Sprout Health Review

What Sprout Health charges

• NAD+: $249 — the plan line reads "$199 your first month, then auto renews at $249 every 4 weeks"; the hero above it prints "Starting at $249/ month" and "Now from $199 first month". Four weeks, not a calendar month, is the cycle the plan line names

A month in the headline, four weeks in the plan line

The hero prints a starting figure with the word month attached to it. The plan line underneath prints the introductory figure, the renewal figure and the renewal interval in one sentence.

That interval is four weeks, not a calendar month, which is thirteen charges in a year rather than twelve.

This row is stored as non-monthly for that reason. Printing a month suffix beside this figure would assert a cycle the seller's own plan line contradicts.

Both wordings are kept on the row rather than reconciled, because both are published by the same seller on the same page today.

Three states named, which is more than a coverage claim

The FAQ answers the state question by saying the service is available nationwide with a few exceptions, and then names the three states it cannot ship this compound to.

Naming exclusions is a stronger disclosure than claiming a footprint, because it can be checked against a reader's own address in one glance.

The stored state list on this row is every state except those three, derived from the seller's own sentence rather than assumed from the word nationwide.

The seller also says a reader in one of those states will be told during the consultation, which is a reasonable thing to publish before an intake rather than after.

The pharmacy is described five times and named none of them

This seller returns to its compounding arrangements repeatedly: the product is compounded in the United States, in state-licensed pharmacies, under strict protocols, to pharmaceutical standards.

None of those sentences contains a facility name, and the checkout disclosure refers only to a partner pharmacy.

It does publish the strength per vial, which is a genuinely useful fact and one many sellers here leave to an intake.

The third-party lab testing it advertises describes the vial rather than the patient, so it does not make this a lab-inclusive service.

The enforcement record names this exact company

A federal warning letter names an operating company doing business under this brand, and that company is the same one this site's own terms page names as the operator.

Its subject concerns the unlawful sale of unapproved and misbranded drugs to United States consumers over the internet.

The full-text search for this brand also returns a run of unrelated food-safety letters to companies whose names contain the same ordinary word, and one letter to a similarly named pharmaceutical company that is a different entity.

The match recorded here was made on the company column and then confirmed by opening the letter and finding this seller's own domain inside it.

FDA disclosure

Sprout Health received an FDA warning letter issued September 2025. A warning letter discloses; it does not, on its own, disqualify a provider — see the trade-offs above for what this one concerned.

How we verified this

• Rendered the priced landing page in a browser and read the hero and the plan line as laid-out text.
• Recorded the renewal interval from the plan line rather than the headline, and stored the row as non-monthly because four weeks is not a calendar month.
• Kept both the headline wording and the plan wording on the row rather than resolving one into the other, since the seller publishes both.
• Fired two nonsense paths at this host in the same pass and confirmed both render the same genuine not-found document.
• Derived the stored state list from the seller's own named exclusions rather than from the word nationwide.
• Read every sentence about compounding for a facility name and found a category in each one.
• Read the third-party testing claim in context and found it describes the vial rather than lab work for the patient.
• Read this site's own terms for the operating company and its governing law, then used that company name as the screening term.
• Screened the live federal warning-letter record with a known-good positive control and a nonsense negative control fired in the same run.
• Set aside the unrelated food-safety letters and the similarly named pharmaceutical company the full-text search returned, matched on the company column, and confirmed the remaining letter by finding this seller's own domain named inside it.