Measured Review

What Measured charges

• NAD+: $159/mo — catalog card prints "FROM" above "$159/mo", with "No insurance required" and "Medication included"
• Glutathione: $129/mo — catalog card prints "FROM" above "$129/mo", with "No insurance required" and "Medication included"
• Sermorelin: $149/mo — catalog card prints "FROM" above "$149/mo", with "No insurance required" and "Medication included"

One table, three compounds, and a trap in the reading order

The catalog page prices every product this seller offers in a single grid, and three of them are compounds compared on this site.

Each card carries the product name, a one-line description, whether insurance is needed, whether medication is included, and the figure under the word FROM.

In the flat text a browser produces, each card's figure lands immediately before the next card's name. Read line by line, two of the three peptides here pick up the neighbouring product's figure.

Every figure on this row was taken from the element that also contains its own compound name, which is the only reading that survives a layout change.

The sitemap advertises pages that do not exist

This seller's sitemap lists a separate URL for each of the three compounds, which is exactly what a comparison site hopes to find.

All three render the same catalog document. There is no per-compound page behind any of them.

That is not a host that answers everything, either: a nonsense path under the same directory renders a genuine not-found document, so the host does distinguish real paths from invented ones.

Because the per-compound paths serve the catalog, every row here cites the catalog rather than a URL that would imply a page this seller does not have.

A named list of states, which is rare

The help centre states the number of states served, gives a rough share of the population that covers, and then names every one of them.

That is a company-level statement about where the service is available, not a claim about where its clinicians hold licences, and the two are not the same fact.

Most sellers compared here publish nothing on this at all, and several publish a licensure claim that reads like a coverage claim until the next sentence withdraws it.

The full list is stored on this row, so a reader can see whether their state is on it before starting anything.

The enforcement record, and what the letter is about

A federal warning letter names this seller's operating company doing business under this brand, and its subject line concerns false and misleading claims and misbranding in a telehealth context.

The letter was matched on the company column rather than on a full-text hit, because the ordinary English word in this brand's name appears inside a great many unrelated letters.

It was then confirmed a second way: the letter body names this seller's own domain, which is the homepage stored on this row.

The letter is recorded on the row with its identifier, issue date and address so a reader can read it rather than take a summary of it.

FDA disclosure

Measured received an FDA warning letter issued February 2026. A warning letter discloses; it does not, on its own, disqualify a provider — see the trade-offs above for what this one concerned.

How we verified this

• Rendered the catalog page in a browser and read each figure from the element that also contains its own compound name, rather than from line proximity.
• Rendered all three of the per-compound URLs the sitemap advertises and confirmed each serves the same catalog document.
• Fired two nonsense paths at this host in the same pass, one of them under the same directory as the advertised compound paths, and confirmed both render a genuine not-found document.
• Opened the help centre's collapsed answers one at a time and read the state answer in full, including the list of names rather than only the count.
• Distinguished the company's own service-area statement from any statement about where its clinicians are licensed, and set the coverage flag on the former.
• Read the seller's own answer to whether lab work is required, and recorded it as not routinely required rather than inferring anything from the absence of a lab page.
• Read the catalog disclosure for a pharmacy name, found a category rather than a name, and did not accept the medical group named in the terms as a substitute for the facility that fills an order.
• Screened this seller in the live federal warning-letter record with a known-good positive control and a nonsense negative control fired in the same run.
• Matched the letter on the company-name column rather than on a full-text hit, because this brand's name is a common English word that appears inside unrelated letters.
• Confirmed the letter belongs to this seller by opening it and finding this row's own domain named inside it.