The Recovery Project Review

What The Recovery Project charges

The Recovery Project does not publish a price today.

The Recovery Project also sells 12 compounds this site boards without publishing a price for them: BPC-157 (board ranks no provider), CJC-1295 (board ranks no provider), Epitalon (board ranks no provider), GHK-Cu, Ipamorelin (board ranks no provider), KPV (board ranks no provider), MOTS-C (board ranks no provider), NAD+, Semax (board ranks no provider), Sermorelin, TB-500 (board ranks no provider) and Tesamorelin.

Cancellation, refunds and shipping

What The Recovery Project states on its own site about leaving, getting money back, and what delivery costs. Read on September 2026.

• Not statedCancellation: Zero occurrences of "cancel", "refund" or "shipping" in the 2,715 characters of homepage text and zero in the 3,283-character Terms page — 5,998 characters with no term of sale of any kind.
• Not statedRefund: Zero occurrences of "refund" on either surface. A Terms page exists and states nothing about money.
• Not statedShipping: Zero occurrences of "shipping" on either surface. No cost, window, carrier or condition is published.

Membership fees

Whether The Recovery Project charges to belong, on top of what it charges for the medication. Read on September 2026.

• Billed separatelyThe Recovery Project bills a membership separately from the medication.
• $99/moOngoing

Who prescribes

Whether The Recovery Project identifies the clinician or medical practice behind the prescription, or describes them only as a group. Read on September 2026.

• Not namedThe Recovery Project does not name a prescriber on any page we checked — its clinicians are described as a group rather than identified.

One of the widest menus you will find

Twelve compounds are named: BPC-157, CJC-1295, epitalon, GHK-Cu, ipamorelin, KPV, MOTS-c, NAD+, semax, sermorelin, TB-500 and tesamorelin.

KPV, MOTS-c and semax are the rare ones. Most sellers never name them at all, so if you are hunting an uncommon compound there is a real reason to look here.

Breadth is the whole argument. Whatever else is thin, the menu is genuine and longer than almost anything else in this comparison.

The list is a menu, not twelve product pages

The same twelve names appear identically on every page. They work as a catalog in the navigation rather than as twelve separately described products.

So the site is wide and not deep. If you want dosing detail, protocol length, or a case for one peptide over another, you will not find it laid out compound by compound.

Not a single figure on the site

No page carries a cost. There is no rate, no starting figure and no billing period attached to anything on the menu.

The site is otherwise easy to move around and reasonably detailed, which makes the silence on price look deliberate rather than accidental.

You cannot compare The Recovery Project against anyone on cost until you call. That is a real barrier when a competing seller prints a monthly rate on the page.

Nothing you can look up

No corporate entity appears anywhere. The brand is the only name published, so there is no company record to check.

No page names a dispensing pharmacy, none lists the states served, and nothing describes lab work as covered by whatever the clinic charges.

You are left with a compound list and very little else. Here, the menu is the disclosure.

Who The Recovery Project suits

Strengths and trade-offs

How we verified this

• The site was read in September 2026, and twelve compounds are named across it.
• The same twelve names appear identically on every page, in the navigation rather than on twelve product pages.
• No page carries a cost of any kind — no rate, no starting figure, no billing period.
• No corporate entity appears anywhere; the brand is the only name published.
• No dispensing pharmacy, no list of states served and no statement that lab work is covered appears on any page.
• The brand was checked against the federal warning-letter database in September 2026.