Coivas dates its own prices on the page, which almost no seller does, and its quarterly totals reconcile exactly against the per-month figures it prints. It also gives itself three different legal names across three of its own pages, and its tirzepatide price renders nowhere except inside a comparison table.
What Coivas charges
Semaglutide: $149/mo — per month, billed $447 every three months; a new-patient intro runs $119 a month, billed $357 for the first three
Tirzepatide: $229/mo — per month, read from the seller's own column of its comparison table, which is the only place the figure renders
Sermorelin: $199/mo — per month, billed $597 every three months; a new-patient intro runs $119 a month, billed $357 for the first three
NAD+: $149/mo — per month after a $99 first month, on the quarterly plan; a monthly plan runs $199 after a $119 first month
NAD+: $119/mo — per month after an $89 first month, on the quarterly plan; a monthly plan runs $129 after a $99 first month
Coivas is not a paid partner; this link may earn a commission if that changes. Full disclosure.
By Nora Castellan, Standards EditorUpdated September 2026
Three legal names for one seller
Its terms and privacy policy call the operator "WellVi LLC d/b/a Coivas".
Its contact block calls it "Coivas Health, Inc.", and its footer carries a copyright line for "Coivas Health" with no suffix at all.
All three are recorded and none is treated as authoritative. A reader who wants to look the company up in a state registry has to guess which name to type.
The tirzepatide figure lives only inside a comparison table
Its "See how Coivas compares" table has four columns, three of which belong to unnamed rivals. The seller's own column was identified three separate ways before any figure was taken from it.
Its membership row reads None, matching the page's sentence that "There are no separate membership or per-visit fees"; its clear-pricing row reads Yes against three Nos; and its semaglutide figure matches the hero above.
The molecule toggle in that hero is JavaScript and renders no tirzepatide price in the served document, so the table is the only place that price exists.
It dates its prices and reconciles its own arithmetic
The treatment page prints "Pricing as of August 2026", which turns a number into a dated observation rather than an open-ended claim.
Every quarterly total it publishes multiplies out correctly against the per-month figure beside it, and every product carries both an introductory rate and the standing rate that follows it.
It also states the regulatory position plainly: "The FDA does not review or approve compounded medications for safety or effectiveness."
The clinical group is named; the pharmacy is not
It names its clinical group and publishes an address, which is more than most sellers here do.
The dispenser is described as a class rather than a company: "Coivas partners with state-licensed 503A compounding pharmacies and 503B outsourcing facilities… The dispensing pharmacy may vary."
Its fifty-state claim is not credited, because its own terms immediately qualify it — the service is "available to residents of states where we are authorized to provide telehealth services", and no list is published.
Who it's for
Readers who want a price with a verification date printed beside it.
Buyers who want to check a quarterly total against its own monthly figure.
Shoppers who want both the introductory rate and the standing rate up front.
Anyone comparing an NAD+ injection against an NAD+ nasal spray from one seller.
Who should look elsewhere
Readers who need one company name they can look up.
Buyers who want the dispensing pharmacy named rather than described.
Anyone who needs their state confirmed before paying.
Shoppers who expect a tirzepatide price to appear as its own figure.
Strengths
Prints its own price-verification month directly on the treatment page
Publishes both the intro and the standing rate for every product
Names its clinical group and its address
Its quarterly arithmetic reconciles exactly against every billed total it prints
Trade-offs
Gives itself three different legal names across three of its own pages
Its tirzepatide price renders only inside a comparison table, not as its own figure
Its fifty-state claim is contradicted by its own terms
Names no dispensing pharmacy and says the dispenser may vary
How we verified this
Identified the seller's own column in its comparison table three independent ways — its membership row, its clear-pricing row and its semaglutide figure matching the hero — before recording anything from it.
Multiplied every published quarterly total against its stated per-month figure and confirmed each one reconciles.
Read the terms, the contact block and the footer and recorded all three company names rather than picking one.
Requested a deliberately meaningless address on this host in the same session and confirmed it returns a not-found response.
Screened the brand, the operating company its terms name and its named clinical group against the live federal warning-letter table, pulling all 3,677 records in pages and filtering locally because the table's own search parameter is ignored, with a positive and a nonsense control in the same run. Nothing attaches to any of the three.
A provider to compare Coivas against
Trellis Vitality
Trellis Vitality frames its program around body-composition tracking rather than scale weight, pairing NAD+, glutathione and tesamorelin with at-home biomarker panels and a 90-day re-test, and names its dispensing pharmacy, VialsRX in Houston, by address.
The site gives three answers. Its terms name one limited liability company trading as Coivas, its contact block names an incorporated Coivas Health, and its footer names Coivas Health with no suffix.
Why is the tirzepatide price hard to find?
Because it only renders inside the comparison table. The molecule toggle in the page hero is JavaScript and produces no tirzepatide figure in the served document.
How current are its prices?
The seller dates them itself, printing a pricing-as-of month on the treatment page. That is unusual and it makes the figures checkable.
Is it available in my state?
It claims all fifty, then qualifies that in its own terms to states where it is authorised to provide telehealth. No list is published, so no coverage claim is credited here.
Coivas is not a paid partner; this link may earn a commission if that changes. Full disclosure.