This seller names the pharmacy that fills the vial, names the physician group separately from the platform company, and prints a first-month rate and an ongoing rate as two different numbers. Fifteen of the one hundred and seventy-two sellers here name the facility that fills an order.
What Precision Telemed charges
NAD+: $149/mo — the ongoing rate, read as "NAD+ Injection Cost: $139.99 First Month, $149/mo After" and restated in the FAQ as "Your first month is $139.99 … Month two onwards is $149/mo"; the first month is cheaper, not more expensive, and the page states the figure "covers your NAD+ prescription, physician oversight, and free shipping"
Sermorelin: $149.99/mo — a starting rate, read as "Explore Sermorelin From $149.99/mo" in the cross-sell block of the NAD+ page — ⛔ this figure was NOT read on a sermorelin product page, so it is the lowest advertised rate for the line and not a price for any particular dose
Precision Telemed is not a paid partner; this link may earn a commission if that changes. Full disclosure.
By Nora Castellan, Standards EditorUpdated September 2026
It names the pharmacy, and then keeps going
Most sellers on this roster describe their pharmacy by licence class and stop. This one names the facility, states its licence class, lists its accreditation and its registration, and says every vial of the coenzyme is compounded and fulfilled exclusively there.
That is a checkable claim rather than a reassuring adjective. A reader can look the facility up; a reader cannot look up "a licensed compounding pharmacy".
It also separates the platform company from the physician group in a single sentence on the product page, and names both. Three identities — trading name, platform company, prescribing group — are published and distinct.
Against that, its testing language is a claim with nothing behind it: the page says every batch is tested for potency, sterility and purity, and publishes no certificate for any batch. Reachability and assertion are different things and this row records them separately.
The first month is cheaper, and the page says so five times
The product page prints a first-month rate and a different ongoing rate, and repeats the pair in its hero, in its pricing block, in its comparison card, in its FAQ answer about how the therapy is priced, and again in its answer about insurance.
That repetition matters, because the shape a reader most often gets burned by is the reverse: a low first-month figure quoted as though it were the ongoing one. Here both are stated together every time.
The ongoing figure is what this site records, with the first month noted in its qualifier. The seller says the figure covers the prescription, the physician oversight and the shipping.
One caution the page invites: it also prints per-session figures for IV clinics as a comparison. Those describe a market, not this seller, and a reader skimming the pricing block can carry them away as though they were.
A fifty-state claim stated three times, and one figure with no page behind it
Coverage is asserted in the trust bar, again under the physicians heading, and again as a direct answer in the FAQ. It is an unqualified claim, and this row records it as one.
The growth-hormone peptide is a different matter. Its figure appears only as a cross-sell line on the coenzyme page, phrased as a starting rate, with no product page fetched behind it in this pass. This site records it as the lowest advertised rate for that line and not as a price for any particular dose.
An earlier capture of this page, made a day before, carried a higher ongoing figure than the page prints today. The lower number is what is recorded, which is why every price on this site carries the date it was read.
No labs are described as included, and no state-by-state detail sits behind the coverage claim.
Who it's for
Buyers who want to know which pharmacy is actually filling the vial.
Readers who want the promotional first month and the ongoing rate printed together.
Anyone who needs the prescribing group named separately from the platform company.
Shoppers who need national availability stated plainly.
Who should look elsewhere
Readers who want a certificate rather than a testing claim.
Buyers looking for a growth-hormone peptide priced on its own product page.
Anyone who needs to know which states sit behind a fifty-state claim.
Shoppers who want lab work inside the monthly figure.
Strengths
Names the filling pharmacy, its licence class and its accreditations, which almost nothing else on this roster does
Separates the platform company from the prescribing medical group and names both
Prints the first-month rate and the ongoing rate as two distinct numbers rather than one blended figure
States a fifty-state footprint three times, including as a direct answer in its own FAQ
Trade-offs
Says "every batch tested for potency, sterility, and purity" and publishes no certificate for any batch
The sermorelin figure appears only as a cross-sell line on the coenzyme page, with no product page behind it in this pass
The $400–$600 per-session figures on the page describe IV clinics generally, not this seller, and a reader skimming will mix them up
No state-by-state detail sits behind the fifty-state claim
How we verified this
Fetched the product page and the terms of use with a full browser user-agent and compared the effective URL to the requested one on both.
Fired a nonsense-path control at the host in the same run before either page; it returned an honest not-found status.
Joined the text nodes before matching, then read every dollar figure in context rather than taking the first one on the page.
Separated the seller's own figures from the IV-clinic comparison figures printed beside them.
Read the pharmacy sentence in full to confirm the facility is named rather than described.
Swept every attribute on both pages, not only href, for a certificate, a PDF or an analysis document; the only files linked are patient injection guides.
Compared today's figure against a capture made a day earlier and recorded the change rather than the older number.
Screened the platform company, the trading name, the physician group and the named pharmacy against the regulator's live warning-letter index, with a known-positive and a nonsense control in the same run.
A provider to compare Precision Telemed against
Trellis Vitality
Trellis Vitality frames its program around body-composition tracking rather than scale weight, pairing NAD+, glutathione and tesamorelin with at-home biomarker panels and a 90-day re-test, and names its dispensing pharmacy, VialsRX in Houston, by address.
Yes — the facility, its licence class, its accreditation and its registration are all published, and the seller says every vial is fulfilled exclusively there.
Does the first month cost the same as the following ones?
No. The first month is cheaper, and the page states both figures together in five separate places, including its own FAQ.
Does it publish certificates of analysis?
No. It says every batch is tested for potency, sterility and purity, and publishes no certificate for any batch.
Is the growth-hormone peptide priced?
Only as a starting rate in a cross-sell line on the coenzyme page. No product page for it was reached in this pass, so the figure is recorded as the lowest advertised rate for that line.
Where is it available?
It claims all fifty states, stated three times including as a direct FAQ answer. No state-by-state detail is published behind the claim.
Precision Telemed is not a paid partner; this link may earn a commission if that changes. Full disclosure.