Try Ageless prices six preparations of two compounds, states a strength and a supply period on each, and names a dispensing pharmacy in its own terms rather than describing a category. Its price layout is the trap: the live figure comes first and the struck-through one second, which is the opposite of how the same page renders its related products.
What Try Ageless charges
Sermorelin: $126/mo — hero reads "Sermorelin Injection / $126 $176 / 1 Month Supply"; $126 is the current figure and $176 the struck-through one, confirmed by the sticky CTA which prints "$126" alone. The page adds "*Exact pricing depends on your prescribed dose. Final amount is shown after clinical review." and an intro code "SERM50 / $50 off"
Sermorelin: $149 — hero reads "Sermorelin Nasal Spray / $149 $199 / Per Bottle" — the only one of the six preparations whose unit is a bottle rather than a month; $149 current, $199 struck through
NAD+: $199/mo — hero reads "NAD+ Injection (1000mg) / $199 $249 / 1 Month Supply" — the same current figure as the 1200 mg vial, so the two strengths are priced identically today; intro code "WELCOME50 / $50 off"
NAD+: $149/mo — hero reads "NAD+ 200mg Troche / $149 $199 / 1-month suplly" — the seller’s own spelling of the supply period; $149 current, $199 struck through
Try Ageless is not a paid partner; this link may earn a commission if that changes. Full disclosure.
By Nora Castellan, Standards EditorUpdated September 2026
Six preparations, each with its own page and its own figure
Two of the compounds this site tracks are sold here in three preparations each, and every preparation has a product page of its own rather than a shared listing with a dropdown.
Each page states a strength in the product title and a supply period directly under the figure, which is the pair of facts that makes one seller comparable to another.
One of the six is priced per bottle rather than per month, so the six numbers are not a single ladder even though they look like one.
Two different strengths of the same injectable carry the same current figure today, which the pages state plainly rather than hiding behind a variant selector.
The price pair reads backwards
The hero block on every product page renders two numbers side by side, the second one styled as a former price.
That is the reverse of the order used by the related-products strip further down the same page, which follows the usual convention of the struck figure first.
Taking the pair in reading order without checking which element carries the strikethrough would publish the higher number as the price on every row.
The reading here was confirmed against the sticky footer control, which prints a single figure with no companion, and that single figure is the lower one.
A pharmacy is named; a service area is not
The terms name a fulfilment pharmacy by name, and the site footer repeats it in the same words on every page.
That is a facility rather than a category, which is the distinction this rubric turns on and which most sellers here do not clear.
The same document says only that a user must live in a state where the services are available, which is a condition rather than a list.
No coverage list is published anywhere that was read, so this row stores none and asserts nothing about the footprint.
A caveat under every figure, and a lot of pages named for states
Each price carries the same footnote saying the exact amount depends on the prescribed dose and is shown after clinical review.
That makes each published number a starting point rather than a settled charge, and the record says so on every row.
The host also publishes a long run of marketing pages named for individual cities and states.
A page about a state is not a claim to serve it, and none of those pages was counted toward coverage.
Who it's for
Readers choosing between an injection, a troche and a nasal spray of the same compound.
Buyers who want the dispensing pharmacy named before they start an intake.
Shoppers who want the strength printed in the product title rather than chosen at checkout.
Anyone comparing two strengths of one injectable that are currently priced the same.
Who should look elsewhere
Readers who want a settled charge rather than a figure subject to dose review.
Buyers who need to know before an intake whether their state is served.
Anyone who wants lab work included in what they pay.
Shoppers comparing a nasal spray to a monthly rate, since one of these is priced per bottle.
Strengths
Prices six separate preparations of two compounds, each on its own product page
States the strength and the supply period beside every figure
Names a dispensing pharmacy in its terms and again in its site footer
Names its operating company and its street address in the same document
Trade-offs
Prints the current figure before the struck-through one, the reverse of the order used elsewhere on the same page
Attaches a dose caveat to every figure, so the published number is a starting point rather than a charge
Makes no statement about which states it serves beyond a conditional in its terms
Prices the nasal spray per bottle while pricing everything else per month, so the six figures are not directly comparable
How we verified this
Rendered each of the six product pages and read the hero block as laid-out text.
Identified which element in the price pair carries the strikethrough rather than taking the two numbers in reading order.
Confirmed the reading against the sticky footer control, which prints one figure alone, and against the related-products strip, which uses the opposite order.
Recorded the supply period printed under each figure, including the one preparation whose unit is a bottle rather than a month.
Fired two nonsense paths at this host in the same pass, one under the product directory, and confirmed both return the same genuine not-found document, smaller than every real product page.
Read the terms in full for a fulfilment pharmacy and found one named, then confirmed the same name in the site footer.
Swept the terms and the product pages for any statement about which states are served, and recorded the conditional rather than inferring a footprint.
Declined to count the host's city-named and state-named marketing pages as coverage claims.
Checked the refund clause for lab work and found laboratory charges named as a deduction rather than an inclusion.
Screened this seller in the live federal warning-letter record by brand and by operating entity, with a known-good positive control and a nonsense negative control fired in the same run, and read the company column of every returned record.
A provider to compare Try Ageless against
Trellis Vitality
Trellis Vitality frames its program around body-composition tracking rather than scale weight, pairing NAD+, glutathione and tesamorelin with at-home biomarker panels and a 90-day re-test, and names its dispensing pharmacy, VialsRX in Houston, by address.