AVArx gives each delivery format its own treatment page and then prices none of them, because what every page actually sells is a provider evaluation rather than a product.
What AVArx charges
AVArx does not publish a price today.
AVArx also sells 3 compounds this site boards without publishing a price for them: Sermorelin, NAD+ and Glutathione.
AVArx is not a paid partner; this link may earn a commission if that changes. Full disclosure.
By Nora Castellan, Standards EditorUpdated September 2026
Five treatment pages, no figure on any of them
The sermorelin page, the sermorelin troche page, the NAD+ injection page, the NAD+ nasal spray page and the glutathione page were all read in one pass. None carries a figure.
Each of those pages is headed as a provider evaluation. That is the seller describing what it is selling, and it explains the missing number rather than excusing it.
A reader arriving to compare cost against another seller has nothing to work with until they enter intake. Nothing on the public site narrows the range.
It splits the routes other sellers bundle
Sermorelin appears twice, once as an injection and once as a troche. NAD+ appears twice as well, once as an injection and once as a nasal spray.
Most sellers on this roster put every route behind one page and one figure. Separating them is the more honest structure, because a troche and an injection are not the same purchase.
The value here is comparative rather than commercial. A reader can see which formats the seller actually offers before asking what any of them costs.
Who runs it
AVArx LLC is named on both the privacy policy and the terms. Naming the operating company twice, on two separate legal pages, is a stronger disclosure than naming it once in small print.
The site also returns a clean error for an address it does not publish, so its pages can be trusted to be real pages rather than a catch-all template.
Those two facts are the site's firmest disclosures. Neither of them tells a reader what anything costs.
What the pages leave unanswered
No page publishes a list of the states the seller covers, so a reader cannot check their own before starting.
The dispensing pharmacy is not named anywhere, and nothing describes lab work as included in what the seller charges.
Framing every listing as a provider evaluation sets expectations correctly, but it also means price, coverage and pharmacy are all questions for intake.
Who it's for
Readers comparing delivery formats rather than costs.
Buyers who want injections, troches and nasal sprays presented as distinct choices.
Anyone who wants the operating company named on more than one legal page.
People who expect to speak with a provider before seeing a number.
Who should look elsewhere
Anyone who wants a figure before entering intake.
Readers building a cost comparison against other sellers.
Buyers who need the dispensing pharmacy named.
Shoppers who need their own state confirmed on the public site.
Strengths
Separates injectable, troche and nasal forms of the same compound into distinct pages
Names its operating company on two separate legal pages
Frames each listing as a provider evaluation rather than as an over-the-counter purchase
Publishes a clean hard error for a path that does not exist, so its pages can be trusted to exist
Trade-offs
Carries no figure on any of its five treatment pages
Gives a reader nothing to compare against another seller before intake
Publishes no state list and names no dispensing pharmacy
Describes no lab work as included in what it charges
How we verified this
Read all five treatment pages by name in a single pass and recorded that none of them carries a figure.
Recorded the census of pages read alongside the absence, so the finding describes those five pages rather than the whole site.
Noted the heading each treatment page carries, which is a provider evaluation rather than a priced product.
Read the privacy policy and the terms for the operating company and confirmed the same name appears on both.
Checked whether any page publishes a state list, names a dispensing pharmacy, or describes lab work as included.
A provider to compare AVArx against
Trellis Vitality
Trellis Vitality frames its program around body-composition tracking rather than scale weight, pairing NAD+, glutathione and tesamorelin with at-home biomarker panels and a 90-day re-test, and names its dispensing pharmacy, VialsRX in Houston, by address.
Not on the five treatment pages read. Each one is headed as a provider evaluation and none carries a figure, so cost is settled after a reader enters intake.
Why are the same compounds listed twice?
Because the routes differ. Sermorelin has an injection page and a troche page, and NAD+ has an injection page and a nasal spray page.
Who operates the brand?
AVArx LLC. The name appears on both the privacy policy and the terms, which is a firmer disclosure than a single mention would be.
Which states does it serve?
The site does not say. No page publishes a state list, so eligibility is another question a reader has to raise directly.
AVArx is not a paid partner; this link may earn a commission if that changes. Full disclosure.