AquaVita NextGen sells its two peptide products as ten-injection kits covering a stated ten-week programme, while pricing its weight-loss products by the month on the same page. Both units are printed; nothing says they are different, and a reader who does not notice will compare a ten-week charge against a monthly one.
What AquaVita NextGen charges
NAD+: $599 — the whole price of a ten-injection kit — "Peptides · NAD + · $599 · NAD+ 10 ML (10 injections) · 10 week program". This is a per-kit charge covering ten weeks, not a monthly rate, and the seller states the programme length itself
Glutathione: $295 — the whole price of a ten-injection kit — "Peptides · Glutathione · $295 · Glutathione 10 ML (10 injections) · 10 week program". A per-kit charge covering ten weeks, not a monthly rate
Semaglutide: $215/mo — per month, labelled by the seller as "One month supply"; the same page offers "Three months supply · Compounded Semaglutide · $600", which is $200 a month across the quarter
Tirzepatide: $320/mo — per month, labelled by the seller as "One month supply"; the same page offers "Three months supply · Compounded Tirzepatide · $900", which is $300 a month across the quarter
AquaVita NextGen is not a paid partner; this link may earn a commission if that changes. Full disclosure.
By Nora Castellan, Standards EditorUpdated September 2026
Two units on one page, neither of them flagged
The weight-loss products are labelled one month supply and three months supply, with a total beside each. The peptide products are labelled as a ten-millilitre vial containing ten injections, covering a ten-week programme, with a single total.
Both labels are accurate and both are visible. What the page never says is that they are different units, so the two blocks sit side by side inviting a comparison that does not hold.
This site records the peptide figures as whole kit prices that are not monthly rates, with the injection count and the programme length written into the qualifier. Dividing a ten-week kit into a monthly figure would invent a unit the seller does not use.
Stating the programme length at all puts this seller ahead of most. The problem is not concealment; it is that the page presents two pricing shapes as if they were one.
Its own heading calls three things peptides
The wellness block carries the heading Peptides, and three products sit under it. Two are peptide products. The third is a lipotropic vitamin injection built around a vitamin and three amino compounds.
That is the seller's own categorisation, not this site's. It is recorded because a reader shopping a peptide menu will count three items where two belong, and because this site's whole purpose is to make category lines legible rather than blur them.
The two genuine peptide products are recorded on this row. The vitamin injection is not, and it is not counted toward this seller's menu.
The compound headings themselves are otherwise clear, naming each preparation and the volume in the same line as the price.
A supplement disclaimer under prescription products
Beneath the product grid the page prints the familiar formula: that these statements have not been evaluated by the regulator, and that the product is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any disease.
That is the disclaimer a dietary supplement carries. It sits here beneath compounded preparations that the same block says are compounded and should be discussed with a licensed clinician first.
This site reports what the page says rather than what the wording ought to be. What a reader gets is two different framings of the same products a few lines apart, and neither one explains the other.
The page's own trust strip describes its fulfilment as regulated pharmacies, as a category. No facility is named anywhere in the pages read.
Who operates it, and one sentence that reads oddly
The terms open by naming an incorporated company and stating that it owns and operates the site. That is a clean answer given in the first sentence of the document.
The most frequent corporate name on the site is not that company. It is a brand-drug manufacturer, and it appears only inside a trademark disclaimer — which is exactly why the operator was read from a named page rather than taken from whichever name occurs most.
The terms also contain a passage stating the company is not a participating provider with any federal or state programmes, in which the word for those programmes has been replaced by the company's own brand name. It reads as boilerplate that was renamed too enthusiastically, and it is recorded here as what the document actually says.
No state coverage list appears anywhere, and no certificate of analysis, purity report or third-party testing claim appears in the text of any page read.
Who it's for
Readers who want the vial size, the injection count and the programme length attached to a peptide price.
Buyers comparing a one-month against a three-month weight-loss supply with both totals shown.
Anyone who wants the operating company named in the first sentence of the terms.
Who should look elsewhere
Anyone comparing monthly costs, since the peptide figures cover ten weeks and the weight-loss figures cover a month.
Readers who want a peptide menu that contains only peptides.
Buyers who need the dispensing pharmacy named rather than described as a regulated category.
Shoppers who need to know whether the service reaches their state.
Anyone who wants a certificate of analysis, which appears nowhere in the pages read.
Strengths
States the programme length and the number of injections beside each peptide price, so the unit behind the figure is visible
Prices its weight-loss lane in both a one-month and a three-month supply with both totals shown
Names the operating company in the opening sentence of its terms and says it owns and operates the site
Carries a disclaimer stating the products are compounded and advising a licensed clinician be consulted first
Trade-offs
Its peptide prices cover ten weeks while its weight-loss prices cover a month, on the same page and with no note that the units differ
It files a lipotropic vitamin injection under the heading "Peptides" alongside the two peptide products
The disclaimer under its product grid is the dietary-supplement formula — that statements have not been evaluated and the product is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any disease — printed beneath compounded prescription products
No state coverage list, no named pharmacy and no certificate of analysis anywhere in the pages read
How we verified this
Loaded the shop page and the platform terms with a full browser user-agent, printed the effective URL beside the requested URL on every fetch, and confirmed neither redirected.
Ran a nonsense-path control on the host in the same run. It returned a not-found status with a body over a hundred and sixty thousand bytes, which is why the status code is read here and never the size.
Joined the page's text nodes before matching any price, so a figure split across two elements could not read as an absence.
Took each figure with its own unit label in the same window — supply length for one lane, injection count and programme length for the other — rather than pairing figures with the nearest product name.
Recorded the peptide figures as whole kit charges rather than dividing them into a monthly rate the seller never publishes.
Read the operating company from the opening sentence of the terms rather than from the most frequent corporate name on the site, which is a brand-drug manufacturer inside a trademark disclaimer.
Read the disclaimer beneath the product grid in full rather than summarising it, and reported its wording rather than characterising it.
Excluded the vitamin injection from this seller's compound list even though the seller's own heading files it with the peptides.
Searched the extracted text of both pages for certificate, purity and third-party testing language and found none.
A provider to compare AquaVita NextGen against
Trellis Vitality
Trellis Vitality frames its program around body-composition tracking rather than scale weight, pairing NAD+, glutathione and tesamorelin with at-home biomarker panels and a 90-day re-test, and names its dispensing pharmacy, VialsRX in Houston, by address.
No. Each is the whole price of a ten-injection kit covering a ten-week programme, which the page states itself. The weight-loss products on the same page are priced by the month.
How many peptides does it sell?
Two. A third product sits under the same Peptides heading and is a lipotropic vitamin injection, which is not counted on this row.
Who operates the site?
An incorporated company named in the first sentence of the terms, which says it owns and operates the site. The brand-drug manufacturer named elsewhere on the site appears only in a trademark disclaimer.
Is the pharmacy named?
No. The site describes regulated pharmacies as a category in its trust strip and names no facility.
Where does it serve?
No state list is published on the shop page or in the terms.
AquaVita NextGen is not a paid partner; this link may earn a commission if that changes. Full disclosure.