PreventiveMD does two things almost nobody else on this roster does: it prints an all-in monthly figure for each compounded protocol and separately breaks its branded lane into a membership fee and a medication rate as two named lines, on the same page — and it publishes a list of the peptides it refuses to sell yet, with the review dates it is waiting on.
What PreventiveMD charges
GHK-Cu: $89/mo — "As low as $89/mo per month, all-in" — the seller's own wording, a floor rather than a quoted rate, on a page that separates its all-in lane from its branded lane where the membership fee and the medication are billed as two named lines. ⛔ DRUG-SCOPED: this figure is for the TOPICAL cream. The seller states the injectable form "is the version currently under FDA review and is not something we offer at this time"
Glutathione: $94/mo — "As low as $94/mo per month, all-in" — the seller's own wording, a floor rather than a quoted rate, on a page that separates its all-in lane from its branded lane where the membership fee and the medication are billed as two named lines
NAD+: $119/mo — "As low as $119/mo per month, all-in" — the seller's own wording, a floor rather than a quoted rate, on a page that separates its all-in lane from its branded lane where the membership fee and the medication are billed as two named lines
Sermorelin: $119/mo — "As low as $119/mo per month, all-in" — the seller's own wording, a floor rather than a quoted rate, on a page that separates its all-in lane from its branded lane where the membership fee and the medication are billed as two named lines
Semaglutide: $83/mo — "As low as $83/mo per month, all-in" — the seller's own wording, a floor rather than a quoted rate, on a page that separates its all-in lane from its branded lane where the membership fee and the medication are billed as two named lines
Tirzepatide: $97/mo — "As low as $97/mo per month, all-in" — the seller's own wording, a floor rather than a quoted rate, on a page that separates its all-in lane from its branded lane where the membership fee and the medication are billed as two named lines
PreventiveMD is not a paid partner; this link may earn a commission if that changes. Full disclosure.
By Nora Castellan, Standards EditorUpdated September 2026
Two pricing shapes, labelled, on one page
The compounded protocols each carry a per-month figure described as all-in. The branded products on the same page carry a different structure entirely: a monthly membership fee named as such, plus a medication rate that starts at a stated figure.
Putting both shapes on one page, each labelled, is the disclosure most sellers here omit. A reader can see that the two lanes are billed differently rather than discovering it at checkout.
Every compounded figure is written as a floor rather than a quote. So the page tells a reader the least they could pay and never what they would pay, which is a real limit on how far the all-in framing goes.
This site records the floor with the seller's own wording attached, and marks it as a per-month figure because that is what the page says it is.
It publishes what it will not sell
A section of the same page lists eleven peptides grouped by purpose — recovery, skin, metabolic, sleep, cognitive, immune — and states plainly that none of them is part of its protocols, that they remain investigational, and that it is watching the regulatory review.
It gives the anticipated review dates it is waiting on, and says it will evaluate each one only if and when guidance allows access.
That is the opposite of the usual pattern in this market, where a seller either sells everything or says nothing about what it does not carry. Publishing the refusal list, with dates, is a checkable commitment.
It also explains the refusal in its own words: it offers only therapies that are approved or legally available through licensed compounding pharmacies under appropriate regulatory pathways, and it is not prescribing the listed ones until review is complete.
The copper peptide is sold in one form and not the other
Its copper peptide appears twice on the page: once with a price, and once inside the refusal list. Those are not a contradiction — they are two different forms, and the page says so.
The form it sells is the topical preparation, described on the compound's own page as offered as a topical compounded preparation within a skin and recovery plan. The injectable form is the one it names as under review and does not offer.
This site records the price against the topical form explicitly, because a figure attached to the wrong route is exactly the kind of error a board carries forward silently. A reader comparing injectable copper peptide prices should not find this row's figure among them without the form attached.
The compound page is franker than most about evidence too, noting that most published research is laboratory work, animal models and small cosmetic-dermatology studies, with large randomised human trials limited.
The testing claim that is not one, and who runs the company
The research note behind this row recorded a third-party-testing claim here. The page does contain the phrase — inside an answer explaining that peptides sold through unregulated online sources may not be third-party tested, and contrasting that with dispensing through compounding pharmacies under regulatory oversight.
