Every peptide figure BloomMD publishes is a refill price rather than a first fill, and the only corporate name in its terms of service belongs to the telehealth software vendor that builds the site.
What BloomMD charges
NAD+: $245 — a REFILL price, not a first fill: printed as "NAD+ Injections Refill — From $245.00" in the prescription-refills collection. No billing period is stated. The same collection also carries "Restorative Cellular (NAD+) Refill — $245.00" as a separate SKU at the same figure
Glutathione: $195 — a REFILL price, printed as "Glutathione Injections Refill — $195.00", with no billing period stated and no first-fill figure published anywhere on the collection
GHK-Cu: $245 — printed as "AquaBiome 0.5% (GHK-Cu) Refill — $245.00". ⛔ The compound is identified only inside the product's brand name and its concentration; a reader scanning for the compound by name alone would miss it. A refill SKU with no billing period stated
BloomMD is not a paid partner; this link may earn a commission if that changes. Full disclosure.
By Nora Castellan, Standards EditorUpdated September 2026
A refill is not a price
The prescription-refills collection is where this seller's peptide figures live, and each product name ends with the word refill. A refill SKU is what an existing patient pays to continue; it is not what a new patient pays to start.
Nothing on the collection publishes a first-fill figure for any of them. A reader arriving to price a programme finds the continuation cost and no starting cost, which is the opposite of the usual gap.
Two of the figures also carry a from, so they are the floor of a range whose ceiling is not published. None of the three states a billing period.
This site records all three as refill prices with no period stated, and says so in every qualifier, because a comparison table that put any of them in a monthly-cost column would be wrong twice over.
The copper peptide is hidden inside a brand name
One of the more useful things on this collection is a copper-peptide refill — a compound very few sellers on this roster price at all. It is listed under a product brand name with the concentration and the compound abbreviation in brackets.
A reader scanning the collection for the compound by name would miss it. So would an automated scan looking for the compound as a standalone token. It is only findable because the seller put the abbreviation in the product label.
That is worth crediting rather than complaining about: the seller could have sold the same thing under the brand name alone and disclosed nothing. It also means this roster's copper-peptide board carries a figure it would not otherwise have.
A second coenzyme product appears under its own brand name at the same figure as the plainly named one, so the same compound is sold twice at one price under two labels.
The operator is a software vendor's name
The terms of use open by stating that the site is owned and operated by a named incorporated company trading under a shortened form of its own name. That company is a telehealth software platform, not a clinic and not this brand.
This site read the sentence rather than trusting a name-shaped match, because on this market a corporate name found on a legal page is routinely an arbitration provider, a payment processor or a website vendor rather than an operator.
Here the sentence is unambiguous about ownership, which makes it harder rather than easier to interpret: the page says the vendor owns and operates the site. No sentence naming a company by the brand's own name was found on the pages read.
Screened by that entity and by the brand against the regulator's warning-letter index, neither returns a letter.
Testing language on a supplement, not on a peptide
The site does carry third-party-testing and purity language, on a supplement product page. It does not appear on any peptide page.
This is a specific trap and it has caught this network before. A scan that records a testing claim at the site level, without recording which product it attaches to, decorates a peptide row with a supplement's certificate.
This site records no testing fact for this seller, because none was found on a page selling a peptide.
No dispensing pharmacy is named, and no state coverage list is published.
Who it's for
Existing patients pricing an ongoing refill rather than a first fill.
Readers who want a copper-peptide figure published at all, which is rare on this roster.
Buyers who want brand-drug membership SKUs kept separate from drug SKUs rather than blended into one number.
Shoppers who want a browsable collection instead of an intake gate.
Who should look elsewhere
Anyone starting treatment, since no first-fill figure is published for any peptide.
Readers who need a billing period, which none of the three figures states.
Buyers who want an operating company published under the brand's own name.
Shoppers who want a certificate of analysis attached to a peptide rather than to a supplement.
Strengths
Prices copper-peptide, antioxidant and coenzyme refills separately and openly, which most sellers on this roster do not publish at all
Puts every refill figure on one browsable collection instead of behind an intake
Separates its brand-drug membership SKUs from the drug SKUs rather than blending them into one number
Names the concentration inside the copper-peptide product label
Trade-offs
Every peptide figure is a refill, so none of them is what a new patient pays first
The only corporate name in the terms of service is a software vendor's
The only third-party-testing language on the site sits on a supplement page, not on any peptide
No dispensing pharmacy named and no state coverage list
How we verified this
Loaded the prescription-refills collection and the terms of service with a full browser user-agent, printing the effective URL beside the requested one on both.
Ran a nonsense-path control on the host in the same run; it returned a not-found status with a body of five hundred thousand bytes, which is exactly why the status is read and never the size.
Joined the page's text nodes before matching any figure, so a price split across elements could not read as an absence.
Recorded each figure with the word refill in its dose and qualifier, so no template can present a continuation price as a starting one.
Read the copper-peptide product label in full, including the concentration and the compound abbreviation inside the brand name.
Read the terms' ownership sentence in full rather than accepting a corporate-name pattern match, because on this market such matches are routinely vendors and arbitration providers.
Located the site's only third-party-testing language and recorded which product page it sits on, which is a supplement and not a peptide.
Screened the named entity and the brand against the regulator's warning-letter index, with a nonsense query as a control in the same run.
A provider to compare BloomMD against
Trellis Vitality
Trellis Vitality frames its program around body-composition tracking rather than scale weight, pairing NAD+, glutathione and tesamorelin with at-home biomarker panels and a 90-day re-test, and names its dispensing pharmacy, VialsRX in Houston, by address.