Healthon publishes four peptide SKUs across two compounds and two routes, three different figures for the injectable coenzyme across its own pages, and an out-of-stock notice on every one of the four.
What Healthon charges
NAD+: $195 — the catalogue figure, printed as "NAD+ . Original price: . Final price: $195 Out of Stock". The product page agrees ("Out of Stock — Energy+Mood — From $195 / month") but sits beside "Up to $190 off your 6-Month Plan" and a line reading "first month /mo after Billed every 3 months", so the period is not settled by the page. ⛔ The site-wide rail on the same pages prints "Nad + Injections — Starting at $150 /mo*", a third figure the seller does not reconcile
NAD+: $110 — the catalogue figure, printed as "NAD+ Nasal Spray . Original price: . Final price: $110 Out of Stock". No billing period is stated anywhere on the catalogue row
Sermorelin: $226 — the catalogue figure, printed as "Sermorelin Injection . Original price: . Final price: $226 Out of Stock". No billing period is stated
Sermorelin: $175 — the catalogue figure, printed as "Sermorelin ODT . Original price: . Final price: $175 Out of Stock". An orally-disintegrating tablet, not an injection, and no billing period is stated
Healthon is not a paid partner; this link may earn a commission if that changes. Full disclosure.
By Nora Castellan, Standards EditorUpdated September 2026
Four SKUs, four out-of-stock notices
The catalogue lists an injectable coenzyme, a nasal spray of the same compound, an injectable growth-hormone peptide and an orally-disintegrating tablet of it. Each carries its own figure. That is a more useful catalogue than most sellers here publish, because it prices routes separately instead of quoting one number for a programme.
Every one of the four also prints, in visible text on the catalogue card, that it is out of stock. The product page for the coenzyme repeats it beside a discount banner advertising money off a six-month plan.
A price on a product that cannot be bought is still a published price, and this site records it. But a review that omitted the stock status would be describing a catalogue rather than a shop, and a reader comparing availability would be misled by the completeness of the price list.
Nothing on the site says when stock is expected, and the discount banner runs regardless.
Three figures for one product
The catalogue gives the injectable coenzyme one figure. Its own product page gives the same figure with a period attached. The site-wide navigation rail, which renders on both of those pages, gives a lower one described as a starting rate.
All three are live on the same site on the same day, and the seller reconciles none of them. This site records the catalogue figure and names the rail figure in the qualifier rather than choosing between them.
The product page compounds the problem in a smaller way. Near the price it carries a fragment reading as a first-month rate, a per-month rate afterwards, and a statement that billing occurs every three months — with the numbers those phrases belong to missing from the rendered text.
That is why the coenzyme figure is not recorded as a monthly rate here. The page states three different billing shapes near one number and settles none of them.
The route distinctions are real and priced
The growth-hormone peptide is sold both as an injection and as an orally-disintegrating tablet, at different figures, on the same catalogue. The coenzyme is sold both as an injection and as a nasal spray, again at different figures.
This is the right way round. A dissolvable tablet and a subcutaneous injection are not the same product, and a comparison that filed both under one compound at one price would be averaging two things a patient chooses between.
The roster carries all four as separate rows with the route on each, so a reader comparing injectable figures across sellers does not find a tablet among them.
Neither tablet nor spray carries a billing period on the catalogue, so all four are recorded as figures whose period the seller has not stated.
A warning letter, and what is missing
The operating company is named in the footer and again in a sentence describing itself as a patient-management platform working with independent licensed providers. Screened by that name against the regulator's warning-letter index, it returns a letter.
The letter concerns unlawful online sale of unapproved and misbranded drugs through a telehealth channel, and it is addressed to a named individual at the company. It is disclosed on the row, linked, and does not move this seller's score or position.
Beyond the letter, the standard omissions apply. No dispensing pharmacy is named. No state coverage list is published. No certificate of analysis exists anywhere on the pages read, though the site does carry third-party-testing language on its about page and its nasal-spray page.
That is the same claimed-but-unreachable shape found on several sellers in this batch, and it is recorded as a claim rather than as testing.
Who it's for
Readers comparing routes, because this seller prices an injection, a spray and a dissolvable tablet separately.
Buyers who want stock status on the catalogue card rather than at checkout.
Anyone who wants a browsable catalogue with a figure on every line instead of an intake gate.
Shoppers who want the operating company and the clinical group named.
Who should look elsewhere
Anyone who needs to buy today, since all four peptide SKUs were out of stock when this was checked.
Readers who need one settled figure, rather than three for the same product across the seller's own pages.
Buyers for whom an enforcement letter against the operating company is disqualifying.
Shoppers who want a certificate of analysis, a named pharmacy or a state coverage list.
Strengths
Publishes a browsable catalogue with a figure against every SKU rather than gating prices behind an intake
Sells the growth-hormone peptide in two routes and the coenzyme in two routes, each priced separately
Marks stock status honestly on the catalogue rather than letting a reader discover it at checkout
Names the operating company and the clinical group in its own pages
Trade-offs
All four peptide SKUs were out of stock on the date read
Three different figures for the injectable coenzyme across the catalogue, the product page and the site-wide rail
Carries an FDA warning letter over online sale of unapproved and misbranded drugs
The product page prints a period fragment — "first month /mo after Billed every 3 months" — with the numbers missing
FDA disclosure
Healthon received an FDA warning letter issued September 2025. A warning letter discloses; it does not, on its own, disqualify a provider — see the trade-offs above for what this one concerned.
How we verified this
Loaded the coenzyme product page, the about page and the full catalogue with a full browser user-agent, printing the effective URL beside the requested one on each.
Ran a nonsense-path control on the host in the same run, which returned a not-found status.
Recorded that a guessed growth-hormone product path returned a not-found status at the same byte count as that control — a guessed path fails exactly like a real absence, which is why the catalogue is cited instead.
Joined the page's text nodes before matching any figure, so a price split across elements could not read as an absence.
Counted the out-of-stock notices against the four peptide SKUs rather than describing availability in general terms.
Compared the catalogue figure, the product-page figure and the navigation-rail figure for the same product and recorded all three rather than reconciling them.
Recorded the coenzyme figure as one whose period the page does not settle, because the page states a first-month rate, an afterwards rate and a three-month billing cycle around it.
Screened the operating company and the brand against the regulator's warning-letter index, with a nonsense query as a control in the same run.
A provider to compare Healthon against
Trellis Vitality
Trellis Vitality frames its program around body-composition tracking rather than scale weight, pairing NAD+, glutathione and tesamorelin with at-home biomarker panels and a 90-day re-test, and names its dispensing pharmacy, VialsRX in Houston, by address.
All four peptide SKUs printed an out-of-stock notice on the catalogue when this was checked, and the product page repeated it.
How many prices does the coenzyme have?
Three: one on the catalogue, one on its product page, and a lower starting figure in the site-wide navigation rail. The seller reconciles none of them.
Are the routes priced separately?
Yes. The injection, the nasal spray and the dissolvable tablet each carry their own figure, which is unusually clear for this roster.
Does it have a warning letter?
Yes, over online sale of unapproved and misbranded drugs. It is disclosed on this seller's row and does not affect its score or position here.
Is there a certificate of analysis?
No. The site claims third-party testing on two pages and publishes no certificate, PDF or index anywhere.
Healthon is not a paid partner; this link may earn a commission if that changes. Full disclosure.