Fitish Review

What Fitish charges

• Sermorelin: $149/mo — "SERMORELIN / $149 / Pricing is for a monthly supply"; the FAQ reads "Starting at $149 for a monthly supply, including your provider consult, the medication if approved, and shipping." Same page: "No-Ship States: AK, AR, CA, IN, MI, MN, SC"
• NAD+: $219/mo — "NAD+ / $219 / Pricing is for a monthly supply"; the FAQ reads "$219 for a monthly supply, including your provider consult, the medication if approved, and shipping". No no-ship list is published on this page
• NAD+: $149/mo — "NAD+ NASAL SPRAY / $149 / Pricing is for a monthly supply"; the FAQ reads "$149 for a monthly supply, including your provider consult, the medication if approved, and shipping"
• GHK-Cu: $189/mo — "GHK-Cu Oral Tablets / $189 / Pricing is for a monthly supply. Prescription medication. Medical evaluation required." This page carries no "How much does it cost?" answer, so the figure comes from the price block alone
• GHK-Cu: $150 — "GHK-Cu Face Cream / $150 / Topical compounded formulation. Medical evaluation required. Creams are custom compounded and take 48 hours once approved" — the only Fitish product read whose block does NOT say "Pricing is for a monthly supply", so no billing period is stated for it

Five preparations, each with what the figure covers

Three compounds this site tracks are sold here, two of them in more than one preparation, and each has a product page of its own.

Four of the five state a monthly supply directly under the figure, and three of those repeat the figure in a question that also lists what it includes: the provider consult, the medication if approved, and shipping.

The fifth, a topical, states no period at all, so it is recorded as having none rather than being assumed to match its siblings.

Two preparations of one compound are priced differently from each other, which is recorded as two separate rows rather than flattened into one.

A no-ship list on one page and silence on four

One product page publishes the states it will not ship to, both as a labelled list and again as a plain sentence in the questions below it.

The other four product pages carry no such list, and the sentence itself points readers to a separate clinic page for the current set.

Turning one product's exclusions into a company-wide roster would publish a footprint the seller has not claimed, so this row stores no states and keeps the list on the row it belongs to.

Publishing any exclusions at all still puts this seller ahead of the many here that say nothing about geography.

A zero inside the price block

The storefront theme prints each product's figure three times, and the middle one is a zero.

That zero is the empty compare-at slot, not a discount and not a price, and a parser scanning for the lowest number on the page would find it.

Each figure stored here was confirmed against the product's own cost answer wherever that answer exists.

Two of the five products carry no such answer, so their figures come from the price block alone and are recorded that way.

The letter, and what the pages do not say

A federal warning letter is attached to this row. It was matched on the company name column and then confirmed by opening the letter and finding this seller's own domain named inside it.

A name match alone would not have been enough, because one-word brand names over-match badly in that index.

Separately, the compounding arrangements are described as a state-licensed pharmacy without a facility name, so that flag is false.

Nothing on the product pages or in the terms describes lab work as part of what is charged, so that flag is false on absence.

FDA disclosure

Fitish received an FDA warning letter issued June 2026. A warning letter discloses; it does not, on its own, disqualify a provider — see the trade-offs above for what this one concerned.

How we verified this

• Rendered all five product pages and read every figure as laid-out text.
• Confirmed each figure against the product's own cost answer wherever one exists, and recorded which two products have none.
• Identified the zero inside the price block as an empty compare-at slot rather than as a discount or a price.
• Read the no-ship list on the one product that publishes it and left it on that row rather than promoting it to a company footprint.
• Checked the other four product pages for their own no-ship lists and recorded that none exists.
• Recorded the topical as having no stated billing period, because its block omits the sentence the other four carry.
• Fired two nonsense paths at this host in the same pass, one under the products directory, and confirmed both return the same genuine not-found document despite a body as large as a real page.
• Read the terms for a named pharmacy and for a coverage claim, finding a category and nothing respectively.
• Screened this seller in the live federal warning-letter record with a known-good positive control and a nonsense negative control fired in the same run.
• Opened the one matching letter and confirmed it names this seller's own domain before attaching it, rather than attaching on a company-name match alone.