Provider review, September 2026
Polly names two of its compounding pharmacies and gives NAD+ two product pages of its own, each printing its figure on the page. What it never answers is what its figures recur on: no page attaches a billing period to a price, and the terms say the interval is disclosed inside a checkout that begins with an email gate.
Polly is not a paid partner; this link may earn a commission if that changes. Full disclosure.
Both NAD+ formats have a product page carrying a bare figure, and the sermorelin figure appears as a badge on a home-page card. All three are published plainly and none of them is converted, divided or derived from anything else.
None of them carries a period. There is no per-month suffix, no billing note beside the number and no plan length stated anywhere on the pages that print them.
The word that appears closest to each figure is a dosing tag on the card, sitting beside the delivery format. It describes how often a dose is taken, not how often a card is charged, and treating it as a billing cycle would invent a rate the seller has never printed.
The terms confirm the gap rather than closing it: subscriptions are charged at regular intervals as described for that product during the checkout process. The interval exists, and it is disclosed after a reader has handed over an email address.
The home page presents its catalogue as a row of cards, each holding a price badge, a product name and two small tags. Read as a flat run of text, the row is ambiguous: a figure could belong to the name before it or the name after it.
It belongs to the name after it. A single card captured on its own shows the badge sitting above the product name inside one bounded box, with the delivery and dosing tags below, and every card in the row is built the same way. Each card links to that product's own intake.
Read the other way, every figure in the row would have been attached to the wrong product and one card would have been left with no price at all. That is not a subtle error; it is the whole comparison, backwards.
This is why a figure here is judged by what a reader sees, not by where the markup happens to put it.
The FAQ asks which pharmacies the service uses and answers with two named compounding pharmacies. Both are real facilities a reader can look up, which is more than a licence class or an accreditation body.
The wording is deliberately open: the answer says the seller partners with licensed compounding pharmacies across the country, including pharmacies such as those two. That is a sample, not a roster, and this review treats it as one.
Nothing on the site says which pharmacy fills a given order, and the product pages say only that treatment ships from a licensed pharmacy. So a reader learns two names without learning whose name will be on their package.
The footer names the operating company behind the brand, and a dedicated page explains the rename from its former identity — both useful when a reader is trying to work out who they are buying from.
The FAQ asks which states the service is available in and answers with the whole country. The question is about this seller's availability and the answer is this seller's own, so it reads as a service-area claim rather than someone else's licensure being borrowed.
Each product page lists what a plan includes, item by item: a provider review, the treatment if approved, ongoing support, shipping and supplies. Laboratory work is not among them and no lab appears anywhere on the site.
There is no sermorelin product page. The path where one would sit returns the site's own not-found document, and the sermorelin card links straight into an intake instead. The figure on that card is the only place the sermorelin price is published.
No line states a dose or a concentration, so as with the billing period, a reader comparing this seller against another is comparing a plan to a plan rather than a quantity to a quantity.
Trellis Vitality frames its program around body-composition tracking rather than scale weight, pairing NAD+, glutathione and tesamorelin with at-home biomarker panels and a 90-day re-test, and names its dispensing pharmacy, VialsRX in Houston, by address.
Read the full Trellis Vitality review
Trellis Vitality is not a paid partner; this link may earn a commission if that changes. Full disclosure.
Visit Trellis VitalityThe seller does not say. No page attaches a billing period to any figure, and its terms say the interval is described during the checkout process. This site records the figures without a period rather than assuming one.
No. It is a dosing tag sitting beside the delivery format on the card, describing how often a dose is taken. It is not a billing term and is not treated as one here.
Its FAQ names two compounding pharmacies as examples, in an answer that explicitly describes a wider set. Nothing on the site says which one fills a given order.
No. The path where one would sit returns the site's own not-found page, and the sermorelin card links directly into an intake. The card badge is the only published sermorelin figure.
No. The itemised plan inclusions are a provider review, the treatment if approved, ongoing support, shipping and supplies. No laboratory work is mentioned anywhere on the site.
Polly is not a paid partner; this link may earn a commission if that changes. Full disclosure.