Peak Wellness sells exactly one tracked compound and publishes every rung of its ladder with a month attached, so nothing about its pricing has to be derived. It is also the rare seller that spends a section of its own product page saying the human evidence for what it sells is early rather than settled.
What Peak Wellness charges
NAD+: $149/mo — starting at, per month on the 6-month plan; the same table publishes $179/month on a 3-month plan and $199/month on a 1-month plan
Peak Wellness is not a paid partner; this link may earn a commission if that changes. Full disclosure.
By Nora Castellan, Standards EditorUpdated September 2026
A three-rung ladder, every rung with a month on it
The plan table publishes a per-month figure for a one-month, a three-month and a six-month term, and each carries a month marker in the page's own text.
None of those had to be worked out from a prepaid total, which is the failure mode this whole category is built on.
The hero headline names the lowest rung as the starting figure, and the table then says which term it belongs to.
The page also prints a per-day and a per-administration number, and neither is recorded here — both are arithmetic on figures the page already prints whole.
A seller arguing against its own category
A section headed before we sell you anything says the rest of the category will claim anything, and that this one will not.
The evidence section separates what is settled biochemistry from what is still building in human trials, and puts injectable evidence in the second bucket.
It says the effect is subtle and cumulative and that anyone promising a first-day result is not worth trusting.
That is a commercial page choosing to be less persuasive, and it is the strongest reason to read this seller rather than a louder one.
Its own state answer, and whose fact it is
The home page FAQ asks what states it serves and answers with all fifty, in a sentence about the company.
A second sentence adds that its telehealth services and partner pharmacy network are available nationwide.
Only the first sentence is what the fifty-state flag rests on, because the second describes a pharmacy network rather than this seller's own licensure.
That distinction has been the difference between a true and a false coverage claim elsewhere on this roster.
What is missing, and one figure that is not this one
The pharmacy is described by license class and sterile-compounding standard throughout, and is never named.
No operating company under a corporate suffix appears on the pages read.
Lab work is not described as included; the FAQ instead explains why routine bloodwork would not show what this product targets.
A different headline figure for this seller's weight-loss line sits in the banner of another page on the same site, and it is not this compound's price.
Who it's for
Readers who want one protocol done properly rather than a wide menu.
Buyers who want every plan rung published as a monthly rate.
Shoppers who want a seller to say where the evidence stops.
Anyone who wants a plain answer about service area.
Who should look elsewhere
Readers who need the dispensing pharmacy named.
Buyers who want more than one compound from a single seller.
Anyone who wants the operating company published.
Shoppers looking for sermorelin, glutathione, GHK-Cu or anything other than the single compound sold.
Strengths
Publishes all three rungs of its ladder with a month on each, so no figure has to be derived
States plainly that human trial evidence for injectable NAD+ is early and still building
Says no money is collected before a provider approves the order, and explains the card hold
Answers its own state question directly, and separates its own coverage from its pharmacies’
Trade-offs
Sells exactly one of the compounds this site tracks
Describes "a licensed 503A pharmacy" throughout and never names one
Prints per-day and per-administration divisions of its own figures beside them
Publishes no operating company under a corporate suffix on any page read
A different headline figure for its GLP-1 line sits on the same site and is easy to mistake for this one
How we verified this
Rendered every page cited on this row in a real browser engine and read the laid-out text nodes, so nothing here rests on markup that never reaches a reader.
Fired two nonsense-path controls at this host in the same run — one at the root and one inside the section the priced pages live in — and compared the address requested with the address actually served.
Joined every text node before scanning for a dollar sign, so a figure split across nested elements could not read as an absence.
Screened this seller in the live federal warning-letter record by brand and, where an operating company is published, by entity — pulling the whole table and filtering locally, because that endpoint's own search parameter is silently ignored.
Ran a known-good positive control and a nonsense negative control against that table in the same run, and read the company column of every returned record rather than accepting a full-text match.
Read every rung of the plan table rather than only the hero headline, and confirmed each carries a month in the page's own text rather than being derived from a prepaid total.
Set aside the per-day and per-administration numbers on the same page, because both are the seller's own arithmetic on figures it prints whole.
Read the state answer's two sentences separately and rested the coverage flag only on the one that describes this company rather than its pharmacy network.
Noted the different headline figure carried in another page's banner so a later reader does not correct this compound's price toward it.
Rejected a similarly named company in the federal warning-letter table on the name in the company column rather than attaching it on a partial match.
A provider to compare Peak Wellness against
Trellis Vitality
Trellis Vitality frames its program around body-composition tracking rather than scale weight, pairing NAD+, glutathione and tesamorelin with at-home biomarker panels and a 90-day re-test, and names its dispensing pharmacy, VialsRX in Houston, by address.