Luma Meds tells you on its product pages that it is available in all fifty states and tells you in its terms that certain services reach only certain states. Its injectable tirzepatide plan card renders no price at all, leaving a navigation entry as the only tirzepatide figure published anywhere on the site.
What Luma Meds charges
Semaglutide: $199/mo — per month, struck through from $249; the same page also prints $140 a month on a three-month plan and $139.99 in its own navigation
Semaglutide: $232/mo — from, per month
Tirzepatide: $272/mo — from, per month; the injectable tirzepatide plan card on the same page renders no price at all
By Nora Castellan, Standards EditorUpdated September 2026
Its terms contradict its own coverage claim
The product pages say "Available in all 50 states." The terms say "Certain of our Services are currently only available to individuals located in certain states."
Both sentences are published by the same seller and neither is qualified by the other.
No fifty-state claim is credited here as a result. When a seller contradicts itself about coverage, the contradiction is the finding.
The tirzepatide card renders no price
Its plan carousel serves only the semaglutide card in the delivered document, so the injectable tirzepatide plan appears with no figure attached.
That leaves a single navigation entry as the only injectable tirzepatide price published anywhere on the site.
A price that only exists in a menu is not a price a buyer can plan against, and the plan card that should carry it says nothing.
Semaglutide carries three figures on one page
One figure sits on the monthly card, a lower one on the three-month card, and a third in the navigation and footer.
The three-month card also anchors against a struck-through total that three times its own monthly rate does not produce, so that anchor is not filed here.
All three live figures are recorded as published. The site offers no note explaining which a buyer would be charged.
What it does state plainly
Its own words are that "Compounded medications have not been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration" and that the agency "does not review compounded medications for safety, effectiveness, or quality before they are dispensed".
It prices the oral and the injectable forms of the weight-loss molecules separately, and publishes a standing monthly figure for NAD+, sermorelin and glutathione where the numbers hold still.
It names its medical group in its terms, though not a dispensing pharmacy, and those terms carry an unedited reference to a pharmacy network belonging to a different brand — the same leftover two other sellers in this batch carry.
Who it's for
Readers buying NAD+, sermorelin or glutathione, where the figure is stable.
Buyers who want the oral and injectable forms priced separately.
Shoppers who want the non-approval statement in the seller's own words.
Anyone content to read the product page and ignore the navigation.
Who should look elsewhere
Readers who need a straight answer on state coverage.
Buyers who want an injectable tirzepatide price from a plan card.
Anyone who needs one semaglutide figure rather than three.
Shoppers who want the dispensing pharmacy named.
Strengths
States in its own words that compounded medicines are not FDA-reviewed
Prices the oral and injectable forms of the weight-loss molecules separately
Publishes a standing monthly figure for NAD+, sermorelin and glutathione
Names its medical group in its terms
Trade-offs
Its terms contradict its own fifty-state claim
Its injectable tirzepatide card renders no price, leaving one navigation entry as the only figure
Semaglutide carries three different prices across one page
Its three-month anchor price does not match three times its own monthly rate
How we verified this
Read the coverage sentence on the product pages and the coverage sentence in the terms, and recorded both rather than crediting the stronger one.
Confirmed the injectable tirzepatide plan card carries no figure in the served document, and recorded the navigation entry as the only published price for it.
Checked the three-month anchor against three times the seller's own monthly rate, found it unsupported, and declined to file it.
Requested a deliberately meaningless address on this host in the same session and confirmed it returns a not-found response.
Screened the brand and its legal entity against the live federal warning-letter table through a matcher that normalises both the query and the filed company name before comparing, pulling all 3,677 records in pages and filtering locally because the table's own search parameter is ignored, with a positive and a nonsense control in the same run.
A provider to compare Luma Meds against
Trellis Vitality
Trellis Vitality frames its program around body-composition tracking rather than scale weight, pairing NAD+, glutathione and tesamorelin with at-home biomarker panels and a 90-day re-test, and names its dispensing pharmacy, VialsRX in Houston, by address.
Its product pages say yes and its terms say certain services reach only certain states. The seller contradicts itself, so no fifty-state claim is credited here.
What does injectable tirzepatide cost?
Its plan card renders no price. The only figure published anywhere on the site for it is a navigation entry, which is not something to plan a purchase around.
Why does semaglutide show three prices?
A monthly card, a three-month card and the site navigation each carry a different figure. All three are published, and nothing on the page reconciles them.
Does it say its products are FDA-approved?
It says the opposite, in its own words: compounded medications have not been approved by the FDA and are not reviewed for safety, effectiveness or quality before dispensing.
Luma Meds is not a paid partner; this link may earn a commission if that changes. Full disclosure.