Breeze Meds answers the coverage question outright instead of deferring it to an intake, and names four filling pharmacies with telephone numbers — then prices exactly one tracked compound, as a floor.
What Breeze Meds charges
NAD+: $169 — starting at; the card names no billing period and no supply length
Breeze Meds is not a paid partner; this link may earn a commission if that changes. Full disclosure.
By Nora Castellan, Standards EditorUpdated September 2026
A coverage claim that is actually the company's
Asked which states it services, this seller answers in one short sentence covering all of them.
That sentence is not doing work on behalf of a pharmacy licence, a physician network or a fulfilment footprint.
Sellers more usually publish no list at all, or hedge availability by state and settle it inside the intake.
The claim sits inside a collapsed answer, so a reader skimming the open page would never see it.
Four pharmacies and a named physician group
The seller names four filling pharmacies, each with a telephone number and a website.
It also names its physician group and two individual prescribers with their national provider identifiers.
Those prescribers are a clinical fact and not a pharmacy, and they are recorded as such rather than counted twice.
Both disclosures are behind collapsed controls on the home page, alongside the coverage answer.
One compound, priced as a floor
This seller prices a single compound this site tracks, so the coverage answer is doing most of the work on this row.
Its figure is introduced by the words starting at, with no billing period and no supply length beside it.
The card next to it prices a weight-loss line, and that figure is not recorded anywhere on this row.
Each figure was read inside its own card rather than by nearness to a compound name, which is how the two stay apart.
What the site does not serve
There is no sitemap on this host, so there is no product list to walk and no way to census what else exists.
The nonsense-path control returns a not-found code and a document of a few dozen characters.
No corporate form is published anywhere; the seller trades under a brand and a support address.
No claim about lab work appears at all, so nothing here treats testing as part of the price.
Who it's for
Readers outside the usual telehealth footprint who want a stated coverage answer.
Buyers who want the filling pharmacies named with telephone numbers.
Shoppers who want to know which prescribers stand behind the prescription.
Anyone who wants the peptide figure on the home page rather than behind an intake.
Who should look elsewhere
Readers who want more than one tracked compound from one seller.
Buyers who need a settled price rather than a floor.
Shoppers who want a billing period attached to a figure.
Anyone who wants a registered company name published on the site.
Strengths
Claims all fifty states in its own words, without leaning on a pharmacy or physician licence
Names four filling pharmacies with phone numbers and websites
Names its physician group and gives two prescribers with NPI numbers
Puts the peptide figure on the home page rather than behind an intake
Trade-offs
Publishes one tracked compound only, so the coverage claim carries most of the weight on this row
Prints its figure as a floor with no billing period or supply length
Serves no sitemap, so there is no product list to walk
Puts both the coverage claim and the pharmacy names inside collapsed accordions
How we verified this
Read every page cited on this row as rendered text in a real browser, not as served HTML, because several sellers in this pass ship the figure in by script and serve a bare currency sign.
Fired a nonsense-path control at this host in the same run and judged it on the rendered document rather than on its status code or its byte count.
Joined every text node before scanning for a currency sign, so a figure split across nested elements could not read as an absence.
Clicked every collapsed accordion on the pages read, because pharmacy names, state answers and lab conditions hid inside them on most sellers checked this pass.
Read each figure inside its own card or panel rather than by nearness to a compound name, on pages that price weight-loss lines beside peptide lines.
Recorded the seller's own published figure and never divided a multi-month total into a monthly one.
Screened this seller in the live federal warning-letter record by entity and by brand, with a known-good positive control and a nonsense negative control fired in the same run.
Read the company column of every returned record rather than accepting a full-text match, and attached no letter unless the letter itself named this seller's own domain.
Clicked the coverage answer, the pharmacy answer and the medical-team answer open individually, since none of the three is visible on the closed page.
Checked that the coverage sentence was the company speaking about itself rather than about a pharmacy or a physician network.
Read the weight-loss card and the peptide card separately, because they sit side by side and carry different figures.
A provider to compare Breeze Meds against
Trellis Vitality
Trellis Vitality frames its program around body-composition tracking rather than scale weight, pairing NAD+, glutathione and tesamorelin with at-home biomarker panels and a 90-day re-test, and names its dispensing pharmacy, VialsRX in Houston, by address.