Mevo Health names three prescribing physicians and prices its cellular-energy line on the same row as its weight-loss lines, and publishes no product page for any of them.
What Mevo Health charges
NAD+: $199 — as low as; the product card prints the figure with no period, while the page hero separately says plans start as low as $199/month
Mevo Health is not a paid partner; this link may earn a commission if that changes. Full disclosure.
By Nora Castellan, Standards EditorUpdated September 2026
A sitemap of policy pages
This seller's sitemap holds seven addresses and six of them are policies.
There is no product page on this host at all; the control on each product card leads straight to an intake on a separate host.
That intake opens with an email gate and was not walked, so nothing on this row rests on what is behind it.
The nonsense-path control returns a not-found code and a plainly worded not-found document.
The same number, twice, meaning two different things
The page hero makes a claim about where its plans start, and that claim carries a period.
The product card for the tracked compound prints the same number with no period attached to it at all.
They are the same figure and they are not the same statement, and only the card is recorded as this compound's price.
The coincidence is written into the provider record so nobody later uses the hero to turn the card into a monthly rate.
Named prescribers, unnamed pharmacy
Three physicians are named on the home page, with the network one of them heads.
Named prescribers are a clinical disclosure and not a dispensing pharmacy, and neither flag on this row moves on them.
No pharmacy is named anywhere, and no corporate form is published for the company itself.
No state list appears, so eligibility is settled inside an intake on a different host.
Two cards this row does not carry
The same product row prices two weight-loss lines in the same unit and the same phrasing as the peptide line.
Each was read in its own card and neither is recorded here.
The three cards are visually identical, which is exactly the condition under which a proximity match produces a confident wrong answer.
No claim about lab work appears anywhere on the pages read.
Who it's for
Readers who want the prescribing physicians named before they start.
Buyers comparing a cellular-energy line against weight-loss lines in one unit.
Shoppers who want cited research behind a seller's claims.
Anyone content to learn the remaining details inside an intake.
Who should look elsewhere
Readers who want a product page rather than a card and an email gate.
Buyers who need a billing period attached to the figure.
Shoppers who need the dispensing pharmacy named.
Anyone who needs a state footprint or a registered company name.
Strengths
Names three prescribing physicians and the network one of them heads
Prices its NAD+ line on the same row as its weight-loss lines, in the same unit
Cites published research for each of its three claims about weight regulation
Publishes a phone number and a support address rather than a form only
Trade-offs
Publishes no product page at all; the only NAD+ detail is a card and an email gate
Prints the card figure with no period, next to a hero figure that carries one
Names no dispensing pharmacy and publishes no state list
Its sitemap holds seven URLs, six of them policy pages
How we verified this
Read every page cited on this row as rendered text in a real browser, not as served HTML, because several sellers in this pass ship the figure in by script and serve a bare currency sign.
Fired a nonsense-path control at this host in the same run and judged it on the rendered document rather than on its status code or its byte count.
Joined every text node before scanning for a currency sign, so a figure split across nested elements could not read as an absence.
Clicked every collapsed accordion on the pages read, because pharmacy names, state answers and lab conditions hid inside them on most sellers checked this pass.
Read each figure inside its own card or panel rather than by nearness to a compound name, on pages that price weight-loss lines beside peptide lines.
Recorded the seller's own published figure and never divided a multi-month total into a monthly one.
Screened this seller in the live federal warning-letter record by entity and by brand, with a known-good positive control and a nonsense negative control fired in the same run.
Read the company column of every returned record rather than accepting a full-text match, and attached no letter unless the letter itself named this seller's own domain.
Read the hero claim and the product card as two separate statements rather than letting the matching number merge them.
Read all three cards on the product row individually, because they are visually identical and carry different figures.
Stopped at the email gate on the separate intake host and let nothing on this row rest on what lies behind it.
A provider to compare Mevo Health against
Trellis Vitality
Trellis Vitality frames its program around body-composition tracking rather than scale weight, pairing NAD+, glutathione and tesamorelin with at-home biomarker panels and a 90-day re-test, and names its dispensing pharmacy, VialsRX in Houston, by address.