages
Sermorelin: $229/mo — starting at, per month, on both the men’s and the women’s shop pages
Tesamorelin: $399/mo — starting at, per month, on both the men’s and the women’s shop pages
Glutathione: $149/mo — starting at, per month, on both the men’s and the women’s shop pages
Tirzepatide: $299/mo — per month at every dose, as the page states — "All doses $299 / mo"
Tirzepatide: $399/mo — per month at every dose, for the oral form
Semaglutide: $199/mo — per month at every dose, as the page states — "All doses $199 / mo"
Loop Health also sells 1 compound this site boards without publishing a price for it: GHK-Cu.
Loop Health is not a paid partner; this link may earn a commission if that changes. Full disclosure.
By Nora Castellan, Standards EditorUpdated September 2026
A price that does not move with the dose
Its shop pages print the phrase "All doses" beside each weight-loss figure. An injection carries one monthly rate and an oral form another, and neither changes as a patient titrates up.
That is worth naming because a dose ladder is the usual shape on this roster: a figure that starts low and roughly doubles by the top of the range.
The peptide side is priced the same way, as a starting monthly figure per compound, on both the men's and the women's shop pages with identical numbers.
The host answers for pages that do not exist
A deliberately meaningless address on this host returned a success code in the same session as the homepage.
On a host like that, a document appearing to be reachable proves nothing, and neither does a page appearing to exist.
So every negative on this record is a negative read in the text of a real page, never inferred from a status code.
What it says about itself
It describes itself as an independent health research collective and sells peptides inside a membership rather than as standalone products.
It names specific trials by name and journal beside its weight-loss claims rather than describing evidence in general terms.
It says its protocols are prescribed by a licensed clinician based on an intake, and pairs a member with a compound rather than selling a catalogue.
Coverage and the gaps
It says its service is available in forty-four states. That is a count, and a count is not a list, so no state coverage is recorded on this row.
No dispensing pharmacy is named.
Because peptides sit inside a membership, the per-compound figure is not the whole cost of the first month.
Who it's for
Readers who want one flat monthly figure that does not rise as the dose goes up.
Buyers who want peptides and weight-loss medicines priced on the same page.
Shoppers who value named trials beside a claim.
Anyone comparing an injectable against an oral form at the same seller.
Who should look elsewhere
Readers who need a published list of served states.
Buyers who want the dispensing pharmacy named.
Anyone who does not want a membership wrapped around a prescription.
Shoppers who want an absence here proven rather than read.
Strengths
Charges the same monthly figure at every GLP-1 dose, so titrating up does not raise the bill
Prices four tracked peptides on the same page as its weight-loss medicines
Cites named trials by name and journal beside its GLP-1 claims
Describes itself as an independent health research collective rather than a pharmacy
Trade-offs
States a count of forty-four states but publishes no list of them
Its host answers a success code for a page that does not exist, so nothing can be shown absent by status alone
Names no dispensing pharmacy
Sells peptides only inside a membership, so the peptide figure is not the whole cost
How we verified this
Read both shop pages on the same day and confirmed the peptide figures are identical on each.
Requested a deliberately meaningless address on this host in the same session and found it returns a success code, so no absence on this row rests on a status code.
Recorded the state figure as a count rather than converting it into a list of states the seller never published.
Screened the brand and the operating name against the live federal warning-letter table, filtering locally because the table's own search parameter returns every record whatever is typed into it, with a positive and a nonsense control in the same run.
Read the "All doses" wording from the page rather than inferring a flat rate from a single figure.
A provider to compare Loop Health against
Trellis Vitality
Trellis Vitality frames its program around body-composition tracking rather than scale weight, pairing NAD+, glutathione and tesamorelin with at-home biomarker panels and a 90-day re-test, and names its dispensing pharmacy, VialsRX in Houston, by address.
Does the price really stay the same at every dose?
That is what the page says: the weight-loss figures are printed with the words "All doses" beside them. It is the seller's own claim, read from its shop pages.
Which forty-four states?
It does not say. It publishes the number and no list, so no state coverage is credited to this row.
Why does the host matter?
Because it returns a success code for an address that does not exist. On such a host, a missing document and a present one look identical, so absences have to be read rather than probed.
Is the peptide figure the whole cost?
No. Peptides are sold inside a membership, so the monthly figure per compound sits on top of whatever the membership costs.
Loop Health is not a paid partner; this link may earn a commission if that changes. Full disclosure.