MintRx Review

What MintRx charges

• Sermorelin: $295/mo — one-time fill, in the seller's own words, of a kit the same card calls a 28-day supply — twenty-eight days is not a calendar month
• Sermorelin: $295/mo — per refill on a 28-day refill cadence, with five refills per prescription and cancellation stated as available at any time; the same figure as the one-time fill, on standing terms
• NAD+: $225/mo — one-time purchase of one vial; the card names the strength and the total content and states no billing period, and the figure is printed on sibling product pages rather than on the NAD+ injection page itself
• NAD+: $179/mo — one-time purchase; the card offers $170.05 with Subscribe & Save and names a spray count rather than a period, so this figure carries no term
• Glutathione: $142.5/mo — one-time purchase of one vial; the card names the strength and the volume and states no billing period, and the figure is printed on sibling product pages rather than on the glutathione injection page itself
• Glutathione: $110/mo — one-time purchase; the card offers $104.50 with Subscribe & Save and names no period, so this figure carries no term
• PT-141: $180/mo — 30-day supply, in the seller's own words
• PT-141: $180/mo — per prescribed order — the same figure as the nasal spray on different terms, because this card names no period at all

The best price detail here, attached to nobody

Each product card names what the figure buys. The sermorelin kit is described as a fifteen-milligram lyophilized vial with a mixing kit, thirty syringes and swabs, and a twenty-eight-day supply.

The NAD+ injection card names a concentration, a vial volume and a total milligram content. The glutathione injection card does the same. The nasal sprays name a spray count or a concentration instead.

That level of detail is what makes two prices comparable, and most sellers here do not supply it.

Then the terms, the privacy policy, the HIPAA notice, the about page, the contact page and every product page pass without naming a company. The only self-naming string on the site is the brand, and the terms carry no governing-law clause either.

Six of seven prices are printed on somebody else's page

The NAD+ injection page does not print the NAD+ injection price. It prints the prices of three sibling products instead. The glutathione injection page behaves the same way, and so does the PT-141 injection page.

Sermorelin is the exception. Its page carries its own two cards, one for a single fill and one for an auto refill.

Every figure recorded here therefore appears on two independent product pages, and the two readings agreed in every case. A reader who lands on one product page may see every price on the site except the one they came for.

A sitewide promotion was running when these pages were read, taking twenty percent off with a code. The figures recorded here are the pre-discount prices the cards print.

One figure, two products, two different terms

Both PT-141 products cost the same. The nasal spray card calls its figure a thirty-day supply. The injection card calls its figure the price of a single prescribed order and names no period at all.

Those are not the same offer, and recording one qualifier for both would have flattened a real difference. Each row here carries the wording from its own card.

Twelve of the forty-five sellers compared here carry PT-141, so it is a narrower market than sermorelin or NAD+ and a place where terms are worth reading closely.

The two nasal sprays also carry a subscribe-and-save price beside the one-time price. Those savings are small and are stated on the card rather than revealed at checkout.

Coverage, the pharmacy, and what LegitScript answers

No state list appears anywhere. The terms say only that availability and eligibility may vary by treatment and by state.

Twenty-four of the forty-five sellers here publish none, and this is one of them, so a reader learns whether they are eligible by starting an intake.

The product pages carry a LegitScript certification claim. That certification is about a seller meeting a certification program's standards, and it says nothing about which company holds the certificate when no company is named.

Ten of the forty-five sellers compared here name the facility that fills an order; this is one of the thirty-five that do not. A telephone number is published, which is more than several sellers here offer.

How we verified this

• Read the home page, seven product pages, the terms, the privacy policy, the HIPAA notice, the about page and the contact page as rendered text.
• Cross-checked every figure on two independent product pages before recording it, because six of the seven products print their price only on a sibling's card.
• Searched all of those pages for a corporate form, a street address, an operating-company sentence and a governing-law clause, and confirmed none appears.
• Checked each price element's computed style and its laid-out box before recording it, and confirmed the numbers render at full opacity with no blur and no account prompt beside them.
• Recorded the two PT-141 products separately, because the same figure is attached to a thirty-day supply on one card and to a single prescribed order on the other.
• Recorded the pre-discount prices rather than the promotional ones, and noted the promotion and its end date.
• Took every page path from the site's own links rather than typing one, after three guessed paths turned out not to exist.
• Probed the host with a nonsense path at two path depths in the same pass and confirmed each answers with its own not-found page.
• Searched the published federal warning-letter record for the brand across the years that record covers, and found no letter to it. That record does not include untitled letters.