Avono answers both of the questions this site asks that sellers almost never answer: it names four dispensing pharmacies with phone numbers and web addresses, and it names the medical group and two prescribers by registry number. Its peptide prices are behind a tab that has to be clicked.
What Avono Health charges
NAD+: $249/mo — the month-to-month rate, published twice on one page: as "NAD+ Injection | In stock | Starting at $249.00 per month" in the Wellness tab (which must be clicked to render), and again inside the bundle sentence "NAD+ Wellness Program (3 Month Bundle) $597.00 … Save $150 (compared to $249/mo with month-to-month pricing)". ⛔ The bundle total was not divided; the monthly figure is the seller's own. The flex-dose tablet and nasal-spray forms carry the identical rate, so no separate rows are recorded for them
Sermorelin: $259/mo — the month-to-month rate, published twice on one page: as "Sermorelin Injection | In stock | Starting at $259.00 per month" in the Wellness tab, and again inside "Strength & Vitality Program (3 Month Bundle) $597.00 … Save $180 (compared to $259/mo with month-to-month pricing)". The oral-dissolving form carries the identical rate, so no separate row is recorded for it
Avono Health is not a paid partner; this link may earn a commission if that changes. Full disclosure.
By Nora Castellan, Standards EditorUpdated September 2026
Four pharmacies, by name, on the homepage
The homepage FAQ asks who the pharmacy providers are and then lists four companies, each with a telephone number and a web address. Not a category, not a regulatory class, not a promise about standards — four names a reader can look up.
A second answer names the medical group and two individual prescribers, each with a national provider identifier. Those numbers are checkable against a public registry, which is a different order of disclosure from a claim about board certification.
Between them, those two answers settle who fills the prescription and who writes it. Very little else on this market settles either.
A footer disclosure pulls in the other direction: it warns that a reader may be redirected to a third-party platform whose own terms and privacy policy govern. That is worth reading before assuming the named parties are the only ones involved.
The prices are not in the page as delivered
The homepage product grid opens on the weight-loss tab and shows only GLP-1 rows. Read as delivered, this host appears to sell no peptides at all.
The tracked compounds sit under a sibling tab. It has to be clicked before its cards render, and when it does, five appear: three delivery forms of one compound at one rate, and two forms of the other at another.
This is exactly the shape of a false absence. A read of this host that never clicked the tab would report, truthfully and wrongly, that nothing is priced here.
Further down the same page the seller publishes both monthly rates again, inside sentences describing three-month bundles. The bundle sentences quote the month-to-month rate themselves, so nothing had to be divided — the two independent printings agree exactly.
Fifty states, then a caveat in the same breath
The state answer says care and support are provided to patients in all fifty states. This record takes that as the coverage claim, because it is the company speaking about itself.
Its second sentence says availability of specific services may vary by state based on licensure and regulation, and names no service and no state. The claim and its qualification arrive together.
That is not dishonest — it is more careful than an unqualified fifty-state banner — but it means a reader in a smaller state still cannot tell from this page whether the peptide programme in particular is available to them.
Nothing anywhere in the programme descriptions mentions lab work, in the rate or beside it.
Who it's for
Readers who want the dispensing pharmacies named and contactable before they order.
Buyers who want the prescribing group and its clinicians identified by registry number.
Anyone who wants a monthly rate published twice, independently, on one page.
Shoppers comparing three delivery forms of one compound priced identically.
Who should look elsewhere
Anyone who needs a coverage claim that is not qualified in its own second sentence.
Buyers who need lab work included in the programme.
Readers who want the peptide range visible without interacting with the page.
Anyone uncomfortable being handed off to a third-party platform with its own terms.
Strengths
Names four dispensing pharmacies outright, each with a phone number and a web address, in an answer on its own homepage
Names the medical group and two individual prescribers by national provider identifier
Publishes the same two monthly rates in two independent places on one page, so neither has to be taken on its own
Prices three delivery forms of one compound at one rate instead of quoting a range
Answers the state question and then says, in the same answer, that specific services may still vary
Trade-offs
The peptide prices render only after a tab is clicked, so the page as delivered shows a GLP-1 catalogue and no peptides at all
The fifty-state answer qualifies itself in its own second sentence without naming which services vary
A footer disclosure warns that a reader may be redirected to a third-party platform whose terms govern instead of this one
No lab work is included in or priced beside either programme
The bundle blocks quote a three-month total beside a monthly rate, which invites a division the seller has already done
How we verified this
Rendered the page in a real browser and read only laid-out, visible text nodes.
Fired two nonsense paths at the host in the same session before the real pages; both returned an honest not-found response.
Clicked the wellness tab and re-read the page, because the peptide products are absent from the page as delivered and a read without that click reports a false absence.
Cross-checked each monthly rate against the bundle sentence further down the same page, which quotes the month-to-month figure itself.
Refused to divide the three-month bundle total, because the seller publishes the monthly rate directly and no arithmetic is needed.
Opened the collapsed homepage FAQ and read the pharmacy answer, the medical-team answer and the state answer from the rendered text.
Screened the operating company and the brand against the regulator's live warning-letter index, with a known-positive query and a nonsense query in the same run.
A provider to compare Avono Health against
Trellis Vitality
Trellis Vitality frames its program around body-composition tracking rather than scale weight, pairing NAD+, glutathione and tesamorelin with at-home biomarker panels and a 90-day re-test, and names its dispensing pharmacy, VialsRX in Houston, by address.