Remote Pharmacy prints the ninety-day total and the thirty-day charge as figures rather than hiding one inside the other, which is more than most sellers here manage. It leads with neither: the hero quotes a per-month rate it computed itself, and the whole page renders inside a frame served from somewhere else.
What Remote Pharmacy charges
NAD+: $249/mo — "30-Day Supply / 1000mg / $249 / per month", with "First month: $149" in the same card; the card beside it prints "90-Day Supply / 3000mg total / $629", which the seller labels "Just $209/month" — its own division of the 90-day total, not a charge
Remote Pharmacy is not a paid partner; this link may earn a commission if that changes. Full disclosure.
By Nora Castellan, Standards EditorUpdated September 2026
The page publishes nothing until you look inside the frame
Asking the product page for its own visible text returns an empty string. There is no heading, no figure and no disclosure in the page itself.
All of it — the plan cards, the benefit list, the compliance answers and the questions — renders inside a child frame served from a third-party host.
A check that read the top document alone would have recorded this seller as publishing no price at all, which would have been exactly wrong.
What a reader sees on the address is the frame's content, so that is what this site treats as published, and the row cites the address rather than the frame.
Two real charges, and a third figure that is arithmetic
The plan block prints a ninety-day supply with its total and its milligram strength, and a thirty-day supply with its own charge, its strength and a lower first-month figure.
Beside them the hero quotes a per-month rate attached to the ninety-day plan. That rate is the total divided by three, and nobody is ever billed it.
This row stores the recurring thirty-day charge and keeps the ninety-day total, the first-month figure and the seller's own division in the qualifier.
Recording the divided figure as the price would have made this seller look cheaper than its own plan block says it is, on a site whose entire purpose is comparing what sellers charge.
A name that says pharmacy, and no pharmacy named
The brand's own name contains the word pharmacy, which is the sort of thing that quietly answers a question it has not actually answered.
Its compliance answers say prescriptions come from licensed 503A-certified compounding pharmacies in the United States — plural, and unnamed.
Those pharmacies are a different party from the telehealth brand, so the brand name settles nothing about which facility fills an order.
The same answers do claim certification and accreditation for the operation itself, and say plainly that no insurance, HSA, HRA or FSA is accepted.
Nothing at all is said about where it sells
Neither the product page, the homepage nor any expanded answer makes a claim about which states this seller serves.
The only coverage-shaped sentence on the site concerns payment methods rather than geography.
That is an absence rather than a restriction, and it is recorded as one: this row stores no states and asserts nothing about the seller's footprint.
The host was checked in the same pass, with two nonsense paths rendering a genuine not-found document, so the absence is the site's rather than the reading's.
Who it's for
Readers comparing a three-month prepayment against a monthly charge who want both totals printed.
Buyers who want the milligram strength stated for each supply size.
Shoppers who want to know before checkout that no insurance or pre-tax account is accepted.
Anyone buying this one compound and nothing else compared here.
Who should look elsewhere
Readers who need the dispensing pharmacy named.
Buyers who need to know whether their state is served before starting.
Anyone who wants lab work included in what they pay.
Shoppers looking for sermorelin, glutathione, GHK-Cu, tesamorelin or PT-141, none of which is sold here.
Strengths
Prints the 90-day total and the 30-day charge as figures rather than only as a per-month rate
States the milligram strength for both supply sizes beside their prices
Says plainly that it accepts no insurance, HSA, HRA or FSA rather than leaving that to checkout
Answers its pharmacy and compliance questions in an accordion on the product page itself
Trade-offs
Leads with a per-month figure it computed from the 90-day total rather than with a charge
The entire product page renders inside a third-party frame, so nothing is published in the page itself
Names no dispensing pharmacy despite trading under a name that says pharmacy
Makes no statement at all about which states it serves
How we verified this
Rendered the product page in a browser and, finding the top document's visible text empty, read every child frame rather than concluding the page publishes nothing.
Took the figures from the plan block as laid-out text and recorded the recurring thirty-day charge as the price.
Kept the ninety-day total, the first-month figure and the seller's own per-month division in the qualifier rather than storing the division as the rate.
Confirmed the quoted per-month rate is exactly the ninety-day total divided by three, and recorded it as arithmetic rather than as a charge.
Fired two nonsense paths at this host in the same pass, one of them under a product directory, and confirmed both render the same genuine not-found document.
Expanded the collapsed compliance and pharmacy answers one at a time and read them for a facility name, finding a category in each.
Declined to treat the brand's own name as an answer to which pharmacy fills an order, since the answers themselves describe a separate party.
Swept the product page, the homepage and every expanded answer for any statement about states, and recorded the absence rather than inferring a footprint.
Screened this seller in the live federal warning-letter record by brand, with a known-good positive control and a nonsense negative control fired in the same run.
Read the company column of every returned record rather than accepting a full-text match, and attached no letter on a name match.
A provider to compare Remote Pharmacy against
Trellis Vitality
Trellis Vitality frames its program around body-composition tracking rather than scale weight, pairing NAD+, glutathione and tesamorelin with at-home biomarker panels and a 90-day re-test, and names its dispensing pharmacy, VialsRX in Houston, by address.
Inside a child frame served from a third-party host. The product page's own document has no visible text at all, so a reader sees the frame's content on the address.
Is the headline rate what you are charged?
No. The hero quotes a per-month figure that is the ninety-day total divided by three. The charges are the ninety-day total and the thirty-day rate.
Which pharmacy fills the order?
None is named. The answers describe licensed 503A-certified compounding pharmacies in the United States, which is a category and a different party from the brand.
Which states does it serve?
The site makes no statement about this anywhere that was read. That is an absence, not a restriction.
Does it take insurance?
No. It says plainly that it does not accept insurance, HSA, HRA or FSA.
Remote Pharmacy is not a paid partner; this link may earn a commission if that changes. Full disclosure.