Garcia Weight Loss publishes six different units for one compound on a single page — per infusion at two strengths, per injection, per vial, and two package sizes — which makes it the most itemised price list in this batch and the hardest to reduce to one number.
What Garcia Weight Loss charges
NAD+: $250 — PER INFUSION: printed as "250mg of IV NAD+: $250.00 per infusion". The same list prints five further units for the same compound — "500mg of IV NAD+: $500.00 per infusion", "Intramuscular (IM): $50.00 per injection", "Intramuscular (IM): $300 per vial (At Home Use)", "Package of 3 IV NAD+ 250mg: $700.00" and "Package of 12 Intermuscular (IM) Injections: $500.00" (the misspelling is the seller's)
Sermorelin: $300/mo — printed as "Sermorelin Therapy pricing — $300 monthly, minimum 3 months of therapy". ⛔ The minimum term is stated separately from the figure, so the monthly rate is real but the commitment is three months. The coenzyme page also prices a combined "Sermorelin + NAD+ (6-month package): $3120.00"
Garcia Weight Loss is not a paid partner; this link may earn a commission if that changes. Full disclosure.
By Nora Castellan, Standards EditorUpdated September 2026
Six units, one compound, one page
The coenzyme page carries a pricing block that separates the intravenous route from the intramuscular one, gives two strengths of the infusion at two figures, prices a single injection, prices a vial for home use, and then adds two package sizes.
That is more granularity than any other seller on this roster offers for any compound. A reader can price an occasional in-clinic infusion, a course of them, a single injection or a month of self-administration, and the seller has priced each separately rather than averaging them.
It also means no single figure represents what this compound costs here. This site records the base infusion figure with its unit, and lists the other five in the qualifier so the shape of the tariff is visible on the row.
The page also prices a six-month package combining the coenzyme with the growth-hormone peptide, which is a seventh construction again.
A minimum term stated separately from the rate
The growth-hormone page gives one figure with the word monthly attached, and then a separate condition: a minimum number of months of therapy.
Stating the two separately is the right way round. A minimum term and a billing cycle are different facts, and sellers on this roster routinely collapse them into a single per-month figure that turns out to require a prepayment.
This site records the figure as a monthly rate, because the seller says monthly, and puts the minimum term into the qualifier.
That makes it directly comparable to other monthly figures here, with the commitment visible rather than hidden.
The legal name contains neither brand
The privacy statement names a limited liability company trading under two different brand names, neither of which appears in its registered name.
A company search on either brand returns nothing about the operator. Only this one sentence connects them, and it is on a page most readers never open.
The terms page carries a different corporate name belonging to the practice-management software vendor. Read in its sentence it is a vendor, not an operator, and it is not recorded as one.
Screened by the registered name and by both brand names against the regulator's warning-letter index, nothing returns.
A clinic model, with what that implies
The infusion figures assume attendance at a clinic. The page names a phone number and a text number for booking and offers a free consultation.
The at-home vial is the exception and is priced separately, which lets a reader compare this seller's self-administration cost against a shipped subscription elsewhere on more equal terms than its infusion figures allow.
The page contains a spelling error in one of its own package labels, which is a small thing and a familiar one on price lists nobody proofreads.
No dispensing pharmacy is named, no certificate of analysis exists on the pages read, and no state coverage list is published.
Who it's for
Readers who want every delivery route priced separately instead of folded into one headline figure.
Buyers comparing an at-home vial against a shipped subscription on more equal terms than an infusion allows.
Anyone who wants a minimum term stated separately from a monthly rate.
Shoppers who want package pricing published beside single-unit pricing.
Who should look elsewhere
Anyone wanting one number for what this compound costs, which six units make impossible.
Readers outside the region the clinic serves, since most of the figures assume attendance.
Buyers who want a company searchable by the brand they are buying from.
Shoppers who want a certificate of analysis, a named pharmacy, or a state coverage list.
Strengths
The most itemised price list in this batch — six units for one compound, each labelled
Separates the in-clinic infusion from the at-home vial and prices both
States the minimum term for the growth-hormone programme separately from the monthly figure
Publishes package pricing beside single-unit pricing so the discount is calculable
Trade-offs
Six units for one compound means no single figure represents what the compound costs here
Its legal name contains neither brand it trades under, so a company search on the brand finds nothing
A regional clinic model, so the infusion figures assume travel a shipped programme does not
No dispensing pharmacy named, no certificate of analysis, no state coverage list
How we verified this
Loaded both product pages and the privacy statement with a full browser user-agent, printing the effective URL beside the requested one on each.
Ran a nonsense-path control on the host in the same run, which returned a clean not-found status with a small body.
Joined the page's text nodes before matching any figure, so a price split across elements could not read as an absence.
Recorded each of the six units on the coenzyme page rather than selecting one and calling it the price, and wrote the other five into the qualifier.
Recorded the growth-hormone figure as a monthly rate with the stated minimum term in the qualifier, because the seller states the two separately.
Read the privacy statement for the registered company name and both trading names it declares.
Read the corporate name on the terms page in its own sentence and recorded it as a software vendor rather than an operator.
Screened the registered name and both brand names against the regulator's warning-letter index, with a nonsense query as a control in the same run.
A provider to compare Garcia Weight Loss against
Trellis Vitality
Trellis Vitality frames its program around body-composition tracking rather than scale weight, pairing NAD+, glutathione and tesamorelin with at-home biomarker panels and a 90-day re-test, and names its dispensing pharmacy, VialsRX in Houston, by address.