Get Thin MD advertises one figure at the top of its coenzyme page and states a different, higher one further down the same page as the month-to-month rate. Its growth-hormone product page, which is long and detailed, publishes no price at all.
What Get Thin MD charges
NAD+: $199/mo — the month-to-month rate, in the seller's own sentence: "For the month-to-month package, the price is $199 per month. If you select a larger package, the monthly price continues to go down." The same page advertises "(Get Started For As Little as $129/Month)" at the top — $129 is the floor of a longer package, not a month
Sermorelin: $129 — read from the site-wide navigation rail as "Sermorelin Injections — As low as $129/mo*", which carries an asterisk this pass did not resolve. ⛔ The seller's own sermorelin product page publishes NO figure of any kind — 18,725 characters of text and no dollar sign
Get Thin MD is not a paid partner; this link may earn a commission if that changes. Full disclosure.
By Nora Castellan, Standards EditorUpdated September 2026
Two figures on one page, and the lower one is not a month
The coenzyme page opens with a bracketed invitation to get started for as little as a figure it names. Scroll further and the seller writes a plain sentence: for the month-to-month package, the price is a different and considerably higher number, and the monthly price falls as the package lengthens.
Both are the seller's own words on the same page. Neither is hidden. But the first is the number a reader takes away and the second is the number a reader without a multi-month commitment will pay.
This site records the month-to-month figure, because that is the one the seller explicitly attaches the word month to, and names the advertised figure in the qualifier as a package floor rather than a rate.
The habit is worth noting for its own sake. Very few sellers on this roster write a sentence stating what a month costs. This one does, and then advertises something else at the top of the same page.
A legal name most readers would never guess
The privacy policy opens in the first person and names the operator: a limited liability company whose registered name is a peptide business, trading under a weight-loss brand. The brand name and the legal name have nothing in common.
That matters for a reader trying to check a company. A search on the brand returns the brand; a search on the operator returns a different business entirely, and only the privacy policy connects them.
The terms of service, on the same site, name a different corporate form for the same brand. This site records both rather than choosing, because an incorporated company and a limited liability company are not the same entity and nothing on the site reconciles them.
Neither name returns a regulatory warning letter when screened against the regulator's own index by entity and by brand.
A long product page with no price on it
The growth-hormone page is one of the more substantial product pages in this batch. It explains the mechanism, distinguishes the compound from direct hormone replacement, lists candidacy criteria and contraindications, gives an administration schedule and storage instructions, and sets expectations across a multi-week timeline.
It contains no figure. This site reduced the page to joined text and searched it for a currency symbol and for three different ways of writing a rate, and found none of them.
The only figure for this compound anywhere on the site sits in the navigation rail that renders on the coenzyme page, where it appears as an as-low-as with an asterisk this pass did not resolve. That is where the roster's figure comes from and the source URL says so.
The page also carries a sentence worth quoting for what it is: the seller states plainly that the compound was once approved under a brand name, that the manufacturer discontinued it, and that it is not currently available as an approved drug product. Very few sellers on this roster write that down.
Every prescription item in the navigation carries a marker identifying it as one, and the footer states that prescription products require an evaluation with a licensed professional. The seller is unambiguous about being a clinical channel rather than a shop.
It is equally unambiguous in the other direction. There is no certificate of analysis, no testing claim, no named dispensing pharmacy and no state coverage list anywhere on the pages read.
The only quality language found is a marketing adjective about a domestic supply chain, which describes an origin rather than a test.
So the seller is clear about what kind of business it is and silent about how the product is made or checked — a combination that is common on this roster and worth naming rather than assuming.
Who it's for
Readers who want a seller to state, in a sentence, what a month costs without a package commitment.
Buyers who want the regulatory status of a compound written down by the seller rather than left implied.
Anyone who wants prescription items marked as such throughout a catalogue.
Shoppers who will read past a banner to find the number that applies to them.
Who should look elsewhere
Anyone who wants the growth-hormone product's price on the growth-hormone product's page, which is not published there.
Readers who need one corporate identity rather than two forms across two legal pages.
Buyers who want a certificate of analysis or a named dispensing pharmacy.
Shoppers who need to know whether the service reaches their state.
Strengths
States the month-to-month price in a plain sentence, which most sellers on this roster never do
Names its operating company in the first person in its own privacy policy
Its growth-hormone page states plainly that the compound "is not currently available as an FDA-approved drug product"
Tags every prescription item in the navigation with a prescription marker
Trade-offs
The advertised figure and the month-to-month figure differ by seventy dollars on the same page
The growth-hormone product page carries no price at all — the only figure for it sits in a navigation rail on a different product's page
The privacy policy and the terms name different corporate forms for the one brand
No certificate of analysis, no named pharmacy, no state coverage list
How we verified this
Loaded the coenzyme page, the growth-hormone page and the privacy policy with a full browser user-agent, printing the effective URL beside the requested one on each.
Ran a nonsense-path control on the host in the same run, which returned a clean not-found status.
Joined the page's text nodes before matching any figure, so a price split across elements could not read as an absence.
Searched the joined text of the growth-hormone page — eighteen thousand seven hundred characters — for a currency symbol and for three ways of writing a rate, and recorded the count, which was zero for all four.
Read the coenzyme figure together with the sentence that follows it, which is how the month-to-month rate and the package floor were separated.
Cited the figure for the growth-hormone compound against the page it was actually read on, rather than the product page that does not carry it.
Read the privacy policy's opening paragraph in full for the operating company's registered name and its trading name.
Screened both the operator's registered name and the brand name against the regulator's warning-letter index, with a nonsense query as a control in the same run.
A provider to compare Get Thin MD against
Trellis Vitality
Trellis Vitality frames its program around body-composition tracking rather than scale weight, pairing NAD+, glutathione and tesamorelin with at-home biomarker panels and a 90-day re-test, and names its dispensing pharmacy, VialsRX in Houston, by address.
The seller states it in a sentence on the coenzyme page, and it is higher than the figure advertised at the top of the same page, which is a package floor.
Is the growth-hormone product priced?
Not on its own page, which carries no figure of any kind. The only figure for it sits in the navigation rail that renders on the coenzyme page.
Who operates this brand?
The privacy policy names a limited liability company whose registered name is unrelated to the brand. The terms name a different corporate form. This site records both.
Does it publish a certificate of analysis?
No. The only quality language on the site describes where the product comes from, not what was tested.
Does the seller say anything about approval status?
Yes. Its growth-hormone page states that the compound is not currently available as an approved drug product and is prepared by compounding pharmacies.
Get Thin MD is not a paid partner; this link may earn a commission if that changes. Full disclosure.