HealthSource prices every peptide by the four-week cycle — thirteen charges a year, not twelve — on a catalogue that also carries products billed every thirty days and products billed monthly.
What HealthSource charges
Sermorelin: $295 — FOUR WEEKS, NOT A MONTH: printed as "Sermorelin Anti-Aging — Wellness — $295.00 every 4 weeks", and repeated in the same words on the product page. Thirteen charges a year, so the annual outlay is $3,835 rather than the $3,540 a monthly reading would give
Glutathione: $180 — printed as "Glutathione Injection — Wellness — $180.00 every 4 weeks". Same thirteen-charge year as the seller's other peptides
NAD+: $179 — printed as "NAD+ Nasal Spray — Wellness — $179.00 every 4 weeks". A nasal spray, not an injection; the injectable is a separate SKU at a higher figure
NAD+: $279 — printed as "NAD+ Injection — Wellness — From: $279.00 every 4 weeks — This product has multiple variants. The options may be chosen on the product page." The floor of a range on a four-week cycle
HealthSource is not a paid partner; this link may earn a commission if that changes. Full disclosure.
By Nora Castellan, Standards EditorUpdated September 2026
Four weeks is not a month, and the seller says four weeks
Every peptide on this catalogue carries its billing period on the card: four weeks. So do the weight-loss products. That is a genuine disclosure, printed where a reader will see it, and it is the reason this seller is worth reading.
It also produces thirteen charges a year rather than twelve. A comparison table with a monthly column and no period field would understate this seller's annual cost by a full payment, on every peptide it carries.
This roster records all four peptide figures as ones that are not monthly rates, with the four-week cycle written into each qualifier and the annual consequence spelled out on the growth-hormone row.
Nothing about this is hidden. The failure it invites belongs to the comparison site, not the seller.
Three periods on one page
The same catalogue carries a product billed every thirty days, another billed every thirty days at a much higher figure, and a third billed by the month. Four weeks, thirty days and a month are three different years.
That is not carelessness so much as a shop selling products sourced under different arrangements and reporting each one accurately. The result is still a page on which the billing period changes from row to row.
It is worth stating plainly what this means: a reader cannot compare two products on this seller's own catalogue without checking the period on each, and neither can an automated scan that reads the number and not the words after it.
This site reads the words after the number, on every row, which is why the four peptide rows are recorded as they are.
Four SKUs across three routes
The catalogue carries a growth-hormone injection, an antioxidant injection, a coenzyme nasal spray and a coenzyme injection. The injectable coenzyme is a range floor with variants chosen on its own page; the other three are fixed figures.
Pricing the spray and the injection of the same compound separately is the correct route treatment and this roster carries them as separate rows.
The catalogue also marks which cards are fixed and which have variants, which prevents a reader from mistaking a floor for a price.
Every prescription item on the catalogue is tagged as one, throughout, rather than only at checkout.
No company anywhere
A census of the homepage and the growth-hormone product page found no corporate name of any kind — no limited liability company, no incorporated company, no professional corporation.
That is a thinner census than this site would like and it is recorded as thin: two pages, both read, neither carrying an operator. It is not a claim that no entity is published anywhere on the site.
Screened by brand against the regulator's warning-letter index — the only handle available without an entity — nothing returns.
No dispensing pharmacy is named, no certificate of analysis exists on the pages read, and no state coverage list is published. The requested growth-hormone product path redirected, so the roster cites the effective one.
Who it's for
Readers who want the billing period printed on every single line of a catalogue.
Buyers comparing a nasal spray against an injection of the same compound at separately published figures.
Anyone who wants fixed-price cards distinguished from variant cards before clicking.
Shoppers who will multiply by thirteen rather than twelve.
Who should look elsewhere
Anyone budgeting monthly, since a four-week cycle produces an extra charge a year.
Readers comparing products within this catalogue, which uses three different billing periods across its rows.
Buyers who want to know which company they are contracting with.
Shoppers who want a certificate of analysis, a named pharmacy, or a state coverage list.
Strengths
States the billing period on every single line rather than leaving it to be assumed
Prices four peptide SKUs across three routes on one browsable catalogue
Distinguishes fixed-price SKUs from variant SKUs and says which is which on the card
Tags every prescription item on the catalogue rather than only at checkout
Trade-offs
Its peptides bill every four weeks, which is thirteen charges a year and will read as twelve in any monthly column
Three different billing periods appear on the same catalogue page against different products
No operating company was found on the pages read
No pharmacy named, no certificate of analysis, no state coverage list
How we verified this
Loaded the catalogue homepage and the growth-hormone product page with a full browser user-agent, printing the effective URL beside the requested one on both and recording that the product path redirected.
Cited the effective product URL on the growth-hormone row.
Ran a nonsense-path control on the host in the same run, which returned an honest not-found status.
Joined the page's text nodes before matching any figure, so a price split across elements could not read as an absence.
Read the words after every figure on the catalogue and recorded the three distinct billing periods present, rather than assuming one applied to all.
Recorded all four peptide figures as ones that are not monthly rates, with the four-week cycle in each qualifier and the annual consequence stated on one of them.
Ran a census of both pages for corporate-suffix tokens, found none, and recorded the census as thin rather than treating it as proof of absence.
Screened the brand name against the regulator's warning-letter index, with a nonsense query as a control in the same run.
A provider to compare HealthSource against
Trellis Vitality
Trellis Vitality frames its program around body-composition tracking rather than scale weight, pairing NAD+, glutathione and tesamorelin with at-home biomarker panels and a 90-day re-test, and names its dispensing pharmacy, VialsRX in Houston, by address.