So the phrase is the seller describing somebody else's market. It is not a claim about its own products, and no certificate of analysis appears anywhere in the pages read. Recording it the other way would have credited this seller with a credential it never asserted.
The terms name an incorporated company as the operator and name a separate limited liability company as the participating medical group, with the word currently attached. That single word is a disclosure that the clinical arrangement can change, which most sellers leave the reader to discover.
No state coverage list appears on any page read, and the compounding pharmacies are described as a category the company works with rather than named.
Who it's for
Readers who want an all-in figure per protocol rather than a medication price with fees discovered later.
Buyers who want to see the membership-plus-medication structure written out rather than blended into one number.
Anyone who wants a seller to publish what it will not sell, and why, with dates.
Shoppers who need the route of a topical compound distinguished from the injectable version.
Who should look elsewhere
Anyone who needs a quoted price rather than a floor, since every compounded figure here is written as a minimum.
Readers looking for the recovery peptides, which this seller lists specifically as ones it does not offer.
Buyers who want the injectable form of the copper peptide, which it says it does not sell.
Shoppers who need to confirm the service reaches their state, which no page answers.
Anyone who wants a certificate of analysis, which appears nowhere in the pages read.
Strengths
Prints an all-in monthly figure per compounded protocol and, on the same page, breaks the branded lane into a membership fee and a medication rate as two separate named lines
Publishes a list of eleven peptides it does NOT offer because they are under regulatory review, with the anticipated review dates, instead of quietly not selling them
Says in its own FAQ that its compounded medications are not FDA-approved and describes the pharmacy category and the standard they work under
Distinguishes the topical form of its copper peptide from the injectable form and states plainly that it does not sell the injectable
Trade-offs
Every peptide figure is an "as low as" floor rather than a quoted rate, so no page states what a given patient would pay
No state coverage list appears anywhere, on any page read
The compounding pharmacies are described as a class it works with and are never named
Its participating medical group is named as the current one, which is a disclosure that the arrangement can change
How we verified this
Loaded the protocols page, a compound page and the terms with a full browser user-agent, printed the effective URL beside the requested URL on every fetch, and confirmed none redirected.
Ran a nonsense-path control on the host in the same run. It returned a not-found status with a body of over seventy thousand bytes, which is why the status code is read here and never the size.
Joined the page's text nodes before matching any price, so a figure split across two elements could not read as an absence.
Read the sentence around the third-party-testing phrase rather than counting the hit, which reversed what the research note had recorded and removed a credential this seller never claimed.
Opened the copper peptide's own page to establish which route the price belongs to, rather than pairing the catalogue figure with the compound name.
Recorded the compound's form on the price row itself, so the figure cannot be compared against injectable prices without the difference being visible.
Read the refusal list and its stated review dates from the page's own text rather than summarising them from the headings.
Read the terms in full for the operating company and the participating medical group, and noted the word qualifying the latter.
Searched the extracted text of every page for certificate and purity language and found none.
A provider to compare PreventiveMD against
Trellis Vitality
Trellis Vitality frames its program around body-composition tracking rather than scale weight, pairing NAD+, glutathione and tesamorelin with at-home biomarker panels and a 90-day re-test, and names its dispensing pharmacy, VialsRX in Houston, by address.
The seller describes them that way, and separately shows its branded lane as a membership fee plus a medication rate. Every compounded figure is written as a floor rather than a quote.
Does it sell the recovery peptides?
No. It publishes a list of eleven it does not offer, says they remain investigational, and gives the review dates it is waiting on before it would consider them.
Which form of the copper peptide is priced?
The topical preparation. The page says the injectable form is under review and is not something it offers.
Does it third-party test its products?
It makes no such claim. The phrase appears only in an answer about peptides sold through unregulated online sources, which is a statement about a different market.
Who provides the care?
The terms name an incorporated operator and a separate medical group described as the current participating one, which signals the arrangement can change.
PreventiveMD is not a paid partner; this link may earn a commission if that changes. Full disclosure.