Della Bellezza names eleven of the sixteen compounds this site tracks on one page, and five more it does not track, without attaching a figure to any of them. Its own storefront is now open to the public and sells skincare, which is the answer to where the peptide prices are: nowhere.
What Della Bellezza Med Spa charges
Della Bellezza Med Spa does not publish a price today.
Della Bellezza Med Spa also sells 11 compounds this site boards without publishing a price for them: BPC-157 (board ranks no provider), CJC-1295 (board ranks no provider), GHK-Cu, Glutathione, Ipamorelin (board ranks no provider), MOTS-C (board ranks no provider), NAD+, PT-141, Semax (board ranks no provider), TB-500 (board ranks no provider) and Tesamorelin.
Della Bellezza Med Spa is not a paid partner; this link may earn a commission if that changes. Full disclosure.
By Nora Castellan, Standards EditorUpdated September 2026
A long menu on a single page
Sixteen compound names appear on the service page, eleven of them ones this comparison follows and five it does not.
They are listed rather than explained, so the page functions as a menu rather than a set of product records.
Nothing on it distinguishes what is stocked from what is available on request, and no page linked from it does either.
A reader gets breadth here and no depth, which is a real trade rather than a defect.
The storefront opened, and it does not sell peptides
The seller links its own store from its footer, and that store answered this pass with a full public catalogue.
That catalogue is skincare and serums: brightening serum, retinol, moisturiser, cleanser, and nothing carrying a peptide name from the service page.
So the store being open changes nothing about the peptide question — the prices a reader wants are not in it.
This row records the absence of a peptide price against a store that was checked and read, not against a link that was assumed.
No figure, and where one was looked for
The service page carries no dollar sign at all, and the seller's own storefront, read this pass, prices skincare rather than any peptide on the menu.
The documentation question closes quickly: no certificate is claimed, and the attribute sweep found none linked either.
Publishing a figure somewhere on its own site is true of one hundred and thirty-seven of the two hundred and ten sellers here, so it separates far fewer of them than a reader expects.
The host itself was checked in the same pass as everything above: 404 at a nonsense path, same effective path, which is what any absence recorded here rests on.
What the roster says about these gaps
One hundred and seventy-six of the two hundred and ten sellers here publish no state list at all, and this is one of them, so eligibility is settled inside an intake rather than before one.
Sixteen of the two hundred and ten sellers here name the facility that fills an order; this is one of the one hundred and ninety-four that do not, so there is no facility a reader can look up.
Four of the two hundred and ten sellers here describe lab work as included in what they charge, and this is not one of them.
It declares eleven of the sixteen compounds this site tracks, and nine sellers here declare more, so it is a wide menu rather than the widest.
Who it's for
Readers building a shortlist by how many tracked compounds a single seller names.
Shoppers in the seller's own metro who will settle price at a consultation.
Buyers who want one clinic for both aesthetic work and a peptide protocol.
Anyone comparing menu breadth across this roster.
Who should look elsewhere
Anyone who needs a peptide figure, because none exists on either the service page or the store.
Readers who want the pharmacy named.
Buyers who need a published state footprint.
Shoppers who want per-compound detail rather than a list of names.
Strengths
One of the widest single-page compound lists on this roster
Declares eleven of the sixteen compounds this site tracks on pages a reader can reach
Keeps its peptide offer separate from its other lines on the page
Answers the category question in plain language rather than in a disclaimer
Trade-offs
Its own storefront is open and sells skincare, so the breadth is a menu with nothing priced behind it
Publishes no figure for any compound on the pages read
Publishes no corporate entity, so there is no company a reader can look up
Publishes no state list and names no dispensing pharmacy
How we verified this
Read every page cited on this row as rendered text in a browser-equivalent fetch, with the response decompressed before any character was counted.
Fired a nonsense-path control at this host in the same run and compared the address requested with the address actually served, so no claim here rests on a status code alone.
Joined every text node before scanning for a dollar sign, so a figure split across nested elements could not read as an absence.
Followed the storefront the seller links from its own footer and read its catalogue rather than recording it as closed on a previous finding.
Counted the compound names on joined text so a name split across nested elements could not be missed.
Screened this seller in the live federal warning-letter record by entity and by brand, with a known-good positive control and a nonsense negative control fired in the same run.
Read the company column of every returned record rather than accepting a full-text match, and attached no letter on a name match.
Swept every attribute on the pages read for a certificate, not only the link targets, because certificates in this market hide in data attributes and lightbox images.
Re-counted the state-list, pharmacy-naming and lab-inclusion claims against the current roster rather than reusing figures from an earlier pass.
A provider to compare Della Bellezza Med Spa against
Trellis Vitality
Trellis Vitality frames its program around body-composition tracking rather than scale weight, pairing NAD+, glutathione and tesamorelin with at-home biomarker panels and a 90-day re-test, and names its dispensing pharmacy, VialsRX in Houston, by address.