MEDGm is one of the few sellers here that names the brand-name products it dispenses — Zepbound, Wegovy and Ozempic — instead of describing an unnamed molecule. What it does not do is tell you what they cost. The figure on every brand tile is a membership fee, and each tile says so in its own words: membership plus medication cost. The medication cost appears nowhere on the site, so the most prominent number on the page is the one part of the bill you can be sure of and the smaller part of what you will pay.
What MEDGm charges
Tirzepatide: $99 — a membership fee that EXCLUDES the medication — the tile reads "$99 MEMBERSHIP + MEDICATION COST" for the Zepbound injection, and the medication cost is not published anywhere on the site
Semaglutide: $171 — a membership fee that EXCLUDES the medication — "$171 MEMBERSHIP + MEDICATION COST" on the Ozempic tile, while the Wegovy tile on the same page carries a $99 membership; neither figure includes the drug
MEDGm is a paid partner; this link may earn a commission. Full disclosure.
By Nora Castellan, Standards EditorUpdated September 2026
The number on the tile is not the price of the drug
Each brand tile carries a figure and, immediately beside it, the words that qualify it: a membership, plus medication cost. That is a more honest construction than many pages here manage, because the qualifier sits in the same line of visible text as the number rather than in a footnote.
The problem is what comes next, which is nothing. The medication cost is not published on the product page, in the terms, in the refund policy, or anywhere else in the seller's sitemap. A reader can learn the price of joining and cannot learn the price of the thing they are joining to buy.
The membership itself is also not one number. Two routes to the same molecule carry two different membership figures on the same page, which means a shopper comparing this seller's semaglutide against another site's is comparing something that varies inside this seller's own catalogue.
Naming the brand is worth something
Most companies in this comparison sell a compounded preparation and name only the molecule. That is accurate as far as it goes, and it leaves the reader unable to tell whether an approved product or a compounded one arrives in the box. This seller names three approved products outright.
That has a practical consequence: for those three, a public label exists that a reader can check without going through the company. Nothing on a marketing page has that property.
It also runs a separate compounded lane, advertised with a price and without a molecule name. The two halves of the catalogue therefore fail in opposite directions — the brands are named but unpriced, the compounded lane is priced but unnamed.
What it says about pharmacies, labs and states
It advertises that lab work is included, in the same marquee that advertises clear pricing. The record carries that as the seller's own claim; nothing here establishes that a panel is actually drawn.
It does not name a pharmacy. The footer says licensed pharmacies and the terms say independent pharmacy partners, both of which are categories rather than a name anyone can look up against a state board's register.
It publishes no state list, and its terms say some services and medications may not be available in every state. The product page adds that telemedicine rules vary by state. The record therefore claims no fifty-state footprint for it — a census of all eight content pages in its sitemap found no such claim to record.
Why it appears on a peptide comparison at all
Semaglutide and tirzepatide are peptides. They reach most readers through drug advertising rather than through the peptide market, which is why they are easy to think of as a separate category, but they belong to the same class as everything else compared here.
This seller qualifies on those two and on nothing else. Its sitemap contains exactly one product page, and the other categories it lists are marked as coming soon. It will not appear on a sermorelin or NAD+ board because it does not sell them.
That narrowness is worth knowing before clicking. A reader looking for a broad peptide catalogue is looking at the wrong company; a reader who wants a named brand-name GLP-1 is looking at one of the few here that will say which product it means.
Who it's for
Buyers who want a brand-name GLP-1 identified by name, with a public label behind it, rather than an unnamed molecule.
People willing to contact the company to find out the medication cost, having seen only the membership fee published.
Readers who value lab work being included in the advertised offer.
Who should look elsewhere
Anyone who needs to know the full monthly cost before starting — the medication charge is published nowhere on the site.
Anyone who wants the dispensing pharmacy named; this seller names a category, not a pharmacy.
Anyone shopping a broad peptide catalogue — this company sells GLP-1s and nothing else this site tracks.
Anyone who needs certainty about availability in their state before paying, since the terms say some services are unavailable in some states without saying which.
Strengths
Sells brand-name GLP-1s under their own names — Zepbound, Wegovy and Ozempic — rather than describing an unnamed molecule
States plainly on each brand tile that the published figure is a membership and that medication is charged on top
Includes lab work in what it advertises, which most of this comparison does not
Trade-offs
The medication cost is never published, so no brand tile answers what a month actually costs
The membership fee itself differs by brand, so two semaglutide routes carry two different figures
Its compounded lane advertises a price without naming the molecule being compounded
No pharmacy is named, and its own terms say some services are unavailable in some states without saying which
How we verified this
Read every page in the seller's own sitemap on 8 September 2026, rendered rather than from a page summary, and took each figure from the tile that carries it.
Ran a nonsense-path control on the same host in the same session; it returned the site's real not-found document, distinct from every page read, so the pages are pages that exist.
Recorded both published figures as membership fees rather than medication prices, because each tile states in visible text that medication is charged on top.
Noted that the two routes to the same molecule carry different membership figures, rather than reconciling them into one number.
Established the molecules from the brand names on the tiles: a search of the product page for the molecule names returns nothing, because the seller writes brands.
Recorded no state list after a census of all eight content pages, and noted that the terms say some services may not be available in every state.
⛔ No FDA warning-letter screen was performed. The empty warning-letter list means nothing was searched, not that a search came back clean.
A provider to compare MEDGm against
Enhance.MD
Enhance.MD names three pharmacies, lists forty-one states, and buys metabolic lab testing with the monthly fee — then leaves the one-month price on its microdosing product blank.
No. Each brand tile states that the figure is a membership and that medication is charged on top. The medication cost is not published anywhere on the seller's site.
Why do two semaglutide routes show different figures?
Because the membership fee itself differs between the two brand tiles on the same page. Neither figure includes the drug, so the difference is in the joining fee rather than in the medication.
Does it sell peptides other than the GLP-1s?
No. Its sitemap holds one product page, covering GLP-1s. Its other listed categories are marked coming soon, so it appears only on the semaglutide and tirzepatide boards here.
Does it say which pharmacy fills the prescription?
No. It refers to licensed pharmacies and to independent pharmacy partners, which are categories rather than a name that can be checked against a register.
Does it serve all fifty states?
It makes no such claim. Its terms say certain services or medications may not be available in every state, and its product page says telemedicine rules vary by state, so no state list is recorded.
Does this site earn a commission on MEDGm?
Yes. It is a paid partner and is labelled as one wherever it appears. That relationship changes nothing about its position on a board, which is computed from the scoring inputs, and nothing about what this review says.
MEDGm is a paid partner; this link may earn a commission. Full disclosure.