Provider review, September 2026
Alternate Health Club gives each of its three tracked compounds a product page of its own and prints one figure per page with the period attached to it. What it does not publish is who fills the prescription, what dose the figure buys, or which states it serves beyond one sentence hidden inside an accordion.
Alternate Health Club is not a paid partner; this link may earn a commission if that changes. Full disclosure.
Glutathione, NAD+ and sermorelin each get a product page, and each page prints a single price with the word month beside it in the same line. There is no second, struck-through number to read the wrong way round and no del-and-ins pair anywhere on the three pages.
That matters more than it sounds. A seller that prints a former price next to a current one gives a reader two numbers and a layout convention to decode, and the convention is not always the obvious one. Here there is nothing to decode.
The home page repeats all three figures in a card row, and the longevity hero repeats the lowest of them as a starting rate. Those are the same numbers, not a fourth one, so there is no arithmetic to reverse and no per-day rate standing in for a per-month one.
The seller also says its pricing is flat at every dose, which is the reason its pages carry no dose ladder: it is claiming there is nothing for a ladder to climb.
Each product page promises that medication is dispensed by a licensed U.S. pharmacy. The sitewide footer promises NABP-accredited, state-licensed pharmacy partners. The terms promise affiliate pharmacy partners, each a licensed 503A compounding pharmacy. The patient release repeats the phrase again.
Four documents, four descriptions, and not one facility name. An accreditation body is a body that accredits; a licence class is a category of licence. Neither is the name of the place that fills an order, and this site does not record a pharmacy as named until a reader can look one up.
The terms do go further in the other direction, which is worth saying plainly: they set out a written authorisation for the company to act as a patient's agent in collecting medication from those pharmacies and forwarding it. A reader learns exactly what the arrangement is without learning who is on the other end of it.
The same terms name the operating company and the state it is registered in, so the corporate half of the question is answered even though the dispensing half is not.
The FAQ asks which states the company currently serves and answers that its telehealth services are available across the whole country. That is the company speaking about its own service, not a pharmacy's licensure and not a clinician network's, which is the distinction that matters when a coverage claim is read off a page.
The answer was not visible when the page loaded. It sits in a collapsed accordion, and it appears only once the control that governs it is clicked. A reader who scans the FAQ headings and leaves never sees it.
The site never prints a state list and never prints a count. Its shipping page adds only that it ships within the United States and not internationally, which is a delivery statement rather than a licensing one.
So the claim is published and it is this seller's own, but a reader who wants to know before an intake whether their own state is served has one sentence and no list to check it against.
Each product page lists what the care plan covers: a clinical evaluation, a personalised plan, a prescription when appropriate, dispensing, and ongoing provider guidance with dose adjustments. Laboratory work is not on that list, and no lab is mentioned on any product page.
The one place the site does mention laboratory tests is a patient-rights passage in its terms, which gives a patient the right to know the price of treatment including any extra products, services, supplements and laboratory tests. That is labs framed as a separate cost, which is the opposite of an inclusion.
Nothing on the three pages states a dose, a concentration or a vial size either, so a reader comparing this seller's figures against another's is comparing a plan rate to a plan rate rather than a quantity to a quantity.
That is a limit worth naming rather than working around. This site records what a seller publishes, and a dose the seller does not print is not a dose we can supply on its behalf.
Trellis Vitality frames its program around body-composition tracking rather than scale weight, pairing NAD+, glutathione and tesamorelin with at-home biomarker panels and a 90-day re-test, and names its dispensing pharmacy, VialsRX in Houston, by address.
Read the full Trellis Vitality review
Trellis Vitality is not a paid partner; this link may earn a commission if that changes. Full disclosure.
Visit Trellis VitalityNo. Its product pages, its footer, its terms and its patient release each describe the pharmacy generically — by licence class or by accreditation body — and none of the four names a facility.
Its FAQ answers that its telehealth services are available across the whole country. That answer sits inside a collapsed accordion, and the site publishes no state list and no count anywhere.
No. The care-plan inclusion list on each product page covers evaluation, plan, prescription, dispensing and provider guidance, and the terms treat laboratory tests as an extra cost to be priced separately.
The seller says its medication pricing is flat at every dose. No page states what dose or concentration the figure buys, so the flat-rate claim is the only thing published about the relationship between dose and price.
Glutathione, NAD+ and sermorelin, each on its own product page. Its remaining catalogue is weight care and a short list of unrelated prescription treatments.
Alternate Health Club is not a paid partner; this link may earn a commission if that changes. Full disclosure.