June Health prices two of the compounds compared here as single flat figures and says the card is only charged if a clinician approves the prescription. Neither figure carries a billing period, one of the two is the same number as the weight-loss rate in the banner above it, and the fifty-state line on every page is about its providers rather than about the company.
What June Health charges
Sermorelin: $259 — "PEPTIDES / Clinician-favorite / Sermorelin / GHRH analog — natural HGH stimulation / PRICE / $259" — no billing period stated; the page adds "Your card is only charged if a licensed clinician approves your prescription."
NAD+: $199 — "WELLNESS / NAD+ Tablets / PRICE / $199" — no billing period stated. ⛔ The product is titled Tablets but its own description reads "Injectable or intranasal NAD+ restores cellular energy production", naming two routes the title does not. ⛔ The banner above this block reads "Medical Weight Loss from $199/mo", the same number with a period attached, for a different compound entirely
June Health is not a paid partner; this link may earn a commission if that changes. Full disclosure.
By Nora Castellan, Standards EditorUpdated September 2026
Two flat figures with no period attached
Each product block prints one number under a heading that says price, with no unit, no cycle and no supply length beside it.
That is unusually clean to read and unusually hard to compare, because a figure without a period cannot be set against a monthly rate.
Both rows are therefore recorded as non-monthly figures, which is a statement about what the seller published rather than about what it charges.
The pages do say something useful about billing: the card is only charged if a clinician approves the prescription.
The banner figure and one of the prices are the same number
A banner runs across the top of every page on this site quoting a weight-loss rate with a monthly unit attached.
One of the two compound prices below it is the same number, with no unit attached.
They are different products and different claims, and a reader skimming down the page meets the one with a period before the one without.
The record notes the collision on the row itself so that the banner's unit is never read onto the compound's figure.
A product titled for one route and described as two others
One of the two products is titled as a tablet.
Its own description says the compound is delivered by injection or intranasally and describes what those routes do.
Three routes are therefore named for one product, and none of the descriptive text matches the title.
The row records the product as the seller titles it and keeps the contradiction beside the figure rather than choosing a route on the seller's behalf.
Whose fifty states
The only fifty-state text on this site appears in the banner and the footer, and both sentences are about providers being licensed.
The terms then say the company operates a technology platform, connects patients with independent licensed providers, and does not itself practise medicine or dispense medication.
So the party said to be licensed everywhere is not the party selling, and nothing published says the company serves all fifty states.
This row stores no states, and it is the clearest example on this site of a licensure claim being read as a footprint.
Who it's for
Readers who want a single flat figure per compound with nothing bundled into it.
Buyers who want to know their card is only charged after clinician approval.
Shoppers comparing a peptide catalogue kept separate from a weight-loss catalogue.
Anyone who will ask what period a figure covers before paying it.
Who should look elsewhere
Readers who need a stated billing period before they can compare anything.
Buyers who need the compounding pharmacy named.
Anyone who reads a fifty-state line as a promise that their state is served.
Shoppers who want lab work included in what they pay.
Strengths
Prices both compounds as single flat figures with nothing bundled into a plan
Says plainly that the card is only charged if a clinician approves the prescription
Renders a distinct not-found document for an unknown product and for an unknown page
Separates its peptide catalogue from its weight-loss catalogue in its own navigation
Trade-offs
States no billing period beside either figure, so neither can be compared to a monthly rate
Prints a weight-loss rate in the banner above every product that equals one of its own peptide prices
Titles one product as tablets while its description names two other routes
Publishes nothing at all in the page itself — the served document has no products in it
How we verified this
Rendered every page, because the served document on this host contains almost no text at all.
Read both product blocks as laid-out text and recorded that neither states a billing period.
Recorded the banner's weight-loss rate and noted that it equals one of the two compound prices while carrying a unit that price does not.
Read the description of the product titled as a tablet and recorded that it names two other routes instead.
Read the terms in full for a service-area statement and found only the two licensure sentences in the banner and the footer.
Confirmed from those same terms that the party described as licensed is a separate company from the one selling, and stored no states on that basis.
Swept the peptides page and the terms for a named dispensing pharmacy and found a badge and a category rather than a facility.
Rendered two nonsense paths in the same pass: one produced a short not-found page and the other a distinct product-not-found page at its own address.
Confirmed neither control fabricates a product page, and that both are far shorter than any real product page here.
Screened this seller in the live federal warning-letter record using the full company name rather than its first word, which is a calendar month, with a known-good positive control and a nonsense negative control in the same run, and read the company column of every returned record rather than accepting a full-text match.
A provider to compare June Health against
Trellis Vitality
Trellis Vitality frames its program around body-composition tracking rather than scale weight, pairing NAD+, glutathione and tesamorelin with at-home biomarker panels and a 90-day re-test, and names its dispensing pharmacy, VialsRX in Houston, by address.
The site does not say. Both figures are printed under a heading that says price, with no period, cycle or supply length beside them.
Does the fifty-state line mean the company serves every state?
No. It says providers are licensed in all fifty states, and the terms say the company connects patients with independent providers rather than practising medicine or dispensing itself.
Why does the banner figure match one of the prices?
Coincidence of numbers. The banner quotes a weight-loss rate with a monthly unit; the compound price is the same number without one.
Is the product titled as tablets actually a tablet?
Its own description names injection and intranasal delivery instead. The record keeps the title and the contradiction together.
Which pharmacy fills the order?
None is named. The site shows a badge for licensed pharmacies and the terms describe third-party licensed and compounding pharmacies.
June Health is not a paid partner; this link may earn a commission if that changes. Full disclosure.