EdgeRx prices the nasal and sublingual route of the same compound identically, which removes the usual penalty for avoiding a needle. It says in its own words that it is 'not the peptide gray-market', and publishes nothing to demonstrate it.
What EdgeRx charges
Sermorelin: $149/mo — per month; the sublingual route is priced identically on the same site
Sermorelin: $149/mo — per month; the nasal route is priced identically on the same site
NAD+: $175/mo — per month; the sublingual route is priced identically on the same site
GHK-Cu: $175/mo — per month, for the single published GHK-Cu protocol
EdgeRx also sells 2 compounds this site boards without publishing a price for them: PT-141 and Glutathione.
EdgeRx is not a paid partner; this link may earn a commission if that changes. Full disclosure.
By Nora Castellan, Standards EditorUpdated September 2026
Two routes, one price
Sermorelin is sold as a nasal spray and as a sublingual, at the same monthly figure, on two separate protocol pages that each point at the other. NAD+ is sold the same way.
Most sellers here charge more for the needle-free presentation. Pricing them level means the route is a clinical or comfort decision rather than a financial one.
The month is stated on every protocol page, so these are rates rather than bare numbers.
A catalogue organised by goal
The homepage groups protocols by what a reader is trying to change — sleep and recovery, energy and cognition, skin and hair, sexual and hormonal health — and prints how many protocols sit in each group.
That is a genuinely useful shape for a category most readers arrive at through a podcast rather than a prescriber, and the site says as much about its own audience.
The trade-off is that several groups carry a category floor rather than a per-compound figure, so PT-141 and glutathione end up without an individual price.
The gray-market line, and what backs it
EdgeRx writes that every product is 'prescribed by a licensed physician and compounded by a US-licensed pharmacy under FDA-regulated quality standards. Not the peptide gray-market. Not the supplement aisle.'
It also says its compounds are tested for purity. No certificate of analysis, batch report or lab document is published or reachable anywhere on the site.
Its GHK-Cu topical is described as 'pharmacy-compounded, not the OTC version', which is a real distinction and one the site is right to draw.
What is missing
No operating company is published on any page read.
No list of served states appears and no dispensing pharmacy is named.
Nothing in the live federal warning-letter table attaches to the brand.
Who it's for
Readers who want a needle-free sermorelin or NAD+ without paying extra for it.
Shoppers who prefer a catalogue organised by outcome rather than by molecule.
Buyers who want a compounded GHK-Cu topical rather than a cosmetic one.
Anyone who wants the month stated on every protocol.
Who should look elsewhere
Readers who need a per-compound price for PT-141 or glutathione.
Buyers who want the purity testing evidenced rather than asserted.
Anyone who needs a named company, pharmacy or state list.
Shoppers who want injectable options as well as needle-free ones.
Strengths
Charges the same monthly figure for the nasal and sublingual route of a compound
Groups its catalogue by goal and prints a protocol count beside each group
Says its GHK-Cu topical is "pharmacy-compounded, not the OTC version"
Attaches the month to every protocol figure it publishes
Trade-offs
Publishes no operating company on any page read
Its PT-141 and glutathione lines are sold inside multi-protocol categories with no single figure
Publishes no state list and names no dispensing pharmacy
Says its compounds are "tested for purity" but publishes no certificate of analysis
How we verified this
Read both sermorelin protocol pages and both NAD+ protocol pages and confirmed the routes are priced identically.
Recorded only compound-scoped figures, and left the category floors for PT-141 and glutathione unrecorded rather than attributing them.
Quoted the seller's own words on its supply chain rather than paraphrasing them.
Searched for a certificate of analysis and recorded that the purity claim is unaccompanied by one.
Screened the brand against the live federal warning-letter table with a positive and a nonsense control in the same run.
A provider to compare EdgeRx against
Trellis Vitality
Trellis Vitality frames its program around body-composition tracking rather than scale weight, pairing NAD+, glutathione and tesamorelin with at-home biomarker panels and a 90-day re-test, and names its dispensing pharmacy, VialsRX in Houston, by address.