Every peptide card on HelloWellness says "Per Month". A footnote lower down the same page says the plan renews every eleven weeks after a three-month minimum, which is neither a month nor a quarter and produces roughly one extra charge a year than a reader would expect.
What HelloWellness charges
NAD+: $79 — the card prints "$117 $79 Per Month" with the higher figure struck through, but the footnote on the same page reads "Plans starting at $79/month (3-month plan minimum. Automatically renews for $239 every 11 weeks, until cancelled)". The charge is $239 on an eleven-week cycle after a three-month minimum, so $79 is a division and not a billing period
Sermorelin: $116 — the card prints "$199 $116 Per Month" with the higher figure struck through. The same page's footnote states a three-month plan minimum renewing every eleven weeks, and the seller's weight-loss pages carry two different renewal intervals — "every 11 weeks" in one place and "billed every 10 weeks" in another — so no card figure on this site can be read as a month
HelloWellness is not a paid partner; this link may earn a commission if that changes. Full disclosure.
By Nora Castellan, Standards EditorUpdated September 2026
The card and the footnote disagree about what a month is
The homepage runs a grid of product cards. Each carries a struck-through anchor, a lower figure, and the words "Per Month" underneath. Read alone, that is a monthly subscription.
Beneath the grid, on the same page, sits a footnote. It says plans start at the lowest figure in the grid, that there is a three-month plan minimum, and that the plan automatically renews for a named amount every eleven weeks until cancelled.
Eleven weeks is not a month and it is not three months. A plan billed on an eleven-week cycle produces about four and seven-tenths charges a year rather than four, and the per-month figure on the card is a division that never matches a calendar month.
This site records every figure on this seller as one that is not a monthly rate, and puts the renewal interval and the minimum into the qualifier. The seller published both halves; only reading them together makes either one usable.
The weight-loss lane makes the same problem worse
The peptide cards are the tidier half of this site. The seller's weight-loss product pages carry a three-month plan label, an every-eleven-weeks renewal statement and a per-month starting figure — three periodicities for one item.
One of those pages states an eleven-week interval in one place and a ten-week interval in another. Two different renewal cycles for the same product on the same page is not a rounding difference; it changes the annual cost.
None of that appears in the peptide rows on this roster, because this site records only what the peptide pages state. It appears here because it establishes something about the seller's habits: on this site, the words next to a number are not a reliable guide to the billing period.
That is the reason the peptide figures are recorded conservatively rather than taken at the card's word.
The pharmacy is described by category, never by name
The homepage carries a badge naming the licensing category of the pharmacy the seller partners with, and states that it is domestic. That is more than most sellers on this roster disclose, and it is genuinely informative: the category carries a different regulatory regime than the alternative.
It is not a name. A reader cannot look the pharmacy up, check its inspection history, or find out whether it is the same facility standing behind another brand they already use.
This site's rubric asks whether a pharmacy is named, and the answer here is no. The category badge does not change that, and recording it as a yes would flatten a real distinction.
No certificate of analysis exists anywhere on the pages read, and no state coverage list is published.
Two legal pages, two corporate forms
The terms of service name the operator as a limited liability company, repeatedly, including inside capitalised liability clauses. The privacy policy on the same site names the same brand as an incorporated company.
Those are different corporate forms. Nothing on the site reconciles them, and this site records both rather than picking the one that appears more often — a frequency count is not a fact about which entity a reader would be contracting with.
Neither name returns a regulatory warning letter when screened against the regulator's own index by entity and by brand.
The terms also name a second, unrelated corporate name, which appears to be a service provider rather than an operator. It is recorded and not treated as the company.
Who it's for
Readers who will read a footnote, because on this seller the footnote is where the billing period actually lives.
Buyers who want the anchor and the charged figure printed together on every card.
Anyone who wants to know the licensing category of the pharmacy involved, even without its name.
Shoppers comparing bundle pricing, since this seller prices peptide combinations as their own products.
Who should look elsewhere
Anyone who needs a monthly billing cycle, because this seller's renewal interval is eleven weeks.
Readers who cannot commit to a three-month minimum.
Buyers who want the dispensing pharmacy named rather than categorised.
Shoppers who want one corporate identity, a certificate of analysis, or a state coverage list.
Strengths
Prints the plan minimum and the renewal interval on the same page as the price rather than burying them in terms
Names the anchor figure and the charged figure together on every card
Discloses the pharmacy category it works with rather than saying nothing about dispensing at all
Sells the two peptides individually and as named bundles, each priced
Trade-offs
Every card says "Per Month" and the renewal interval is eleven weeks, which is neither
The two legal pages name different corporate forms for one brand
The pharmacy is described only by its licensing category, never by name
No certificate of analysis and no state coverage list anywhere
How we verified this
Loaded the homepage and the terms of service with a full browser user-agent, printing the effective URL beside the requested one on both.
Ran a nonsense-path control on the host in the same run; it returned a not-found status with a body of a hundred and sixty-two thousand bytes, which is why the status is read and never the size.
Joined the page's text nodes before matching any figure, so a price split across elements could not read as an absence.
Read each card figure together with the footnote that governs it, rather than recording the card alone.
Recorded every figure as one that is not a monthly rate, on the strength of the seller's own stated eleven-week renewal interval.
Read the terms of service in full for the operating company and recorded the second corporate name it carries without treating it as the operator.
Searched the extracted text for certificate, purity and third-party-testing language and found none.
Screened the operating company and the brand against the regulator's warning-letter index, with a nonsense query as a control in the same run.
A provider to compare HelloWellness against
Trellis Vitality
Trellis Vitality frames its program around body-composition tracking rather than scale weight, pairing NAD+, glutathione and tesamorelin with at-home biomarker panels and a 90-day re-test, and names its dispensing pharmacy, VialsRX in Houston, by address.
The cards say so and the footnote does not. The stated renewal interval is eleven weeks after a three-month minimum, which produces about one more charge a year than a monthly reading would.
Is there a minimum commitment?
Yes. The footnote states a three-month plan minimum before the eleven-week renewal cycle begins.
Is the pharmacy named?
No. The site names the licensing category of its partner pharmacy and describes it as domestic, but never names the facility.
Who operates the brand?
The terms name a limited liability company and the privacy policy names an incorporated one. This site records both because they are different corporate forms.
Is there a certificate of analysis?
No. There is no certificate, purity or third-party-testing language anywhere on the pages read.
HelloWellness is not a paid partner; this link may earn a commission if that changes. Full disclosure.