Arc-1 shows its list price beside its subscription price on every product, which is the honest way to do it. Only the subscription figure carries a month, and the company behind the storefront is not published anywhere.
What Arc-1 charges
Sermorelin: $239.99/mo — as low as, per month with subscription
Sermorelin: $299.99 — the listed regular price; the page states no billing period for it
Glutathione: $329.99/mo — as low as, per month with subscription
Glutathione: $389.99 — the listed regular price; the page states no billing period for it
NAD+: $299.99 — listed on the storefront with no billing period stated
Arc-1 is not a paid partner; this link may earn a commission if that changes. Full disclosure.
By Nora Castellan, Standards EditorUpdated September 2026
Both numbers, side by side
Each product page prints a regular price and, beneath it, a lower rate available with a subscription. A reader can see what the discount is worth before deciding whether the commitment is worth it.
That is a small courtesy and a rare one. Plenty of sellers here print only the promotional figure and leave the standing rate to be discovered at checkout.
Sermorelin, glutathione and NAD+ injections are all priced this way on an open storefront that needs no intake first.
Only one of the two figures is a rate
The subscription line reads 'as low as' followed by a figure and the words 'per month with subscription'. That is a monthly rate and it is recorded as one.
The regular price carries no billing period anywhere on the page. It could be a month, a vial or a single purchase; nothing published says which, so it is recorded as not monthly.
The NAD+ listing on the storefront carries a figure with no period at all, which is the weakest of the three shapes.
A product URL that argues with its own page
The glutathione product sits at a web address containing the words 'one time purchase' while the page itself sells a monthly subscription.
That is probably a leftover from an earlier catalogue rather than a claim. It is still the kind of thing a careful buyer notices and a careless one does not.
Nothing on the page reconciles the two, and the seller has not corrected either half.
No company, no pharmacy, no states
No corporate entity appears on the homepage, the terms, the privacy policy, the about page or the contact page. A brand screen against the live federal warning-letter table found nothing, but no entity screen was possible.
No dispensing pharmacy is named and no certificate of analysis is reachable.
No list of served states is published, so eligibility is discovered at checkout rather than before it.
Who it's for
Shoppers who want the undiscounted figure visible before subscribing.
Readers buying glutathione injections, which fewer sellers here price.
Buyers who prefer a storefront to a consultation funnel.
Anyone comparing subscription against one-off pricing on the same product.
Who should look elsewhere
Readers who need every figure to carry a billing period.
Buyers who want an operating company they can look up.
Anyone who needs a named pharmacy or published testing.
Shoppers who want a published state list.
Strengths
Shows the list price and the subscription price side by side rather than only the lower one
Prices three separate injections on an open storefront with no intake first
Attaches the month explicitly to the subscription figure
Publishes a glutathione injection price, which most sellers here do not
Trade-offs
Publishes no operating company on any page read
Its regular prices carry no billing period at all
Publishes no state list and names no dispensing pharmacy
A product page URL says "one-time-purchase" while the page sells a monthly subscription
How we verified this
Read each product page and recorded the regular price and the subscription price as separate rows.
Recorded the regular prices as carrying no billing period, because none is stated anywhere on those pages.
Recorded the mismatch between the glutathione product's web address and the plan it actually sells.
Searched the site for an operating company and recorded that none is published.
Screened the brand against the live federal warning-letter table with a positive and a nonsense control in the same run.
A provider to compare Arc-1 against
Trellis Vitality
Trellis Vitality frames its program around body-composition tracking rather than scale weight, pairing NAD+, glutathione and tesamorelin with at-home biomarker panels and a 90-day re-test, and names its dispensing pharmacy, VialsRX in Houston, by address.
Because the page publishes two: a regular price and a lower subscription rate. Only the subscription rate states a month, so only that one is treated as a monthly figure.
Is the glutathione product a subscription or a one-off?
The page sells a monthly subscription. Its web address says 'one time purchase', which appears to be a leftover the seller has not corrected.
Who runs Arc-1?
No company is published on any page read — not on the homepage, the terms, the privacy policy, the about page or the contact page.
Is there any testing documentation?
None is reachable. No certificate of analysis or batch report appears anywhere on the storefront.
Arc-1 is not a paid partner; this link may earn a commission if that changes. Full disclosure.