VAULT Men's Health Review

What VAULT Men's Health charges

• BPC-157: $249/mo — starting at, per month; the page attaches no dose, vial size or quantity to the figure
• TB-500: $349/mo — starting at, per month; the page attaches no dose, vial size or quantity to the figure
• CJC-1295: $299/mo — starting at, per month; the page attaches no dose, vial size or quantity to the figure
• Ipamorelin: $279/mo — starting at, per month; the page attaches no dose, vial size or quantity to the figure
• GHK-Cu: $229/mo — starting at, per month; the page attaches no dose, vial size or quantity to the figure
• Semaglutide: $399/mo — starting at, per month; the page attaches no dose, vial size or quantity to the figure

Five peptides priced, none of them measured

Each of the five sits on its own product page with its own starting monthly figure, which is more than most sellers here manage.

Every one of those figures is a bare floor: no dose, no vial size, no quantity anywhere on the page.

So a reader can learn which peptides this seller will price at all, and cannot learn what any of them costs per milligram. Those are different questions and only the first is answered.

Not a research-chemical vendor, and the sentences were read

A long peptide catalogue is often the signal of a grey-market supplier, so the pages were read for the language that usually accompanies one.

No research-use-only wording and no not-for-human-consumption wording appears anywhere on this site. Its peptides are described as prescribed by licensed physicians and compounded by licensed pharmacies.

Its own words on category are that "compounded medications are not FDA-approved but are legal when prescribed", alongside a sitewide footnote that its statements have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration.

Broken paths and empty answers

Its own pricing path is in the site's own link set and returns not-found, so the page a reader would go to first does not exist.

The peptides path redirects to a single product page rather than to an index, so there is no one place to see the catalogue.

Its FAQ renders question headings with no answers beneath them, which is the same failure in a different part of the site.

No pharmacy, no state list

It names no dispensing pharmacy anywhere on the pages read.

Its nearest thing to a coverage statement is a requirement that a buyer be a resident of a state where its services are available, which is a condition rather than a list.

It does publish its governing law and venue, which is more than several sellers with far more polished pages do.

How we verified this

• Read all six product pages and confirmed that no dose, vial size or quantity accompanies any published figure, then recorded each as a bare floor.
• Read the site for research-use-only and not-for-human-consumption language and found none, so the catalogue is not treated as a grey-market signal.
• Followed its own linked pricing path and its peptides path, and recorded that the first returns not-found and the second redirects to a product page rather than an index.
• Requested a deliberately meaningless address on this host in the same session and confirmed it returns a not-found response.
• Screened the brand and its legal entity against the live federal warning-letter table through a matcher that normalises both the query and the filed company name before comparing, pulling all 3,677 records in pages and filtering locally because the table's own search parameter is ignored, with a positive and a nonsense control in the same run.