Ways2Well Review

What Ways2Well charges

• Glutathione: $149 — per infusion, booked singly; the menu lists this bag’s ingredients as glutathione alone, which is why it is filed here and the multi-ingredient bags are not
• NAD+: $249 — per infusion at 250 mg; the same menu prices 500 mg at $449 and 1000 mg at $849, and the entry’s own heading adds "Featuring additional vitamins as advised by your clinician" while its ingredient line reads NAD+ alone

A state list, itemised and footnoted

The peptide page names the covered states one by one rather than counting them, and marks several with a symbol that the footnote explains: certain peptide therapies are restricted in those states under current regulations.

That is a more careful disclosure than a bare number, and it is the reason a state list appears on this record where most rows here carry none.

The District of Columbia is in the seller's own list. It is dropped from this record only because the field here carries state codes.

The count and the list disagree

The homepage says care is available in forty-six states. The peptide list names forty-three states plus the District of Columbia.

Both were read on the same day. The narrower, itemised one is what is recorded, because it is the one scoped to peptides and the one that names names.

The gap is recorded rather than resolved. It may be that non-peptide services reach further, but the site does not say so.

Prices are per bag, and the ingredients are listed

Every infusion on the menu lists its ingredients. That makes it possible to tell a single-ingredient bag from a cocktail, which is exactly what a price comparison needs.

One bag lists glutathione alone; that is the figure recorded for glutathione. Several other bags contain glutathione alongside six or ten other things and are not filed against it.

The NAD+ entry lists NAD+ alone in its ingredients while its heading adds that additional vitamins may be included as a clinician advises. Both readings are recorded, unresolved, on the price row itself.

Testing language, and what it is not

The peptide page carries the words third-party tested, and says independent labs verify purity and potency.

That is a claim about testing. It is not a certificate, and none is reachable on the site.

It is recorded here as a claim, which is what it is, and it does not earn this seller a testing credit.

How we verified this

• Copied the state list from the seller's own peptide page rather than converting a count into one.
• Recorded the homepage count and the peptide list as conflicting statements and kept the itemised one.
• Read the ingredient line of every infusion and filed a price only against a bag whose ingredients name one tracked compound.
• Recorded the NAD+ entry's own internal contradiction on the price row rather than choosing a reading.
• Treated the third-party-testing sentence as a claim and confirmed no certificate is reachable.
• Screened the brand against the live federal warning-letter table, filtering locally because the table's own search parameter returns every record whatever is typed into it, with a positive and a nonsense control in the same run.