Fridays publishes four partner pharmacies with websites, street addresses and telephone numbers in its own terms, and publishes two different corporate names for itself.
What Fridays charges
Sermorelin: $259 — the product page prints the figure with no billing period, supply length or cycle stated
NAD+: $259 — the product page prints the figure with no billing period, supply length or cycle stated
NAD+: $259 — the product page prints the figure with no billing period stated; the three strengths carry the same figure
Fridays is not a paid partner; this link may earn a commission if that changes. Full disclosure.
By Nora Castellan, Standards EditorUpdated September 2026
Four pharmacies, with addresses
The seller names its partner pharmacies in its terms, each with a website, a street address and a telephone number.
That is a genuinely checkable disclosure rather than a claim that certified pharmacies are used.
The disclosure sits in the terms rather than on any product page, so a reader has to follow a footnote to find it.
The link that promises the list from the footer does not resolve on its own; the list was found inside the terms document itself.
Two names for one company
The footer names one incorporated entity as the operator of the site and gives a street address for it.
The terms open by naming a differently constituted entity as the operator of the same site.
Both statements are published today, by the same seller, on the same domain, and neither corrects the other.
A reader trying to find out which registered company takes the money has two candidates and no way to choose.
Figures with no period on them
Each of the three products prints a single figure and nothing beside it: no cycle, no supply length, no term.
The currency sign and the number render in separate elements, so a naive text scan can miss the figure entirely.
Because no period is stated, the figures are stored as unperiodised rather than as monthly rates.
The oral product offers three strengths after a provider sets the titration, and all three carry the same figure.
Clinical services, labs and who provides them
Clinical services are named as coming from an outside physician network rather than from the seller.
That is the network's arrangement and not a coverage claim by this company, and it is not read as one here.
The terms say plainly that laboratories and pharmacies are not operated by or for the seller.
Medication cost is described as included in the program; lab work is explicitly outside it.
Who it's for
Readers who want the dispensing pharmacies named and addressed.
Buyers who prefer one flat figure per product to a dose ladder.
Shoppers choosing between an injection and an oral form of the same compound.
Anyone who wants to see a seller state that its labs and pharmacies are third parties.
Who should look elsewhere
Readers who need to know which registered company they are dealing with.
Buyers who need a billing cycle attached to a figure.
Shoppers who need a state footprint before the intake.
Anyone who expects lab work to be part of what they pay.
Strengths
Publishes four partner pharmacies by name with street addresses and phone numbers
Prints one figure per product with no ladder that climbs as the dose rises
Says in its own terms that labs and pharmacies are not operated by the company
Offers the same compound in both an injectable and an oral route at a stated strength range
Trade-offs
Publishes two different corporate names for itself, one in the footer and one in the terms
Prints its figures with no billing period, supply length or cycle attached
Publishes no state list, so eligibility is settled inside the intake
Places lab work outside the program the figures cover
How we verified this
Read every page cited on this row as rendered text in a real browser, not as served HTML, because several sellers in this pass ship the figure in by script and serve a bare currency sign.
Fired a nonsense-path control at this host in the same run and judged it on the rendered document rather than on its status code or its byte count.
Joined every text node before scanning for a currency sign, so a figure split across nested elements could not read as an absence.
Clicked every collapsed accordion on the pages read, because pharmacy names, state answers and lab conditions hid inside them on most sellers checked this pass.
Read each figure inside its own card or panel rather than by nearness to a compound name, on pages that price weight-loss lines beside peptide lines.
Recorded the seller's own published figure and never divided a multi-month total into a monthly one.
Screened this seller in the live federal warning-letter record by entity and by brand, with a known-good positive control and a nonsense negative control fired in the same run.
Read the company column of every returned record rather than accepting a full-text match, and attached no letter unless the letter itself named this seller's own domain.
Read the terms document in full rather than trusting the footer link that promises the pharmacy list.
Compared the entity named in the footer against the entity named in the terms and recorded both rather than picking one.
Separated the outside physician network's arrangement from any claim this company makes about its own coverage.
A provider to compare Fridays against
Trellis Vitality
Trellis Vitality frames its program around body-composition tracking rather than scale weight, pairing NAD+, glutathione and tesamorelin with at-home biomarker panels and a 90-day re-test, and names its dispensing pharmacy, VialsRX in Houston, by address.