Mochi Health prices NAD+ in three delivery formats, which nothing else read this pass does, and states on every product page that the medication figure excludes a separate membership fee. None of its four figures carries a billing period, so none of them is a monthly rate as printed.
What Mochi Health charges
Sermorelin: $199 — starting at, plus a separate Mochi Health membership; the page states no billing period for the medication figure
NAD+: $135 — starting at, plus a separate Mochi Health membership; the page states no billing period for the medication figure
NAD+: $83 — starting at, plus a separate Mochi Health membership; the page states no billing period for the medication figure
NAD+: $54 — starting at, plus a separate Mochi Health membership; the page states no billing period for the medication figure
Mochi Health is not a paid partner; this link may earn a commission if that changes. Full disclosure.
By Nora Castellan, Standards EditorUpdated September 2026
One compound, three formats, three figures
NAD+ appears as an injection, as a nasal spray and as a topical cream, each with its own page and its own figure.
The three differ by more than a little, and the dosage each corresponds to is named beside it.
A reader who does not want to inject has an option here with a number attached, which is unusual.
Sermorelin is the fourth priced product, and the only other tracked compound sold.
The figure is not what you pay, and the seller says so
Every product page prints the figure and then, in the same block, that a membership is required and that the medication cost is not included in the membership fee.
The home page states the membership rate for a first month and the higher rate that follows it.
The seller never publishes the two added together, and neither does this record — a sum nobody printed is a number we would be inventing.
So each figure here is a component of a bill rather than the bill.
No billing period, anywhere
Each figure is introduced as a starting figure beside a dosage, and no page states a cycle for it.
That is why all four rows are recorded as non-monthly rather than assumed to renew monthly because the membership does.
A layout that puts a monthly membership fee near a medication figure makes that assumption very easy to make.
Resisting it is the whole reason the unit is a field on this site rather than a phrase in a sentence.
Pharmacy, states and the record
The site runs a pharmacy marketplace and says so, but its pharmacy page recruits pharmacies rather than naming the one that fills an order.
No state list is published; its FAQ describes the program as virtual and available anywhere in the United States, which is a claim about format rather than a licensure list.
Lab work is not described as included in what is charged.
The federal warning-letter record was screened by brand and by the operating company named in the page footer, with controls in the same run, and returned nothing.
Who it's for
Readers who want NAD+ without an injection.
Buyers who want the dosage stated beside the figure.
Shoppers who will read the membership line before comparing anything.
Anyone who prefers a seller that states what its price excludes.
Who should look elsewhere
Readers who want a single all-in figure.
Buyers who need a billing period stated.
Anyone who needs the dispensing pharmacy named or a state footprint published.
Shoppers looking for glutathione, GHK-Cu, tesamorelin or anything beyond the two compounds sold.
Strengths
Prices NAD+ in three delivery formats, so the injection is not the only option with a figure attached
States on every product page that the medication figure excludes the membership, rather than burying that in terms
Names the dosage each figure corresponds to, and says additional dosages exist
Runs a pharmacy marketplace and says so openly, rather than implying a single in-house facility
Trade-offs
No medication figure carries a billing period, so none is comparable to a monthly rate without arithmetic
Every figure requires a separate membership the product page does not add in
Names no dispensing pharmacy; its pharmacy page is a recruitment page for pharmacies, not a disclosure
Publishes no state list — its FAQ describes the program as virtual and available "anywhere in the United States", which is a format claim rather than a licensure list
How we verified this
Rendered every page cited on this row in a real browser engine and read the laid-out text nodes, so nothing here rests on markup that never reaches a reader.
Fired two nonsense-path controls at this host in the same run — one at the root and one inside the section the priced pages live in — and compared the address requested with the address actually served.
Joined every text node before scanning for a dollar sign, so a figure split across nested elements could not read as an absence.
Screened this seller in the live federal warning-letter record by brand and, where an operating company is published, by entity — pulling the whole table and filtering locally, because that endpoint's own search parameter is silently ignored.
Ran a known-good positive control and a nonsense negative control against that table in the same run, and read the company column of every returned record rather than accepting a full-text match.
Read the membership footnote printed under each figure and declined to add the membership rate to any recorded price, because the seller publishes no combined number.
Recorded every figure as non-monthly because no product page states a billing cycle, rather than inheriting the membership's monthly cycle for the medication.
Opened the site's own pharmacy page and found it recruits pharmacies rather than disclosing the one that fills an order.
Read the FAQ's availability sentence as the statement about program format that it is, rather than as a state licensure disclosure.
A provider to compare Mochi Health against
Trellis Vitality
Trellis Vitality frames its program around body-composition tracking rather than scale weight, pairing NAD+, glutathione and tesamorelin with at-home biomarker panels and a 90-day re-test, and names its dispensing pharmacy, VialsRX in Houston, by address.
No. Every product page states that a separate membership is required and that the medication cost is not included in the membership fee.
Are the figures monthly?
No page states a billing period for any of them, so none is recorded as a monthly rate.
Which formats are priced?
NAD+ as an injection, as a nasal spray and as a topical cream, plus sermorelin as an injection.
Does it name the pharmacy?
No. It operates a pharmacy marketplace and its pharmacy page is a recruitment page, not a disclosure.
Which states does it serve?
No list is published. Its FAQ says the program is virtual and available anywhere in the United States, which describes the format rather than licensure.
Mochi Health is not a paid partner; this link may earn a commission if that changes. Full disclosure.