Mavés Health labels its growth-hormone figure a first-month rate on the product page and prints the same number on its homepage with that condition removed — and its terms of service name a company operating an entirely different website.
What Mavés Health charges
Sermorelin: $120 — a FIRST-MONTH rate: the product page prints "$120 first month — then $160/mo after" twice, once beside the buy button and once inside a "Monthly Plan" panel, and adds "5mL (10mg) vial and homekit included". ⛔ The homepage card for the same product reads "Sermorelin — Starting at $120/month" with the first-month condition removed
NAD+: $149/mo — printed on the homepage card as "Energy + Longevity — NAD+ — Starting at $149/month". ⛔ The seller's sibling card on the same homepage strips a first-month condition off a figure, so this card being unqualified is not evidence that the figure is unconditioned — it is evidence that this homepage does not carry conditions
Mavés Health is not a paid partner; this link may earn a commission if that changes. Full disclosure.
By Nora Castellan, Standards EditorUpdated September 2026
The same number, with and without its condition
The product page is careful. It prints the figure twice, once beside the buy button and once inside a plan panel, and both times it says first month and names the higher standing rate immediately after.
The homepage card for the same product prints the same figure as a starting monthly rate. The words first month do not appear on it.
One of those is a complete claim and the other is the same claim with the qualifier deleted. A reader who never opens the product page takes away a number that lapses after four weeks.
This site records the figure as a first-month rate and puts the standing rate in the qualifier, which is what the product page says and what the homepage does not.
The coenzyme card carries no condition either — and that proves nothing
The homepage also carries a coenzyme card with a starting monthly figure and no condition attached.
It would be easy to read that as a clean price. On this site it is not evidence of one, because the card beside it on the same homepage strips a first-month condition off a number that has one.
What the homepage demonstrates is that this seller's homepage does not carry conditions, not that this product lacks them. The qualifier on the roster row says exactly that.
No product page for the coenzyme was reached in this pass, so the standing rate for it is unknown rather than absent.
A vendor stack disclosed in full, naming the wrong site
The terms of service are unusually complete about who is involved: an operating company, a platform vendor, and two clinical entities, each named. Very few sellers on this roster disclose that much of their supply chain.
The operating company's name contains nothing resembling the brand, which is common enough here to be unremarkable on its own.
What is not common is the sentence itself. It states that the operating company owns and operates the websites located at a named address — and that address is a different domain from the one serving the page.
This site records the operating company and records the discrepancy. A terms document served by one site and describing another is a fact a reader deciding who they are contracting with needs.
Testing language, on the other lane
The site carries laboratory-testing and third-party-testing language on its weight-loss pages. Neither peptide page carries any.
That is the same split found on other sellers in this batch, and it is why this site records testing facts per product page rather than per site.
The product page does state useful physical facts: the vial volume, the milligram strength, and that a home kit is included. That is more product detail than most rows on this roster carry.
No dispensing pharmacy is named on the peptide pages, no certificate of analysis exists anywhere, and no state coverage list is published. Screened by entity and by brand against the regulator's warning-letter index, nothing returns.
Who it's for
Readers who will open the product page, where the first-month condition is stated in full.
Buyers who want the vial volume, the milligram strength and the included kit named beside the figure.
Anyone who wants a seller's platform vendor, clinical entities and pharmacy disclosed together.
Shoppers who want stock status marked on the product page.
Who should look elsewhere
Anyone shopping from the homepage, which prints a promotional figure without the condition that makes it promotional.
Readers who want terms served by the site they describe.
Buyers who want testing language on the peptide pages rather than only on the weight-loss lane.
Shoppers who need a state coverage list or a certificate of analysis.
Strengths
The product page states both the first-month rate and the standing rate in one line
Prints the vial volume and the milligram strength beside the figure and says a home kit is included
Discloses an unusually complete vendor stack — platform, two clinical entities and a named pharmacy — in its own terms
Marks stock status on the product page
Trade-offs
The homepage advertises the promotional figure without the condition that makes it promotional
Its terms of service name a company operating a different domain than the one serving them
The testing language on this site sits on the weight-loss pages, never on either peptide page
No state coverage list and no certificate of analysis
How we verified this
Loaded the growth-hormone product page, the homepage and the terms of service with a full browser user-agent, printing the effective URL beside the requested one on each.
Ran a nonsense-path control on the host in the same run, which returned a clean not-found status.
Joined the page's text nodes before matching any figure, so a price split across elements could not read as an absence.
Compared the product-page figure against the homepage card for the same product and recorded that the condition appears on one and not the other.
Recorded the growth-hormone figure as a first-month rate with the standing rate written into the qualifier, rather than recording the homepage's unconditioned version.
Declined to treat the coenzyme card's lack of a condition as evidence, and said so in its qualifier, because the sibling card on the same page is known to drop one.
Read the terms' ownership sentence in full and recorded the domain it names against the domain serving it.
Located every testing claim on the site and recorded which page each sits on, which is the weight-loss lane and not either peptide.
A provider to compare Mavés Health against
Trellis Vitality
Trellis Vitality frames its program around body-composition tracking rather than scale weight, pairing NAD+, glutathione and tesamorelin with at-home biomarker panels and a 90-day re-test, and names its dispensing pharmacy, VialsRX in Houston, by address.
No. The product page says it covers the first month and names a higher standing rate. The homepage prints the same figure without that condition.
What does the growth-hormone price include?
The page states a vial volume, a milligram strength and an included home kit, with free expedited shipping.
Who operates the site?
The terms name an operating company whose name does not contain the brand, and state that it operates a different website from the one serving those terms.
Is there a certificate of analysis?
No. The site's testing language sits on its weight-loss pages and appears on neither peptide page.
Is the pharmacy named?
A pharmacy is named in the terms as part of the vendor stack, but no dispensing pharmacy is named on either peptide page.
Mavés Health is not a paid partner; this link may earn a commission if that changes. Full disclosure.