Jently Review

What Jently charges

• Semaglutide: $124/mo — as low as, per month
• Tirzepatide: $174/mo — as low as, per month
• NAD+: $119/mo — as low as, per month; the nasal spray is listed at the same figure
• Sermorelin: $119/mo — as low as, per month; the nasal spray is listed at the same figure
• Glutathione: $119/mo — as low as, per month

A named pharmacy, with an address

Its product pages say the medications are physically compounded by a specific pharmacy, print that pharmacy's street address and town, and describe it as a state-licensed 503A compounding pharmacy.

That is a fact a reader can check against a state board register, which is the whole point of asking for it.

It also says of itself that it is a telehealth platform and not a pharmacy or a manufacturer, which sets the boundary of what it is responsible for.

Five compounds at one floor

The homepage lists each product with an "as low as" monthly figure. NAD+, its nasal spray, sermorelin, its nasal spray and glutathione all share the same floor.

The two weight-loss drugs are priced above it, the dual-action one highest.

Every figure is a floor rather than the rate at a stated dose, so what a buyer actually pays depends on where in the range a provider lands.

The host answers for pages that do not exist

A deliberately meaningless address on this host returned a success code in the same session as the homepage.

An earlier sweep of this roster appeared to find certificates of analysis on this host at four different addresses. That was the homepage served four times, not four documents.

So no absence on this record rests on a status code. What is recorded as missing is missing from the text of pages that were read.

What it says about the medicine

It states that compounded drugs are not FDA-approved for safety, efficacy or quality.

It says participation does not guarantee medication and that prescriptions are determined by a licensed provider based on eligibility.

It publishes no list of served states, saying instead that state notices are available on a partner's terms page.

How we verified this

• Read the pharmacy name, street address and 503A description from the seller's own product pages rather than from a claim about quality.
• Requested a deliberately meaningless address on this host in the same session and found it returns a success code, so no absence on this row rests on a status code.
• Recorded every headline figure as a floor, in the qualifier, because each is published as an "as low as" figure.
• Screened the brand and the named pharmacy against the live federal warning-letter table, filtering locally because the table's own search parameter returns every record whatever is typed into it, with a positive and a nonsense control in the same run.
• Declined to record a state list, because the site refers the question to a partner's page rather than answering it.