This clinic names the pharmacy that compounds its prescriptions, gives its city and state, cites the federal section the compounding rests on, and links it — then prices a peptide by a thirty-day supply.
What Longevity DSM charges
Semax: $229 — A THIRTY-DAY SUPPLY, in the seller's own words — "We offer Semax and Selank as provider guided injections, currently a 30 day supply for $229" — and the word "currently" is the seller's. The figure covers semax and selank together, not semax alone. ⛔ The "$50 off labs" and "$99 Longevity IV package" on the same page are a discount and a different product
Longevity DSM is not a paid partner; this link may earn a commission if that changes. Full disclosure.
By Nora Castellan, Standards EditorUpdated September 2026
The pharmacy is named, located and linked
The page states that when medication is prescribed it is prepared and dispensed by a named pharmacy, in a named city and state, that compounds patient-specific prescriptions under a named federal section. It then links that pharmacy from its own page.
Fifteen of the one hundred and seventy-two sellers here name the facility that fills an order, and most of those give a name and nothing else. A name plus a location plus a licence basis plus a link is at the top of what this market discloses.
The page goes further and explains what the federal section permits — that qualifying state-licensed pharmacies may prepare medication for an individually identified patient on a valid prescription when the section's requirements are met.
A thirty-day supply covering two peptides
The published figure is described by the seller as a thirty-day supply, with the word "currently" attached, and it covers two peptides sold together rather than one. Neither has a price of its own.
The page also prints an infusion package figure and a discount off lab work. Neither is a peptide price and the discount is not a price at all.
This site records the supply-window figure with the two-peptide scope written into its qualifier, so the number cannot later be read as belonging to either peptide alone.
One host, and one that was not tested
The research pass that surfaced this seller reached it through a different domain, which it recorded as returning a success status for every path and redirecting to this one. This pass did not re-probe that domain and makes no claim about it.
Every fetch behind this row was made directly against the clinic's own host, whose nonsense-path control returned a clean not-found with an empty body — one of the cleanest controls in the batch.
No corporate entity is published. No state coverage is published either; this is a single-city practice, and the footer says prescription treatment is provided only when a licensed provider finds it clinically appropriate.
Who it's for
Readers who want the dispensing pharmacy named, located and licensed on the record.
Buyers who want the legal basis for compounding cited rather than asserted.
Anyone who wants a supply window stated beside a figure.
Shoppers near the clinic.
Who should look elsewhere
Anyone who needs a price for a single peptide rather than a pair.
Readers who need a corporate entity.
Buyers outside its city.
Shoppers wanting a wide catalogue with pages behind every compound.
Strengths
Names the compounding pharmacy, its city, its state and its licence basis, and links it
Cites the federal section the compounding rests on and explains what it permits
States the supply window beside the figure rather than leaving the unit implied
Says prescription treatment is provided only when a licensed provider finds it clinically appropriate
Trade-offs
Publishes no corporate entity of its own
The published figure covers two peptides sold together, so neither has a price alone
Only one compound on this site's list has a page behind it here
Publishes no state coverage; the practice is a single Iowa city
How we verified this
Fetched the product page directly against the clinic's own host with a full browser user-agent and compared the effective URL to the requested one.
Fired a nonsense-path control at that host in the same run; it returned a not-found status with an empty body.
Deliberately made no claim about the second domain the research pass used to reach this seller, because it was not probed in this pass.
Joined the text nodes before matching and read all three dollar figures with the nouns attached to them.
Read the pharmacy sentence in full, including the city, the state and the cited federal section.
Separated the lab discount and the infusion package from the peptide figure.
Screened the clinic name and the named pharmacy against the regulator's live warning-letter index, with a known-positive and a nonsense control in the same run.
A provider to compare Longevity DSM against
PeRx
PeRx, the trading name of Wellness MD Group PC, lists twenty-six compounds and blurs the price on every one of them, publishing a floor and a range on a separate pricing page instead.
Yes, with its city, its state, its licence basis and a link from the clinic's own page.
What does the published figure buy?
A thirty-day supply covering two peptides sold together. Neither has a price of its own.
Is a company named?
No corporate entity appears on the page read.
What is the discount on the page?
A reduction on lab work. It is not a price and is not recorded as one.
Which domain is the seller?
The clinic's own host, which is what every fetch behind this row used. An earlier research pass reached it through a different domain that this pass did not test.
Longevity DSM is not a paid partner; this link may earn a commission if that changes. Full disclosure.