InVigorate Med Spa publishes a figure against every item on its infusion menu, including two strengths of the compound compared here, and charges per visit rather than per month. It also carries a federal warning letter naming its own domain, and its page named for peptides is an explainer with no catalogue in it.
What InVigorate Med Spa charges
NAD+: $350 — "250mg infusion $350. 500mg infusion $600." — a per-visit charge with no billing period stated; the menu adds "IV Infusions are usually about 30 minutes to an hour in length. NAD infusion may take longer."
NAD+: $600 — "250mg infusion $350. 500mg infusion $600." — the higher of the two published strengths, again per visit with no billing period stated
InVigorate Med Spa is not a paid partner; this link may earn a commission if that changes. Full disclosure.
By Nora Castellan, Standards EditorUpdated September 2026
The prices are not on the page named for peptides
The page whose address and title promise peptides is a short explainer about what peptides are and what they might be used for.
It lists conditions rather than products, and it carries no figure at all.
The clinic's online-store address is likewise navigation with nothing in it.
Every figure recorded here came from the infusion menu, which is where this clinic actually publishes its prices.
Two strengths, priced per visit
The infusion menu prices the compound at two milligram strengths, each with its own figure.
Neither figure names a billing period, because neither is one: these are charges for a single visit.
The menu says an infusion usually takes half an hour to an hour and that this compound's infusion may take longer, which is the kind of detail a monthly rate hides.
Both rows are recorded as non-monthly figures so that nobody later compares them to a subscription rate as though they were the same thing.
The antioxidant is an ingredient, not a product
One further compound this site tracks appears on the menu three times, inside blended drips for liver support, immune support and skin brightening.
Each of those drips carries a figure, but the figure prices the whole blend rather than the compound.
No standalone price for that compound is published anywhere on the menu.
This row therefore declares one compound and stores no row for the other, rather than attributing a blend's price to an ingredient inside it.
One clinic, one letter, no pharmacy named
A federal warning letter is attached to this row. It was matched on the company name column and confirmed by opening the letter and finding this clinic's own domain inside it.
The clinic has one street address and one telephone number, and the menu closes by inviting readers to call or stop in, so there is no coverage question to answer.
That also means there is no coverage claim, and this row stores no states rather than inferring one from the address.
Nothing on the menu names a compounding facility, and no lab work is described as part of any charge.
Who it's for
Readers near Pittsburgh who want a single infusion rather than a programme.
Buyers who want the milligram strength stated against each figure.
Shoppers who prefer a per-visit charge to a monthly rate.
Anyone who wants a clinic to price its whole menu rather than a selection.
Who should look elsewhere
Readers who will not use a clinic carrying a federal warning letter.
Buyers looking for a standalone price on the antioxidant compound.
Anyone who needs a mail-order option rather than an in-person visit.
Shoppers who need the compounding pharmacy named.
Strengths
Publishes a figure against every item on its intravenous menu, not a selection
States the milligram strength for both of the priced options
Charges per visit and says so, rather than quoting a rate nobody is billed
Names its street address and telephone number on every page
Trade-offs
Carries a federal warning letter that names its own domain
Puts its prices on a menu page while its page named for peptides carries none
Sells the antioxidant compared here only inside blended drips priced as a whole
Names no compounding pharmacy anywhere on the menu
FDA disclosure
InVigorate Med Spa received an FDA warning letter issued September 2025. A warning letter discloses; it does not, on its own, disqualify a provider — see the trade-offs above for what this one concerned.
How we verified this
Read the page named for peptides in full and confirmed it carries no figure and no catalogue.
Read the online-store address and confirmed it contains no products.
Took every figure from the infusion menu, which is where this clinic publishes its prices.
Recorded both published strengths of the compound as separate rows, each with the milligram figure the menu states.
Recorded both as per-visit charges rather than monthly rates, because the menu names no billing period for either.
Identified the antioxidant compound as an ingredient in three blended drips and declined to attribute any of those blend prices to it.
Swept the menu for a compounding pharmacy name and for any lab-work statement, finding neither.
Recorded that the clinic makes no coverage claim, and stored no states rather than inferring one from its address.
Fired two nonsense paths at this host in the same pass and confirmed both return the same genuine not-found document.
Screened this clinic in the live federal warning-letter record with a known-good positive control and a nonsense negative control in the same run, then opened the one matching letter and confirmed it names this clinic's own domain before attaching it.
A provider to compare InVigorate Med Spa against
Trellis Vitality
Trellis Vitality frames its program around body-composition tracking rather than scale weight, pairing NAD+, glutathione and tesamorelin with at-home biomarker panels and a 90-day re-test, and names its dispensing pharmacy, VialsRX in Houston, by address.